USPTO Examiner FRUNZI VICTORIA E - Art Unit 3689

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
18639869SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR GENERATING PRODUCT SPECIFIC QUESTIONSApril 2024March 2026Abandon2310NoNo
18585233E-COMMERCE INTELLIGENT DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMFebruary 2024February 2026Abandon2410NoNo
18529009DYNAMIC USER-ORIENTED VEHICLE SALES OPTIMIZATION METHODS AND SYSTEMSDecember 2023January 2026Abandon2510NoNo
18490799SYSTEM FOR PROVIDING PHOTOGRAPHY SERVICE AND OPERATION METHOD THEREOFOctober 2023March 2026Allow2910NoNo
18244901GENERATION AND MANAGEMENT OF DATA QUALITY SCORES USING MULTIMODAL MACHINE LEARNINGSeptember 2023January 2026Abandon2910NoNo
18231145Real-Time Visual Quoting SystemAugust 2023January 2026Abandon2910NoNo
18273758PURCHASING FACTOR ESTIMATION DEVICE, PURCHASING FACTOR ESTIMATION SYSTEM, PURCHASING FACTOR ESTIMATION METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUM ON WHICH PURCHASING FACTOR ESTIMATION PROGRAM IS STOREDJuly 2023December 2025Abandon2810YesNo
18221415METHODS AND SYSTEMS OF FACILITATING INTERACTIVE SEARCH AND DISCOVERY OF REAL ESTATE PROPERTIESJuly 2023November 2025Abandon2810NoNo
18202277DATA-DRIVEN AUTOMATED VISUAL CONFORMANCE ESTIMATION FOR COMPLEMENTARY ITEM DISCOVERY IN E-COMMERCEMay 2023March 2026Abandon3330YesNo
18187495UNMANNED AUTOMATED NON-FACE-TO-FACE PRODUCT SALES SYSTEM WITH OCCUPANCY SPACE-OPTIMIZED DESIGNMarch 2023November 2025Abandon3220NoNo
18245325A MODULAR AUTOMATED RETAIL STORE AND SYSTEMMarch 2023February 2026Allow3521NoNo
18103095SINGLE-SELECT PREDICTIVE PLATFORM MODELJanuary 2023October 2025Allow3321YesNo
18147877DYNAMICALLY PRESENTING AUGMENTED REALITY CONTENT GENERATORS BASED ON DOMAINSDecember 2022October 2025Allow3410YesNo
17959813SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AUTOMATING CLOTHING TRANSACTIONOctober 2022June 2025Allow3320YesNo
17859872SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR REDUCING PERSONALIZED REAL ESTATE COLLECTION SUGGESTION DELAYS VIA BATCH GENERATIONJuly 2022September 2025Allow3830YesNo
13806586PASSENGER GUIDANCE DISPLAY SYSTEM, PASSENGER GUIDANCE DISPLAY APPARATUS, AND PASSENGER GUIDANCE DISPLAY METHODDecember 2012December 2014Allow2410NoNo

Appeals Overview

No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.

Examiner FRUNZI, VICTORIA E. - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner FRUNZI, VICTORIA E. works in Art Unit 3689 and has examined 1 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 100.0%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 24 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner FRUNZI, VICTORIA E.'s allowance rate of 100.0% places them in the 100% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by FRUNZI, VICTORIA E. receive 1.00 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 9% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues significantly fewer office actions than most examiners.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by FRUNZI, VICTORIA E. is 24 months. This places the examiner in the 84% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications move through prosecution relatively quickly with this examiner.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 40% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 44% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

    Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

    • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
    • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
    • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
    • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
    • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
    • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

    Important Disclaimer

    Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

    No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

    Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

    Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.