Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19079691 | Healthcare Object Recognition, Systems And Methods | March 2025 | May 2025 | Allow | 2 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18679232 | SOFTWARE APPLICATION FOR PATIENT CARE AND RELATED DEVICE, SYSTEM, AND METHOD | May 2024 | March 2025 | Allow | 9 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18417752 | SENIOR LIVING ENGAGEMENT AND CARE SUPPORT PLATFORMS | January 2024 | April 2025 | Allow | 15 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18562283 | NEUROSTIMULATION PARAMETER AUTHENTICATION AND EXPIRATION SYSTEM FOR NEUROSTIMULATION | November 2023 | May 2025 | Allow | 18 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18481312 | SENIOR LIVING ENGAGEMENT AND CARE SUPPORT PLATFORMS | October 2023 | July 2024 | Allow | 10 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18550367 | INTERPRETATION OF INTRAOPERATIVE SENSOR DATA USING CONCEPT GRAPH NEURAL NETWORKS | September 2023 | March 2025 | Allow | 18 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18296024 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CREATING AND SELECTING MODELS FOR PREDICTING MEDICAL CONDITIONS | April 2023 | June 2025 | Allow | 27 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18127969 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS PROCESSING DATA | March 2023 | February 2025 | Allow | 23 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17851323 | FLUID DELIVERY EVENT TRACKING AND TRANSACTION MANAGEMENT | June 2022 | June 2024 | Allow | 24 | 4 | 1 | Yes | Yes |
| 17546848 | MEDICAL DEVICE MANAGEMENT | December 2021 | June 2025 | Abandon | 43 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17079872 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROVIDING ORTHODONTIC TREATMENT | October 2020 | March 2025 | Allow | 53 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner BURGESS, JOSEPH D works in Art Unit 3681 and has examined 8 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 87.5%, this examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 24 months.
Examiner BURGESS, JOSEPH D's allowance rate of 87.5% places them in the 63% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications.
On average, applications examined by BURGESS, JOSEPH D receive 1.25 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 23% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues significantly fewer office actions than most examiners.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by BURGESS, JOSEPH D is 24 months. This places the examiner in the 74% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly faster than average with this examiner.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a -14.3% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by BURGESS, JOSEPH D. This interview benefit is in the 1% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 42.9% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 94% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. If you receive a final rejection, filing an RCE with substantive amendments or arguments has a strong likelihood of success.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 0.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 1% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 36% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 36% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.