Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17106699 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING AN ALIMENTARY PREPARATION PROVIDER | November 2020 | November 2022 | Allow | 23 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17095972 | REPLACEMENT OF CONTENT ITEMS | November 2020 | March 2024 | Abandon | 40 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17093149 | SELLER VERIFICATION OF A REQUEST TO SELL AN EXCHANGE ITEM IN AN EXCHANGE ITEM MARKETPLACE NETWORK | November 2020 | August 2023 | Abandon | 34 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17087094 | Wirelessly Powered Electronic Display Apparatuses | November 2020 | April 2024 | Allow | 41 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17078927 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR TRADING VIRTUAL PET COMMODITY | October 2020 | September 2024 | Abandon | 47 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16979160 | COMPUTE RESOURCE EFFICIENT PERFORMANCE PRODUCT PROVISIONING | September 2020 | August 2023 | Abandon | 35 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16925881 | System and Method for Real-Time Garment Recommendations | July 2020 | November 2023 | Abandon | 40 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 16919103 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR INTEGRATING INTERMEDIARY AND END-USER ONLINE RETAIL EXPERIENCES | July 2020 | April 2023 | Abandon | 34 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16893105 | EXCHANGE FOR FRACTIONAL INTERESTS AND USAGE RIGHTS IN A COLLECTION OF ASSETS | June 2020 | June 2024 | Abandon | 48 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 16824498 | NETWORK-BASED SYSTEM FOR SHOWING CARS FOR SALE BY NON-DEALER VEHICLE OWNERS | March 2020 | March 2023 | Allow | 36 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16642898 | COMPUTER SYSTEM FOR SUGGESTING WINE TO DRINK WITH FOOD AND METHOD AND PROGRAM TO BE EXECUTED IN SAID COMPUTER SYSTEM | February 2020 | February 2023 | Abandon | 35 | 4 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 16795644 | APPARATUS, SYSTEM, AND METHOD FOR ELECTRONIC SOCIAL INTERACTION | February 2020 | March 2023 | Abandon | 37 | 0 | 1 | No | No |
| 16752761 | MACHINE LEARNING BASED INTELLIGENT PARTS CATALOG | January 2020 | June 2024 | Abandon | 53 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 16773727 | TECHNIQUES AND ARCHITECTURES FOR RECOMMENDING PRODUCTS BASED ON WORK ORDERS | January 2020 | August 2022 | Allow | 31 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16733765 | DYNAMIC ORDER PRIORITIZATION ENABLEMENT | January 2020 | January 2023 | Allow | 36 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16729281 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR RECOMMENDING TRANSPORTATION SERVICES | December 2019 | October 2023 | Abandon | 46 | 2 | 1 | No | No |
| 16706236 | Multi-Site Order Fulfillment with Single Gesture | December 2019 | August 2023 | Abandon | 44 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 16657052 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MANAGEMENT AND DELIVERY OF SHOPPABLE CONTENT DATA | October 2019 | June 2022 | Allow | 32 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 16653867 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROVIDING RECOMMENDATIONS BASED ON COLLABORATIVE AND/OR CONTENT-BASED NODAL INTERRELATIONSHIPS | October 2019 | December 2022 | Allow | 38 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16579051 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ESTABLISHING MESSAGE ROUTING PATHS THROUGH A COMPUTER NETWORK | September 2019 | January 2023 | Allow | 40 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16569209 | USING PLAIN TEXT TO LIST AN ITEM ON A PUBLICATION SYSTEM | September 2019 | March 2022 | Allow | 31 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16550011 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR PRODUCT SEARCHES | August 2019 | October 2022 | Abandon | 38 | 2 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 16538040 | DEEP COGNITIVE CONSTRAINED FILTERING FOR PRODUCT RECOMMENDATION | August 2019 | October 2022 | Allow | 38 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16531491 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR VERIFYING IDENTITY OF A USER ON AN EQUIPMENT ONLINE MARKETPLACE PLATFORM | August 2019 | December 2022 | Allow | 41 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 16446039 | SOCIAL SHOPPING EXPERIENCE UTILIZING INTERACTIVE MIRROR AND POLLING OF TARGET AUDIENCE MEMBERS IDENTIFIED BY A RELATIONSHIP WITH PRODUCT INFORMATION ABOUT AN ITEM BEING WORN BY A USER | June 2019 | October 2022 | Allow | 40 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16444074 | VIRTUALIZED DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM OFFERING VIRTUAL PRODUCTS OR SERVICES | June 2019 | May 2023 | Abandon | 47 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 16364874 | ITEM AND ACTION DETERMINATION | March 2019 | February 2024 | Allow | 58 | 4 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 16278711 | SYSTEM AND METHOD OF ORDERING AND AUTOMATED DELIVERY SYSTEM | February 2019 | December 2022 | Abandon | 45 | 2 | 1 | No | No |
| 16274043 | DYNAMIC CHECKOUT PAGE OPTIMIZATION USING MACHINE-LEARNED MODEL | February 2019 | July 2022 | Allow | 41 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16265323 | MESSAGE-LESS B2B TRANSACTION PROCESSING | February 2019 | November 2022 | Allow | 46 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16201945 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR QUICK TRANSACTIONS | November 2018 | June 2022 | Allow | 43 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16121176 | Method and System of Obtaining a Bid For Services | September 2018 | December 2022 | Abandon | 51 | 2 | 1 | No | No |
| 16007056 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR GENERATING MULTIPLE USER PROFILES FOR PERSONALIZED RECOMMENDATIONS | June 2018 | November 2023 | Abandon | 60 | 5 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 16060824 | A SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ATTRIBUTING A PURCHASE TO A USER BY USER DEVICE LOCATION | June 2018 | August 2022 | Allow | 51 | 2 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 15339897 | User-Assisted Processing of Receipts and Invoices | October 2016 | December 2022 | Abandon | 60 | 4 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 15223300 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR ONLINE SHOPPING FOR SCHOOL SUPPLIES BASED ON GENERIC LISTS PROVIDED BY TEACHERS FOR SEARCHING AND SELECTION BY USERS | July 2016 | August 2022 | Allow | 60 | 6 | 1 | Yes | Yes |
| 14806297 | LOCALIZED SORT OF RANKED PRODUCT RECOMMENDATIONS BASED ON PREDICTED USER INTENT | July 2015 | January 2023 | Allow | 60 | 7 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14742103 | METHOD FOR COST EFFICIENT FULFILLMENT | June 2015 | July 2023 | Abandon | 60 | 7 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 14411882 | LOTTERY SYNDICATE SYSTEM | December 2014 | March 2019 | Abandon | 51 | 7 | 0 | Yes | No |
This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner LEVINE, ADAM L.
With a 0.0% reversal rate, the PTAB affirms the examiner's rejections in the vast majority of cases. This reversal rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals face significant challenges here.
Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.
In this dataset, 40.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is above the USPTO average, suggesting that filing an appeal can be an effective strategy for prompting reconsideration.
⚠ Appeals to PTAB face challenges. Ensure your case has strong merit before committing to full Board review.
✓ Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.
Examiner LEVINE, ADAM L works in Art Unit 3684 and has examined 39 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 48.7%, this examiner allows applications at a lower rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 41 months.
Examiner LEVINE, ADAM L's allowance rate of 48.7% places them in the 12% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is less likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by LEVINE, ADAM L receive 2.77 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 77% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by LEVINE, ADAM L is 41 months. This places the examiner in the 22% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +46.7% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by LEVINE, ADAM L. This interview benefit is in the 90% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner and should be strongly considered as a prosecution strategy. Per MPEP § 713.10, interviews are available at any time before the Notice of Allowance is mailed or jurisdiction transfers to the PTAB.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 21.9% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 29% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show below-average effectiveness with this examiner. Carefully evaluate whether an RCE or continuation is the better strategy.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 19.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 24% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.
When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 0.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 20% percentile among all examiners. Note: Pre-appeal conferences show limited success with this examiner compared to others. While still worth considering, be prepared to proceed with a full appeal brief if the PAC does not result in favorable action.
This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 50.0% of appeals filed. This is in the 21% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: This examiner rarely withdraws rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. If you file an appeal, be prepared to fully prosecute it to a PTAB decision. Per MPEP § 1207, the examiner will prepare an Examiner's Answer maintaining the rejections.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 33.3% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 20% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are rarely granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing a petition, as the Technology Center Director typically upholds this examiner's decisions.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 39% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 44% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.