Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18773933 | MANAGEMENT SYSTEM, INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE, AND PROGRAM | July 2024 | February 2026 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18771468 | REAL-TIME PROVISIONING OF TARGETED, ALTERNATIVE PRODUCT INFORMATION BASED ON STRUCTURED MESSAGING DATA | July 2024 | June 2025 | Allow | 11 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18748853 | ON-LINE SESSION TRACE SYSTEM | June 2024 | May 2025 | Allow | 11 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18672851 | EMBEDDED STOREFRONT | May 2024 | June 2025 | Allow | 13 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18614796 | INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY STORAGE MEDIUM | March 2024 | March 2026 | Abandon | 24 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18595048 | Alternative Item Booster Service | March 2024 | March 2025 | Allow | 13 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18593624 | CROSS-SYSTEM RECOMMENDER | March 2024 | August 2025 | Allow | 17 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18436760 | Service Execution System and Related Product | February 2024 | August 2025 | Allow | 18 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18434952 | CROWDSOURCING INCENTIVE BASED ON SHELF LOCATION | February 2024 | May 2025 | Allow | 15 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18425464 | ITEM RECOMMENDATIONS WEIGHTED BY USER-VALUED FEATURES | January 2024 | February 2025 | Allow | 13 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18420362 | PRODUCT RECOMMENDATIONS BASED ON CHARACTERISTICS FROM END USER-GENERATED TEXT | January 2024 | August 2024 | Allow | 7 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18541862 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROOF OF APPLICATION OWNERSHIP | December 2023 | December 2024 | Allow | 12 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18535185 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETERMINING PRICE BANDS AND USER PRICE AFFINITY PREDICTIONS USING MACHINE LEARNING ARCHITECTURES AND TECHNIQUES | December 2023 | May 2025 | Allow | 17 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18535906 | ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE DEVICE FOR MULTI-MODAL RECOMMENDER AND CONTROL METHOD THEREOF | December 2023 | December 2025 | Allow | 24 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18530907 | UTILIZING ADDITIVE DECOMPOSITION FOR UNIVERSAL OFF-POLICY EVALUATION OF DIGITAL CONTENT SLATE RECOMMENDATIONS | December 2023 | July 2025 | Allow | 19 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18528744 | Machine Learning Model for Click Through Rate Predication Using Three Vector Representations | December 2023 | June 2025 | Allow | 18 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18519920 | BACK END SERVER MODIFICATION AND MODEL VISUALIZATION | November 2023 | November 2024 | Allow | 11 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18507067 | RECYCLED AUTO PART REAL TIME AVAILABILITY VERIFICATION | November 2023 | September 2024 | Allow | 10 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18485797 | REPLACING AN UNAVAILABLE ITEM IN AN ORDER USING A TRAINED OUTCOME PREDICTION MODEL | October 2023 | August 2025 | Allow | 22 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18479722 | SCHEDULING OF ORDER PROCESSING FOR REMOTELY ORDERED GOODS | October 2023 | March 2025 | Allow | 17 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18478268 | Merchant Selection Model for Dynamic Management of Add-Ons for Delivery Service Orders | September 2023 | December 2024 | Allow | 14 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18275153 | INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE, CONTROL METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUM | July 2023 | May 2025 | Allow | 21 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18341074 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GARMENT SIZE RECOMMENDATION | June 2023 | March 2025 | Abandon | 20 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18335921 | MACHINE LEARNING COLLABORATION TECHNIQUES | June 2023 | November 2025 | Allow | 29 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18209806 | OPTIMIZED MULTIPLE DIGITAL WALLET PRESENTATION | June 2023 | July 2024 | Allow | 13 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18331107 | MULTI-VENDOR API MARKETPLACE WITH TARGETED CONTENT AND CUSTOMIZED RATE PLAN MONETIZAION CAPABILITIES | June 2023 | March 2026 | Abandon | 33 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18197630 | STRUCTURED ITEM ORGANIZING MECHANISM IN E-COMMERCE | May 2023 | January 2025 | Allow | 20 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18139289 | MAPPING RECIPE INGREDIENTS TO PRODUCTS | April 2023 | January 2025 | Allow | 21 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18304033 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR IMPROVED E-COMMERCE SHOPPING | April 2023 | May 2025 | Allow | 25 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18129796 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AN ONLINE MARKETPLACE | March 2023 | January 2026 | Abandon | 33 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18181062 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR MANAGING FABRIC SUPPLIER TERMINALS AND FABRIC BUYER TERMINALS USING A PLURALITY OF NEURAL NETWORK | March 2023 | September 2024 | Allow | 19 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18180307 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DYNAMICALLY DETERMINING EVENT CONTENT ITEMS | March 2023 | January 2026 | Allow | 34 | 2 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 18163437 | Sales and Interaction Platform | February 2023 | January 2025 | Allow | 23 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18163178 | Verified-Party Content | February 2023 | July 2024 | Allow | 18 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18150036 | ELEMENT IN CONNECTION WITH CONCURRENT PRESENTATION DURING SERVER OPERATION | January 2023 | January 2025 | Allow | 25 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18004008 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR GENERATING RECOMMENDATION REASON, AND STORAGE MEDIUM | December 2022 | September 2025 | Allow | 33 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18148018 | PRODUCT CARDS PROVIDED BY AUGMENTED REALITY CONTENT GENERATORS | December 2022 | November 2024 | Allow | 23 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17999714 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR INCREASING THE MIGRATION AND ACCESSIBILITY OF DATA | November 2022 | February 2025 | Allow | 27 | 0 | 1 | No | No |
| 17926378 | INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM | November 2022 | December 2024 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17985200 | AERIAL MESSAGE JOB DEVICES, SYSTEMS, AND METHODS | November 2022 | October 2024 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18052734 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CURRENCY TRANSFER USING AUGMENTED REALITY ENVIRONMENTS | November 2022 | September 2024 | Allow | 23 | 0 | 1 | No | No |
| 17977581 | VEHICLE RECOMMENDATION SYSTEM AND VEHICLE RECOMMENDATION METHOD | October 2022 | January 2026 | Allow | 39 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 18050378 | CONCEPT REFINEMENT USING CONCEPT ACTIVATION VECTORS | October 2022 | August 2024 | Allow | 21 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18049581 | Method for Curation and Transaction | October 2022 | February 2025 | Abandon | 28 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17966273 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AUTOMATED MASS MEDIA COMMERCE | October 2022 | November 2024 | Abandon | 25 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18046132 | SYSTEM AND APPARATUS TO PRESENT PREDICTED ITEMS | October 2022 | December 2024 | Allow | 26 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17949611 | Systems And Methods For Providing Paint Colors Based On Music | September 2022 | November 2024 | Allow | 26 | 0 | 1 | No | No |
| 17946119 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AUTOMATED MASS MEDIA COMMERCE | September 2022 | October 2024 | Abandon | 25 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17944078 | EVIDENCE MANAGEMENT METHOD, EVIDENCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM, AND NODE | September 2022 | March 2025 | Allow | 30 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17899190 | USING MACHINE LEARNING TO PREDICT ACCEPTANCE OF LARGER SIZE VARIANTS | August 2022 | January 2025 | Allow | 29 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17893472 | APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR GENERATING POSITIONING INDICATOR | August 2022 | December 2024 | Allow | 28 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17796688 | INFORMATION-PROVIDING SYSTEM | August 2022 | December 2024 | Allow | 29 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17733276 | Merchant Selection Model for Dynamic Management of Add-Ons for Delivery Service Orders | April 2022 | November 2024 | Allow | 30 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17707209 | Security Video Sharing via a Searchable Database | March 2022 | December 2024 | Allow | 32 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17583202 | Lead Routing System for Product or Service Requests | January 2022 | April 2025 | Allow | 38 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17569482 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SHAPE CLASSIFICATION OF THE HUMAN FIGURE FOR APPAREL RECOMMENDATIONS | January 2022 | August 2024 | Allow | 32 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17555478 | RECOMMENDING ELECTRONIC PRODUCTS BASED ON USER SPECIFICATION | December 2021 | March 2026 | Allow | 51 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17456062 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR DETERMINING VARIANCE BETWEEN CRITERIA | November 2021 | September 2024 | Allow | 34 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17532224 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR FACILITATING ONLINE VEHICLE DONATIONS | November 2021 | August 2024 | Allow | 32 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17523081 | INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE AND INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD | November 2021 | July 2024 | Allow | 33 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16266420 | COMPUTER PROGRAM, METHOD, AND SYSTEM FOR MATCHING CONSUMERS WITH SERVICE PROVIDERS | February 2019 | April 2020 | Allow | 14 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16001554 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR IMPROVED INTERACTIVE TELEVISION PROCESSING | June 2018 | August 2018 | Allow | 2 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 15924556 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR IMPROVED E-COMMERCE SHOPPING | March 2018 | May 2018 | Allow | 2 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 15747113 | GIVE-AND-TAKE PLATFORM | January 2018 | March 2020 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15784324 | Video e-commerce | October 2017 | July 2019 | Allow | 21 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 15684348 | Recommendation Engine | August 2017 | April 2018 | Allow | 8 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15683382 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR VERIFYING ASSOCIATION OF USERS WITH PRODUCTS AND INFORMATION | August 2017 | June 2019 | Allow | 22 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 15664410 | Website Shopping System and Shopping Method Thereof | July 2017 | February 2020 | Allow | 30 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15547497 | SYSTEM AND METHODS FOR ADVANCED PERSONALIZED RETAIL SHOPPING PLATFORM | July 2017 | June 2019 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15620077 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR INTERACTIVE JEWELRY DESIGN | June 2017 | January 2020 | Allow | 31 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 15415779 | METHOD, APPARATUS, SYSTEM, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM FOR OFFERING AND DISPLAYING PRODUCT INFORMATION | January 2017 | February 2020 | Allow | 36 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 15333103 | METHOD AND SYSTEM TO CONDUCT ELECTRONIC COMMERCE THROUGH MOTION PICTURES OR LIFE PERFORMANCE EVENTS | October 2016 | October 2018 | Allow | 23 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 15267310 | Method and System For Improved Interactive Television Processing | September 2016 | March 2019 | Allow | 30 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15221675 | EVALUATING SERVICE PROVIDERS USING A SOCIAL NETWORK | July 2016 | January 2018 | Allow | 18 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15109073 | PROCESS FOR PREPARATION AND PURCHASE OF INDIVIDUALIZED COSMETICS UNDER A PRINCIPAL BRAND AND DEVICE ACCORDING TO THE SAID PROCESS | June 2016 | February 2019 | Allow | 32 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15196171 | ISSUE RESOLUTION UTILIZING FEATURE MAPPING | June 2016 | October 2018 | Allow | 27 | 0 | 1 | No | No |
| 15139611 | AUCTION BID NOTIFICATION VIA A WEARABLE DEVICE | April 2016 | June 2019 | Allow | 38 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15079525 | IDENTIFYING CHILD NODE CORRELATIONS | March 2016 | May 2018 | Allow | 26 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 14940757 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR IDENTIFYING TRUE CUSTOMER ON WEBSITE AND PROVIDING ENHANCED WEBSITE EXPERIENCE | November 2015 | July 2018 | Allow | 32 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14793618 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF PROVIDING OUTCOMES BASED ON COLLECTIVE INTELLIGENCE EXPERIENCE | July 2015 | May 2019 | Allow | 46 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 14752757 | Placing a Purchase Order Using One of Multiple Procurement Options | June 2015 | February 2018 | Allow | 31 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14750016 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR EFFICIENT AND COMPREHENSIVE PRODUCT CONFIGURATION AND SEARCHING | June 2015 | March 2019 | Allow | 45 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14682381 | Search and Rank Organizations | April 2015 | April 2018 | Allow | 36 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 14667382 | COMPUTER PROGRAM, METHOD, AND SYSTEM FOR MATCHING CONSUMERS WITH SERVICE PROVIDERS | March 2015 | October 2018 | Allow | 43 | 2 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 14537092 | Recommendation Engine | November 2014 | May 2017 | Allow | 30 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 14329858 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR PURCHASING PRODUCTS OR SERVICES APPEARING IN PLAYING MEDIA WITHOUT INTERRUPTING VIEWING | July 2014 | March 2015 | Allow | 8 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14327543 | Computer-Aided Decision Systems | July 2014 | November 2018 | Allow | 52 | 2 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 14321984 | 3-D IMMERSION TECHNOLOGY IN A VIRTUAL STORE | July 2014 | July 2017 | Allow | 36 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 14292400 | EFFICIENTLY AUTHORIZING CUSTOMERS FOR PRODUCTS UNDER DIFFERENT AUTHORIZATION CONDITIONS | May 2014 | July 2017 | Allow | 37 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14258545 | ESL SYSTEM USING SMART PHONE AND OPERATING METHOD THEREOF | April 2014 | February 2015 | Allow | 10 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14257413 | Video e-commerce | April 2014 | June 2017 | Allow | 38 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 14169058 | Virtual Purchasing Assistant | January 2014 | April 2017 | Allow | 39 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14148592 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR GENERATING AN INTERACTIVE COMMUNICATION SESSION WITH A LIVE CONSULTANT | January 2014 | June 2015 | Allow | 17 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14077302 | METHODS FOR SELECTING, ORDERING AND PURCHASING GLASS PRODUCTS | November 2013 | May 2017 | Allow | 42 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14034260 | PLACING A PURCHASE ORDER USING ONE OF MULTIPLE PROCUREMENT OPTIONS | September 2013 | March 2015 | Allow | 18 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13922848 | COMMUNICATION METHOD | June 2013 | December 2013 | Allow | 5 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 13915856 | LIGHTING INFRASTRUCTURE AND REVENUE MODEL | June 2013 | February 2014 | Allow | 8 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 13846789 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR CREDITING A RETAILER FOR AN INTERNET PURCHASE | March 2013 | January 2015 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13837374 | APPARATUS, ARTICLE OF MANUFACTURE, AND METHODS FOR RECOMMENDING A JEWELRY ITEM | March 2013 | October 2018 | Allow | 60 | 4 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 13837495 | APPARATUS, ARTICLE OF MANUFACTURE AND METHODS FOR CUSTOMIZED DESIGN OF A JEWELRY ITEM | March 2013 | October 2017 | Allow | 55 | 3 | 0 | No | Yes |
This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner AIRAPETIAN, MILA.
With a 40.0% reversal rate, the PTAB reverses the examiner's rejections in a meaningful percentage of cases. This reversal rate is above the USPTO average, indicating that appeals have better success here than typical.
Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.
In this dataset, 46.7% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is particularly effective here. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.
✓ Appeals to PTAB show good success rates. If you have a strong case on the merits, consider fully prosecuting the appeal to a Board decision.
✓ Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.
Examiner AIRAPETIAN, MILA works in Art Unit 3688 and has examined 213 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 98.1%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 28 months.
Examiner AIRAPETIAN, MILA's allowance rate of 98.1% places them in the 90% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by AIRAPETIAN, MILA receive 1.71 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 36% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues fewer office actions than average, which may indicate efficient prosecution or a more lenient examination style.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by AIRAPETIAN, MILA is 28 months. This places the examiner in the 70% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly faster than average with this examiner.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a -4.3% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by AIRAPETIAN, MILA. This interview benefit is in the 6% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 36.8% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 84% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. If you receive a final rejection, filing an RCE with substantive amendments or arguments has a strong likelihood of success.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 60.9% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 86% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner is highly receptive to after-final amendments compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 714.12, after-final amendments may be entered "under justifiable circumstances." Consider filing after-final amendments with a clear showing of allowability rather than immediately filing an RCE, as this examiner frequently enters such amendments.
When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 40.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 38% percentile among all examiners. Note: Pre-appeal conferences show below-average success with this examiner. Consider whether your arguments are strong enough to warrant a PAC request.
This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 72.2% of appeals filed. This is in the 60% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 30.8% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner shows above-average willingness to reconsider rejections during appeals. The mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) provides an opportunity for reconsideration.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 59.3% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 63% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions show above-average success regarding this examiner's actions. Petitionable matters include restriction requirements (MPEP § 1002.02(c)(2)) and various procedural issues.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 27.2% of allowed cases (in the 99% percentile). Per MPEP § 1302.04, examiner's amendments are used to place applications in condition for allowance when only minor changes are needed. This examiner frequently uses this tool compared to other examiners, indicating a cooperative approach to getting applications allowed. Strategic Insight: If you are close to allowance but minor claim amendments are needed, this examiner may be willing to make an examiner's amendment rather than requiring another round of prosecution.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 43% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.