Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17126826 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PROCESSING RISK-MANAGEMENT FEATURE FACTORS, ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND STORAGE MEDIUM | December 2020 | October 2022 | Allow | 22 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17113893 | MANAGING RECURRING CALENDAR EVENTS | December 2020 | May 2024 | Abandon | 41 | 6 | 0 | No | No |
| 17090119 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR AUTOMATICALLY PREPARING DOCUMENTATION | November 2020 | September 2023 | Abandon | 35 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17087895 | LEVERAGING BLOCKCHAIN BASED MACHINE LEARNING MODELING FOR EXPENSE CATEGORIZATION | November 2020 | July 2022 | Allow | 21 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17074907 | SYSTEM AND METHOD TO DYNAMICALLY MANAGE AND OPTIMIZE PROCUREMENT | October 2020 | February 2023 | Abandon | 28 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17075060 | POSITION-CENTRIC PERSONNEL ASSESSMENT APPARATUS AND METHOD | October 2020 | October 2021 | Allow | 12 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17031623 | TECHNOLOGY OPPORTUNITY MAPPING | September 2020 | June 2024 | Allow | 45 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17030135 | OPTIMIZATION TECHNIQUES FOR CONTENT PRESENTATION STRATEGIES | September 2020 | August 2023 | Allow | 35 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17016830 | Personal Corporate Survey Chatbot Management | September 2020 | August 2023 | Abandon | 35 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17007774 | METHODS AND APPARATUS TO ESTIMATE CARDINALITY OF USERS REPRESENTED IN ARBITRARILY DISTRIBUTED BLOOM FILTERS | August 2020 | January 2023 | Allow | 28 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17008407 | UTILIZING MACHINE LEARNING MODELS TO DETERMINE AND RECOMMEND NEW RELEASES FROM CLOUD PROVIDERS TO CUSTOMERS | August 2020 | March 2023 | Allow | 31 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16991883 | MANAGEMENT OF VEHICLES ON PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE | August 2020 | August 2021 | Abandon | 12 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 16991247 | PEST AND AGRONOMIC CONDITION PREDICTION AND ALERTS ENGINE | August 2020 | January 2023 | Allow | 29 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16946951 | UTILIZING SIMILARITY, KNOWLEDGE GRAPHS, AND MACHINE LEARNING MODELS TO REFINE/REDEFINE A TARGET SKILL PROFILE BASED ON SKILLS DATA FROM EMPLOYEES OF AN ENTITY AND ACTIVATE A RECOMMENDATION SYSTEM | July 2020 | December 2023 | Allow | 41 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16851872 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETERMINATION OF RECOMMENDATIONS AND ALERTS IN AN ANALYTICS ENVIRONMENT | April 2020 | December 2023 | Allow | 44 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 16830771 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AUTOMATED TAGGING FOR SCHEDULING EVENTS | March 2020 | March 2023 | Abandon | 36 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16795198 | ADVERTISEMENT ENGAGEMENT MEASUREMENT | February 2020 | October 2022 | Allow | 32 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16639133 | APPARATUS, METHOD, PROGRAM, SIGNAL FOR DETERMINING INTERVENTION EFFECTIVENESS INDEX | February 2020 | July 2022 | Abandon | 29 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16782753 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MANAGING ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURES | February 2020 | October 2022 | Allow | 33 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 16699372 | SERVER SUPPORTED MOBILE APPLICATION FOR SCHEDULING OR CONDUCTING TRANSACTIONS | November 2019 | January 2023 | Abandon | 38 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 16682823 | FEATURE-BASED ITEM SIMILARITY AND FORECASTING SYSTEM | November 2019 | June 2022 | Abandon | 31 | 0 | 1 | No | No |
| 16682091 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ASSISTING USERS IN ASSESSING COSTS OF TRANSACTIONS | November 2019 | February 2021 | Allow | 15 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16587133 | MANAGEMENT AND AGGREGATION OF TICKET DATA FROM MULTIPLE SOURCES | September 2019 | December 2023 | Abandon | 51 | 4 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 16587358 | MANAGEMENT OF TICKETS AND RESOLUTION PROCESSES FOR AN INDUSTRIAL AUTOMATION ENVIRONMENT | September 2019 | November 2023 | Abandon | 50 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16584677 | Presenting Context-Based Guidance using Electronic Signs | September 2019 | June 2022 | Allow | 32 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16533277 | PLANNING AND SCHEDULING TOOL ASSISTANT | August 2019 | March 2022 | Abandon | 32 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16456386 | INFORMATION ACQUISITION METHOD, INFORMATION ACQUISITION SYSTEM, AND INFORMATION ACQUISITION APPARATUS | June 2019 | June 2023 | Abandon | 48 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16405632 | DECLARATIVE RULE-BASED DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM | May 2019 | September 2022 | Allow | 41 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16282565 | Root Cause Identification and Analysis | February 2019 | January 2024 | Allow | 59 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16275194 | RISK PROFILING FOR ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT | February 2019 | November 2021 | Allow | 34 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 16274620 | Method and Apparatus for Interactive Vehicle Service Reception | February 2019 | November 2020 | Abandon | 21 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16270411 | USER INTERFACE FOR PROVIDING A USER WITH THE ABILITY TO VIEW JOB ASSIGNMENT INFORMATION | February 2019 | January 2022 | Abandon | 35 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 16251792 | Method and Apparatus for Interactive Vehicle Service Reception | January 2019 | November 2020 | Abandon | 22 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16235416 | Workflow Management System and Method for Creating and Modifying Workflows | December 2018 | September 2022 | Abandon | 44 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 16234820 | COMPUTER-READABLE RECORDING MEDIUM, DEMAND FORECASTING METHOD AND DEMAND FORECASTING APPARATUS | December 2018 | September 2022 | Abandon | 44 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 16234377 | SEQUENCE MODELING FOR SEARCHES | December 2018 | January 2022 | Allow | 37 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16234354 | INFORMATION SYSTEM, ELECTRONIC DEVICE, COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM, AND INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD | December 2018 | January 2022 | Abandon | 37 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 16313483 | TASK EXECUTION ORDER DETERMINATION SYSTEM AND TASK EXECUTION METHOD | December 2018 | November 2022 | Abandon | 47 | 3 | 1 | No | No |
| 16306023 | DECISION METHOD OF CONDITION-BASED MAINTENANCE TO POWER GRID RISK | November 2018 | June 2022 | Abandon | 43 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 16183288 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR INTEGRATING SPECULATIVE DECISION-MAKING IN CROSS-PLATFORM REAL-TIME DECISION-MAKING SYSTEMS | November 2018 | March 2023 | Abandon | 52 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16174134 | SYSTEM TO DYNAMICALLY MANAGE AND OPTIMIZE THE UTILIZATION OF OUTDOOR ADVERTISING UNITS | October 2018 | January 2021 | Abandon | 26 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16146043 | Career Pivot Intelligence | September 2018 | February 2021 | Abandon | 29 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16145820 | COGNITIVE USER INTERFACE FOR TECHNICAL ISSUE DETECTION BY PROCESS BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS FOR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICE WORKLOADS | September 2018 | October 2021 | Allow | 37 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16147133 | METHODS AND APPARATUS TO COLLECT AND ANALYZE RATING INFORMATION | September 2018 | December 2021 | Allow | 39 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16048594 | SOFTWARE PROGRAM SYSTEM | July 2018 | June 2024 | Abandon | 60 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16031441 | Extraordinary Calendar Events | July 2018 | October 2021 | Abandon | 39 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16031042 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IMPLEMENTING ACTIONS BASED ON ACTIVITY DATA ACQUIRED DURING A POINT OF SALE FUNCTION | July 2018 | March 2023 | Abandon | 56 | 5 | 0 | No | No |
| 16030598 | TEAM PERFORMANCE SUPERVISOR | July 2018 | September 2022 | Abandon | 50 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16030301 | DATA RECONCILIATION | July 2018 | January 2021 | Allow | 31 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16013719 | MACHINE LEARNING FOR MARKETING OF BRANDED CONSUMER PRODUCTS | June 2018 | September 2021 | Allow | 38 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15988247 | OPERATIONAL RECOMMENDATIONS BASED ON MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL INPUTS | May 2018 | January 2022 | Abandon | 44 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 15989076 | DEMAND FORECAST | May 2018 | January 2021 | Abandon | 31 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15987961 | DETERMINING ROOM SERVICE TIMES BASED ON LOCK AUDIT RECORDS | May 2018 | March 2022 | Abandon | 46 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15989136 | Systems And Methods For Improved Monitoring Of Energy And Water Consumption | May 2018 | December 2020 | Abandon | 30 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15987542 | COMPETENCY GAP IDENTIFICATION OF AN OPERATORS RESPONSE TO VARIOUS PROCESS CONTROL AND MAINTENANCE CONDITIONS | May 2018 | December 2021 | Abandon | 43 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15850574 | Image processing and information extraction system and method for workflow processing of purchase request semantic models | December 2017 | November 2020 | Abandon | 35 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15850946 | LOGISTICS SYSTEM AND PROCESS FOR STREAMLINING SURGERIES WITHIN A HOSPITAL AND OTHER WORKFLOW ENVIRONMENTS THAT OPERATE IN A VENDOR/MANUFACTURER MODEL | December 2017 | June 2020 | Abandon | 29 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15850418 | SYSTEM FOR AUTOMATING UPDATING INVENTORY PRICING AND ADVERTISEMENTS | December 2017 | December 2021 | Abandon | 48 | 2 | 1 | No | No |
| 15850900 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ANALYZING PATRON SATISFACTION DATA | December 2017 | September 2021 | Abandon | 45 | 2 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 15849745 | Composing Microservices through Workflows for Applications in Engineering Design and Manufacturing | December 2017 | August 2022 | Abandon | 56 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 15739079 | Recruitment and Selection System, Method of Selecting and Recruiting an Interviewer, and Mobile Electronic Device | December 2017 | November 2020 | Abandon | 35 | 0 | 1 | No | No |
| 15827324 | DETERMINING MUSIC TO INFLUENCE CUSTOMER BEHAVIOR | November 2017 | February 2019 | Abandon | 15 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15819808 | TECHNIQUES TO QUANTIFY EFFECTIVENESS OF SITE-WIDE ACTIONS | November 2017 | June 2021 | Allow | 43 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15820317 | COMPUTING RISK FROM A CROP DAMAGING FACTOR FOR A CROP ON AN AGRONOMIC FIELD | November 2017 | March 2022 | Allow | 52 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15820322 | DIGITAL MODELING OF DISEASE ON CROPS ON AGRONOMIC FIELDS | November 2017 | June 2021 | Allow | 43 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15819740 | METHOD, APPARATUS, AND COMPUTER-READABLE MEDIA FOR A WEB-BASED OPINION SURVEY FACTORY | November 2017 | April 2021 | Abandon | 41 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 15819589 | REMOTE CONTROL OF MULTIPLE DIFFERENT MACHINES | November 2017 | May 2022 | Abandon | 54 | 4 | 1 | No | No |
| 15819360 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE PLATFORM FOR SUPPLY CHAIN | November 2017 | April 2021 | Abandon | 41 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 15809799 | RISK IDENTIFICATION BASED ON HISTORICAL BEHAVIORAL DATA | November 2017 | November 2020 | Allow | 36 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15783660 | DYNAMIC MEMORYLESS DEMAND-SUPPLY PEGGING | October 2017 | November 2022 | Allow | 60 | 6 | 0 | No | No |
| 15701353 | SYSTEMS FOR DETERMINING AGRONOMIC OUTPUTS FOR A FARMABLE REGION, AND RELATED METHODS AND APPARATUS | September 2017 | November 2020 | Abandon | 38 | 3 | 1 | No | No |
| 15684507 | Automated Risk Visualization Using Customer-Centric Data Analysis | August 2017 | August 2021 | Allow | 48 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15671393 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR COORDINATING AND CONTROLLING PRODUCTION PROCESSES AND INTER-RELATED DECISION MAKING PROCESSES | August 2017 | November 2020 | Abandon | 39 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 15651057 | PREDICTING AND CLASSIFYING NETWORK ACTIVITY EVENTS | July 2017 | October 2020 | Allow | 39 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15498166 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ANALYZING RESEARCH LITERATURE FOR STRATEGIC DECISION MAKING OF AN ENTITY | April 2017 | March 2021 | Abandon | 47 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 15493749 | AUTOMATING TASK PROCESSING | April 2017 | July 2021 | Abandon | 50 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15476144 | DETERMINING MUSIC TO INFLUENCE CUSTOMER BEHAVIOR | March 2017 | September 2019 | Abandon | 30 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 15427785 | USER INTERFACE FOR PROVIDING A USER WITH THE ABILITY TO VIEW JOB ASSIGNMENT INFORMATION | February 2017 | March 2019 | Abandon | 25 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 15391478 | METHOD FOR PREDICTING USER PREFERENCE | December 2016 | May 2022 | Abandon | 60 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15391175 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GENERATING A USER PROFILE USING DATA ASSOCIATED WITH CASH-BASED FINANCIAL TRANSACTIONS | December 2016 | May 2021 | Abandon | 52 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15390119 | Methods and Systems for Managing Retail Experience | December 2016 | April 2023 | Allow | 60 | 6 | 1 | Yes | Yes |
| 15359536 | SYSTEM AND METHOD TO PREVENT VEHICLE FAILURES ON PUBLIC ROADWAYS | November 2016 | August 2020 | Abandon | 45 | 3 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 15215376 | ATTRIBUTION OF VALUES TO USER INTERACTIONS IN A SEQUENCE | July 2016 | November 2020 | Abandon | 52 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 15177223 | System and Method of Root Cause Analysis of Objective Violations and Query Analysis | June 2016 | May 2022 | Allow | 60 | 5 | 0 | No | No |
| 15036942 | LOCATION-BASED ALUMNUS BUSINESS BUILDING SYSTEM AND METHOD | May 2016 | November 2020 | Abandon | 54 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 15151342 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SETTING INVENTORY THRESHOLDS FOR OFFERING AND FULFILLMENT ACROSS RETAIL SUPPLY NETWORKS | May 2016 | July 2020 | Allow | 51 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 15032949 | DAYS OF INVENTORY DETERMINATION BASED ON CONSTRAINTS | April 2016 | September 2019 | Abandon | 40 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15141040 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DISPLAYING A DYNAMIC RISK LEVEL INDICATOR OF AN ATM SITE OR OTHER REMOTE MONITORING SITE ON A MAP FOR IMPROVED REMOTE MONITORING | April 2016 | August 2020 | Abandon | 52 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15028380 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR USE IN MARKETING | April 2016 | June 2019 | Abandon | 38 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15092827 | Method And System For Providing Business Intelligence Data | April 2016 | October 2017 | Allow | 18 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15071175 | PRIVILEGE-BASED TASK PROCESSING AT A VIRTUAL ASSISTANT | March 2016 | August 2020 | Abandon | 53 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15056211 | MODELING, SIMULATION, AND PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS | February 2016 | March 2023 | Allow | 60 | 8 | 1 | No | No |
| 15055622 | Method and Apparatus for Activity Networking | February 2016 | April 2021 | Allow | 60 | 4 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 15055265 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CONTEXTUAL RECOMMENDATION OF LEARNING CONTENT | February 2016 | April 2021 | Allow | 60 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 15054166 | PRESENTING CONTEXT-BASED GUIDANCE USING ELECTRONIC SIGNS | February 2016 | June 2019 | Allow | 40 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15055522 | AUTOMATED TASK PROCESSING WITH ESCALATION | February 2016 | October 2019 | Abandon | 43 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15055056 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PRICE ANALYSIS AND OPTIMIZATION | February 2016 | September 2019 | Abandon | 43 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15055158 | GROUPING OF ENTITIES FOR DELIVERY OF TANGIBLE ASSETS | February 2016 | March 2021 | Abandon | 60 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15053480 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING A SEQUENCE FOR PERFORMING A PLURALITY OF TASKS | February 2016 | June 2019 | Abandon | 39 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15053071 | System and Method for Time Shifting Meetings | February 2016 | July 2019 | Abandon | 41 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner HATCHER, DEIRDRE D.
With a 8.7% reversal rate, the PTAB affirms the examiner's rejections in the vast majority of cases. This reversal rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals face significant challenges here.
Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.
In this dataset, 15.6% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is less effective here than in most other areas.
⚠ Appeals to PTAB face challenges. Ensure your case has strong merit before committing to full Board review.
⚠ Filing a Notice of Appeal shows limited benefit. Consider other strategies like interviews or amendments before appealing.
Examiner HATCHER, DEIRDRE D works in Art Unit 3683 and has examined 272 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 23.2%, this examiner allows applications at a lower rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 44 months.
Examiner HATCHER, DEIRDRE D's allowance rate of 23.2% places them in the 3% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is less likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by HATCHER, DEIRDRE D receive 3.28 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 89% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by HATCHER, DEIRDRE D is 44 months. This places the examiner in the 16% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +21.9% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by HATCHER, DEIRDRE D. This interview benefit is in the 65% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide an above-average benefit with this examiner and are worth considering.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 9.1% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 5% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show lower effectiveness with this examiner compared to others. Consider whether a continuation application might be more strategic, especially if you need to add new matter or significantly broaden claims.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 5.6% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 7% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.
When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 23.5% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 29% percentile among all examiners. Note: Pre-appeal conferences show below-average success with this examiner. Consider whether your arguments are strong enough to warrant a PAC request.
This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 28.1% of appeals filed. This is in the 3% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 33.3% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner rarely withdraws rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. If you file an appeal, be prepared to fully prosecute it to a PTAB decision. Per MPEP § 1207, the examiner will prepare an Examiner's Answer maintaining the rejections.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 27.6% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 14% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are rarely granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing a petition, as the Technology Center Director typically upholds this examiner's decisions.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 38% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 44% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.