Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18430186 | CACHING SCHEME FOR REAL-TIME DELIVERY OF OPTIMAL VEHICLE DATA | February 2024 | April 2025 | Abandon | 14 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18405924 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR INTEGRATING INTERMEDIARY AND END-USER ONLINE RETAIL EXPERIENCES | January 2024 | April 2025 | Abandon | 15 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18460640 | IMPACT RETAIL HUB | September 2023 | December 2024 | Abandon | 16 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18207801 | GENERATING FAIRNESS SCORES FOR EXECUTION ENGINE OUTPUT | June 2023 | March 2025 | Allow | 21 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18330301 | System and Method for Incorporating a Wagering Activity into an Electronic Commerce Transaction | June 2023 | December 2024 | Abandon | 19 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18197063 | Transactional Platform | May 2023 | April 2025 | Abandon | 23 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18059777 | Social Shopping Experience Utilizing Interactive Mirror and Polling of Target Audience Members Identified by a Relationship with Product Information About an Item Being Worn by a User | November 2022 | May 2025 | Allow | 29 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17948977 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR UPDATING RECOMMENDATION MODEL, COMPUTER DEVICE AND STORAGE MEDIUM | September 2022 | June 2025 | Allow | 33 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17813210 | SYSTEM AND METHOD OF OPTIMIZING MATCHING OF LEADS | July 2022 | July 2024 | Allow | 24 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17664718 | PREDICTIVE SERVICE ORCHESTRATION USING THREAT MODELING ANALYTICS | May 2022 | March 2025 | Allow | 34 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17663723 | CONTRIBUTION DEGREE CALCULATION SYSTEM AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT | May 2022 | March 2025 | Allow | 34 | 3 | 1 | No | No |
| 17743633 | INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUM | May 2022 | May 2025 | Abandon | 36 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17577556 | Shopping Method and System for Compiling a Revised User List on a Portable User Device Using a Store List Downloaded From a Remote Database to the Portable User Device | January 2022 | April 2025 | Abandon | 39 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17615042 | SHOPPING SYSTEM AND METHOD | November 2021 | August 2024 | Allow | 33 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17515198 | AUTOMATIC RECOMMENDATION OF FEATURE UPGRADES IN A TEST AND MEASUREMENT INSTRUMENT | October 2021 | January 2025 | Abandon | 38 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17510016 | Systems and Methods for Providing Digital Content Marketplace Security | October 2021 | March 2025 | Allow | 41 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 17509957 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CONTENT INTEGRATED PRODUCT PURCHASING | October 2021 | August 2024 | Allow | 34 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17493780 | TRAINING A MACHINE LEARNING MODEL TO ESTIMATE A TIME FOR A SHOPPER TO SELECT AN ORDER FOR FULFILLMENT AND ACCOUNTING FOR THE ESTIMATED TIME TO SELECT WHEN GROUPING ORDERS | October 2021 | December 2024 | Allow | 39 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17429723 | ITEM MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SYSTEM, ITEM MANAGEMENT SUPPORT METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE MEDIUM | August 2021 | January 2025 | Abandon | 41 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17304043 | UTILIZING MACHINE LEARNING TO GENERATE AUGMENTED REALITY VEHICLE INFORMATION FOR A VEHICLE CAPTURED BY CAMERAS IN A VEHICLE LOT | June 2021 | October 2024 | Allow | 40 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17337143 | DIGITAL RESILIENCE MARKETPLACE PLATFORM AND METHOD THEREOF | June 2021 | June 2025 | Allow | 48 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17301692 | HOME BASED AUGMENTED REALITY SHOPPING | April 2021 | February 2025 | Allow | 46 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17218097 | Commodity Anti-counterfeiting Tracing Method and System Applicable to E-Commerce Platform | March 2021 | January 2025 | Abandon | 45 | 2 | 1 | No | No |
| 17106064 | METHOD AND SYSTEM OF AN AUGMENTED/VIRTUAL REALITY PLATFORM | November 2020 | February 2024 | Abandon | 38 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 17047868 | IN-STORE NAVIGATION, ITEM IDENTIFICATION AND AUTOMATIC PURCHASE METHODS | October 2020 | June 2024 | Allow | 44 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17030237 | SYSTEM FOR PERSONALIZED RECOMMENDATIONS | September 2020 | March 2025 | Allow | 54 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17011543 | COMPLEMENTARY ITEM RECOMMENDATIONS BASED ON MULTI-MODAL EMBEDDINGS | September 2020 | December 2024 | Allow | 51 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16995873 | VIRTUAL TRY-ON SYSTEM, VIRTUAL TRY-ON METHOD, COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT, AND INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE | August 2020 | October 2024 | Allow | 60 | 2 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 16936362 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CONTENT CREATION TOOL FOR USE WITH SHOPPABLE CONTENT DATA | July 2020 | June 2025 | Allow | 59 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16908274 | VEHICLE SAFETY INFORMATION SYSTEM | June 2020 | September 2024 | Allow | 51 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16816226 | SELECTING A LOCATION FOR ORDER FULFILLMENT BASED ON MACHINE LEARNING MODEL PREDICTION OF INCOMPLETE FULFILLMENT OF THE ORDER FOR DIFFERENT LOCATIONS | March 2020 | June 2024 | Allow | 51 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16576984 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR A PREDEFINED SUITE OF CONSUMER INTERACTIONS FOR INITIATING EXECUTION OF COMMANDS | September 2019 | September 2024 | Allow | 60 | 5 | 0 | No | No |
| 16410405 | PERSONALIZED SHARED CONTENT GENERATION AND DELIVERY | May 2019 | May 2025 | Abandon | 60 | 9 | 0 | No | No |
| 15709867 | METHOD FOR DISPLAYING SEARCH RESULTS FOR ITEMS WITH ENVIRONMENTAL ATTRIBUTES | September 2017 | August 2020 | Abandon | 35 | 4 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 14253029 | SERVICES FOR ENABLING USERS TO SHARE INFORMATION REGARDING E-COMMERCE TRANSACTIONS VIA USER CREATED COMMUNITIES | April 2014 | May 2017 | Allow | 37 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13872117 | Generating and Providing Content Recommendations to a Group of Users | April 2013 | June 2017 | Allow | 50 | 2 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 13238851 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING CUSTOMIZED PRODUCT CONFIGURATION AND SERVICE PLAN OPTIONS FOR A CAMERA DEVICE | September 2011 | February 2013 | Allow | 16 | 7 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 13238924 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING A CONFIGURED CAMERA, IMAGE PRODUCTS, AND SERVICES | September 2011 | August 2013 | Allow | 23 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13073632 | METHODS FOR VIRAL MARKETING WITH VISUAL COMMUNICATIONS | March 2011 | August 2012 | Allow | 17 | 1 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 13051278 | Extracting Quotes from Customer Reviews | March 2011 | February 2017 | Allow | 60 | 7 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12946717 | SERVICES FOR ENABLING USERS TO SHARE INFORMATION REGARDING E-COMMERCE TRANSACTIONS | November 2010 | March 2012 | Allow | 16 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12870031 | LISTING RECOMMENDATION USING GENERATION OF A USER-SPECIFIC QUERY IN A NETWORK-BASED COMMERCE SYSTEM | August 2010 | December 2013 | Allow | 39 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 12638158 | REMOTE SERVICING SYSTEM | December 2009 | October 2013 | Allow | 46 | 2 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 12507314 | ONLINE ORDERING SYSTEM AND METHOD UTILIZING NORMALIZED PRODUCT FEEDS AND INSERTION OF ORDER DATA WITHOUT REDIRECT | July 2009 | July 2013 | Allow | 48 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12466971 | INTERACTIVE EVENT PLANNING AND PAYMENT METHOD AND SYSTEM | May 2009 | September 2010 | Allow | 16 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 12429544 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SATELLITE NAVIGATION USING LOCALLY GENERATED EPHEMERIS DATA | April 2009 | June 2013 | Allow | 49 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 12284968 | SYSTEM FOR ENABLING CONSUMERS TO EVALUATE AUTOMOBILE LEASES | September 2008 | October 2012 | Allow | 49 | 1 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 12132703 | METHOD FOR ESTIMATING LOCATION AND APPARATUS USING THE SAME | June 2008 | June 2014 | Allow | 60 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 11851290 | TAG SUGGESTIONS BASED ON ITEM METADATA | September 2007 | August 2011 | Allow | 47 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 11842083 | SERVICES FOR ENABLING USERS TO SHARE INFORMATION REGARDING E-COMMERCE TRANSACTIONS | August 2007 | March 2014 | Allow | 60 | 3 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 11739015 | SYSTEM FOR INTERACTIVE PARTICIPATION BY REMOTE BIDDERS IN LIVE AUCTIONS | April 2007 | June 2011 | Allow | 50 | 2 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 11735788 | INEXPENSIVE METHOD FOR PROVIDING VENDORS WITH THEIR UNIQUE BRAND OF MEDICAMENTS FOR RESALE | April 2007 | September 2010 | Allow | 41 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 11670413 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ADVERTISING GOODS AND SERVICES USING A SHORT IDENTIFYING CODE | February 2007 | December 2011 | Abandon | 58 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 11639647 | A POINTS REDEMPTION PROGRAM CARRIED OUT VIA AN ON-LINE AUCTION | December 2006 | February 2013 | Allow | 60 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 11549733 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING IMAGE PRODUCTS AND/OR SERVICES | October 2006 | June 2011 | Allow | 56 | 2 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 11456535 | HYBRID DISTRIBUTION METHOD FOR PLAYABLE MEDIA | July 2006 | September 2013 | Allow | 60 | 2 | 1 | No | Yes |
| 11384027 | METHOD AND SYSTEMS FOR FACILITATING A PURCHASE CORRESPONDING TO AN EVENT BY DETERMINING A PURCHASE RECOMMENDATION BASED ON A RECORD OF A GIVEN SCREENSAVER BEING USED. | March 2006 | March 2011 | Allow | 60 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 11375821 | METHODS FOR VIRAL MARKETING WITH VISUAL COMMUNICATIONS | March 2006 | February 2011 | Allow | 59 | 1 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 10856909 | METHOD OF CONTROLLING ELECTRONIC COMMERCE QUEUE | May 2004 | February 2013 | Allow | 60 | 4 | 1 | Yes | Yes |
| 10831518 | METHODS, SYSTEM, AND COMPUTER-READABLE MEDIUM FOR RECOMMENDING AN AUCTION STRUCTURE | April 2004 | August 2008 | Allow | 51 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 10683985 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR CONTROLLING FEEDBACK FOR AN ONLINE AUCTION | October 2003 | July 2010 | Allow | 60 | 2 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 10639611 | USER INTERFACE AND METHOD FOR FACILITATING A REALTY TRANSACTION | August 2003 | March 2010 | Allow | 60 | 4 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 10628584 | METHODS FOR PURCHASING OF GOODS AND SERVICES | July 2003 | September 2007 | Allow | 50 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 10425572 | COLLECTING COMPETITIVE PRICING INFORMATION VIA A MERCHANT WEB SITE FOR USE IN SETTING PRICES ON THE MERCHANT WEB SITE | April 2003 | September 2009 | Allow | 60 | 6 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 09945208 | ELECTRONIC SINGLE ACTION SOFTWARE DISTRIBUTION | August 2001 | December 2013 | Allow | 60 | 10 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner LEVINE, ADAM L.
With a 80.0% reversal rate, the PTAB has reversed the examiner's rejections more often than affirming them. This reversal rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals are more successful here than in most other areas.
Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.
In this dataset, 44.4% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is above the USPTO average, suggesting that filing an appeal can be an effective strategy for prompting reconsideration.
✓ Appeals to PTAB show good success rates. If you have a strong case on the merits, consider fully prosecuting the appeal to a Board decision.
✓ Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.
Examiner LEVINE, ADAM L works in Art Unit 3689 and has examined 63 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 81.0%, this examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 46 months.
Examiner LEVINE, ADAM L's allowance rate of 81.0% places them in the 45% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications.
On average, applications examined by LEVINE, ADAM L receive 2.75 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 91% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by LEVINE, ADAM L is 46 months. This places the examiner in the 2% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +33.6% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by LEVINE, ADAM L. This interview benefit is in the 84% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner and should be strongly considered as a prosecution strategy. Per MPEP § 713.10, interviews are available at any time before the Notice of Allowance is mailed or jurisdiction transfers to the PTAB.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 28.6% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 43% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show below-average effectiveness with this examiner. Carefully evaluate whether an RCE or continuation is the better strategy.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 16.7% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 12% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.
When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 0.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 18% percentile among all examiners. Note: Pre-appeal conferences show limited success with this examiner compared to others. While still worth considering, be prepared to proceed with a full appeal brief if the PAC does not result in favorable action.
This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 54.5% of appeals filed. This is in the 21% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 16.7% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner rarely withdraws rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. If you file an appeal, be prepared to fully prosecute it to a PTAB decision. Per MPEP § 1207, the examiner will prepare an Examiner's Answer maintaining the rejections.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 109.1% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 98% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are frequently granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1002.02(c), various examiner actions are petitionable to the Technology Center Director, including prematureness of final rejection, refusal to enter amendments, and requirement for information. If you believe an examiner action is improper, consider filing a petition.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 17.5% of allowed cases (in the 99% percentile). Per MPEP § 1302.04, examiner's amendments are used to place applications in condition for allowance when only minor changes are needed. This examiner frequently uses this tool compared to other examiners, indicating a cooperative approach to getting applications allowed. Strategic Insight: If you are close to allowance but minor claim amendments are needed, this examiner may be willing to make an examiner's amendment rather than requiring another round of prosecution.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 37% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.