Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18959325 | TRANSACTION FLOW WITH MASTER ACCOUNT LEDGER AND ESCROW LEDGER INTERACTION | November 2024 | March 2025 | Allow | 4 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18959306 | TRANSACTION FLOW WITH MASTER ACCOUNT LEDGER AND ESCROW LEDGER INTERACTION | November 2024 | March 2025 | Allow | 4 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18616180 | TRANSACTION FLOW WITH MASTER ACCOUNT LEDGER AND ESCROW LEDGER | March 2024 | November 2024 | Allow | 7 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18616359 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DIGITAL OR CRYPTOGRAPHIC MEDIA, ASSETS, OR TOKENS LINKED TO PHYSICAL OBJECTS, SERVICES, OR PRIVILEGES IN THE REAL-WORLD | March 2024 | October 2024 | Allow | 7 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18394192 | ORDER MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS AND METHODS | December 2023 | June 2025 | Allow | 17 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18538376 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF SHARING AN AUGMENTED ENVIRONMENT WITH A COMPANION | December 2023 | January 2025 | Allow | 14 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18473978 | IDENTIFYING CANDIDATE REPLACEMENT ITEMS FROM A GRAPH IDENTIFYING RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN ITEMS MAINTAINED BY AN ONLINE CONCIERGE SYSTEM | September 2023 | May 2025 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18465507 | VISUALIZATION OF SPENDING DATA IN AN ALTERED REALITY | September 2023 | June 2025 | Allow | 21 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18223232 | Transaction Access Control Using Tokenized Reputation Scores | July 2023 | September 2024 | Allow | 14 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18309472 | DIGITAL REPUTATION MANAGEMENT | April 2023 | November 2024 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18131476 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR COMMERCIAL INVENTORY MAPPING INCLUDING DETERMINING IF GOODS ARE STILL AVAILABLE | April 2023 | March 2025 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18165184 | INTELLIGENT PREDICTION OF BUNDLES OF SPARE PARTS | February 2023 | April 2025 | Allow | 26 | 4 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 18163519 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR OPTIMIZED TRANSFER OF DIGITAL ASSETS | February 2023 | February 2025 | Allow | 24 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18163192 | Intelligent Pre-Processing and Fulfillment of Mixed Orders | February 2023 | November 2024 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18102239 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ALTERING A GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACE (GUI) BASED ON AFFINITY AND REPURCHASE INTENT | January 2023 | May 2025 | Allow | 27 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18098639 | FRESH FOOD RETURN PROCESSING SYSTEM AND RELATED METHODS | January 2023 | March 2025 | Allow | 26 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18082513 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR USER INTERFACE ORCHESTRATION AND PRESENTATION | December 2022 | November 2024 | Allow | 23 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18065157 | AI-BASED VEHICLE TRANSACTION SUPPORT SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR USE THEREWITH | December 2022 | August 2024 | Allow | 20 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18072316 | IDENTIFYING CANDIDATE REPLACEMENT ITEMS WITH A SOURCE SIMILARITY SCORE | November 2022 | December 2024 | Allow | 24 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18058221 | LOCATION-BASED VERIFICATION OF USER REQUESTS, IDENTIFICATION OF MATCHING USERS BASED ON IMAGE ANALYSIS, AND GENERATION OF NOTIFICATIONS ON MOBILE DEVICES | November 2022 | November 2024 | Allow | 23 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17963788 | SHOPPING CART WITH SOUND-BASED VALIDATION | October 2022 | September 2024 | Allow | 23 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17900264 | VEHICLE MATCHING SYSTEM BASED ON SAFETY INFORMATION | August 2022 | January 2025 | Abandon | 28 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17895338 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ENHANCED INFORMATION VISUALIZATION | August 2022 | July 2024 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17811700 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PROVIDING STATE INFORMATION OF TAXI SERVICE ORDER, AND STORAGE MEDIUM | July 2022 | September 2024 | Allow | 26 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17833896 | ELECTRIC VEHICLE CONDITION REPORTING | June 2022 | October 2024 | Abandon | 28 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17824165 | DISTRIBUTED AUTHENTICATION AT A PHYSICAL PREMISES | May 2022 | July 2024 | Allow | 26 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17746034 | HYPER-SEGMENTED PERSONALIZATION USING MACHINE LEARNING-BASED MODELS IN AN INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM | May 2022 | October 2024 | Allow | 29 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17733525 | GLOBAL EMERGENCY ROADSIDE ASSISTANCE SYSTEM | April 2022 | February 2025 | Abandon | 34 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 17767566 | INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE, CONTROL METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUM | April 2022 | July 2024 | Allow | 27 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17557949 | RECOMMENDATION SYSTEM WITH SPARSE FEATURE ENCODING | December 2021 | April 2025 | Allow | 40 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17543523 | MERCHANDISE REGISTRATION DEVICE AND METHOD | December 2021 | June 2024 | Allow | 30 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17328469 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ITEM ACQUISITION BY SELECTION OF A VIRTUAL OBJECT PLACED IN A DIGITAL ENVIRONMENT | May 2021 | April 2025 | Abandon | 47 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 14094685 | INTRODUCING A FIXED-PRICE TRANSACTION MECHANISM IN CONJUNCTION WITH AN AUCTION TRANSACTION MECHANISM | December 2013 | June 2014 | Allow | 7 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13684224 | System and Method for Providing Electronic Multi-Merchant Gift Registry Services Over a Distributed Network | November 2012 | May 2015 | Allow | 29 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 13446691 | DIGITAL CONTENT AGGREGATION | April 2012 | August 2012 | Allow | 5 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13439795 | PROVIDING RECOMMENDATIONS IN A SOCIAL SHOPPING TRIP | April 2012 | November 2015 | Allow | 43 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13398809 | METHODS FOR DISCOUNTING GOODS AND SERVICES | February 2012 | May 2012 | Allow | 3 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13272147 | HOSTED DEMAND AGGREGATION | October 2011 | March 2012 | Allow | 5 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 13197347 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR NETWORK TRANSACTION | August 2011 | April 2014 | Allow | 33 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 13105387 | REAL-TIME OFFERS AND DYNAMIC PRICE ADJUSTMENTS PRESENTED TO MOBILE DEVICES | May 2011 | November 2013 | Allow | 30 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13105441 | METHODS FOR DYNAMIC DISCOUNTING | May 2011 | October 2013 | Allow | 29 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13053148 | WEBSITE, USER INTERFACES, AND APPLICATIONS FACILITATING IMPROVED MEDIA SEARCH CAPABILITY | March 2011 | July 2013 | Allow | 28 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 13022677 | CONFIGURING A PRODUCT OR SERVICE VIA SOCIAL INTERACTIONS | February 2011 | April 2013 | Allow | 27 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12819044 | MULTI-ATTRIBUTE WEB CONTENT AUCTIONS | June 2010 | September 2011 | Allow | 15 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12730206 | CONSUMER DRIVEN PRICE MARKETPLACE | March 2010 | September 2011 | Allow | 18 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12704713 | PRICE COMPARISON PROCESS AND SYSTEM | February 2010 | January 2013 | Allow | 35 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12697929 | METHOD FOR SELECTIVELY VERIFYING OR BLOCKING REMOTE PURCHASE REQUESTS | February 2010 | January 2012 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 12539714 | GROUPING ORDERS ACROSS MULTIPLE FORUMS | August 2009 | November 2011 | Allow | 28 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12254908 | CONTENTS SALES METHOD AND CYBER MALL SYSTEM USING SUCH METHOD AND STORAGE MEDIUM STORING THEREIN ITS CONTENTS SALES PROGRAM | October 2008 | August 2010 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 11955379 | METHOD, SYSTEM, AND PROGRAM FOR TRANSLATING AND INTERFACING BETWEEN DATA POOLS AND PRODUCT INFORMATION MANAGEMENT (PIM) SYSTEMS | December 2007 | November 2011 | Allow | 55 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 11877566 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR PROVIDING A WIDGET USABLE IN AFFILIATE MARKETING | October 2007 | March 2009 | Allow | 17 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 11841667 | AUCTION SYSTEM WITH CREDIT INFORMATION | August 2007 | May 2012 | Allow | 57 | 2 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 11841767 | ENHANCING TOUCH AND FEEL ON THE INTERNET | August 2007 | October 2011 | Allow | 50 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 11770876 | SALES METHODS, DELIVERY METHODS, CODE VERIFICATION METHODS, REPUDIATION RESOLUTION METHODS, AND ARTICLES OF MANUFACTURE | June 2007 | August 2011 | Allow | 50 | 1 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 11798756 | ORDER SUPPORTING SYSTEM, ORDER SUPPORTING METHOD, AND RECORDING MEDIUM | May 2007 | April 2011 | Allow | 47 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 11549437 | COMPUTERIZED DISPUTE RESOLUTION SYSTEM AND METHOD | October 2006 | September 2009 | Abandon | 35 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 11536597 | LOCAL PRODUCT INFORMATION | September 2006 | January 2011 | Allow | 52 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 11530412 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR ORDERING A CONSUMABLE FOR A DEVICE | September 2006 | June 2010 | Allow | 45 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 11515833 | REPRODUCTION APPARATUS AND REPRODUCTION METHOD OF DIGITAL VIDEO SIGNAL OR AUDIO SIGNAL | September 2006 | November 2007 | Allow | 14 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 11515113 | INITIAL PRODUCT OFFERING SYSTEM AND METHOD | September 2006 | October 2010 | Allow | 50 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 11468457 | SYSTEM, AND ASSOCIATED METHOD, FOR CONFIGURING A BUYING CLUB AND A COOP ORDER | August 2006 | December 2010 | Allow | 52 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 11509701 | CUSTOMER-BASED PRODUCT DESIGN MODULE | August 2006 | June 2009 | Allow | 34 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 11493011 | VALUE DRIVEN INTEGRATED BUILD-TO-BUY DECISION ANALYSIS SYSTEM AND METHOD | July 2006 | May 2010 | Allow | 46 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 11429778 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR HYBRID SINGLE AND AGGREGATION SALE | May 2006 | September 2010 | Allow | 52 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 11279550 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DESIGNING AND OPERATING AN ELECTRONIC STORE | April 2006 | August 2007 | Allow | 16 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 11329526 | SCART-CARD (SECURE CONSUMER ADVANTAGED RETAIL TRADING) | January 2006 | March 2010 | Allow | 50 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 11008063 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR AUTOMATICALLY DISPLAYING AN IMAGE AND A PRODUCT IN A PAGE BASED ON CONTEXTUAL INTERACTION AND METADATA | December 2004 | July 2006 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 10984328 | SALES SYSTEM AND SALES PROCESSING APPARATUS FOR SELLING AN INTANGIBLE PRODUCT AND A TANGIBLE PRODUCT | November 2004 | October 2006 | Allow | 23 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 10872400 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING RECOMMENDATION OF GOODS AND SERVICES BASED ON RECORDED PURCHASING HISTORY | June 2004 | February 2007 | Allow | 32 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 10831969 | METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR AN AUCTION SYSTEM WITH INTERACTIVE BIDDING | April 2004 | July 2008 | Allow | 50 | 1 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 10799653 | CONTENTS SALES METHOD AND CYBER MALL SYSTEM USING SUCH METHOD AND STORAGE MEDIUM STORING THEREIN ITS CONTENTS SALES PROGRAM | March 2004 | July 2008 | Allow | 52 | 2 | 1 | Yes | Yes |
| 10782023 | METHOD FOR SELECTIVELY BLOCKING REMOTE PURCHASE REQUESTS | February 2004 | September 2006 | Allow | 31 | 1 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 10746093 | SYSTEM FOR PROVIDING INTEGRATED FINANCING SERVICES | December 2003 | June 2007 | Allow | 42 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 10706465 | METHOD, SYSTEM, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT FOR IDENTIFYING AND IMPLEMENTING COLLECTED PRIVACY POLICIES AS AGGREGATE PRIVACY POLICIES IN ELECTRONIC TRANSACTIONS | November 2003 | November 2006 | Allow | 36 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 10683819 | COMPUTERIZED DISPUTE RESOLUTION SYSTEM AND METHOD | October 2003 | March 2007 | Allow | 41 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 10602761 | DATA HEALTH MONITOR FOR FINANCIAL INFORMATION COMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS | June 2003 | November 2005 | Allow | 29 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 10370940 | DATA PROCESSING SYSTEM FOR COMPLEX PRICING AND TRANSACTIONAL ANALYSIS | February 2003 | September 2009 | Allow | 60 | 9 | 1 | Yes | Yes |
| 10239937 | SHOPPING AND PAYMENT/CREDIT HANDLING | February 2003 | November 2006 | Allow | 50 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 10318536 | AUTO ALLOCATION SWAP SYSTEM | December 2002 | November 2006 | Allow | 47 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 10251634 | ONLINE TRADING FOR THE PLACEMENT OF ADVERTISING IN MEDIA | September 2002 | March 2006 | Allow | 42 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 10243456 | DEMAND AGGREGATION SYSTEM | September 2002 | August 2006 | Allow | 47 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 10210107 | RECORDING APPARATUS FOR RECORDING DIGITAL INFORMATION | August 2002 | January 2005 | Allow | 29 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 10166233 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DESIGNING AND OPERATING AN ELECTRONIC STORE | June 2002 | February 2006 | Allow | 45 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 10133918 | APPARATUS FOR ISSUING COMMODITY CODES FOR COMMODITY MODEL NAMES | April 2002 | October 2006 | Allow | 53 | 2 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 10053416 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR ORDERING A CONSUMABLE FOR A DEVICE | January 2002 | August 2006 | Allow | 55 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 09987706 | PROMOTION PRICING SYSTEM AND METHOD | November 2001 | September 2005 | Allow | 46 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 09876057 | MANAGING CUSTOMIZATION OF PROJECTS PRIOR TO MANUFACTURE IN AN ELECTRONIC COMMERCE SYSTEM | June 2001 | February 2005 | Allow | 45 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 09852828 | METHOD, SYSTEM, AND PRODUCT FOR FACILITATING INTERNATIONAL TRAVEL WITH RESPECT TO IMMIGRATION | May 2001 | August 2005 | Allow | 51 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 09834633 | INFORMATION RANKING SYSTEM, INFORMATION RANKING METHOD, AND COMPUTER-READABLE RECORDING MEDIUM RECORDED WITH INFORMATION RANKING PROGRAM | April 2001 | February 2005 | Allow | 46 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 09815052 | NET SHOPPING METHOD, SYSTEM THEREFOR, AND AUTOMATIC PAYMENT TRANSFER DEVICE | March 2001 | August 2007 | Allow | 60 | 5 | 0 | No | No |
| 09790732 | AUCTION SYSTEM, AUCTION SERVER, USER TERMINAL, AUCTION METHOD, BIDDING METHOD, STORAGE MEDIA AND PROGRAM TRANSMISSION APPARATUS | February 2001 | December 2005 | Allow | 57 | 3 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 09777077 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SOFTWARE SELLING | February 2001 | April 2006 | Allow | 60 | 6 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 09769533 | DELIVERY MANAGEMENT METHOD AND DEVICE, AND DELIVERY INFORMATION SERVICE METHOD | January 2001 | November 2007 | Allow | 60 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner ROSEN, NICHOLAS D.
With a 0.0% reversal rate, the PTAB affirms the examiner's rejections in the vast majority of cases. This reversal rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals face significant challenges here.
Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.
In this dataset, 11.1% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is less effective here than in most other areas.
⚠ Appeals to PTAB face challenges. Ensure your case has strong merit before committing to full Board review.
⚠ Filing a Notice of Appeal shows limited benefit. Consider other strategies like interviews or amendments before appealing.
Examiner ROSEN, NICHOLAS D works in Art Unit 3689 and has examined 89 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 94.4%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 30 months.
Examiner ROSEN, NICHOLAS D's allowance rate of 94.4% places them in the 84% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by ROSEN, NICHOLAS D receive 1.51 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 37% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues fewer office actions than average, which may indicate efficient prosecution or a more lenient examination style.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by ROSEN, NICHOLAS D is 30 months. This places the examiner in the 43% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly slower than average with this examiner.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +7.4% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by ROSEN, NICHOLAS D. This interview benefit is in the 38% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide a below-average benefit with this examiner.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 35.3% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 74% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. Consider whether your amendments or new arguments are strong enough to warrant an RCE versus filing a continuation.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 55.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 77% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner is highly receptive to after-final amendments compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 714.12, after-final amendments may be entered "under justifiable circumstances." Consider filing after-final amendments with a clear showing of allowability rather than immediately filing an RCE, as this examiner frequently enters such amendments.
When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 100.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 75% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: Pre-appeal conferences show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. If you have strong arguments, a PAC request may result in favorable reconsideration.
This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 77.8% of appeals filed. This is in the 66% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 28.6% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner shows above-average willingness to reconsider rejections during appeals. The mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) provides an opportunity for reconsideration.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 76.9% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 91% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are frequently granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1002.02(c), various examiner actions are petitionable to the Technology Center Director, including prematureness of final rejection, refusal to enter amendments, and requirement for information. If you believe an examiner action is improper, consider filing a petition.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 24.7% of allowed cases (in the 100% percentile). Per MPEP § 1302.04, examiner's amendments are used to place applications in condition for allowance when only minor changes are needed. This examiner frequently uses this tool compared to other examiners, indicating a cooperative approach to getting applications allowed. Strategic Insight: If you are close to allowance but minor claim amendments are needed, this examiner may be willing to make an examiner's amendment rather than requiring another round of prosecution.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 14.3% of allowed cases (in the 91% percentile). Per MPEP § 714.14, a Quayle action indicates that all claims are allowable but formal matters remain. This examiner frequently uses Quayle actions compared to other examiners, which is a positive indicator that once substantive issues are resolved, allowance follows quickly.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.