Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19280226 | FOLDING FRAME | July 2025 | January 2026 | Allow | 6 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18931095 | SOFA BARRIER | October 2024 | January 2026 | Allow | 15 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18676213 | SURGICAL CART SUPPORTING ONE OR MORE SURGICAL ROBOTIC ARMS AND INTERFACE MOVEABLY INTERCONNECTING SURGICAL CART WITH SURGICAL TABLE | May 2024 | November 2025 | Allow | 18 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18415708 | THICKNESS-ADJUSTABLE AIR MATTRESS STRUCTURE | January 2024 | February 2026 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18473759 | Medical Procedure Facilitation System | September 2023 | January 2026 | Allow | 28 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18217450 | SPRING MODULES FOR AN ADJUSTABLE SLEEPING SYSTEM | June 2023 | December 2025 | Allow | 30 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18211982 | SURGICAL FRAME HAVING TRANSLATING LOWER BEAM AND MOVEABLE LINKAGE OR SURGICAL EQUIPMENT ATTACHED THERETO AND METHOD FOR USE THEREOF | June 2023 | February 2026 | Allow | 32 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18255963 | EXERCISE DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT BED | June 2023 | February 2026 | Abandon | 33 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18203750 | ADJUSTABLE BED | May 2023 | January 2026 | Allow | 32 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18144081 | MULTIFUNCTIONAL FOLDING CHAIR | May 2023 | November 2025 | Allow | 30 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18063625 | ROLLABLE PORTABLE PERSONAL BLANKET | December 2022 | March 2026 | Abandon | 39 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17575426 | MEDICAL PROCEDURE FACILITATION SYSTEM | January 2022 | October 2025 | Allow | 45 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15482806 | CONVERTIBLE BED/WHEELCHAIR APPARATUS | April 2017 | September 2017 | Allow | 6 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner THROOP, MYLES A works in Art Unit 3679 and has examined 1 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 100.0%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 6 months.
Examiner THROOP, MYLES A's allowance rate of 100.0% places them in the 100% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by THROOP, MYLES A receive 0.00 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 1% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues significantly fewer office actions than most examiners.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by THROOP, MYLES A is 6 months. This places the examiner in the 100% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications move through prosecution relatively quickly with this examiner.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 0.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 6% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are rarely granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing a petition, as the Technology Center Director typically upholds this examiner's decisions.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 39% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 200.0% of allowed cases (in the 100% percentile). Per MPEP § 714.14, a Quayle action indicates that all claims are allowable but formal matters remain. This examiner frequently uses Quayle actions compared to other examiners, which is a positive indicator that once substantive issues are resolved, allowance follows quickly.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.