USPTO Examiner WATSON PETER HUCKLEBERRY - Art Unit 3675

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
17120708LOCKING DEVICE AND METHODDecember 2020April 2025Allow5240YesYes
17115314Hands-Free Door Opening SystemDecember 2020October 2023Abandon3420NoNo
17113943SMART DOOR LOCKDecember 2020June 2023Allow3020YesNo
17110384RELEASABLE LOCKING MECHANISM FOR A REFRIGERATED APPLIANCEDecember 2020October 2023Allow3430YesNo
17104284EXIT DEVICE ASSEMBLY WITH INTEGRATED ACCESS CONTROLNovember 2020October 2024Allow4760NoNo
17098115HANDS-FREE DOOR LATCHNovember 2020May 2023Abandon3011NoNo
17096504"Integrator" adapter for a Mul-T-Lock Deadbolt door lock and a Medeco Deadbolt door lock with an August WiFi Smart Lock/Smart Lock Pro.November 2020June 2023Abandon3110NoNo
17070949DOOR LOCKING DEVICEOctober 2020May 2024Allow4331YesNo
16974134Door locking foldable safety trimOctober 2020August 2023Abandon3410NoNo
17034762ELECTRIC DOOR LOCK FACILITYSeptember 2020January 2023Abandon2810NoNo
17034860ELECTRIC DOOR LOCK DEVICESeptember 2020January 2023Abandon2810NoNo
17031795LATCH ASSEMBLY TO SECURE OPENING OF AN ENCLOSURESeptember 2020June 2023Allow3240NoNo
17027906INSIDE HANDLE DEVICESeptember 2020October 2023Allow3740YesNo
17027122WIRELESS CONTROLLED BLOCKING APPARATUS AND SINGLE POINT LOCKING SYSTEMSeptember 2020November 2022Allow2610NoNo
17027413FASTENING STRUCTURESeptember 2020January 2023Abandon2820NoNo
17018914CHILD-SAFE DOOR, CABINET, AND DRAWER LOCKING SYSTEM AND APPARATUSSeptember 2020July 2023Abandon3511NoNo
17014064Drive Structure of Lock BoltSeptember 2020January 2023Abandon2810NoNo
16976582LOCKING MECHANISMSAugust 2020January 2024Abandon4110NoNo
17004468A Transmission Structure of a Rotary Shaft of an Electronic LockAugust 2020October 2022Allow2600NoNo
16995110HANDLE MECHANISM AND CASING ASSEMBLYAugust 2020November 2023Allow3940YesNo
16986847LINEAR RECIPROCATING-MOTION APPARATUSAugust 2020June 2023Allow3420YesNo
16941538DOOR STOP ROD WITH WARNING FUNCTIONJuly 2020June 2023Abandon3520NoNo
16923356DOOR LEAF HANDLE FOR A MOTOR VEHICLEJuly 2020June 2024Allow4750YesNo
16900012Symmetrical and Reversible-Clutch Mortise LockJune 2020May 2022Allow2310YesNo
16868585Door lock for a domestic electrical applianceMay 2020November 2023Allow4230YesNo
16868668Door lock for a domestic electrical appliance with a movably arranged locking memberMay 2020December 2022Allow3120YesNo
16844605KEY CAPTURE LOCKApril 2020March 2025Allow59100NoNo
16844800BOLT RETAINER CLIP TO MAINTAIN A BOLT WITHIN A CONFIGURED RECEIVING ELEMENT OF A COMPONENTApril 2020July 2024Abandon5240YesNo
16652242ACCIDENTAL UNLOCKING PREVENTION ELECTRONIC LOCKMarch 2020July 2023Allow4011NoNo
16649221HANDLE ASSEMBLY FOR A DOOR OR WINDOW HAVING A DEFINED THICKNESS, AND A METHOD FOR INSTALLING SUCH HANDLE ASSEMBLYMarch 2020December 2023Allow4450YesNo
16823039INTEGRATED LATCH MECHANISM FOR SECURING RACKMOUNT EQUIPMENT IN A CHASSISMarch 2020March 2023Allow3630YesNo
16818985LATCH ASSEMBLYMarch 2020February 2024Abandon4740NoNo
16804720ELECTRIFIED LATCHFebruary 2020September 2024Allow5451NoNo
16802910RESETTABLE DOOR LOCKING DEVICE FOR AN ELECTRIC HOUSEHOLD APPLIANCE, IN PARTICULAR A DISHWASHER, AND ELECTRIC HOUSEHOLD APPLIANCE PROVIDED THEREWITHFebruary 2020July 2023Allow4130NoNo
16802953DOOR LOCK CONFIGURED TO BE OPENED BY ONE HANDFebruary 2020May 2022Allow2710NoNo
16641839MOTOR VEHICLE DOOR LOCKFebruary 2020January 2023Allow3530NoNo
16788648ELECTRONIC LOCKFebruary 2020August 2022Abandon3010NoNo
16784535SOCKET STRUCTURE OF LOCK CIRCUIT BOARD OF SHARED BICYCLEFebruary 2020November 2023Abandon4520NoNo
16636811ELECTRONIC ACCESS CONTROL STRIKEAND PRELOAD RESISTANT MODULE THEREFOREFebruary 2020October 2022Allow3320YesNo
16773169COMPARTMENT LOCKING SYSTEMJanuary 2020September 2024Abandon5560YesNo
16623134OUTER HANDLE DEVICE FOR VEHICLE DOORDecember 2019September 2024Abandon5760YesNo
16708714MOTOR VEHICLE LOCK ARRANGEMENTDecember 2019April 2023Abandon4061YesNo
16620479VEHICLE DOOR LOCKING DEVICE AND VEHICLE DOOR LOCKING SETDecember 2019March 2023Allow3940YesNo
16704131RETAINING LATCH, CLOSURE CONFIGURATION, CONTAINER AND RAIL VEHICLEDecember 2019December 2024Abandon60100YesNo
16695694VEHICULAR LATCH ASSEMBLY WITH SNAP-TYPE CONNECTION FEATURE PROVIDING AN INTEGRATED SEALING FUNCTIONNovember 2019November 2022Abandon3620NoNo
16695561LATCH ASSEMBLY WITH LATCH HOUSING MOTOR SEAT WITH RESILIENT MOTOR RETENTION FEATURENovember 2019January 2023Abandon3830NoNo
16696535SMART CONTAINER AND METHOD OF USENovember 2019October 2023Abandon4620NoNo
16693615LOW-PROFILE HANDLE ASSEMBLYNovember 2019July 2024Allow5660YesNo
16687948REMOTELY CONTROLLABLE SECURITY BARNovember 2019February 2023Abandon3920YesNo
16681728ELECTRICAL APPARATUS AND CASING APPARATUS AND A REMOVABLE PANEL MODULE THEREOFNovember 2019July 2024Abandon5660NoNo
16607990Door LockOctober 2019October 2023Allow4850NoNo
16657580DOOR STRIKE ASSEMBLY WITH A REVOLVING LATCH EJECTOROctober 2019August 2023Allow4631YesNo
16599799METHOD FOR OPERATING AN OPENING MECHANISMOctober 2019June 2023Allow4420YesNo
16598668A DOOR LOCK ASSEMBLY AND METHOD OF USE THEREOFOctober 2019May 2025Abandon6051NoNo
16587969DOOR HANDLE LOCK AND LOCKING METHODSeptember 2019June 2022Abandon3320NoNo
16582900TAMPER PROOF SEAL ASSEMBLYSeptember 2019October 2022Allow3720NoNo
16575361MAGNET RESPONSIVE CABINET LOCKSeptember 2019February 2023Allow4130NoNo
16567079ANTI-TORSION DOOR LOCKSeptember 2019July 2022Abandon3420NoNo
16563876Window LockSeptember 2019January 2023Abandon4110NoNo
16560249Control Structure for Rotary Shaft of Electronic LockSeptember 2019September 2022Abandon3610NoNo
16546811LOCKABLE HANDLE ASSEMBLY WITH FLOATING CAM MECHANISMAugust 2019August 2024Allow6050YesNo
16540104Tool BoxAugust 2019February 2022Allow3010NoNo
16527796DOOR UNLOCKING DEVICE OF CONSTRUCTION MACHINEJuly 2019October 2022Abandon3820NoNo
16518817POWER CHILD LOCK OPERATING DEVICEJuly 2019September 2022Abandon3820NoNo
16504094SWITCH DEVICEJuly 2019May 2023Abandon4721NoNo
16454337BIDIRECTIONAL INERTIA LATCH FOR VEHICLE INTERIOR COMPONENTSJune 2019October 2022Abandon3920NoNo
16451015LOCKING DEVICEJune 2019August 2023Allow5050YesNo
16441995Motor-Driven Door Latch for VehicleJune 2019August 2023Allow5040YesNo
16468231SLIDE LATCHING SYSTEM FOR A DOOR SYSTEMJune 2019August 2024Allow6070NoNo
16364620LATCH HOLDER HAVING AUTOMATIC OPENING STRUCTURE AND AN APPLIANCE WITH AUTOMATIC OPENING DOOR USING LATCH HOLDERMarch 2019February 2025Abandon6070YesNo
16287555DRAW LATCHFebruary 2019May 2022Abandon3910NoNo
16249971PIN LATCH WITH ADJUSTABLE PRE-LOADJanuary 2019May 2022Allow4010NoNo
16241104Lockable Bolt DeviceJanuary 2019September 2022Allow4531YesNo
16215882POSITION SENSOR FOR DOOR LOCKDecember 2018March 2023Abandon5120YesNo
16124894DIGITAL DOOR LOCK INCLUDING LATCH BOLT SELF-LOOSENING STRUCTURESeptember 2018January 2023Abandon5220NoNo
16053447Flat Pin Safe Lock SystemAugust 2018June 2025Abandon6070YesNo
16033424LATCH ASSEMBLIES FOR PORTABLE ELECTRONIC DEVICESJuly 2018December 2023Abandon6040YesNo
16030904Door latch for an electrical domestic applianceJuly 2018April 2022Allow4520YesNo
15967972MORTISE AND MULTIPOINT LATCHING ASSEMBLYMay 2018January 2024Allow6060NoNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner WATSON, PETER HUCKLEBERRY.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
1
Allowed After Appeal Filing
1
(100.0%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
0
(0.0%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
99.3%
Higher than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 100.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is particularly effective here. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Strategic Recommendations

Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Examiner WATSON, PETER HUCKLEBERRY - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner WATSON, PETER HUCKLEBERRY works in Art Unit 3675 and has examined 79 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 50.6%, this examiner allows applications at a lower rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 40 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner WATSON, PETER HUCKLEBERRY's allowance rate of 50.6% places them in the 14% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is less likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by WATSON, PETER HUCKLEBERRY receive 3.11 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 86% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by WATSON, PETER HUCKLEBERRY is 40 months. This places the examiner in the 25% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +32.7% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by WATSON, PETER HUCKLEBERRY. This interview benefit is in the 80% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner and should be strongly considered as a prosecution strategy. Per MPEP § 713.10, interviews are available at any time before the Notice of Allowance is mailed or jurisdiction transfers to the PTAB.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 17.0% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 17% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show lower effectiveness with this examiner compared to others. Consider whether a continuation application might be more strategic, especially if you need to add new matter or significantly broaden claims.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 21.4% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 29% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows below-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. You may need to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 100.0% of appeals filed. This is in the 98% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: This examiner frequently reconsiders rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1207.01, all appeals must go through a mandatory appeal conference. Filing a Notice of Appeal may prompt favorable reconsideration even before you file an Appeal Brief.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 120.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 95% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are frequently granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1002.02(c), various examiner actions are petitionable to the Technology Center Director, including prematureness of final rejection, refusal to enter amendments, and requirement for information. If you believe an examiner action is improper, consider filing a petition.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 38% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 5.0% of allowed cases (in the 82% percentile). Per MPEP § 714.14, a Quayle action indicates that all claims are allowable but formal matters remain. This examiner frequently uses Quayle actions compared to other examiners, which is a positive indicator that once substantive issues are resolved, allowance follows quickly.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Prepare for rigorous examination: With a below-average allowance rate, ensure your application has strong written description and enablement support. Consider filing a continuation if you need to add new matter.
  • Expect multiple rounds of prosecution: This examiner issues more office actions than average. Address potential issues proactively in your initial response and consider requesting an interview early in prosecution.
  • Prioritize examiner interviews: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner. Request an interview after the first office action to clarify issues and potentially expedite allowance.
  • Appeal filing as negotiation tool: This examiner frequently reconsiders rejections during the appeal process. Filing a Notice of Appeal may prompt favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.
  • Plan for extended prosecution: Applications take longer than average with this examiner. Factor this into your continuation strategy and client communications.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.