USPTO Examiner MOSELEY GREGORY D - Art Unit 3686

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
17102328COMPUTERIZED SYSTEM TO PROVIDE MEDICAL DIAGNOSIS, PROGNOSIS, AND TREATMENT USING MORE REFINED DIGITAL HEALTH RECORDS HAVING IMPROVED CONTEXTNovember 2020September 2024Abandon4520YesNo
16950924INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE, INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND INFORMATION PROCESSING PROGRAMNovember 2020December 2023Abandon3730NoNo
17092156ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD NAVIGATIONNovember 2020February 2024Allow3930YesNo
17031008Methods and Systems to Predict Macular Edema in a Patient's Eye Following Cataract SurgerySeptember 2020June 2024Abandon4530YesNo
17003459COMPUTING SYSTEM THAT GENERATES PATIENT-SPECIFIC OUTCOME PREDICTIONSAugust 2020September 2023Abandon3720NoNo
16942400TRANSACTION ANALYSIS AND ASSET RECOVERY SYSTEMJuly 2020November 2023Abandon4021YesNo
16922548ANALYSIS SYSTEM AND ANALYSIS METHODJuly 2020April 2023Abandon3320NoNo
16895424DOMAIN-TRANSFERRED HEALTH-RELATED PREDICTIVE DATA ANALYSISJune 2020February 2024Abandon4440YesNo
16888199Patient Context Vectors: Low Dimensional Representation of Patient Context Towards Enhanced Rule Engine Semantics and Machine LearningMay 2020June 2022Abandon2410YesNo
16884730ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI) SYSTEM FOR INDIVIDUAL HEALTH MAINTENANCE RECOMMENDATIONSMay 2020February 2023Abandon3320NoNo
16865131SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CLINICAL ASSESSMENTS AND INTERVENTIONS USING MULTIDIMENSIONAL SCALING ANALYSISMay 2020June 2023Allow3720YesNo
16848520ADVANCED HEALTH MONITORING SYSTEM AND METHODApril 2020November 2023Abandon4330NoNo
16848072MODEL AUGMENTED MEDICAL CODINGApril 2020May 2024Allow4950YesNo
16834939SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ENCRYPTED GENUINE GATHERINGMarch 2020April 2022Abandon2510NoNo
16644239Methods of Prognosing Early Stage Breast LesionsMarch 2020June 2023Allow3920NoNo
16795707AUTOMATIC USER PROVISIONING, SUCH AS THE AUTOMATIC CREATION OF PROVIDER PROFILES IN AN ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD SYSTEMFebruary 2020March 2024Abandon4941YesNo
16775869METHODS AND DEVICES FOR STORING AND PROCESSING ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD ON BLOCKCHAINJanuary 2020September 2023Abandon4470YesNo
16736523DEVICE AND METHOD FOR MEASURING RISK OF DRY EYE, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM FOR EXECUTING METHODJanuary 2020September 2023Abandon4530NoNo
16704393COMPUTER-IMPLEMENTED METHOD AND AN APPARATUS FOR USE IN DETECTING MALINGERING BY A FIRST SUBJECT IN ONE OR MORE PHYSICAL AND/OR MENTAL FUNCTION TESTSDecember 2019August 2023Abandon4530YesNo
16683139PREDICTION OF FUTURE ADVERSE HEALTH EVENTS USING NEURAL NETWORKS BY PRE-PROCESSING INPUT SEQUENCES TO INCLUDE PRESENCE FEATURESNovember 2019July 2021Allow2030YesNo
16591623MEDICAL DIAGNOSTIC AID AND METHODOctober 2019December 2022Allow3820NoNo
16592617DIAGNOSIS SUPPORT SYSTEM, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND PROGRAMOctober 2019January 2024Allow5250YesNo
16585927SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PREDICTING PATIENT RISK OUTCOMESSeptember 2019October 2022Abandon3740YesNo
16573508Veterinary Services Inquiry SystemSeptember 2019September 2024Abandon6050NoNo
16554875CONSULTATION SUPPORT SYSTEMAugust 2019December 2023Abandon5140YesNo
16489971MEDICAL ADVERSE EVENT PREDICTION, REPORTING, AND PREVENTIONAugust 2019March 2022Abandon3020NoNo
16542938PROCESSING PROFILES USING MACHINE LEARNING TO EVALUATE CANDIDATESAugust 2019October 2022Allow3830YesNo
16528087METHODS, SYSTEMS, AND APPARATUSES FOR PREDICTING THE RISK OF HOSPITALIZATIONJuly 2019September 2024Abandon6030NoYes
16507215DATA BASED TRUTH MAINTENANCEJuly 2019December 2022Allow4100YesNo
16445691Decision Support Tool for Stroke PatientsJune 2019October 2020Allow1600YesNo
16339895TIME-SENSITIVE RISK MODEL CALCULATIONApril 2019July 2024Abandon6080NoNo
16375543MEDICAL RECORD MANAGEMENT SYSTEM WITH ANNOTATED PATIENT IMAGES FOR RAPID RETRIEVALApril 2019February 2020Abandon1010NoNo
16375407SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ASSESSING SIGNS AND SYMPTOMS IN CONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE PATIENTSApril 2019December 2022Abandon4440YesNo
16362684Method to help ensure correct medical procedure is performed and billedMarch 2019March 2022Abandon3621YesNo
16353821SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AUTOMATED PRESCRIPTION DISPENSINGMarch 2019December 2021Abandon3320NoNo
16262759SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING DATA MANAGEMENT SYSTEMJanuary 2019November 2021Abandon3310NoNo
16321774PREDICTING THE PLACEBO RESPONSE AND PLACEBO RESPONDERS USING BASELINE PSYCHOMETRIC AND CLINICAL ASSESSMENT SCOREJanuary 2019June 2021Abandon2910NoNo
16257779OPTIMIZED MEDICATION RECOMMENDATION USING A NEURAL NETWORKJanuary 2019January 2022Abandon3620YesNo
16203611HOME CARE OPTIONS COMPLIANCE TABLET FOR POST-ACUTE-CARE PATIENTSNovember 2018January 2020Abandon1310NoNo
16162575ADVANCED HEALTH MONITORING SYSTEM AND METHODOctober 2018November 2023Abandon6050YesNo
16041290CLINICAL TRIAL SUPPORT NETWORK DATA SECURITYJuly 2018February 2023Abandon5530NoNo
16027463SMART MONITORING SAFETY SYSTEM USING SENSORSJuly 2018June 2021Allow3540NoNo
16026433Drug Repurposing Hypothesis Generation Using Clinical Drug-Drug Interaction InformationJuly 2018June 2021Abandon3520NoNo
15982875Methods and Systems for a FHIR Interface for Customer Relationship Management SystemsMay 2018January 2021Abandon3240NoNo
15946512MEDICAL RECORD/MANAGEMENT SYSTEM WITH AUGMENTED PATIENT IMAGES FOR RAPID RETRIEVALApril 2018January 2023Abandon5850YesNo
15913652DRUG DISCOVERY PLATFORMMarch 2018February 2022Abandon4720NoYes
15905909METHOD AND DATA PROCESSING UNIT FOR SELECTING A PROTOCOL FOR A MEDICAL IMAGING EXAMINATIONFebruary 2018May 2024Abandon6040YesYes
15903845MANAGING DYNAMIC LICENSES FOR PHYSIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS IN A PATIENT MONITORING ENVIRONMENTFebruary 2018November 2020Allow3310YesNo
15889373USING IMAGE REFERENCES IN RADIOLOGY REPORTS TO SUPPORT REPORT-TO-IMAGE NAVIGATIONFebruary 2018November 2023Abandon60100NoNo
15845348MONITORING AN INDIVIDUAL'S CONDITION BASED ON MODELS GENERATED FROM E-TEXTILE BASED CLOTHINGDecember 2017May 2021Allow4120YesNo
15799318Distant Asthma Assessment And Treatment SystemOctober 2017July 2023Abandon6050NoNo
15799321PROVIDING CUSTOMIZED CONSUMER DISCOUNTS ON PRESCRIPTION MEDICATIONSOctober 2017July 2020Abandon3310NoNo
15798631Multilevel Intelligent Interactive Mobile Health System for Behavioral Physiology Self-Regulation in Real-TimeOctober 2017January 2021Abandon3820YesNo
15797295FACILITATING HEALTH INTERVENTION SUGGESTION FOR DISEASE MITIGATION AND/OR PREVENTIONOctober 2017April 2022Allow5340YesNo
15570662CLINICAL SUPPORT SYSTEM AND METHODOctober 2017April 2022Abandon5340NoNo
15567041Context-Aware Careflow Engine, Platform, Device, System, Method, and Computer-Readable MediumOctober 2017November 2019Abandon2520NoYes
15667154APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR REAL-TIME ASSESSMENT, MAPPING, AND BUILDING DATABASES OF QUALITY OF LIFE INDICATORSAugust 2017November 2020Abandon4010NoNo
15596035IMAGING METHOD FOR CARRYING OUT A MEDICAL EXAMINATIONMay 2017December 2020Abandon4340YesNo
15432059SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR REMOTE MONITORING OF NON-CRITICALLY ILL HOSPITALIZED PATIENTSFebruary 2017September 2022Allow6040YesNo
15428209SYSTEM AND PROCESS FOR GENERATING A MEDICAL BILLFebruary 2017June 2023Abandon6050NoYes
15425328SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETECTING AND MONITORING ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION RISKFebruary 2017February 2018Abandon1210NoNo
15415443Simplified Instances of Virtual Physiological Systems for Internet of Things ProcessingJanuary 2017September 2021Abandon5640YesNo
15414508INTELLIGENT STROKE RISK PREDICTION AND MONITORING SYSTEMJanuary 2017February 2018Abandon1210NoNo
15403375METHOD AND SYSTEM OF RADIATION PROFILINGJanuary 2017February 2021Abandon5020NoNo
15380201MEDICAL SUPPORT APPARATUS AND SYSTEM, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUMDecember 2016June 2020Abandon4220NoNo
15364693REDUCING CONTAGIOUS DISEASE SPREAD UTILIZING TRAVEL INFORMATIONNovember 2016February 2022Abandon6040YesNo
15347141SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR COMPILING AND DELIVERING PATIENT INFORMATION AND CLINICAL ASSISTANCENovember 2016November 2020Abandon4820NoNo
15297077HEALTH ACTIVITY MONITORING AND WORK SCHEDULINGOctober 2016June 2020Abandon4420YesNo
15192141METHOD AND ARRANGEMENT FOR ARRANGING AN INFORMATION SERVICE TO DETERMINE NUTRITION AND/OR MEDICATIONJune 2016July 2020Abandon4911NoNo
15141391METHODS, SYSTEMS, AND COMPUTER READABLE MEDIA FOR AUTOMATED BEHAVIORAL ASSESSMENTApril 2016June 2021Allow6040YesNo
15140363DATABASE SYSTEMS AND INTERACTIVE USER INTERFACES FOR DYNAMIC INTERACTION WITH, AND COMPARISON OF, DIGITAL MEDICAL IMAGE DATAApril 2016December 2022Abandon6040YesNo
15140346DATABASE SYSTEMS AND INTERACTIVE USER INTERFACES FOR DYNAMIC INTERACTION WITH, AND SORTING OF, DIGITAL MEDICAL IMAGE DATAApril 2016June 2020Abandon5020NoNo
15136869SYSTEMS, METHODS AND DEVICES FOR ENSURING QUALITY IN HEALTHCARE AND WELLNESSApril 2016June 2021Abandon6040NoNo
15096097DIAGNOSIS SUPPORT SYSTEM, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND PROGRAMApril 2016February 2020Abandon4620NoNo
15085645TELEMEDICINE SYSTEM INCLUDING PRESCRIPTION DELIVERYMarch 2016December 2019Abandon4410NoNo
15083797Patient Risk Assessment Based on Machine Learning of Health Risks of Patient PopulationMarch 2016February 2020Abandon4620YesNo
15078806Application Program Interface for Generating a Medical Classification CodeMarch 2016April 2020Abandon4930YesNo
15074929SYSTEMS AND ARCHITECTURE FOR ELECTRONIC INTERFACES AND COMPLEX DATA STRUCTURES FOR MEDICATION RECONCILIATION AND PATIENT REGIMEN ADHERENCE DETECTIONMarch 2016October 2019Abandon4310NoNo
15071864SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR A PATIENT INITIATED MEDICAL INTERVIEW USING A VOICE-BASED MEDICAL HISTORY QUESTIONNAIREMarch 2016April 2022Abandon6050NoYes
15066144MEASUREMENT, ANALYSIS AND APPLICATION OF PATIENT ENGAGEMENTMarch 2016September 2021Allow6040YesNo
15062540METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR MOTIVATING PROPER PRESCRIPTION DRUG USAGEMarch 2016June 2020Allow5120YesNo
15054150DIAGNOSIS SUPPORT APPARATUS AND METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUMFebruary 2016November 2019Allow4520YesNo
15053494HEALTHCARE APPLICATION CONNECTING PATIENTS TO EMERGENCY AND URGENT CARE CENTERS, AND PROVIDING EXPEDITED PATIENT CHECK-INFebruary 2016May 2019Abandon3910YesNo
15045721NOVEL OPEN-ACCESS SCHEDULING SYSTEM THAT OPTIMIZES HEALTHCARE DELIVERY SYSTEM OPERATIONFebruary 2016February 2020Abandon4821NoNo
15041872Communication System and Method for Medical CoordinationFebruary 2016September 2023Allow6060YesNo
14996994MULTI-FURCATED ALLOCATION SYSTEMJanuary 2016April 2022Allow6070NoNo
14955947DECISION SUPPORT TOOL FOR STROKE PATIENTSDecember 2015March 2019Allow4010NoNo
14944192INFORMATION COLLECTION APPARATUS AND SYSTEM FOR DIAGNOSIS SUPPORT PROGRAM, AND OPERATING METHODNovember 2015February 2020Abandon5130YesNo
14943682FACILITATING THE SHARING OF HEALTH INFORMATIONNovember 2015October 2019Abandon4720YesNo
14891734Health Care Information Process SystemNovember 2015September 2019Abandon4620NoNo
14937765Healthcare Content Management SystemNovember 2015September 2022Abandon6070YesNo
14934432METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR PROCESSING CLINICAL DATANovember 2015April 2019Abandon4220NoNo
14839143METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR ONLINE DELIVERY OF HEALTHCAREAugust 2015January 2019Abandon4101NoNo
14838309PATIENT HEALTH RECORD PORTAL GAMIFICATIONAugust 2015March 2024Allow60100YesYes
14836281Methods and Systems that Manage Spending on Implantable Health Care DevicesAugust 2015December 2018Abandon3910NoNo
14832865SYSTEM AND METHOD OF MATCHING IDENTITIES AMONG DISPARATE PHYSICIAN RECORDSAugust 2015June 2019Abandon4620NoNo
14674944SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR E-PRESCRIPTION TRANSACTION PRE-DESTINATION EVALUATION, EDITING, REJECTION, AND MESSAGINGMarch 2015April 2022Abandon6040YesYes
14671338SOCIAL MEDICATION MANAGEMENT WITH SENSORSMarch 2015January 2019Abandon4520NoNo
14670172METHOD FOR DIAGNOSIS AND DOCUMENTATION OF HEALTHCARE INFORMATIONMarch 2015July 2018Abandon4060YesNo
14665502Quality Assurance Injection Method and SystemMarch 2015April 2021Abandon6040YesYes

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner MOSELEY, GREGORY D.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
10
Examiner Affirmed
9
(90.0%)
Examiner Reversed
1
(10.0%)
Reversal Percentile
23.3%
Lower than average

What This Means

With a 10.0% reversal rate, the PTAB affirms the examiner's rejections in the vast majority of cases. This reversal rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals face significant challenges here.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
22
Allowed After Appeal Filing
2
(9.1%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
20
(90.9%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
13.2%
Lower than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 9.1% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is less effective here than in most other areas.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB face challenges. Ensure your case has strong merit before committing to full Board review.

Filing a Notice of Appeal shows limited benefit. Consider other strategies like interviews or amendments before appealing.

Examiner MOSELEY, GREGORY D - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner MOSELEY, GREGORY D works in Art Unit 3686 and has examined 155 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 20.0%, this examiner allows applications at a lower rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 45 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner MOSELEY, GREGORY D's allowance rate of 20.0% places them in the 3% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is less likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by MOSELEY, GREGORY D receive 3.14 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 86% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by MOSELEY, GREGORY D is 45 months. This places the examiner in the 14% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +31.3% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by MOSELEY, GREGORY D. This interview benefit is in the 78% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner and should be strongly considered as a prosecution strategy. Per MPEP § 713.10, interviews are available at any time before the Notice of Allowance is mailed or jurisdiction transfers to the PTAB.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 9.2% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 5% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show lower effectiveness with this examiner compared to others. Consider whether a continuation application might be more strategic, especially if you need to add new matter or significantly broaden claims.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 2.7% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 5% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 80.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 65% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: Pre-appeal conferences show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. If you have strong arguments, a PAC request may result in favorable reconsideration.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 23.1% of appeals filed. This is in the 3% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 66.7% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner rarely withdraws rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. If you file an appeal, be prepared to fully prosecute it to a PTAB decision. Per MPEP § 1207, the examiner will prepare an Examiner's Answer maintaining the rejections.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 44.4% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 36% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions show below-average success regarding this examiner's actions. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.6% of allowed cases (in the 62% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments more often than average to place applications in condition for allowance (MPEP § 1302.04).

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 45% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Prepare for rigorous examination: With a below-average allowance rate, ensure your application has strong written description and enablement support. Consider filing a continuation if you need to add new matter.
  • Expect multiple rounds of prosecution: This examiner issues more office actions than average. Address potential issues proactively in your initial response and consider requesting an interview early in prosecution.
  • Prioritize examiner interviews: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner. Request an interview after the first office action to clarify issues and potentially expedite allowance.
  • Plan for RCE after final rejection: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments. Budget for an RCE in your prosecution strategy if you receive a final rejection.
  • Plan for extended prosecution: Applications take longer than average with this examiner. Factor this into your continuation strategy and client communications.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.