USPTO Examiner BOMAR THOMAS S - Art Unit 3676

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
18881223OIL WELL OPTICAL FIBER MULTI-PARAMETER TESTING METHOD AND APPARATUSJanuary 2025October 2025Allow1000NoNo
15621568Method For Developing Oil And Gas Fields Using High-Power Laser Radiation For More Complete Oil And Gas ExtractionJune 2017October 2017Allow410NoNo
15326746DRILL ROD HAVING INTERNALLY PROJECTING PORTIONSJanuary 2017January 2018Allow1220NoNo
15347189GAS SEPARATOR ASSEMBLY FOR GENERATING ARTIFICIAL SUMP INSIDE WELL CASINGNovember 2016October 2017Allow1100NoNo
15293955FORMATION-ENGAGING ASSEMBLIES, EARTH-BORING TOOLS INCLUDING SUCH ASSEMBLIES, AND ASSOCIATED METHODSOctober 2016September 2017Allow1110NoNo
15129766ROD MANIPULATOR FOR A MINING DRILL RIGSeptember 2016November 2017Allow1310NoNo
15243251METHOD FOR CONTROLLING DRILLING DIRECTIONS OF A DRILL BIT BY A ROTARY STEERABLE DRILLING TOOLAugust 2016March 2018Abandon1920YesNo
15242251DISINTEGRATING PLUG FOR SUBTERRANEAN TREATMENT USEAugust 2016September 2017Allow1310NoNo
15117584LANDFILL WELL LIQUID LEVEL CONTROL PUMPAugust 2016October 2016Allow300NoNo
15209377HYDRAULICALLY ACTUATED APPARATUS FOR GENERATING PRESSURE PULSES IN A DRILLING FLUIDJuly 2016January 2018Allow1800NoNo
15035449Underbalanced Drilling Through Formations With Varying LithologiesMay 2016June 2017Allow1300NoNo
15099059COILED TUBING DOWNHOLE TOOLApril 2016August 2017Allow1621YesNo
15078991BIDIRECTIONAL STABILIZER WITH IMPACT ARRESTORS AND BLADES WITH WRAP ANGLESMarch 2016June 2016Allow300NoNo
15077508Automated Fluid Fraction Sampling SystemMarch 2016January 2018Allow2200NoNo
15073821BRANCH PATCH ARRAY FOR REAL TIME MONITORING OF SURFACE MICRO-SEISMIC WAVESMarch 2016December 2017Allow2000NoNo
15021623Self-Lubricating Seal Element for Rotating Control DeviceMarch 2016May 2017Abandon1410YesNo
14917284SHOCK WAVE MODIFICATION IN PERCUSSION DRILLING APPARATUS AND METHODMarch 2016February 2017Allow1110NoNo
14981376BIDIRECTIONAL STABILIZER WITH IMPACT ARRESTORSDecember 2015August 2016Allow710NoNo
14967757HELIX NOZZLE OSCILLATING DELIVERY SYSTEMDecember 2015November 2017Allow2400NoNo
14958205SHALE GAS EXTRACTION SYSTEMDecember 2015October 2016Allow1010NoNo
14894322MUD MOTOR WITH INTEGRATED ABRASION-RESISTANT STRUCTURENovember 2015July 2017Allow2020NoNo
14771594DRILLING TOOLAugust 2015September 2017Allow2400NoNo
14802104BIDIRECTIONAL STABILIZERJuly 2015November 2015Allow410YesNo
14745038FLUID PRESSURE PULSE GENERATING APPARATUS WITH PRIMARY SEAL ASSEMBLY, BACK UP SEAL ASSEMBLY AND PRESSURE COMPENSATION DEVICE AND METHOD OF OPERATING SAMEJune 2015August 2016Allow1420NoNo
14730365FACILITY FOR ASSEMBLY OF WELL HEATERSJune 2015January 2018Allow3110NoNo
14730366METHOD FOR ASSEMBLY OF WELL HEATERSJune 2015December 2015Allow700NoNo
14715478Multi-Frac ToolMay 2015June 2016Allow1310NoNo
14439316BARRIER TESTING METHODApril 2015September 2017Allow2810NoNo
14439599APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR COAXIALLY JOINING COMPONENTS TO RESIST RELATIVE ROTATIONAL AND LONGITUDINAL MOVEMENTApril 2015October 2016Allow1820NoNo
14698478DEVICES AND RELATED METHODS FOR ACTUATING WELLBORE TOOLS WITH A PRESSURIZED GASApril 2015August 2017Allow2710NoNo
14438550Rupture Disc Secondary Seal Assembly and Related MethodsApril 2015November 2017Allow3120NoNo
14661837METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR FORMING HOLE IN GROUNDMarch 2015August 2017Allow2910NoNo
14429024METHOD FOR CONNECTING A DRILL HEAD TO A DRILL PIPE, AND DEVICE FOR HOLDING A DRILL HEADMarch 2015December 2017Allow3220YesNo
14661397WELL SCREEN-OUT PREDICTION AND PREVENTIONMarch 2015August 2017Allow2900NoNo
14661630DRILL HEAD AND DEVICE WITH A SLIDING CONTACT ELECTRICAL CONNECTION FOR DRILLING A BORE IN THE GROUNDMarch 2015August 2017Allow2910NoNo
14660070SELECTOR VALVE FOR HIGH PRESSURE HYDROCARBON PRODUCTION OPERATIONSMarch 2015October 2017Allow3110YesNo
14658929SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING THE START TIME OF A PRESSURE PULSE FROM A DOWNHOLE EXPLOSIVE DEVICEMarch 2015December 2017Abandon3310NoNo
14659197RETRIEVABLE DOWNHOLE TOOL SYSTEMMarch 2015August 2017Allow2910NoNo
14425477EXPANDABLE DROP DEVICEMarch 2015December 2017Allow3320YesNo
14636126Multi-Tasking Rod Guide Having Backflow ReducerMarch 2015February 2017Allow2400YesNo
14423058Resettable Remote and Manual Actuated Well ToolFebruary 2015January 2016Allow1100NoNo
14625279CABLE-BASED WELL HEATERFebruary 2015August 2017Allow3011NoNo
14606155MODULAR COMPACTION BORING MACHINE SYSTEMJanuary 2015August 2017Allow3020NoNo
14606869Subsurface Deployment for Monitoring Along a BoreholeJanuary 2015August 2017Abandon3110NoNo
14606503METHOD OF LINING AN OIL WELL PIPE IN SITUJanuary 2015July 2017Allow3020NoNo
14606530Down-Hole Gas and Solids Separator Utilized in Production HydrocarbonsJanuary 2015May 2017Allow2810NoNo
14606749Compact Bail Supported Fill Up and Circulation ToolJanuary 2015June 2017Allow2810NoNo
14417490Near-Bit Borehole Opener Tool and Method of ReamingJanuary 2015July 2017Abandon3010YesNo
14605467Downhole Cutting and Jacking SystemJanuary 2015March 2017Allow2610NoNo
14415350INTELLIGENT CORING SYSTEMJanuary 2015September 2017Allow3210NoNo
14588473SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR POWER MANAGEMENT OF PUMPING SYSTEMJanuary 2015February 2017Allow2610NoNo
14412638DISPLACEABLE COMPONENTS IN DRILLING OPERATIONSJanuary 2015November 2017Allow3530YesNo
14412639DEVICE FOR COVERING A PIPELINE FROM A WELLBOREJanuary 2015June 2017Allow2910NoNo
14588795DOWNHOLE ACTIVATION ASSEMBLY WITH OFFSET BORE AND METHOD OF USING SAMEJanuary 2015April 2017Allow2710NoNo
14588261APPARATUS, SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SEPARATING SAND AND OTHER SOLIDS FROM OIL AND OTHER FLUIDSDecember 2014June 2017Allow3011NoNo
14587850CONTROL LINE PROTECTION SYSTEMDecember 2014June 2017Allow2920NoNo
14412226WAVE SPRING FLAPPER CLOSURE MECHANISMDecember 2014October 2017Abandon3420YesNo
14587895RADIALLY ENERGIZED HANGER SYSTEMDecember 2014June 2017Allow2920NoNo
14587598ENERGIZED SEAL SYSTEM AND METHODDecember 2014July 2017Allow3111NoNo
14586565Rotary Isobaric Pressure Exchanger System with Flush SystemDecember 2014April 2017Allow2711NoNo
14585397High-Rate Injection Screen Assembly with Checkable PortsDecember 2014February 2017Allow2610NoNo
14586357BACK PRESSURE VALVEDecember 2014July 2017Allow3020NoNo
14585883METHOD OF BALANCING RESOURCE RECOVERY FROM A RESOURCE BEARING FORMATIONDecember 2014March 2017Allow2620YesNo
14586463Activation Ring for WellheadDecember 2014December 2017Allow3540YesNo
14586545Rotary Isobaric Pressure Exchanger System with Lubrication SystemDecember 2014July 2017Allow3121NoNo
14584877DRILL ROD HANDLING SYSTEM FOR MOVING DRILL RODS TO AND FROM AN OPERATIVE POSITIONDecember 2014October 2016Allow2210NoNo
14581621PROGRESSING CAVITY PUMP SYSTEM WITH FLUID COUPLINGDecember 2014May 2017Allow2811NoNo
14398054Downhole Control DeviceOctober 2014April 2017Allow2911NoNo
14495793Method and System for Hydraulic Fracture Diagnosis with the use of a Coiled Tubing Dual Isolation Service ToolSeptember 2014May 2017Allow3250NoNo
14384291OUTWARD VENTING OF INFLOW TRACER IN PRODUCTION WELLSSeptember 2014June 2017Abandon3310YesNo
14472006DEVICE THAT UNDERGOES A CHANGE IN SPECIFIC GRAVITY DUE TO RELEASE OF A WEIGHTAugust 2014August 2017Abandon3620YesNo
14380020APPARATUS FOR ALIGNING DRILLING MACHINESAugust 2014August 2017Allow3620NoNo
14446918Downhole Ball Dropping Systems and Methods with Redundant Ball Dropping CapabilityJuly 2014July 2016Allow2320NoNo
14328335Casing ValveJuly 2014November 2016Allow2810NoNo
14371244SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MONITORING WELLBORE VIBRATIONS AT THE SURFACEJuly 2014November 2016Allow2800NoNo
14327123APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR PREVENTING TUBING CASING ANNULUS PRESSURE COMMUNICATIONJuly 2014September 2016Allow2600NoNo
14371017A DRILL BIT FOR A PERCUSSIVE HAMMER AND SHANK THEREFOREJuly 2014May 2017Allow3420NoNo
14326223POSITIVE LOCK SYSTEMJuly 2014March 2017Allow3320YesNo
14323172MULTI-ZONE SINGLE TREATMENT GRAVEL PACK SYSTEMJuly 2014July 2016Allow2420YesNo
14322483SELF-STABILIZING GAS LIFT VALVEJuly 2014June 2016Allow2420NoNo
14320789DRILLING DEVICE AND DRILLING METHODJuly 2014March 2016Allow2110NoNo
14369531RETENTION OF MULTIPLE ROLLING CUTTERSJune 2014October 2016Allow2721NoNo
14369543APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR STORING CORE SAMPLES AT HIGH PRESSUREJune 2014September 2017Allow3920NoNo
14316644PRODUCTION STRING PRESSURE RELIEF SYSTEMJune 2014April 2016Allow2210NoNo
14316544EXTENDABLE AND RETRACTABLE STABILIZERJune 2014May 2017Allow3541NoNo
14315179NON-ROTATING METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR ISOLATING WELLHEAD PRESSUREJune 2014January 2017Allow3130NoNo
14313546Multi-Lateral Well SystemJune 2014April 2016Allow2210NoNo
14313088Downhole Ball Dropping Systems and MethodsJune 2014July 2016Allow2520NoNo
14312538DOWNHOLE COUPLINGJune 2014December 2016Allow2930NoNo
14367699Handling Device for Drill Rods and So-Called Top Drive Having Such a Handling DeviceJune 2014March 2016Allow2110NoNo
14309498FIXED-CUTTER DRILL BITS GENERATING CORESJune 2014January 2017Abandon3121NoNo
14309599Packer Setting Method Using Disintegrating PlugJune 2014December 2016Allow3030YesNo
14302119CUTTING STRUCTURES AND STRUCTURES FOR RETAINING THE SAMEJune 2014June 2016Allow2420NoNo
14353517DRILL AND PRODUCTION METHOD FOR A DRILLJune 2014September 2016Abandon2911NoNo
14362906ANNULAR BARRIER WITH AN EXPANSION DETECTION DEVICEJune 2014April 2016Allow2210YesNo
14293935METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR DIRECTIONAL DRILLINGJune 2014March 2016Allow2210NoNo
14289433METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR WELLBORE CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETIONMay 2014December 2016Allow3120NoNo
14287393HIGH-SPEED CAMERA TO MONITOR SURFACE DRILLING DYNAMICS AND PROVIDE OPTICAL DATA LINK FOR RECEIVING DOWNHOLE DATAMay 2014January 2017Allow3210NoNo
14360714EXCAVATING TOOLMay 2014April 2016Allow2310NoNo
14127216UNCOUPLING DEVICE FOR CONNECTING A DRILLING TOOL TO THE END OF A DRILLING COLUMN AND A DRILLING SYSTEM COMPRISING SUCH AN UNCOUPLING DEVICEMay 2014March 2017Abandon3910NoNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner BOMAR, THOMAS S.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
2
Examiner Affirmed
1
(50.0%)
Examiner Reversed
1
(50.0%)
Reversal Percentile
77.7%
Higher than average

What This Means

With a 50.0% reversal rate, the PTAB reverses the examiner's rejections in a meaningful percentage of cases. This reversal rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals are more successful here than in most other areas.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
11
Allowed After Appeal Filing
2
(18.2%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
9
(81.8%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
22.4%
Lower than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 18.2% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is less effective here than in most other areas.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB show good success rates. If you have a strong case on the merits, consider fully prosecuting the appeal to a Board decision.

Filing a Notice of Appeal shows limited benefit. Consider other strategies like interviews or amendments before appealing.

Examiner BOMAR, THOMAS S - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner BOMAR, THOMAS S works in Art Unit 3676 and has examined 469 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 75.7%, this examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 30 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner BOMAR, THOMAS S's allowance rate of 75.7% places them in the 41% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by BOMAR, THOMAS S receive 1.95 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 48% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues fewer office actions than average, which may indicate efficient prosecution or a more lenient examination style.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by BOMAR, THOMAS S is 30 months. This places the examiner in the 62% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly faster than average with this examiner.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a -3.7% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by BOMAR, THOMAS S. This interview benefit is in the 6% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 33.3% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 73% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. Consider whether your amendments or new arguments are strong enough to warrant an RCE versus filing a continuation.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 59.4% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 85% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner is highly receptive to after-final amendments compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 714.12, after-final amendments may be entered "under justifiable circumstances." Consider filing after-final amendments with a clear showing of allowability rather than immediately filing an RCE, as this examiner frequently enters such amendments.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 66.7% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 56% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: Pre-appeal conferences show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. If you have strong arguments, a PAC request may result in favorable reconsideration.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 83.3% of appeals filed. This is in the 77% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 50.0% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner frequently reconsiders rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1207.01, all appeals must go through a mandatory appeal conference. Filing a Notice of Appeal may prompt favorable reconsideration even before you file an Appeal Brief.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 32.6% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 20% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are rarely granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing a petition, as the Technology Center Director typically upholds this examiner's decisions.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 10.7% of allowed cases (in the 94% percentile). Per MPEP § 1302.04, examiner's amendments are used to place applications in condition for allowance when only minor changes are needed. This examiner frequently uses this tool compared to other examiners, indicating a cooperative approach to getting applications allowed. Strategic Insight: If you are close to allowance but minor claim amendments are needed, this examiner may be willing to make an examiner's amendment rather than requiring another round of prosecution.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.6% of allowed cases (in the 56% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions more often than average when claims are allowable but formal matters remain (MPEP § 714.14).

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Consider after-final amendments: This examiner frequently enters after-final amendments. If you can clearly overcome rejections with claim amendments, file an after-final amendment before resorting to an RCE.
  • Appeal filing as negotiation tool: This examiner frequently reconsiders rejections during the appeal process. Filing a Notice of Appeal may prompt favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.
  • Examiner cooperation: This examiner frequently makes examiner's amendments to place applications in condition for allowance. If you are close to allowance, the examiner may help finalize the claims.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.