Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18783363 | BELT | July 2024 | April 2025 | Allow | 9 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18572693 | PORTABLE ACCESSORY COMPRISING A CASE FOR RECEIVING A PAD CONTAINING A VOLATILE ACTIVE SUBSTANCE | December 2023 | April 2025 | Abandon | 16 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18499173 | HOLDER | October 2023 | June 2025 | Abandon | 19 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18460685 | JEWELRY PIECE | September 2023 | June 2025 | Allow | 21 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18451203 | BUCKLE ASSEMBLY | August 2023 | March 2025 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18274760 | TAPE ATTACHMENT | July 2023 | January 2025 | Allow | 18 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18226475 | Cargo Strap Securing Assembly | July 2023 | November 2024 | Allow | 16 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18221080 | WEB STRAP BUCKLE WITH LOCKING MECHANISM | July 2023 | March 2025 | Allow | 20 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18265841 | NON-PIERCING-TYPE EARRING | June 2023 | February 2025 | Abandon | 20 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18195117 | FIXING BELT ADJUSTING MECHANISM AND WEARABLE DEVICE | May 2023 | January 2025 | Allow | 20 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18121135 | Bracelet with Fingerprints | March 2023 | March 2025 | Abandon | 24 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18021233 | FASTENING DEVICE FOR JEWELLERY | February 2023 | June 2025 | Abandon | 28 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18101480 | ROTATING JEWELRY CLOSURE | January 2023 | November 2024 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17993189 | PORTABLE OBJECT COMPRISING A MIDDLE DEVOID OF FASTENING HORNS AND A REMOVABLE BRACELET | November 2022 | March 2025 | Allow | 28 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17990668 | Wrist Flag and Autograph Band | November 2022 | March 2025 | Abandon | 38 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17969547 | JEWELRY INCLUDING FOOD, BEVERAGE, AND/OR BOTANICAL EXTRACTS AND METHODS OF MAKING SAME | October 2022 | May 2025 | Abandon | 31 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 17946233 | INTERCHANGEABLE CHARM JEWELRY | September 2022 | June 2025 | Allow | 33 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17865793 | DEVICE FOR ADJUSTING THE LENGTH OF A WRISTLET | July 2022 | June 2025 | Allow | 35 | 2 | 1 | No | No |
| 17860207 | BED COVERING RETENTION ASSEMBLY | July 2022 | December 2024 | Abandon | 29 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17677020 | SIZE ADJUSTABLE MULTI-WRAP JEWELRY WITH ANCHORING LOOP | February 2022 | June 2024 | Abandon | 28 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner RASHID, ANNA SALEM works in Art Unit 3677 and has examined 19 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 52.6%, this examiner allows applications at a lower rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 22 months.
Examiner RASHID, ANNA SALEM's allowance rate of 52.6% places them in the 9% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is less likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by RASHID, ANNA SALEM receive 1.37 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 29% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues fewer office actions than average, which may indicate efficient prosecution or a more lenient examination style.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by RASHID, ANNA SALEM is 22 months. This places the examiner in the 83% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications move through prosecution relatively quickly with this examiner.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +52.9% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by RASHID, ANNA SALEM. This interview benefit is in the 95% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner and should be strongly considered as a prosecution strategy. Per MPEP § 713.10, interviews are available at any time before the Notice of Allowance is mailed or jurisdiction transfers to the PTAB.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 37.5% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 83% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. If you receive a final rejection, filing an RCE with substantive amendments or arguments has a strong likelihood of success.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 25.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 26% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows below-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. You may need to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 200.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 100% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are frequently granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1002.02(c), various examiner actions are petitionable to the Technology Center Director, including prematureness of final rejection, refusal to enter amendments, and requirement for information. If you believe an examiner action is improper, consider filing a petition.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 36% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 20.0% of allowed cases (in the 93% percentile). Per MPEP § 714.14, a Quayle action indicates that all claims are allowable but formal matters remain. This examiner frequently uses Quayle actions compared to other examiners, which is a positive indicator that once substantive issues are resolved, allowance follows quickly.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.