Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18292964 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR AUTOMATING STANDARD API SPECIFICATION FOR DATA DISTRIBUTION BETWEEN HETEROGENEOUS SYSTEMS | January 2024 | June 2024 | Allow | 5 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17657183 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CARE AND DISEASE MANAGEMENT | March 2022 | August 2024 | Abandon | 28 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17702378 | Communication Application for Care Facilities | March 2022 | August 2024 | Abandon | 29 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17700749 | INTERACTIVE GRAPHICAL SYSTEM FOR ESTIMATING BODY MEASUREMENTS | March 2022 | March 2024 | Allow | 23 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17697343 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR A CONTINUOUS PATIENT ENGAGEMENT ORAL CARE MODEL | March 2022 | August 2024 | Abandon | 29 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17586107 | ELECTRONIC PATIENT ADVISOR AND HEALTHCARE SYSTEM FOR REMOTE MANAGEMENT OF CHRONIC CONDITIONS | January 2022 | July 2024 | Abandon | 30 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17648926 | APPLIED BEHAVIORAL THERAPY APPARATUS AND METHOD | January 2022 | July 2024 | Abandon | 29 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17567853 | METHOD AND COMPUTER PROGRAM TO DETERMINE USER'S MENTAL STATE BY USING USER'S BEHAVIOR DATA OR INPUT DATA | January 2022 | June 2024 | Abandon | 30 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17567486 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR IMAGE ANALYSIS USING SEQUENTIAL MACHINE LEARNING MODELS WITH UNCERTAINTY ESTIMATION | January 2022 | July 2024 | Abandon | 30 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17528527 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR REAL-TIME ACCESS TO STANDARDIZED MEDICATION INFORMATION | November 2021 | May 2024 | Abandon | 30 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17594234 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROCESSING MRI DATA | October 2021 | April 2024 | Abandon | 30 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17488465 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PREDICTION OF INTRADIALYTIC ADVERSE EVENT AND COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM THEREOF | September 2021 | April 2024 | Allow | 31 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17478927 | Two-Sided Digitized Healthcare Assets Platform | September 2021 | April 2024 | Abandon | 31 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17444880 | NOTIFICATION OF PRIVACY ASPECTS OF HEALTHCARE PROVIDER ENVIRONMENTS DURING TELEMEDICINE SESSIONS | August 2021 | September 2024 | Abandon | 37 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17389814 | HEALTHCARE WORKER BURNOUT DETECTION TOOL | July 2021 | February 2024 | Abandon | 30 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17416382 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING HUMAN PERFORMANCE | June 2021 | September 2024 | Abandon | 39 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner EVANS, ASHLEY ELIZABETH works in Art Unit 3686 and has examined 7 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 14.3%, this examiner allows applications at a lower rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 31 months.
Examiner EVANS, ASHLEY ELIZABETH's allowance rate of 14.3% places them in the 2% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is less likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by EVANS, ASHLEY ELIZABETH receive 1.29 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 18% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues significantly fewer office actions than most examiners.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by EVANS, ASHLEY ELIZABETH is 31 months. This places the examiner in the 57% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly faster than average with this examiner.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +33.3% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by EVANS, ASHLEY ELIZABETH. This interview benefit is in the 81% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner and should be strongly considered as a prosecution strategy. Per MPEP § 713.10, interviews are available at any time before the Notice of Allowance is mailed or jurisdiction transfers to the PTAB.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 0.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 3% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 40% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 43% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.