Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19017309 | "LIVE-STREAMING" WAREHOUSE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM BASED ON ULTRA-HIGH FREQUENCY (UHF) RFID TECHNOLOGY | January 2025 | April 2025 | Allow | 3 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18592278 | Computing Devices, Computer Program Products, and Methods for Efficient Rendering Pipeline for Makeup Including VTO UI Option Configuration/Selection and Looks | February 2024 | January 2026 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18436417 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR ADAPTIVE COLLABORATIVE MATCHING | February 2024 | November 2025 | Allow | 21 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18503055 | METHODS AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM FOR SHOWING AVAILABILITY OF ORDERS FOR CONCIERGE SHOPPING SERVICE | November 2023 | September 2024 | Allow | 11 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18371870 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF PRODUCT IDENTIFICATION WITHIN AN IMAGE | September 2023 | February 2026 | Allow | 29 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18466945 | FULFILLMENT CENTER AND RETAIL STORE FULFILLMENT OF RETAIL ORDERS | September 2023 | May 2025 | Abandon | 20 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18466939 | COLLABORATIVE ITEM LIST DISTROBUTION SYSTEM, METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM | September 2023 | August 2024 | Allow | 11 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18450623 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROVIDING A USER INTERFACE FOR AN ELECTRONIC TRANSACTIONS PLATFORM | August 2023 | November 2025 | Abandon | 27 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18209919 | SYSTEMS, METHODS, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE MEDIUM FOR RECOMMENDING 2D IMAGE | June 2023 | January 2026 | Allow | 31 | 4 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 18322062 | ORDER MANAGEMENT DEVICE, PROGRAM RECORDING MEDIUM, AND ORDER PROCESSING SYSTEM | May 2023 | February 2026 | Abandon | 33 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18302875 | SYSTEMS, NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUMS, AND METHODS FOR OBTAINING PRODUCT INFORMATION VIA A CONVERSATIONAL USER INTERFACE | April 2023 | November 2025 | Allow | 31 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18303169 | SYSTEM FOR THE MERCHANDISING AND DELIVERY OF CUSTOMIZED INFORMATION RELATED TO A SPECIFIC PRODUCT OF INTEREST TO A CONSUMER | April 2023 | October 2024 | Abandon | 18 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18193788 | METHODS, SYSTEMS, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUMS FOR PRODUCT CATALOG MAPPING AND INTEGRATION ACROSS DISTRIBUTED SYSTEMS AND INTERFACES, DYNAMIC DETERMINATION AND PRESENTATION OF CUSTOMIZED SERVICE OFFERS AND LIFECYCLE MANAGEMENT OF SERVICES | March 2023 | July 2024 | Allow | 16 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18124385 | SYSTEM, NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE MEDIUM, AND METHOD FOR FACILITATING CONTACTLESS DRIVE UP ORDER FULFILLMENT | March 2023 | July 2025 | Allow | 28 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17427048 | APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR FACILITATING A SHOPPING EXPERIENCE | January 2023 | December 2025 | Abandon | 52 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18097022 | ORDER ASSEMBLY METHODS AND SYSTEM FOR MULTIPLE POINTS OF SALE | January 2023 | March 2025 | Allow | 26 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18010814 | ONLINE SHOPPING MALL SYSTEM USING AUTOMATED PROCESSING OF CONTENT CATEGORIES AND MAPS | December 2022 | July 2025 | Abandon | 31 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18066489 | METHODS, SYSTEMS, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE MEDIUMS FOR PRODUCT CATALOG MAPPING AND INTEGRATION ACROSS DISTRIBUTED SYSTEMS AND INTERFACES, DYNAMIC DETERMINATION AND PRESENTATION OF CUSTOMIZED SERVICE OFFERS AND LIFECYCLE MANAGEMENT OF SERVICES | December 2022 | July 2024 | Allow | 19 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17975896 | Apparatus, Method, and System for Supplier Partnership Program | October 2022 | June 2025 | Abandon | 32 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17968351 | KNOWLEDGE SEARCH ENGINE METHOD, SYSTEM, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE MEDIUM FOR ENHANCED BUSINESS LISTINGS | October 2022 | September 2025 | Allow | 35 | 7 | 0 | No | No |
| 17932970 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING ELECTRIC VEHICLE LOCATION ASSESSMENTS | September 2022 | December 2024 | Abandon | 27 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17931793 | CREATION TRADING SYSTEM | September 2022 | January 2026 | Abandon | 40 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17897084 | SYSTEMS, METHODS, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE STORAGE MEDIUMS FOR SELECTION OF CANDIDATE CONTENT ITEMS | August 2022 | September 2025 | Allow | 37 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17891693 | METHODS, NON-TRANSITORY MACHINE-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM, AND SYSTEMS FOR ORDER MANAGEMENT AND PROCESSING USING A DISTRIBUTED COMMERCE PLATFORM | August 2022 | December 2024 | Allow | 28 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17891885 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING ELECTRIC VEHICLE LOCATION ASSESSMENTS | August 2022 | August 2025 | Abandon | 36 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17889167 | SYSTEMS FOR GENERATING A PHOTONICS DATABASE | August 2022 | April 2025 | Allow | 32 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17873221 | VIRTUAL REALITY SHOPPING SYSTEM | July 2022 | February 2026 | Abandon | 43 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17661027 | LINKING MEDIA TO SPECIFIC ONLINE CALCULATORS | April 2022 | March 2025 | Abandon | 34 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17697057 | METHODS, SYSTEMS, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE DATA STORAGE MEDIUMS FOR INFORMATION DISPLAY AND ANALYSIS | March 2022 | September 2025 | Allow | 42 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17689743 | ART MARKET PRICING AND COMMISSION NON-TRANSITORY MACHINE-READABLE MEDIUM, SYSTEM, AND METHOD FOR USING THE SAME | March 2022 | May 2025 | Allow | 38 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17651788 | HOUSE-RENTING RECOMMENDATION METHOD, ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND STORAGE MEDIUM | February 2022 | October 2024 | Abandon | 32 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17649647 | NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM STORING VIRTUAL STORE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM AND VIRTUAL STORE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM | February 2022 | March 2025 | Abandon | 38 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17588701 | PIGGYBACK FULFILLMENT OF REPLACEMENT CONSUMABLE ITEM FOR PRINTING DEVICE USING ALTERNATIVE PROVIDER | January 2022 | February 2025 | Abandon | 36 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17557785 | LOCATION-BASED GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACES | December 2021 | July 2025 | Abandon | 43 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17556936 | SELECTING METHODS TO ALLOCATE SHOPPERS FOR ORDER FULFILLMENT IN GEOGRAPHIC REGIONS BY AN ONLINE CONCIERGE SYSTEM BASED ON MACHINE-LEARNED EFFICIENCIES FOR DIFFERENT ALLOCATION METHODS | December 2021 | December 2025 | Abandon | 48 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17644247 | COMPUTER ANALYSIS OF ELECTRONIC ORDER MANAGEMENT FOR PRODUCT FULFILLMENT | December 2021 | November 2024 | Abandon | 35 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17501160 | PURCHASE SUPPORT SERVER, PURCHASE SUPPORT METHOD, PURCHASE SUPPORT SYSTEM, AND PROGRAM | October 2021 | May 2025 | Abandon | 43 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17482324 | METHODS UTILIZING A LIT OCLOCK MULTI-SENSORY CANNABIS MAGAZINE | September 2021 | December 2024 | Allow | 39 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17448462 | PROCESS CONTROL SYSTEM (PCS) BENCHMARKING TOOL | September 2021 | October 2025 | Abandon | 49 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17402277 | METHODS, SYSTEMS, AND ONE OR MORE NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIA INCLUDING TEMPLATES TO GENERATE AUGMENTED REALITY CONTENT ITEMS THAT DISPLAY PRODUCT INFORMATION | August 2021 | February 2025 | Allow | 42 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17398641 | CLOTHING RECOMMENDATION USING A NUMERIC ESTIMATION MODEL | August 2021 | March 2026 | Abandon | 55 | 5 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 17305468 | SERVER DEVICE, NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM, AND METHOD FOR MANAGING MULTIPLE TRANSACTIONAL WORKFLOWS | July 2021 | July 2024 | Allow | 37 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17365633 | ITEM OPTION IDENTIFICATION AND SEARCH RESULT PRESENTATION AT A SEARCH ENGINE | July 2021 | October 2025 | Abandon | 52 | 6 | 1 | Yes | Yes |
| 17105240 | METHODS FOR GROUP PURCHASE OF ACCESS TO INFORMATION | November 2020 | July 2022 | Abandon | 20 | 9 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17038233 | SYSTEM, NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM, AND METHOD FOR INTEGRATING VOICE ASSISTANT DEVICE AND DIGITAL ASSISTANT DEVICE WITH CLOUD-BASED SERVICES | September 2020 | March 2025 | Allow | 54 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17030282 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROVIDING INTELLIGENT MULTI-DIMENSIONAL RECOMMENDATIONS DURING ONLINE SHOPPING | September 2020 | June 2024 | Allow | 45 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16397658 | ITEM RECOGNITION AND PRESENTION WITHIN IMAGES | April 2019 | December 2025 | Abandon | 60 | 15 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15053235 | AUGMENTED REALITY E-COMMERCE | February 2016 | September 2019 | Allow | 43 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14813178 | EVALUATION AND TRAINING FOR ONLINE VEHICLE REQUEST AND RESPONSE MESSAGING | July 2015 | June 2019 | Allow | 46 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner WEINER, ARIELLE E.
Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.
In this dataset, 0.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is less effective here than in most other areas.
⚠ Filing a Notice of Appeal shows limited benefit. Consider other strategies like interviews or amendments before appealing.
Examiner WEINER, ARIELLE E works in Art Unit 3689 and has examined 17 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 41.2%, this examiner allows applications at a lower rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 45 months.
Examiner WEINER, ARIELLE E's allowance rate of 41.2% places them in the 8% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is less likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by WEINER, ARIELLE E receive 4.59 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 99% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by WEINER, ARIELLE E is 45 months. This places the examiner in the 13% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a -10.0% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by WEINER, ARIELLE E. This interview benefit is in the 3% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 12.7% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 8% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show lower effectiveness with this examiner compared to others. Consider whether a continuation application might be more strategic, especially if you need to add new matter or significantly broaden claims.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 0.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 3% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 100.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 93% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are frequently granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1002.02(c), various examiner actions are petitionable to the Technology Center Director, including prematureness of final rejection, refusal to enter amendments, and requirement for information. If you believe an examiner action is improper, consider filing a petition.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 40% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 44% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.