USPTO Examiner WEBB JESSICA MARIE - Art Unit 3683

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
18614062CAREGIVER SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR INTERFACING WITH AND CONTROLLING A MEDICATION DISPENSING DEVICEMarch 2024May 2025Allow1430YesNo
18469433REMOTE DIAGNOSTIC TESTING AND TREATMENTSeptember 2023January 2026Abandon2810NoNo
18278215A Privacy Enabled System And Method For Managing Logistics For Clinical Study ParticipantsAugust 2023January 2026Abandon2910NoNo
18230328METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR CONDUCTING PREGNANCY-RELATED CLINICAL TRIALSAugust 2023December 2025Abandon2910NoNo
18219683MAPPING BIOMEDICAL ENTITIESJuly 2023November 2025Abandon2910NoNo
18336125METHODS FOR QUALITY OF LIFE ASSESSMENT IN COMPANION ANIMALSJune 2023February 2026Abandon3220NoNo
18325980INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND PROGRAMMay 2023December 2025Abandon3120NoNo
18168210REMOTE DIAGNOSTIC TESTING AND TREATMENTFebruary 2023September 2025Abandon3110NoNo
18101372SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING REAL-TIME PRESCRIPTION SHARING AND DISPENSING INFORMATION MONITORING SERVICE BASED ON BLOCKCHAIN NETWORKJanuary 2023September 2025Abandon3210NoNo
18089593AI-BASED CUSTOMIZED MEDICAL INFORMATION PROVISION SYSTEM AND METHODDecember 2022September 2025Abandon3310NoNo
17755516METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR BLOCKCHAIN-BASED MEDICINE-TAKING MANAGEMENT FOR CLINICAL TRIAL SUBJECTDecember 2022August 2025Abandon3910NoNo
17913203IDENTIFYING HIGH COST IMAGING PROCEDURES HAVING SCOPE FOR OPERATIONAL AND FINANCIAL IMPROVEMENTSeptember 2022June 2025Abandon3310NoNo
17941898SINGLE BARCODE SCAN CAST SYSTEM FOR PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTSSeptember 2022January 2026Allow4020YesNo
17939947SYSTEM FOR PROVIDING HEALTH INFORMATION THROUGH CUSTOMIZED SEARCH THAT REFLECTS INDIVIDUAL HEALTH CONDITIONS, AND OPERATION METHOD THEREOFSeptember 2022April 2025Abandon3210NoNo
17882070SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR IDENTIFYING TREATABLE AND REMEDIABLE FACTORS OF DEMENTIA AND AGING COGNITIVE CHANGESAugust 2022October 2025Abandon3820NoNo
17866286INTELLIGENT MEDICAL ASSESSMENT AND COMMUNICATION SYSTEM WITH ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCEJuly 2022September 2025Allow3820YesNo
17865250System and Method of Facilitating Digital Therapy for Long-Term Neuropsychological RehabilitationJuly 2022December 2024Abandon2910NoNo
17660573Electronic Prescription SystemApril 2022October 2024Abandon3010NoNo
17724908REFERENTIAL DATA GROUPING AND TOKENIZATION FOR LONGITUDINAL USE OF DE-IDENTIFIED DATAApril 2022March 2025Allow3530YesNo
17655515METHOD FOR RECOMMENDING CONTINUING EDUCATION TO HEALTH PROFESSIONALS BASED ON PATIENT OUTCOMESMarch 2022September 2024Allow3010NoNo
17687326SYSTEM, METHOD, AND APPARATUS FOR PROVIDING REMOTE HEALTHCAREMarch 2022October 2024Abandon3110NoNo
17674323ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD INTEROPERABILITY TOOLFebruary 2022June 2025Allow4020NoNo
17634277PATIENT-BASED DIETARY PLAN RECOMMENDATION SYSTEMFebruary 2022June 2025Abandon4130YesNo
17669171SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SIGNALING COGNITIVE-STATE TRANSITIONSFebruary 2022February 2025Abandon3620YesNo
17381954PERSONAL AND CORPORATE PATHOGEN-RISK ASSESSMENT WITH PANDEMIC-BIO-SURVEILLANCE MULTI PATHOGEN SYSTEMSJuly 2021February 2025Abandon4220NoYes
17215044DIAGNOSTIC DEVICE FOR REMOTE CONSULTATIONS AND TELEMEDICINEMarch 2021August 2024Allow4150YesYes
17194073HEALTH MONITORING SYSTEM SUPPORTING CONFIGURABLE HEALTH STUDIESMarch 2021April 2025Abandon4950NoNo
17183741INTERACTIVE SURGICAL SYSTEMS WITH ENCRYPTED COMMUNICATION CAPABILITIESFebruary 2021December 2025Abandon5840YesNo
17163429TRIAL DESIGN WITH CONVEX-HULL TECHNIQUESJanuary 2021October 2024Abandon4520YesNo
17163432ROBUST TRIAL DESIGN PLATFORMJanuary 2021November 2024Abandon4640YesNo
17100324GENERATING DYNAMIC ELECTRONIC USER NOTIFICATIONS TO FACILITATE SAFE PRESCRIPTION USENovember 2020October 2024Abandon4720YesNo
16918876MULTI-SIDED MATCH MAKING PLATFORMSJuly 2020August 2024Allow4960YesNo
16351230PROJECTED FLAP DESIGNMarch 2019September 2025Abandon6060YesYes
16351299METHOD OF AND SYSTEM FOR IMPAIRMENT RATING REPAIR FOR THE MANAGED IMPAIRMENT REPAIR PROCESSMarch 2019August 2024Allow6090YesNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner WEBB, JESSICA MARIE.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
2
Examiner Affirmed
2
(100.0%)
Examiner Reversed
0
(0.0%)
Reversal Percentile
17.8%
Lower than average

What This Means

With a 0.0% reversal rate, the PTAB affirms the examiner's rejections in the vast majority of cases. This reversal rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals face significant challenges here.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
3
Allowed After Appeal Filing
0
(0.0%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
3
(100.0%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
9.8%
Lower than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 0.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is less effective here than in most other areas.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB face challenges. Ensure your case has strong merit before committing to full Board review.

Filing a Notice of Appeal shows limited benefit. Consider other strategies like interviews or amendments before appealing.

Examiner WEBB, JESSICA MARIE - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner WEBB, JESSICA MARIE works in Art Unit 3683 and has examined 10 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 30.0%, this examiner allows applications at a lower rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 49 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner WEBB, JESSICA MARIE's allowance rate of 30.0% places them in the 4% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is less likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by WEBB, JESSICA MARIE receive 4.50 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 99% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by WEBB, JESSICA MARIE is 49 months. This places the examiner in the 7% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +37.5% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by WEBB, JESSICA MARIE. This interview benefit is in the 85% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner and should be strongly considered as a prosecution strategy. Per MPEP § 713.10, interviews are available at any time before the Notice of Allowance is mailed or jurisdiction transfers to the PTAB.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 10.0% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 5% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show lower effectiveness with this examiner compared to others. Consider whether a continuation application might be more strategic, especially if you need to add new matter or significantly broaden claims.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 0.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 3% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 33.3% of appeals filed. This is in the 5% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: This examiner rarely withdraws rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. If you file an appeal, be prepared to fully prosecute it to a PTAB decision. Per MPEP § 1207, the examiner will prepare an Examiner's Answer maintaining the rejections.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 0.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 6% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are rarely granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing a petition, as the Technology Center Director typically upholds this examiner's decisions.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 40% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 43% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Prepare for rigorous examination: With a below-average allowance rate, ensure your application has strong written description and enablement support. Consider filing a continuation if you need to add new matter.
  • Expect multiple rounds of prosecution: This examiner issues more office actions than average. Address potential issues proactively in your initial response and consider requesting an interview early in prosecution.
  • Prioritize examiner interviews: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner. Request an interview after the first office action to clarify issues and potentially expedite allowance.
  • Plan for RCE after final rejection: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments. Budget for an RCE in your prosecution strategy if you receive a final rejection.
  • Plan for extended prosecution: Applications take longer than average with this examiner. Factor this into your continuation strategy and client communications.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.