Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17113783 | PERSONALIZED VISUAL PRESENTATION OF JOB SKILLS | December 2020 | February 2023 | Allow | 26 | 2 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 17250036 | OIL FIELD RESOURCE ALLOCATION USING MACHINE LEARNING AND OPTIMIZATION | November 2020 | October 2023 | Allow | 35 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16949596 | GOAL OPTIMIZED PROCESS SCHEDULER | November 2020 | March 2024 | Abandon | 40 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17088639 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PREDICTING DESTINATION IN ONLINE TO OFFLINE SERVICE | November 2020 | August 2023 | Abandon | 33 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17085242 | APPARATUS FOR PROCESSING WORK OBJECT AND METHOD PERFORMING THE SAME | October 2020 | August 2022 | Allow | 22 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17075555 | INTELLIGENT EDGE STATE OPTIMIZATION WITHIN ENTERPRISE WITH ZERO DATA EXHAUST | October 2020 | May 2022 | Allow | 18 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17065422 | System and Method for Measuring Service Performance | October 2020 | November 2022 | Abandon | 25 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16948837 | DYNAMIC FORMATION OF INSIDE SALES TEAM OR EXPERT SUPPORT TEAM | October 2020 | September 2022 | Allow | 23 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17038764 | Retail User Interface for Dynamic Behavior Configuration | September 2020 | September 2022 | Allow | 24 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17028454 | OPTIMIZATION OF ORDER FULFILLMENT CONDITIONS | September 2020 | August 2022 | Allow | 22 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17027160 | PRICE OPTIMIZATION SYSTEM | September 2020 | April 2023 | Allow | 30 | 2 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 17025521 | BUILDING TOPIC-ORIENTED AUDIENCES | September 2020 | October 2023 | Abandon | 37 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 17024495 | INDEXING ENTITIES BASED ON PERFORMANCE METRICS | September 2020 | January 2022 | Allow | 16 | 1 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 17023895 | SYSTEM FOR CLIENT AND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT IN THE ELECTRONIC DEVICE REPAIR INDUSTRY | September 2020 | May 2024 | Abandon | 44 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17022741 | JOB QUALITY INDEX SYSTEM | September 2020 | January 2024 | Abandon | 40 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17014766 | MERCHANT INCREMENTAL ELECTRONIC IMPACT VALUE PREDICTION AND RANKING USING MULTIPLE MACHINE LEARNING MODELS | September 2020 | October 2022 | Allow | 25 | 2 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 17005640 | AUTOMATED WORKFLOWS ENABLING SELECTIVE INTERACTION WITH USERS | August 2020 | March 2024 | Allow | 43 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17006427 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DIGITAL SHELF DISPLAY | August 2020 | September 2022 | Allow | 24 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16969179 | WORK PLAN MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND COMPONENT MOUNTING SYSTEM | August 2020 | February 2022 | Allow | 18 | 1 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 16984581 | OPTIMIZED ESTIMATES FOR SUPPORT CHARACTERISTICS FOR OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS | August 2020 | August 2022 | Allow | 25 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16941750 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR VALIDATING A CANDIDATE RECOMMENDATION MODEL | July 2020 | August 2022 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 16940769 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR MULTISTAGE CANDIDATE RANKING | July 2020 | April 2023 | Allow | 33 | 2 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 16922187 | HIERARCHICAL OPTIMIZATION FOR PROCESSING OBJECTIVES SEQUENTIALLY AND/OR ITERATIVELY | July 2020 | January 2022 | Allow | 18 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16918668 | ANALYZING CROP FIELDS BASED ON AGRICULTURAL MANAGEMENT PRACTICES | July 2020 | December 2021 | Allow | 18 | 1 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 16915708 | BENEFIT SURRENDER PREDICTION | June 2020 | January 2022 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16911926 | PRESENTING PROJECT DATA MANAGED BY A CONTENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM | June 2020 | May 2024 | Allow | 47 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16909636 | METHOD OF SELECTING QUESTIONS FOR RESPONDENTS IN A RESPONDENT-INTERROGATOR SYSTEM | June 2020 | January 2023 | Abandon | 31 | 0 | 1 | No | No |
| 16909754 | TRACKING AND FAULT DETERMINATION IN COMPLEX SERVICE ENVIRONMENT | June 2020 | October 2023 | Allow | 40 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 16903492 | COMPUTER-IMPLEMENTED METHOD FOR CALCULATING A REFERENCE SALES PRICE FOR A COMPLEX INDUSTRIAL PRODUCT TO BE MANUFACTURED AT INDUSTRIAL LEVEL | June 2020 | April 2022 | Allow | 22 | 2 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 16902902 | Providing Industry Access to Proprietary Fisheries Dependent Data While Preserving Confidentiality Rights and Using Same to Provide Verification of Supply Chain Data | June 2020 | June 2022 | Abandon | 24 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16898303 | ADOPTION ANALYTIC BASED FUNCTIONALITY | June 2020 | April 2022 | Allow | 22 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16898034 | SYSTEM FOR AUTOMATED AND INTELLIGENT ANALYSIS OF DATA KEYS ASSOCIATED WITH AN INFORMATION SOURCE | June 2020 | October 2022 | Allow | 29 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16895166 | VOICE ENABLED ASSISTANT FOR COMMUNITY DEMAND FULFILLMENT | June 2020 | February 2022 | Allow | 20 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16892238 | VIDEO ANALYSIS OF FOOD SERVICE COUNTER OPERATIONS | June 2020 | January 2022 | Allow | 19 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16885004 | MANAGING SALES OPPORTUNITIES WITHIN AN ORGANIZATION | May 2020 | July 2021 | Allow | 13 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16882636 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MEASURING TRAFFIC DENSITY IN A REGION | May 2020 | February 2023 | Allow | 33 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15929816 | CONSUMER RESPONSE INTELLIGENT SPEND PREDICTION SYSTEM | May 2020 | September 2021 | Abandon | 16 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16859341 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR CONTROLLING A DISPLAY SCREEN WITH GRAPHICAL OBJECTS FOR SCHEDULING | April 2020 | March 2022 | Allow | 23 | 2 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 16857038 | Method for the Organizing and Provision of Student Sourced Services | April 2020 | January 2024 | Abandon | 45 | 2 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 16855162 | FORECASTING METHODS | April 2020 | January 2023 | Abandon | 33 | 2 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 16853509 | JOB VALUE MODEL GENERATION METHOD AND SYSTEM | April 2020 | September 2023 | Allow | 41 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16850600 | ASSET MANAGEMENT EXPERT PEER IDENTIFICATION | April 2020 | November 2021 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16849744 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR IMPROVING HUMAN-CENTRIC PROCESSES | April 2020 | April 2022 | Allow | 24 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16842277 | PROVIDING ACTION ITEMS FOR AN ACTIVITY BASED ON SIMILAR PAST ACTIVITIES | April 2020 | March 2024 | Abandon | 48 | 2 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 16817242 | ENTITY SCORING CALIBRATION | March 2020 | April 2022 | Allow | 25 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16817473 | DETERMINING USER INTENTS RELATED TO WEBSITES BASED ON SITE SEARCH USER BEHAVIOR | March 2020 | March 2022 | Abandon | 24 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16798326 | APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR GENERATING A MOTOR DIAGNOSIS MODEL | February 2020 | May 2023 | Abandon | 39 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16736482 | Self Encrypting/Decrypting Algorithm to create a System and Process for Secure and Rapid Exchange and Management of Arbitrary Personal or Business Data | January 2020 | March 2022 | Abandon | 26 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 16732046 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ALLOCATING SERVICE REQUESTS | December 2019 | February 2022 | Abandon | 25 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16729971 | EXPLAINABLE PROCESS PREDICTION | December 2019 | July 2023 | Allow | 43 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16707748 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR MACHINE LEARNING BASED ITEM MATCHING BY CONSIDERING USER MINDSET | December 2019 | August 2021 | Allow | 20 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16698167 | MEDIA DEVICE ON/OFF DETECTION USING RETURN PATH DATA | November 2019 | March 2023 | Allow | 39 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 16672153 | METHOD FOR COMPUTATIONAL MODELLING AND ANALYSIS OF THE SKILLS AND COMPETENCIES OF INDIVIDUALS | November 2019 | April 2022 | Allow | 30 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16593503 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR COMMUTE ANALYSIS AND MODELING | October 2019 | July 2021 | Allow | 21 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16585183 | DEATH CARE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND METHOD | September 2019 | October 2021 | Abandon | 24 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16558819 | UNIFIED EVENT/TASK CREATION FROM AUTO GENERATED ENTERPRISE COMMUNICATION CHANNELS AND NOTIFICATIONS | September 2019 | March 2022 | Allow | 31 | 2 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 16555129 | SYSTEM WITH TASK ANALYSIS FRAMEWORK DISPLAY TO FACILITATE UPDATE OF ELECTRONIC RECORD INFORMATION | August 2019 | December 2022 | Allow | 40 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16550960 | REYADA SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT, COMMUNICATION, STRATEGIC PLANNING, AND STRATEGY EXECUTION | August 2019 | April 2021 | Allow | 20 | 0 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 16542450 | OPTIMIZING REGISTRATION FIELDS WITH USER ENGAGEMENT SCORE | August 2019 | November 2023 | Allow | 51 | 4 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 16532010 | STEP ANALYSIS PROCESS STEPS WITHIN A FLEET PERFORMANCE OPTIMIZATION TOOL | August 2019 | May 2021 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16525061 | DETERMINING SHOPPING DURATION BASED ON A MOVEMENT OF A USER DEVICE AND TRANSACTION DATA | July 2019 | January 2021 | Allow | 18 | 2 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 16508070 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GENERATING A TWO-DIMENSIONAL PLANOGRAM BASED ON INTERMEDIATE DATA STRUCTURES | July 2019 | August 2021 | Allow | 26 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 16445574 | IDENTIFYING GEOGRAPHIC MARKET SHARE | June 2019 | June 2023 | Allow | 48 | 4 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 16442631 | RULES BASED DRIVER SELECTION | June 2019 | August 2021 | Allow | 26 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16421525 | DYNAMIC RANKING OF RECOMMENDATION PAIRINGS | May 2019 | February 2022 | Allow | 33 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16389493 | Intelligent Decision Synchronization in Real Time for both Discrete and Continuous Process Industries | April 2019 | September 2020 | Allow | 17 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 16334026 | CEPHALOPOD FISHERY FORECASTING METHOD IN NORTHWEST AFRICAN WATERS BASED ON ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS | March 2019 | January 2022 | Abandon | 34 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16276894 | MULTI-LAYER CYBER-PHYSICAL SYSTEMS SIMULATION PLATFORM | February 2019 | August 2022 | Allow | 42 | 1 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 16267594 | SERVER TOOL | February 2019 | November 2020 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16267710 | COGNITIVE LABOR FORECASTING | February 2019 | January 2021 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16323288 | A WEB-BASED METHOD FOR ENHANCED ANALYSIS OF ANALYTICS SETUP AND DATA | February 2019 | September 2021 | Abandon | 31 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16238576 | BUSINESS FORECASTING USING PREDICTIVE METADATA | January 2019 | April 2021 | Allow | 28 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16165333 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR ENGINEER-TO-ORDER PLANNING AND MATERIALS FLOW CONTROL AND OPTIMIZATION | October 2018 | July 2021 | Abandon | 33 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16350231 | System and method for distributing sports officiating opportunities | October 2018 | June 2021 | Abandon | 32 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 16128000 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR A CUSTOMER ENGAGEMENT PLATFORM TO INCREASE RESIDENTIAL WATER USE EFFICIENCY | September 2018 | February 2021 | Abandon | 29 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16046975 | SYSTEM AND METHOD OF USER BEHAVIOR BASED SERVICE DISPATCH | July 2018 | August 2020 | Allow | 25 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16011484 | DOUBLE-BLIND RESEARCH PORTAL | June 2018 | September 2020 | Allow | 27 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15986525 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR IDENTIFYING OUTLIER DATA IN INDEXED SPECIALTY PROPERTY DATA | May 2018 | July 2021 | Abandon | 38 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 15986509 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR GENERATING INDEXED SPECIALTY PROPERTY DATA INFLUENCED BY GEOGRAPHIC, ECONOMETRIC AND DEMOGRAPHIC DATA | May 2018 | July 2021 | Abandon | 38 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 15986547 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR GENERATING INDEXED SPECIALTY PROPERTY DATA FROM TRANSACTIONAL MOVE-IN DATA | May 2018 | May 2021 | Abandon | 35 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 15984039 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR GENERATING SPECIALTY PROPERTY DEMAND INDEX | May 2018 | April 2021 | Abandon | 35 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 15984099 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR GENERATING SAME PROPERTY COST GROWTH ESTIMATE IN CHANGING INVENTORY OF SPECIALTY PROPERTY | May 2018 | June 2021 | Abandon | 37 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 15984054 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR GENERATING SPECIALTY PROPERTY COST INDEX | May 2018 | April 2021 | Abandon | 35 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 15984084 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR GENERATING COST ESTIMATES FOR SPECIALTY PROPERTY | May 2018 | May 2021 | Abandon | 36 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 15962218 | IDENTIFYING GEOGRAPHIC MARKET SHARE | April 2018 | December 2021 | Abandon | 43 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15962843 | CONTROL OF PLANT-GROWING FACILITIES AND WORKFORCES | April 2018 | November 2022 | Abandon | 55 | 2 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 15962284 | Business Management System | April 2018 | April 2021 | Allow | 36 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 15961285 | BUSINESS INSIGHT GENERATION SYSTEM | April 2018 | May 2023 | Abandon | 60 | 4 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 15960897 | MARKET ANALYSIS SYSTEM | April 2018 | January 2021 | Allow | 33 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15961506 | PRICE OPTIMIZATION SYSTEM | April 2018 | December 2020 | Allow | 31 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 15960959 | INVENTORY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM | April 2018 | May 2021 | Allow | 37 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15302610 | METHOD FOR SELECTING PETFOODS HAVING A PALATABILITY EFFECT AND A CALORIE INTAKE REDUCING EFFECT FOR PETS | April 2018 | October 2020 | Abandon | 48 | 2 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 15943107 | GIS DATA APPLIANCE FOR IDENTIFYING AND COMPARING DATA ASSOCIATED WITH GEOGRAPHIC REGIONS | April 2018 | March 2021 | Abandon | 35 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15933344 | CONSUMER RESPONSE INTELLIGENT SPEND PREDICTION SYSTEM | March 2018 | March 2021 | Abandon | 36 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 15928888 | ASSOCIATION METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM | March 2018 | July 2020 | Allow | 28 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 15933358 | Method and System for Brokering Land Surveys | March 2018 | October 2020 | Abandon | 31 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 15933249 | COMPUTER SUPPORT FOR MEETINGS | March 2018 | May 2021 | Allow | 37 | 2 | 1 | No | No |
| 15928981 | SYSTEM FOR EXAMINING SERVICE CERTIFICATIONS WITH MULTI-SIDES BASED ON CUSTOMER EXPERIENCES | March 2018 | April 2020 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15928062 | OPTIMIZATION METHOD AND SYSTEM OF MATCHING PRODUCT EXPERIENCING ACTIVITY WITH PARTICIPANTS | March 2018 | September 2021 | Abandon | 42 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 15928063 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR FORECASTING PRODUCT SALES ON MODEL-FREE PREDICTION BASIS | March 2018 | December 2020 | Abandon | 33 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner WAESCO, JOSEPH M.
With a 11.1% reversal rate, the PTAB affirms the examiner's rejections in the vast majority of cases. This reversal rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals face significant challenges here.
Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.
In this dataset, 8.5% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is less effective here than in most other areas.
⚠ Appeals to PTAB face challenges. Ensure your case has strong merit before committing to full Board review.
⚠ Filing a Notice of Appeal shows limited benefit. Consider other strategies like interviews or amendments before appealing.
Examiner WAESCO, JOSEPH M works in Art Unit 3683 and has examined 278 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 48.6%, this examiner allows applications at a lower rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 40 months.
Examiner WAESCO, JOSEPH M's allowance rate of 48.6% places them in the 12% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is less likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by WAESCO, JOSEPH M receive 2.71 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 75% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by WAESCO, JOSEPH M is 40 months. This places the examiner in the 25% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +35.8% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by WAESCO, JOSEPH M. This interview benefit is in the 83% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner and should be strongly considered as a prosecution strategy. Per MPEP § 713.10, interviews are available at any time before the Notice of Allowance is mailed or jurisdiction transfers to the PTAB.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 20.9% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 26% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show below-average effectiveness with this examiner. Carefully evaluate whether an RCE or continuation is the better strategy.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 0.8% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 5% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.
When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 0.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 20% percentile among all examiners. Note: Pre-appeal conferences show limited success with this examiner compared to others. While still worth considering, be prepared to proceed with a full appeal brief if the PAC does not result in favorable action.
This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 16.3% of appeals filed. This is in the 2% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 28.6% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner rarely withdraws rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. If you file an appeal, be prepared to fully prosecute it to a PTAB decision. Per MPEP § 1207, the examiner will prepare an Examiner's Answer maintaining the rejections.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 41.7% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 31% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions show below-average success regarding this examiner's actions. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 38% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 44% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.