USPTO Examiner SIDKY YAHYA I - Art Unit 3675

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
18983381POINTER TYPE COMBINATION LOCK BOX AND POINTER TYPE COMBINATION LOCKDecember 2024February 2026Allow1400NoNo
18931566LOCKING ASSEMBLY WITH SPRING MECHANISMOctober 2024January 2026Allow1500NoNo
18815776LOCK CAPABLE OF SHOWING LOCKING OR UNLOCKING STATEAugust 2024March 2026Allow1810NoNo
18808019LATCH ASSEMBLY FOR TONNEAU COVERAugust 2024January 2026Allow1700NoNo
18793145MAGNETIC DOOR LATCH ASSEMBLYAugust 2024November 2025Allow1510NoNo
18758606DOOR HANDLE SYSTEM FOR A SAFETY DOOR, ESPECIALLY FOR A SLIDING DOOR OR A SWING DOORJune 2024February 2026Allow1910NoNo
18746608OVERHEAD LOCKING DEVICEJune 2024April 2025Allow1010NoNo
18719931LOCKING DEVICE FOR A DOORJune 2024January 2026Allow2010YesNo
18714609Locking Device for a Driveshaft of a Bicycle, and Bicycle Comprising SameMay 2024January 2026Allow2010NoNo
18655902WRAP-AROUND GATE LATCHMay 2024August 2025Allow1510NoNo
18635846Electronic Mortise Lock CylinderApril 2024August 2025Allow1610NoNo
18697059SERVER AND TOOL-FREE LOCKING MECHANISMMarch 2024November 2025Allow2010NoNo
18695965ELECTRONIC LOCK TRANSMISSION STRUCTURE, ELECTRONIC LOCK, AND MOTOR VEHICLEMarch 2024February 2026Allow2210NoNo
18406355LATCH ASSEMBLY FOR USE WITH AN INVERSION DRUMJanuary 2024July 2025Allow1820YesNo
18402727Door mounted door position maintaining deviceJanuary 2024February 2026Abandon2510NoNo
18496230APPARATUS, SYSTEMS, AND METHODS FOR SINGLE-SIDED LOCKSOctober 2023December 2024Allow1310YesNo
18286570DOOR HANDLE DEVICE FOR A VEHICLE DOOROctober 2023April 2025Allow1910NoNo
18484747COMPACT POWERED DOOR LATCHOctober 2023January 2026Allow2710NoNo
18378652GATE LATCHOctober 2023December 2025Allow2610NoNo
18480251Locking System for an Aircraft DoorOctober 2023September 2025Allow2310NoNo
18374869HIDDEN DOOR HANDLE, VEHICLE DOOR AND VEHICLESeptember 2023February 2026Allow2820NoNo
18553116ELECTROMECHANICAL LOCK ASSEMBLYSeptember 2023January 2026Allow2810NoNo
18553094ARRANGEMENT AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING STATUS OF AN ELECTROMAGNETIC PADLOCKSeptember 2023March 2025Allow1800NoNo
18477101FLUSH BOLT ASSEMBLY WITH BOLT-CONTAINED SPRINGSeptember 2023October 2025Abandon2410NoNo
18473849LATCH LOCK ASSEMBLY WITH FAULT MONITORING, AND CLOSURE STRUCTURE HAVING SUCH A LATCH LOCK ASSEMBLYSeptember 2023August 2025Allow2210YesNo
18372474NACELLE PIN LATCH ASSEMBLYSeptember 2023October 2025Allow2510NoNo
18371829MINIMALIST SECONDARY BARRIERSeptember 2023December 2025Allow2720NoNo
18470018Locks for Sliding DoorsSeptember 2023October 2025Abandon2510NoNo
18469901DEVICE FOR IDENTIFYING A POSITION OF A VEHICLE HANDLESeptember 2023February 2026Allow2920YesNo
18550072Magnetic Locking System for a Movable Door or WindowSeptember 2023July 2025Allow2210NoNo
18244457VERTICALLY ADJUSTABLE STRIKE PLATESeptember 2023December 2025Allow2720YesNo
18243668HOOK LATCH FOR AIRCRAFT PANELSeptember 2023May 2025Allow2010NoNo
18548860A CHILD SAFETY LOCK FOR CABINETS AND DRAWERSSeptember 2023February 2026Abandon3010NoNo
18547501RETAINING AND RELEASING DEVICE AND ASSEMBLY FOR SPACECRAFTAugust 2023August 2025Allow2410NoNo
18236163DOOR LOCK MECHANISMAugust 2023July 2025Allow2310NoNo
18234566DOOR LOCK ASSEMBLYAugust 2023July 2025Allow2310YesNo
18231376STRIKER LOCKING LATCH ASSEMBLY INCORPORATING A CINCHING CAM AND HOOK FOR COMPRESSING THE STRIKER AGAINST OUTER SUPPORT PLATESAugust 2023August 2024Allow1210YesNo
18363343DOOR HOLDING DEVICEAugust 2023July 2025Abandon2310NoNo
18362774Retractable Door Pins for Aircraft DoorJuly 2023October 2025Allow2710NoNo
18346251Door HolderJuly 2023January 2026Allow3120YesNo
18344304QUICK RELEASE AUTOMOTIVE CHECK STRAPJune 2023July 2025Allow2411NoNo
18344217DOOR HANDLE ADAPTER FOR SPRUNG HUBJune 2023September 2024Allow1411NoNo
18336512ELECTRONIC LOCK WITH ADJUSTABLE DEAD LATCH CHANNEL LOCATIONJune 2023August 2025Allow2610NoNo
18267528TWO-WHEELER LOCKJune 2023September 2025Allow2710NoNo
18322891EMERGENCY EGRESS SAFETY SYSTEMMay 2023April 2025Allow2320YesNo
18198428SMART DOOR LOCK INTEGRATED AIR CHANNEL TO MOUNTING BRACKET FOR VENTILATIONMay 2023November 2025Allow3020NoNo
18312798DOOR LATCH DEVICEMay 2023May 2025Allow2410NoNo
18307186METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR OPERATION OF SAFETY FEATURES OF AIRCRAFT GALLEY CONTAINERSApril 2023July 2025Allow2710NoNo
18130516LOCKING ASSEMBLY WITH SPRING MECHANISMApril 2023July 2024Allow1610NoNo
18122256MOTOR VEHICLE LOCK FOR A LOCKING ELEMENT OF A MOTOR VEHICLEMarch 2023July 2025Allow2810NoNo
18180547SECURITY DEVICE FOR SLIDING DOOR OR SLIDING WINDOW ASSEMBLYMarch 2023February 2024Allow1110NoNo
18043932LOCKING DEVICEMarch 2023June 2025Allow2820NoNo
18113145VEHICLE DOOR HANDLE ASSEMBLYFebruary 2023March 2025Allow2610NoNo
18173220VEHICLE DOOR HANDLE ASSEMBLYFebruary 2023June 2025Allow2820YesNo
18022288FRICTION HINGE FOR OUTWARD OPENING TOP HUNG WINDOWSFebruary 2023March 2025Abandon2510NoNo
18171781Dampening Mechanism for Touch Bar Exit DeviceFebruary 2023November 2024Allow2010NoNo
18171451PRE-MOUNTED LOCK FOR A DOOR OF A LOW VOLTAGE ENCLOSUREFebruary 2023September 2025Allow3110NoNo
18041543LOCKING COREFebruary 2023September 2024Allow1900YesNo
18007075SAFETY LOCK WITH DOUBLE CLOSURE AND APPLICATION FOR USEJanuary 2023April 2025Abandon2710NoNo
18101925LOCK WITH PICK PREVENTION ASSEMBLY AND ALARMJanuary 2023August 2025Allow3010YesNo
18099889LANYARD FOBJanuary 2023November 2024Allow2210NoNo
18015408ACTUATING DEVICE FOR LOCK DEVICE, AND LOCK DEVICEJanuary 2023June 2025Allow2920YesNo
18081020LOCKING DEVICE FOR LOCKERDecember 2022January 2024Abandon1320NoNo
18007604HOUSEHOLD APPLIANCEDecember 2022July 2025Allow3210NoNo
17927028LOCKING MODULENovember 2022April 2025Abandon2910NoNo
17990308LATCH MODULE AND AN APPLIANCE USING THE SAMENovember 2022May 2025Allow3020YesNo
17998343ALIGNMENT GUIDE FOR A DOOR HANDLE ASSEMBLYNovember 2022July 2025Allow3210NoNo
17916849MOTOR VEHICLE LOCKOctober 2022May 2025Allow3130NoNo
17959905FLEX DRIVE TIE-BAR WINDOW LOCK SYSTEMOctober 2022January 2025Allow2710NoNo
17955751Lock Assembly for a Door of a Distribution BoxSeptember 2022March 2024Allow1720YesNo
17894471TUBULAR-TYPE DEADBOLT DOOR LOCK WITH BACKSET ADJUSTMENTAugust 2022December 2023Allow1610NoNo
17890800COMBINATION LOCK FOR THE REAR CARGO DOORS OF A VEHICLEAugust 2022January 2025Allow2910NoNo
17819659EMERGENCY DOOR LOCKAugust 2022October 2024Abandon2610NoNo
17797579CONTROL ASSEMBLY FOR A MOTOR VEHICLE LOCK SYSTEMAugust 2022August 2025Allow3620NoNo
17878841MORTISE LOCK RESISTANT TO BLUNT FORCE ATTACKSAugust 2022June 2025Allow3520NoNo
17878298Overhead Locking DeviceAugust 2022February 2024Allow1820NoNo
17816514ROTARY LOCKED STRUCTURE OF DOOR LOCKAugust 2022August 2025Allow3611YesNo
17806612CARGO CONTAINER WITH INTEGRATED LOCKING APPARATUSJune 2022October 2024Abandon2810NoNo
17782184MOTOR VEHICLE, IN PARTICULAR MOTOR VEHICLE DOOR LOCKJune 2022January 2025Allow3210NoNo
17782001UNLOCKING DEVICEJune 2022November 2024Allow3020NoNo
17664266DOOR LATCH BLOCK AND ASSEMBLYMay 2022August 2024Allow2700NoNo
17748287DOOR LATCH CLASP ASSEMBLYMay 2022May 2024Allow2420YesNo
17727802LATCH MECHANISM OF OPENING/CLOSING DOOR AND DEVICE INCLUDING OPENING/CLOSING DOOR USING LATCH MECHANISMApril 2022July 2024Allow2711YesNo
17727095ELECTRONIC CARGO CONTAINER LOCKING MECHANISMApril 2022April 2024Allow2420YesNo
17726353ROTATABLE HANDLE FOR HVAC ACCESS PANELSApril 2022July 2025Allow3920NoNo
17721977Electronic Mortise Lock CylinderApril 2022August 2024Allow2842YesNo
17720329WRAP-AROUND GATE LATCHApril 2022February 2024Allow2210NoNo
17718431LOCK FOR ROLL OFF CONTAINERApril 2022August 2024Allow2830YesNo
17761750LOCK DEVICE AND SYSTEMMarch 2022January 2026Allow4630NoNo
17693284RAPID DOOR LATCHING DEVICEMarch 2022December 2024Abandon3320NoNo
17651603HASP ASSEMBLY FOR A HIDDEN-SHACKLE PADLOCKFebruary 2022July 2024Allow2910YesNo
17670414HLOCK Temporary Construction Door LatchFebruary 2022December 2023Abandon2210YesNo
17590040DOOR LOCK FOR A HOUSEHOLD APPLIANCE AND HOUSEHOLD APPLIANCE HAVING THE DOOR LOCKFebruary 2022May 2024Allow2800YesNo
17625865MOTOR VEHICLE LOCKING DEVICEJanuary 2022December 2024Allow3520NoNo
17562814Multiple Bearing Locking Mechanism ModuleDecember 2021March 2024Allow2611YesNo
17561005DOOR HAVING INTEGRATED OPENING AND CLOSING MECHANISMSDecember 2021June 2025Allow4140YesNo
17643633ELECTRONIC LOCK WITH ADJUSTABLE DEAD LATCH CHANNEL LOCATIONDecember 2021November 2023Abandon2310NoNo
17614258INDUCTIVE SENSOR FOR VEHICLENovember 2021May 2025Allow4121YesNo
17612078Automatic Lock With Rotatable TriggerNovember 2021February 2024Abandon2710NoNo
17454848INDUSTRIAL DOOR LOCKNovember 2021November 2023Allow2410NoNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner SIDKY, YAHYA I.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
1
Examiner Affirmed
0
(0.0%)
Examiner Reversed
1
(100.0%)
Reversal Percentile
98.4%
Higher than average

What This Means

With a 100.0% reversal rate, the PTAB has reversed the examiner's rejections more often than affirming them. This reversal rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals are more successful here than in most other areas.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
2
Allowed After Appeal Filing
1
(50.0%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
1
(50.0%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
83.0%
Higher than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 50.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is particularly effective here. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB show good success rates. If you have a strong case on the merits, consider fully prosecuting the appeal to a Board decision.

Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Examiner SIDKY, YAHYA I - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner SIDKY, YAHYA I works in Art Unit 3675 and has examined 126 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 77.0%, this examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 38 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner SIDKY, YAHYA I's allowance rate of 77.0% places them in the 44% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by SIDKY, YAHYA I receive 1.95 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 48% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues fewer office actions than average, which may indicate efficient prosecution or a more lenient examination style.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by SIDKY, YAHYA I is 38 months. This places the examiner in the 31% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly slower than average with this examiner.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +30.6% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by SIDKY, YAHYA I. This interview benefit is in the 78% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner and should be strongly considered as a prosecution strategy. Per MPEP § 713.10, interviews are available at any time before the Notice of Allowance is mailed or jurisdiction transfers to the PTAB.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 29.0% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 54% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. Consider whether your amendments or new arguments are strong enough to warrant an RCE versus filing a continuation.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 27.6% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 39% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows below-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. You may need to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 200.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 98% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: Pre-appeal conferences are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. Before filing a full appeal brief, strongly consider requesting a PAC. The PAC provides an opportunity for the examiner and supervisory personnel to reconsider the rejection before the case proceeds to the PTAB.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 66.7% of appeals filed. This is in the 51% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 50.0% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner shows above-average willingness to reconsider rejections during appeals. The mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) provides an opportunity for reconsideration.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 66.7% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 74% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions show above-average success regarding this examiner's actions. Petitionable matters include restriction requirements (MPEP § 1002.02(c)(2)) and various procedural issues.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 39% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 2.1% of allowed cases (in the 68% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions more often than average when claims are allowable but formal matters remain (MPEP § 714.14).

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Prioritize examiner interviews: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner. Request an interview after the first office action to clarify issues and potentially expedite allowance.
  • Request pre-appeal conferences: PACs are highly effective with this examiner. Before filing a full appeal brief, request a PAC to potentially resolve issues without full PTAB review.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.