Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18643846 | Savings Education And Management System | April 2024 | December 2024 | Allow | 8 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18603610 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GEO MAPPING | March 2024 | August 2024 | Allow | 5 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18443671 | TWO-DIMENSIONAL CODE COMPATIBILITY SYSTEM | February 2024 | March 2025 | Allow | 13 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18425953 | ON-DEMAND AUCTION | January 2024 | February 2025 | Allow | 13 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18426011 | RANDOMIZED AUCTION NOTIFICATION | January 2024 | February 2025 | Allow | 13 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18521468 | SECURE QR CODE BASED DATA TRANSFERS | November 2023 | February 2025 | Allow | 15 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18381579 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ATM INTEGRATED CARD FABRICATOR | October 2023 | November 2024 | Abandon | 13 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18486545 | COMPRESSION OF AN EXCHANGE TRADED DERIVATIVE PORTFOLIO | October 2023 | December 2024 | Allow | 14 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18485943 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IMPLEMENTING BLOCKCHAIN-BASED PLATFORMS FOR ONLINE SKILL-BASED COMPETITIONS | October 2023 | January 2026 | Abandon | 27 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18481686 | CURRENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE DEVICE | October 2023 | January 2025 | Allow | 16 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18244127 | AUTOMATED CONVERSION OF INCOMPATIBLE DATA FILES INTO COMPATIBLE BENEFIT PACKAGES FOR PHARMACY BENEFIT MANAGEMENT PLATFORM | September 2023 | March 2025 | Abandon | 18 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18227839 | PROVISIONING OF AN INDIVIDUAL COMPUTING DEVICE VIA ATM | July 2023 | May 2025 | Abandon | 22 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18206739 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING A BONUS PAYMENT FOR A RETIREMENT INCOME PLAN | June 2023 | December 2025 | Abandon | 30 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18207081 | REDUCING FALSE POSITIVE FRAUD ALERTS FOR ONLINE FINANCIAL TRANSACTIONS | June 2023 | March 2025 | Allow | 21 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18318227 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CARD AUTHENTICATION | May 2023 | December 2024 | Allow | 19 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18307374 | BLOCKCHAIN-BASED EVENT PROCESSING METHODS AND APPARATUSES | April 2023 | August 2025 | Abandon | 27 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18299128 | INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, ASSET MANAGEMENT APPARATUS, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, ASSET MANAGEMENT METHOD, AND RECORDING MEDIUM | April 2023 | April 2025 | Abandon | 24 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18192926 | TEMPORARY DEBIT CARD SYSTEM AND METHOD | March 2023 | April 2025 | Allow | 25 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18004925 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MANAGEMENT OF DATA EXCHANGE WITH MULTIPLE PROTOCOLS IN A COMPUTER NETWORK | January 2023 | June 2025 | Abandon | 29 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17985420 | Trigger-Based Electronic Fund Transfers | November 2022 | October 2025 | Abandon | 36 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17938420 | FUNDRAISING INCUBATOR FOR CORPORATE CAPITALIZATION | October 2022 | December 2025 | Abandon | 38 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17857833 | EMBEDDING ANALYSIS FOR ENTITY CLASSIFICATION DETECTION | July 2022 | September 2025 | Abandon | 38 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17732892 | Multi Device-Multi Channel Authorization Code Using Hash Reconstruction Technique | April 2022 | October 2024 | Allow | 30 | 2 | 1 | No | No |
| 17655072 | PREDICTIVE SELECTION OF DESIGNATED USERS FOR FULFILLMENT OF SERVICE REQUESTS | March 2022 | January 2025 | Abandon | 34 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17667689 | PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTION BASED PREDICTION | February 2022 | June 2025 | Abandon | 41 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17214490 | HANDLING BULK FILE PROCESSING WHILE MAINTAIN FILE LEVEL CONSISTENCY | March 2021 | November 2025 | Abandon | 56 | 7 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16731008 | NAVIGATING TO USER CONTENT IN A FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM | December 2019 | March 2025 | Abandon | 60 | 2 | 0 | No | Yes |
This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner BUI, TOAN D..
With a 0.0% reversal rate, the PTAB affirms the examiner's rejections in the vast majority of cases. This reversal rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals face significant challenges here.
Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.
In this dataset, 0.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is less effective here than in most other areas.
⚠ Appeals to PTAB face challenges. Ensure your case has strong merit before committing to full Board review.
⚠ Filing a Notice of Appeal shows limited benefit. Consider other strategies like interviews or amendments before appealing.
Examiner BUI, TOAN D. works in Art Unit 3693 and has examined 2 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 0.0%, this examiner allows applications at a lower rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 10000 months.
Examiner BUI, TOAN D.'s allowance rate of 0.0% places them in the 1% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is less likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by BUI, TOAN D. receive 4.50 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 99% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by BUI, TOAN D. is 10000 months. This places the examiner in the 1% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +0.0% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by BUI, TOAN D.. This interview benefit is in the 16% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 0.0% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 1% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show lower effectiveness with this examiner compared to others. Consider whether a continuation application might be more strategic, especially if you need to add new matter or significantly broaden claims.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 0.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 3% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.
This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 0.0% of appeals filed. This is in the 2% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: This examiner rarely withdraws rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. If you file an appeal, be prepared to fully prosecute it to a PTAB decision. Per MPEP § 1207, the examiner will prepare an Examiner's Answer maintaining the rejections.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 41% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.