USPTO Examiner PHAN NICHOLAS K - Art Unit 3685

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
17105075DATA MONETIZATION AND EXCHANGE PLATFORMNovember 2020September 2022Allow2200NoNo
17014920METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR IMPROVING SECURITY IN NETWORK-SUPPORTED DYNAMIC TRANSACTINGSeptember 2020December 2022Abandon2710NoNo
16995540ANONYMOUS FUNDING OF AN ONLINE ACCOUNT WITH CASHAugust 2020January 2023Allow2910NoNo
16987143NEAR FIELD COMMUNICATION RESOURCE TRANSFERAugust 2020April 2024Abandon4401NoNo
16915680PREVENTION OF DUPLICATE TRANSACTIONS ACROSS MULTIPLE TRANSACTION ENTITIES IN DATABASE SYSTEMSJune 2020September 2023Allow3930YesNo
16754498INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND PROGRAMApril 2020November 2023Allow4340YesNo
16837718SOURCE INDEPENDENT CONSISTENT TOKENIZATIONApril 2020April 2023Allow3620YesNo
16819182MOBILE ORDERING AND PAYMENT SOLUTION BASED ON WI-FI NETWORKMarch 2020October 2022Abandon3110NoNo
16645698SUBSCRIPTION PROCESSING METHOD, DEVICE, ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND READABLE STORAGE MEDIUMMarch 2020August 2023Allow4140NoNo
16779449BLOCKCHAIN-BASED REIMBURSEMENT SPLITTINGJanuary 2020October 2021Allow2130YesNo
16634629PRODUCT SELLING APPARATUS AND PRODUCT SELLING METHODJanuary 2020July 2022Abandon2920NoNo
16731950PROXY CHECKOUT AND PAYMENT TRANSACTION SERVICESDecember 2019June 2022Allow3010YesNo
16722252CREDIT PAYMENT METHOD AND APPARATUS BASED ON MOBILE TERMINAL PEER-TO-PEERDecember 2019August 2021Allow2030YesNo
16720400CREDIT PAYMENT METHOD AND APPARATUS BASED ON MOBILE TERMINAL EMBEDDED SECURE ELEMENTDecember 2019August 2021Allow2030YesNo
16719348CREDIT PAYMENT METHOD AND APPARATUS BASED ON CARD EMULATION OF MOBILE TERMINALDecember 2019September 2021Allow2130YesNo
16714525Multi-Faceted License Management Approach to Support Multi-Layered Product StructureDecember 2019December 2023Abandon4840YesNo
16663575RIGHTS MANAGEMENT OF CLOUD RESOURCESOctober 2019August 2022Allow3410NoNo
16601420METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR HOSTED ORDER PAGE/SILENT ORDER POSTOctober 2019October 2022Allow3600YesNo
16585494METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR ASSISTING TRANSACTIONSSeptember 2019October 2022Allow3710YesNo
16585449Automated Event Processing Computing Platform for Handling and Enriching Blockchain DataSeptember 2019August 2021Allow2320NoNo
16584041METHOD AND APPRATUS FOR BLOCKCHAINS WITH MODIFIABLE RECORDED TRANSACTIONSSeptember 2019March 2024Allow5431NoNo
16581870Automated Event Processing Computing Platform for Handling and Enriching Blockchain DataSeptember 2019November 2021Allow2620NoNo
16574144PRE-BUILT USER INTERFACE FOR PAYMENT SYSTEM AND METHODSeptember 2019June 2022Allow3310NoNo
16560520BLOCKCHAIN-BASED DATA PROCESSING METHOD AND DEVICESeptember 2019March 2022Allow3040YesNo
16551376FINANCIAL TRANSACTIONS SYSTEM AND METHOD UTILIZING BLOCKCHAIN TRANSFERSAugust 2019April 2023Abandon4310NoNo
16550435SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CUSTOMER INITIATED FRAUD MANAGEMENTAugust 2019May 2022Allow3210NoNo
16536963UPGRADEABLE SECURITY TOKENAugust 2019March 2022Allow3220YesNo
16534552SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR A DISTRIBUTED LEDGER FOR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ASSET MANAGEMENTAugust 2019March 2021Abandon1910NoNo
16532895MACHINE LEARNING BASED SYSTEM FOR AUTHORIZATION OF AUTONOMOUS RESOURCE TRANSFERS BETWEEN DISTRIBUTED IOT COMPONENTSAugust 2019April 2022Allow3210NoNo
16522027METHODS, SYSTEMS AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCTS FOR TRANSACTION AUTHENTICATIONJuly 2019May 2022Allow3420YesNo
16441977AUTOMATED SERVICE MANAGEMENT FOR A TRANSPORTJune 2019March 2024Abandon5770YesNo
16199235SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR TRANSITIONING A BLOCKCHAIN BETWEEN DIFFERENT STATESNovember 2018October 2021Abandon3410NoNo
16200027ACTIVE MALFEASANCE EXAMINATION AND DETECTION BASED ON DYNAMIC GRAPH NETWORK FLOW ANALYSISNovember 2018January 2022Allow3720NoNo
16123404SYSTEM AND METHODS FOR INTERNATIONAL ACH TRANSACTIONSSeptember 2018September 2023Allow6070YesNo
16122705SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SECURE TRANSACTIONS WITH A TRUSTED EXECUTION ENVIRONMENT (TEE)September 2018April 2022Allow4340YesNo
16043417CREDIT PAYMENT METHOD AND APPARATUS BASED ON CARD EMULATION OF MOBILE TERMINALJuly 2018September 2021Allow3720YesNo
16042808CREDIT PAYMENT METHOD AND APPARATUS BASED ON MOBILE TERMINAL PEER-TO-PEERJuly 2018November 2021Allow4040YesNo
16042772CREDIT PAYMENT METHOD AND APPARATUS BASED ON MOBILE TERMINAL EMBEDDED SECURE ELEMENTJuly 2018December 2021Allow4140YesNo
15988026METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR TRANSACTION AUTHORIZATION VIA CONTROLLED BLOCKCHAINMay 2018December 2021Allow4220YesNo
15770533METHOD FOR PAYMENT WITH CASH CARDApril 2018May 2022Allow4940YesNo
15957596PROVIDING RELEVANT DATA TO PERFORM DISCOVERY AND MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS IN CONSUMER DECISION MAKING IN FASHION, IN COSMETICS, AND/OR RETAILApril 2018October 2020Abandon3010NoNo
15957871TIME STAMPING SYSTEMS AND METHODSApril 2018February 2022Abandon4610NoNo
15957331SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CONDUCTING TRANSACTIONS USING A SURROGATE PINApril 2018July 2022Allow5140YesNo
15954549Method for Publicizing Musical Artists and Promoting New Musical WorksApril 2018October 2020Abandon3010NoNo
15916293EFFICIENT VALIDATION OF TRANSACTION POLICY COMPLIANCE IN A DISTRIBUTED LEDGER SYSTEMMarch 2018September 2021Allow4330NoNo
15877108SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR INDUSTRY REPORTING VIA BLOCKCHAINJanuary 2018November 2021Abandon4630YesNo
15877006SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SECURELY FILING DOCUMENTS VIA BLOCKCHAINJanuary 2018November 2021Abandon4630YesNo
15877046SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING COMPLIANCE VIA BLOCKCHAINJanuary 2018February 2022Abandon4940YesNo
15876381VERIFICATION OF CLINICAL DATAJanuary 2018October 2022Abandon5740YesYes
15877066SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR BLOCKCHAIN-BASED PAYMENTSJanuary 2018September 2021Allow4340YesNo
15875912RECORDING EVIDENCE OF ADDRESS/ACCOUNT ALLOCATIONS IN A DISTRIBUTED LEDGERJanuary 2018November 2022Abandon5841YesYes
15866266CROSS-LEDGER TRANSFERS BETWEEN DISTRIBUTED LEDGERSJanuary 2018April 2022Allow5140YesNo
15840069METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR CONSUMER-INITIATED TRANSACTIONS USING ENCRYPTED TOKENSDecember 2017September 2021Allow4540YesNo
15840724MANAGING A DEMAND ON AN ELECTRICAL GRID USING A PUBLICLY DISTRIBUTED TRANSACTIONS LEDGERDecember 2017December 2020Abandon3620NoNo
15839245Method and Apparatus for Processing Mobile Payment Using Blockchain TechniquesDecember 2017July 2020Abandon3110NoNo
15837177ELECTRONIC PAYMENT DEVICE TRANSACTIONSDecember 2017May 2020Abandon2910YesNo
15834346AUTOMATED EVENT PROCESSING COMPUTING PLATFORM FOR HANDLING AND ENRICHING BLOCKCHAIN DATADecember 2017August 2021Allow4430YesNo
15788718DATA MONETIZATION AND EXCHANGE PLATFORMOctober 2017September 2020Allow3520YesNo
15457703PAYMENT VIA FINANCIAL SERVICE PROVIDER USING NETWORK-BASED DEVICEMarch 2017May 2022Allow6040YesNo
15510581Computerised system and Method for Establishing and Trading Contractual Rights in a Creative ProductionMarch 2017June 2020Abandon3910YesNo
15274296USING LEDGER SENSORS TO ENABLE CONTEXTUAL CONTRACTS ACROSS VARIOUS ENTERPRISE BLOCKCHAIN APPLICATIONSSeptember 2016September 2021Allow5930YesNo
15250381MOBILE DIALOGUE SYSTEM AND MOBILE CONTENT DELIVERY SOLUTIONSAugust 2016November 2020Abandon5101NoNo
15148121METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR INSTANTANEOUS PAYMENT USING RECORDED GUARANTEESMay 2016March 2022Allow6040NoYes
15146558RUNTIME COMPUTER SOFTWARE PRODUCT MANAGEMENT SYSTEMMay 2016July 2021Allow6030YesNo
15061617SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SMART CARD ONLINE PURCHASE AUTHENTICATIONMarch 2016March 2020Abandon4830YesNo
15058988SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR TRANSACTION ACCOUNT TOKENIZATIONMarch 2016July 2021Allow6050YesNo
15057098ELECTRONIC METHOD FOR INSTANTLY CREATING AN ACCOUNT WITH A SERVICE PROVIDER DURING POINT OF SALEFebruary 2016December 2021Allow6050YesNo
15056450PAYMENT CHECKOUT WITHIN AN APPLICATIONFebruary 2016June 2020Abandon5220YesNo
14915539METHOD FOR PROCESSING TRANSACTIONAL DATA, CORRESPONDING DEVICES AND COMPUTER PROGRAMSFebruary 2016August 2020Abandon5320NoNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner PHAN, NICHOLAS K.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
4
Allowed After Appeal Filing
1
(25.0%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
3
(75.0%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
37.3%
Lower than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 25.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is below the USPTO average, suggesting that filing an appeal has limited effectiveness in prompting favorable reconsideration.

Strategic Recommendations

Filing a Notice of Appeal shows limited benefit. Consider other strategies like interviews or amendments before appealing.

Examiner PHAN, NICHOLAS K - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner PHAN, NICHOLAS K works in Art Unit 3685 and has examined 69 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 63.8%, this examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 40 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner PHAN, NICHOLAS K's allowance rate of 63.8% places them in the 26% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by PHAN, NICHOLAS K receive 2.54 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 70% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues a slightly above-average number of office actions.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by PHAN, NICHOLAS K is 40 months. This places the examiner in the 25% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +25.7% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by PHAN, NICHOLAS K. This interview benefit is in the 71% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide an above-average benefit with this examiner and are worth considering.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 29.8% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 60% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. Consider whether your amendments or new arguments are strong enough to warrant an RCE versus filing a continuation.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 11.9% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 13% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 100.0% of appeals filed. This is in the 98% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: This examiner frequently reconsiders rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1207.01, all appeals must go through a mandatory appeal conference. Filing a Notice of Appeal may prompt favorable reconsideration even before you file an Appeal Brief.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 20.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 10% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are rarely granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing a petition, as the Technology Center Director typically upholds this examiner's decisions.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 39% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 45% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Plan for RCE after final rejection: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments. Budget for an RCE in your prosecution strategy if you receive a final rejection.
  • Appeal filing as negotiation tool: This examiner frequently reconsiders rejections during the appeal process. Filing a Notice of Appeal may prompt favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.
  • Plan for extended prosecution: Applications take longer than average with this examiner. Factor this into your continuation strategy and client communications.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.