Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18599339 | FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT SYSTEM | March 2024 | February 2026 | Abandon | 23 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18420195 | Supertab 5G Secondary Authentication Methods | January 2024 | March 2026 | Abandon | 25 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18231737 | SYSTEMS INCLUDING A HUB PLATFORM AND COMMUNICATION NETWORK CONFIGURED FOR PROCESSING DATA INVOLVING INTERACTIVE DISPLAY OF TIME-STAMPED/TIME-SENSITIVE INFORMATION ON AND ASSOCIATED HANDLING OF INPUTS SUBMITTED VIA LINKED COMMUNICATION PORTALS/GUI'S AND/OR OTHER FEATURES | August 2023 | June 2025 | Abandon | 22 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18268325 | AN OPERATING COMPUTER FOR PAYMENT SETTLEMENT, PAYMENT SETTLEMENT SYSTEM, AND PAYMENT SETTLEMENT METHOD | June 2023 | July 2025 | Abandon | 25 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18313913 | PROCESSING DATA FOR ADMINISTERING STABLE VALUE PRODUCTS WITH POOLING AND CAPPING OF RISK FEATURES UTILIZING COMPUTER-IMPLEMENTED METHODS AND COMPUTER SYSTEMS | May 2023 | May 2025 | Abandon | 24 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18299025 | DATA COMPARISON METHOD AND APPARATUS, DEVICE AND STORAGE MEDIUM | April 2023 | October 2024 | Abandon | 18 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18125730 | INTERFACE DISPLAY METHOD AND APPARATUS, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE | March 2023 | January 2026 | Abandon | 34 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 18180725 | DIGITAL FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT HAVING CHAT SUPPORT PLATFORM WITH CHAT ERASURE FROM MEMORY BY USER COMMAND | March 2023 | July 2025 | Abandon | 28 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18177811 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PROCESSING COMPOSITE TRADING ORDERS | March 2023 | February 2025 | Abandon | 23 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18093274 | PEER-TO-PEER TRANSFER OF A STORED VALUE | January 2023 | November 2024 | Abandon | 23 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18012074 | Laterpay 5G Secondary Authentication | December 2022 | June 2025 | Abandon | 30 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18083120 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IDENTIFYING RISKS IN A SALES PIPELINE | December 2022 | November 2025 | Abandon | 35 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17970146 | System and Method for Indicating Whether a Vehicle Crash Has Occurred | October 2022 | September 2024 | Allow | 23 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17965821 | MANAGEMENT DEVICE, MANAGEMENT METHOD, AND COMPUTER-READABLE RECORDING MEDIUM STORING MANAGEMENT PROGRAM | October 2022 | February 2025 | Abandon | 28 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17902460 | Computer-Implemented Trading System for Dynamic Market in Exempt Offerings of Publicly-Traded Companies | September 2022 | August 2025 | Abandon | 35 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17897263 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR FACILITATING INCORPORATION OF DATA TYPES WHEN ASSESSING CREDIT | August 2022 | November 2024 | Abandon | 26 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17811345 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CREATING AND ISSUING VIRTUAL TRANSACTION INSTRUMENTS | July 2022 | February 2026 | Abandon | 43 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17834725 | ENHANCED IMAGE CAPTURE AND ANALYSIS OF DAMAGED TANGIBLE OBJECTS | June 2022 | January 2026 | Abandon | 43 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17657682 | DETERMINING RECOGNIZED USER ACTIVITIES FOR A THIRD-PARTY RISK GENERATOR INTEGRATED WITHIN AN APPLICATION | April 2022 | January 2025 | Abandon | 34 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17703492 | Cognitive Identification of Credit Reporting Disputes and Dispute Resolution Using Quantum Computing | March 2022 | January 2025 | Abandon | 34 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17679939 | RISK MITIGATION USING MIXTURE IMPORTANCE SAMPLING WITH RANDOM EFFECT CONSIDERATIONS | February 2022 | January 2026 | Abandon | 47 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17678542 | MODIFYING RISK MODEL UTILITIES | February 2022 | July 2025 | Abandon | 41 | 5 | 0 | No | No |
| 17651984 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR PROXY EVENT VISUALIZATION | February 2022 | October 2025 | Abandon | 43 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 17672407 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROACTIVELY RECOGNIZING REASONS FOR ACCOUNT ENGAGEMENT AND PROVIDING NOTIFICATIONS | February 2022 | February 2025 | Abandon | 36 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17665192 | Methods, systems, and devices for managing and processing trading activity and trading information | February 2022 | December 2025 | Abandon | 46 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17622194 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR THE RAPID, FLEXIBLE APPROVAL AND DISBURSEMENT OF A LOAN | December 2021 | February 2025 | Abandon | 38 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17492160 | DYNAMICALLY UPDATING ACCOUNT ACCESS BASED ON EMPLOYMENT DATA | October 2021 | July 2025 | Abandon | 46 | 5 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 17492520 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR RATING APPLICANTS | October 2021 | October 2024 | Abandon | 37 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17441409 | INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, TERMINAL DEVICE, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUM | September 2021 | April 2025 | Abandon | 42 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17323879 | Instant Lending Decisions | May 2021 | September 2025 | Abandon | 52 | 2 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 17218757 | MINIMIZATION OF THE CONSUMPTION OF DATA PROCESSING RESOURCES IN AN ELECTRONIC TRANSACTION PROCESSING SYSTEM VIA SELECTIVE PREMATURE SETTLEMENT OF PRODUCTS TRANSACTED THEREBY BASED ON A SERIES OF RELATED PRODUCTS | March 2021 | July 2025 | Allow | 52 | 3 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 17249655 | CONTEXTUAL MODELING FOR ELECTRONIC LOAN APPLICATIONS | March 2021 | January 2025 | Abandon | 46 | 4 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 17184283 | ELECTRONIC EXCHANGE THAT ENABLES TRANSFERABLE CONTROL OF ORDERS POSITIONED IN AN ORDER QUEUE | February 2021 | November 2024 | Abandon | 45 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17133329 | Cover-OCO For Legged Order | December 2020 | February 2025 | Abandon | 50 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 16895408 | ACCIDENT FAULT DETERMINATION FOR AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES | June 2020 | March 2021 | Allow | 9 | 7 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 16875724 | WEB SERVICE PLATFORM FOR DISTRIBUTED SERVER SYSTEMS | May 2020 | November 2024 | Abandon | 55 | 2 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 16870294 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR FACILITATING MESSAGE FORMAT DISCOVERY IN ONLINE TRANSACTION PROCESSING | May 2020 | September 2025 | Abandon | 60 | 5 | 1 | Yes | Yes |
| 16849690 | ARCHITECTURE FOR CREATION, PUBLICATION, AND DISTRIBUTED INVESTMENT OF PROPERTY-BACKED VEHICLES | April 2020 | April 2025 | Abandon | 60 | 6 | 0 | No | No |
| 16849788 | DECENTRALIZED ARCHITECTURE FOR PROPERTY-BACKED VEHICLES AND CREATION, PUBLICATION, AND DISTRIBUTED OWNER INVESTMENT | April 2020 | May 2025 | Abandon | 60 | 6 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 16791693 | Computer Methods and Systems for Dimensionality Reduction in Conjunction with Spectral Clustering of Financial or Other Data | February 2020 | October 2024 | Abandon | 56 | 4 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 16716330 | MACHINE LEARNING MODEL FOR SELF-SERVICE TRANSACTION ANOMALY RESOLUTION | December 2019 | August 2025 | Allow | 60 | 4 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 16486393 | CONTACTLESS INTERACTION SYSTEM, APPARATUS AND METHOD | August 2019 | January 2025 | Abandon | 60 | 4 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 16536468 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR GENERATING TIME-SERIES TOKEN DATA | August 2019 | May 2025 | Abandon | 60 | 6 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 15382528 | Multichannel Exchange Mechanism Apparatuses, Methods and Systems | December 2016 | September 2025 | Abandon | 60 | 10 | 0 | No | No |
| 15255787 | Generating an Output Based on Processed Sensor Data | September 2016 | July 2025 | Abandon | 60 | 12 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 15154247 | Real-time hazard-based navigational system and database | May 2016 | May 2025 | Abandon | 60 | 8 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 13952866 | FIRM TRADE PROCESSING SYSTEM AND METHOD | July 2013 | July 2025 | Allow | 60 | 11 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 13704084 | System and method for configuring risk tolerance in transaction cards | December 2012 | January 2025 | Abandon | 60 | 24 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 11612467 | END USER GENERATED BILLING CYCLES | December 2006 | October 2012 | Allow | 60 | 4 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 10706470 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING A CREDIT ACCOUNT FOR DEBT RECOVERY | November 2003 | January 2010 | Allow | 60 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner GREGG, MARY M.
With a 21.4% reversal rate, the PTAB affirms the examiner's rejections in the vast majority of cases. This reversal rate is below the USPTO average, indicating that appeals face more challenges here than typical.
Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.
In this dataset, 14.3% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is less effective here than in most other areas.
⚠ Appeals to PTAB face challenges. Ensure your case has strong merit before committing to full Board review.
⚠ Filing a Notice of Appeal shows limited benefit. Consider other strategies like interviews or amendments before appealing.
Examiner GREGG, MARY M works in Art Unit 3695 and has examined 25 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 24.0%, this examiner allows applications at a lower rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 10000 months.
Examiner GREGG, MARY M's allowance rate of 24.0% places them in the 3% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is less likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by GREGG, MARY M receive 6.00 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 100% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by GREGG, MARY M is 10000 months. This places the examiner in the 1% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a -22.1% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by GREGG, MARY M. This interview benefit is in the 1% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 2.9% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 2% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show lower effectiveness with this examiner compared to others. Consider whether a continuation application might be more strategic, especially if you need to add new matter or significantly broaden claims.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 4.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 5% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.
When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 16.7% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 26% percentile among all examiners. Note: Pre-appeal conferences show below-average success with this examiner. Consider whether your arguments are strong enough to warrant a PAC request.
This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 22.2% of appeals filed. This is in the 3% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 25.0% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner rarely withdraws rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. If you file an appeal, be prepared to fully prosecute it to a PTAB decision. Per MPEP § 1207, the examiner will prepare an Examiner's Answer maintaining the rejections.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 0.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 7% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are rarely granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing a petition, as the Technology Center Director typically upholds this examiner's decisions.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 4.0% of allowed cases (in the 83% percentile). Per MPEP § 1302.04, examiner's amendments are used to place applications in condition for allowance when only minor changes are needed. This examiner frequently uses this tool compared to other examiners, indicating a cooperative approach to getting applications allowed. Strategic Insight: If you are close to allowance but minor claim amendments are needed, this examiner may be willing to make an examiner's amendment rather than requiring another round of prosecution.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 44% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.