Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18987351 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ENCRYPTION AND DECRYPTION SERVICE FOR ELECTRONIC TRANSACTION MONITORING AND REPORTING | December 2024 | January 2026 | Allow | 13 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18894668 | ENHANCED CONSUMER DEVICE VALIDATION | September 2024 | February 2026 | Allow | 17 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18647068 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROVIDING A DECENTRALIZED ANTI-COUNTERFEIT SOLUTION FOR SUPPLY CHAIN TRACKING USING SINGLE-USE CODES | April 2024 | May 2025 | Allow | 12 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18631843 | APPARATUS FOR CRYPTOGRAPHIC RESOURCE TRANSFER BASED ON QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT REGARDING NON-FUNGIBLE TOKENS | April 2024 | December 2025 | Abandon | 21 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18605150 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR ANONYMOUS DIRECTED BLOCKCHAIN TRANSACTION | March 2024 | December 2024 | Allow | 9 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18523152 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DYNAMIC INCLUSION OF ENHANCED DATA IN TRANSACTIONS | November 2023 | June 2024 | Allow | 7 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18554782 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR DATA SECURITY AND VERIFICATION | October 2023 | March 2026 | Allow | 29 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18372652 | COMPUTER-CONTROLLED MARKETPLACE NETWORK FOR DIGITAL TRANSACTIONS | September 2023 | May 2025 | Allow | 20 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18372640 | COMPUTER-CONTROLLED MARKETPLACE NETWORK FOR DIGITAL TRANSACTIONS | September 2023 | January 2026 | Allow | 28 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18334598 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR INTEGRATED APPLICATION AND PROVISIONING | June 2023 | March 2026 | Allow | 33 | 4 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 18320491 | Method, System, and Computer Program Product for Network Bound Proxy Re-Encryption and Pin Translation | May 2023 | June 2024 | Allow | 13 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18314931 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR INTEGRATED APPLICATION AND PROVISIONING | May 2023 | February 2025 | Allow | 21 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18312563 | Elastic License Management in a SaaS Management Platform | May 2023 | December 2024 | Allow | 20 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18312521 | Elastic License Management in a SaaS Management Platform | May 2023 | May 2025 | Abandon | 24 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 18312568 | Elastic License Management in a SaaS Management Platform | May 2023 | June 2025 | Abandon | 25 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 18312376 | Systems and Methods for Instant NFTs and Protection Structure, Detection of Malicious Code within Blockchain Smart Contracts, Tokens with Transfer Limitations, Mirror Tokens and Parallel Addresses, Smart Contract Risk Scoring Method, and Cross-Device Digital Rights Management | May 2023 | July 2025 | Allow | 26 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18135268 | DECENTRALIZED PLATFORM APPLICATION PROGRAMMING INTERFACE PROTOCOL FOR SECURE RESOURCE TRANSMISSIONS | April 2023 | February 2025 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18301129 | METHOD AND SYSTEM OF DIGITALLY SECURING AND TRANSFERRING ASSETS | April 2023 | December 2025 | Abandon | 32 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 18176405 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR VERIFYING CRYPTOGRAPHICALLY SECURED COMMUNICATIONS BETWEEN USERS USING NON-TRANSFERABLE TOKENS | February 2023 | March 2025 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18106022 | COMPUTER METHOD AND GUI FOR DISPLAYING A REFLEXIVE INDEX PRICE FROM THE SETTLEMENT OF COMMODITY CONTRACTS | February 2023 | September 2024 | Allow | 20 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18155207 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ENCRYPTION AND DECRYPTION SERVICE FOR ELECTRONIC TRANSACTION MONITORING AND REPORTING | January 2023 | September 2024 | Allow | 20 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18065937 | APPLICATION PROGRAMMING INTERFACE INTEGRATION | December 2022 | October 2025 | Allow | 34 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17897984 | DECENTRALIZED AUTHORIZATION | August 2022 | April 2025 | Allow | 31 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17822744 | EFFICIENT EXECUTION OF BLOCKCHAIN SMART CONTRACTS USING CLOUD RESOURCE PRIMITIVES | August 2022 | July 2025 | Abandon | 35 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17798758 | OPERATION METHOD OF BLOCKCHAIN REMITTANCE SERVICE SYSTEM, AND ELECTRONIC WALLET FOR REMITTANCE | August 2022 | December 2025 | Abandon | 40 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 17816082 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ENTITY LABELING BASED ON BEHAVIOR | July 2022 | August 2025 | Allow | 37 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17859585 | SYSTEM FOR OBFUSCATION OF NETWORK IDENTITY TO PREVENT DATA EXFILTRATION | July 2022 | September 2025 | Abandon | 39 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17853309 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GENERATING AND TRANSMITTING ELECTRONIC TRANSACTION ACCOUNT INFORMATION MESSAGES | June 2022 | November 2025 | Allow | 40 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17804343 | DETERMINING AN OPTIMUM QUANTITY OF FRACTIONAL NON-FUNGIBLE TOKENS TO GENERATE FOR CONTENT AND A CONTENT EXCHANGE | May 2022 | September 2025 | Allow | 40 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17746169 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR SUPPORTING DIGITAL RIGHTS MANAGEMENT IN MACHINE-TO-MACHINE SYSTEM | May 2022 | January 2026 | Abandon | 44 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17744966 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PROVISIONING A DATA TRANSFER APPLICATION | May 2022 | December 2024 | Allow | 31 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17729540 | System, Method, and Computer Program Product for Managing Operation of a Remote Terminal | April 2022 | October 2025 | Allow | 41 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17695771 | AUTOMATED DEVICE PAIRING | March 2022 | March 2025 | Allow | 36 | 1 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 17589713 | SMART CONTRACTS FOR LICENSING | January 2022 | June 2025 | Allow | 41 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17566934 | USER ASSUMPTION OF IDENTITY OF NFT IN CRYPTO WALLET | December 2021 | September 2025 | Allow | 44 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17538012 | SYSTEM FOR EXCHANGE OF ELECTRONIC DIGITAL CERTIFICATES ASSOCIATED WITH ELECTRONIC RESOURCE DATA | November 2021 | August 2025 | Abandon | 45 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17611506 | TRANSACTION VERIFICATION SYSTEM FOR BLOCKCHAIN, AND TRANSACTION VERIFICATION METHOD FOR BLOCKCHAIN | November 2021 | June 2025 | Allow | 43 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17521018 | INFORMATION TRANSACTION METHOD, INFORMATION USER TERMINAL, AND RECORDING MEDIUM | November 2021 | February 2025 | Allow | 40 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17474984 | NON-FUNGIBLE TOKENIZED CONTRACT EMBEDDED IN A BLOCKCHAIN | September 2021 | May 2025 | Allow | 44 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17467040 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROCESSING DATA MESSAGES FROM A USER VEHICLE | September 2021 | February 2025 | Allow | 41 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17444090 | ANONYMOUS DISTRIBUTED CONTACT TRACING AND VERIFICATION SYSTEM | July 2021 | February 2025 | Allow | 43 | 2 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 17093497 | CREDENTIAL PROVISIONING FOR AN ELECTRONIC DEVICE | November 2020 | December 2024 | Allow | 49 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16964544 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SECURE DATA DELIVERY | July 2020 | November 2025 | Abandon | 60 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16649494 | SMART CONTRACT EXECUTION USING DISTRIBUTED COORDINATION | March 2020 | December 2024 | Allow | 57 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15844496 | Mobile Communication Device In-kind Payment Verification | December 2017 | February 2025 | Allow | 60 | 3 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner ALI, JAHED.
With a 100.0% reversal rate, the PTAB has reversed the examiner's rejections more often than affirming them. This reversal rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals are more successful here than in most other areas.
Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.
In this dataset, 100.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is particularly effective here. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.
✓ Appeals to PTAB show good success rates. If you have a strong case on the merits, consider fully prosecuting the appeal to a Board decision.
✓ Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.
Examiner ALI, JAHED works in Art Unit 3699 and has examined 11 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 81.8%, this examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 44 months.
Examiner ALI, JAHED's allowance rate of 81.8% places them in the 53% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications.
On average, applications examined by ALI, JAHED receive 3.09 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 88% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by ALI, JAHED is 44 months. This places the examiner in the 15% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +20.8% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by ALI, JAHED. This interview benefit is in the 65% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide an above-average benefit with this examiner and are worth considering.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 30.8% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 62% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. Consider whether your amendments or new arguments are strong enough to warrant an RCE versus filing a continuation.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 0.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 4% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.
When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 0.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 20% percentile among all examiners. Note: Pre-appeal conferences show limited success with this examiner compared to others. While still worth considering, be prepared to proceed with a full appeal brief if the PAC does not result in favorable action.
This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 50.0% of appeals filed. This is in the 20% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: This examiner rarely withdraws rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. If you file an appeal, be prepared to fully prosecute it to a PTAB decision. Per MPEP § 1207, the examiner will prepare an Examiner's Answer maintaining the rejections.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 41% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 45% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.