USPTO Examiner PEZZUTO ROBERT ERIC - Art Unit 3671

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
17028497MONITORING DEVICE FOR MONITORING CROP YIELDSeptember 2020June 2024Allow4510NoNo
17018306ROBUST MULTI-TOOL ASSEMBLY FOR HYDRAULIC EXCAVATORSSeptember 2020November 2024Allow5030NoNo
16939533Dual Powered Riding Lawn MowerJuly 2020September 2020Allow200NoNo
16930575VISUAL CUES TO REDUCE MARINE LIFE MORTALITY DURING A DREDGING OPERATIONJuly 2020May 2025Allow5830NoNo
16764970AN EARTH CUTTING APPARATUS, SYSTEM AND METHODMay 2020September 2020Allow400NoNo
16652882VOLUME SENSOR FOR COMBINE HARVESTER TAILINGS RETURN SYSTEMApril 2020July 2020Allow400NoNo
16652012Automatic Chopper Pan ControlMarch 2020July 2020Allow400NoNo
16579711ROBOT POSITIONING WITH STATION-KEEPINGSeptember 2019March 2020Allow610NoNo
16577324Spring Loaded Feeding DeviceSeptember 2019December 2019Allow310NoNo
16470380ROTATING TOOLBAR WITH DOUBLE ROD CYLINDERJune 2019September 2019Allow300NoNo
16424719SAFETY SYSTEM FOR MOWERS AND MOWER THEREWITHMay 2019March 2020Allow910NoNo
16406337LAWN CARE APPARATUSMay 2019September 2019Allow510NoNo
16386433Spring Loaded Feeding DeviceApril 2019September 2019Allow510NoNo
16371267WALK-BEHIND, SELF-PROPELLED MACHINEApril 2019July 2019Allow300NoNo
16352274Snow Discharge DiverterMarch 2019January 2020Allow1110NoNo
16285767CROP PROCESSING APPARATUS IN A COMBINE HARVESTERFebruary 2019January 2020Allow1010NoNo
16267362METHOD FOR AUTONOMOUSLY WEEDING CROPS IN AN AGRICULTURAL FIELDFebruary 2019July 2019Allow510NoNo
16257628Cleaning Loss Sensor Arrangement for Combine HarvesterJanuary 2019August 2020Allow1910NoNo
16309257VERGE-CUTTING MOWER DEVICE COMPRISING A PIECE OF CUTTING/GRINDING EQUIPMENT ACTUATED USING AN ELECTRIC MOTORDecember 2018July 2020Allow1910NoNo
16213763WEAR PLATE ASSEMBLY WITH TWO-PART KEY ASSEMBLYDecember 2018June 2019Allow610NoNo
16208612Air Chute Feed Assembly for A Crossflow Cleaning Fan AssemblyDecember 2018September 2020Allow2110NoNo
16202138Series Hydraulic Motor System for Driving Air Moving Fans on an Agricultural Harvesting CombineNovember 2018April 2020Allow1710NoNo
16196371PICKUP REEL FOR A CROP HARVESTING HEADERNovember 2018May 2019Allow610NoNo
16303270WEARING-PART SYSTEMNovember 2018June 2020Allow1910NoNo
16188883Ice Removal MachineNovember 2018June 2019Allow710NoNo
16181322APPARATUS CONFIGURED TO ACT AS BOTH AN EDGER AND A SOD CUTTERNovember 2018September 2019Allow1100NoNo
16180958RETENTION SYSTEM FOR MOTOR GRADER BITSNovember 2018August 2020Allow2120NoNo
16177007Valve Assembly For Work AttachmentOctober 2018January 2020Allow1410NoNo
16174502Mowing DeviceOctober 2018September 2020Allow2310NoNo
16162687CONCENTRATED HIGH-SPEED RIGID HUBOctober 2018July 2020Allow2120NoNo
16161295Hydraulic Control SystemOctober 2018November 2019Allow1310NoNo
16154484SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLED CLEANING IN A CANE HARVESTEROctober 2018August 2019Allow1000NoNo
16090989HYDRAULIC APPARATUS FOR SUPPLYING AN ASSEMBLY OF TRACK-SETTING DEVICES FOR A TRACKED VEHICLE, THE ASSEMBLY OF TRACK-SETTING DEVICES AND THE TRACKED VEHICLEOctober 2018May 2020Allow1901NoNo
16089680Work VehicleSeptember 2018June 2020Allow2110NoNo
16134580SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING SOIL PARAMETERS OF A FIELD AT A SELECTED PLANTING DEPTH DURING AGRICULTURAL OPERATIONSSeptember 2018August 2020Allow2310NoNo
16084854A WHEEL LOADER FRONT UNIT AND A WHEEL LOADERSeptember 2018July 2020Allow2210NoNo
16127272SELF-LEARNING GRAIN SENSING SYSTEMSeptember 2018September 2020Allow2400NoNo
16127353Sensor Assembly For A Combine Harvester ScreenSeptember 2018June 2020Allow2110NoNo
16126234HIGH PRESSURE WATER JET ADD-ON TO HYDROVAC BOOM HOSESeptember 2018September 2019Allow1210YesNo
16082551A ROBOTIC HARVESTERSeptember 2018May 2020Allow2000NoNo
16115061VARIABLE TOOTH COULTER BLADE WITH SIZED INSERTSAugust 2018August 2020Allow2400NoNo
16080540TAGGED EXCAVATION ELEMENTAugust 2018July 2020Allow2320NoNo
16110452THRESHING AND SEPARATING SYSTEM WITH ADJUSTABLE ROTOR VANESAugust 2018January 2020Allow1710NoNo
16111205Universal Bumper PlowAugust 2018March 2020Allow1930YesNo
16110067MULTIPLE TOOL CONSTRUCTION MACHINEAugust 2018January 2020Allow1710NoNo
16110072TOOL CHANGER FOR A CONSTRUCTION MACHINEAugust 2018September 2020Allow2410NoNo
16077775IMPLEMENT OPERATING APPARATUSAugust 2018April 2020Allow2000NoNo
16077318FEMALE PART, RETAINING DEVICE AND PIN SYSTEM FOR EXCAVATORS AND THE LIKEAugust 2018September 2020Allow2510NoNo
16057938CONTROL METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR A ROTOR CAGE WITH ACTUATED CAGE VANES IN A HARVESTERAugust 2018September 2020Allow2510NoNo
16075223A METHOD OF OPERATING AN AGRICULTURAL SYSTEM HAVING A TRACTOR AND AN IMPLEMENT, AND AN AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMAugust 2018March 2020Allow1900NoNo
16049873CONVEYOR CHAIN WITH MULTI-SEGMENT CONVEYING FLOORJuly 2018January 2020Allow1810NoNo
16050965COVER ATTACHMENT FOR LAWNMOWER CUTTER HOUSINGJuly 2018May 2020Allow2110NoNo
16049021SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AUTOMATIC IMPLEMENT DEPTH MEASUREMENT CONTROLJuly 2018June 2020Allow2310NoNo
16042724EXCAVATING TOOTH ASSEMBLY WITH LOCKING PIN ASSEMBLYJuly 2018November 2018Allow410NoNo
16039638MODULAR SENSOR ARRAY FOR BULK MATERIAL DETECTIONJuly 2018February 2020Allow1900NoNo
16037440AUTOMATIC CONTROL OF WINDROWER SWATHBOARDJuly 2018July 2020Allow2410NoNo
16037513COMPUTER CONTROLLED HYDRAULIC CONDITIONER ROLL TENSIONING ADJUSTMENTJuly 2018August 2019Allow1300NoNo
16032847Suspension For A MowerJuly 2018August 2020Allow2510NoNo
16029152REMOTE CONTROL SYSTEMJuly 2018August 2020Allow2610NoNo
16028363ORIFICED CHECK VALVE IN WING CIRCUITJuly 2018May 2020Allow2200NoNo
16028355WING LOCKING WITH HYDRAULIC BLOCKER VALVEJuly 2018August 2020Allow2610NoNo
16025500CHOPPING MODULEJuly 2018August 2019Allow1400NoNo
16067656MACHINE WITH BALLAST RECEIVING DEVICEJuly 2018June 2020Allow2310NoNo
16067740METHOD OF IDENTIFYING A DIFFICULTY LEVEL OF AN OPERATING CONDITION OF A LOADERJuly 2018January 2020Allow1810NoNo
16024281SYSTEM, METHOD AND APPARTUS FOR IN-SITU, DYNAMIC REPAIR OF A RAILROADJune 2018July 2020Allow2510NoNo
16024450Autonomous Mobile Platform with Harvesting System and Pest and Weed Suppression SystemsJune 2018August 2020Allow2510YesNo
16015875Device and Method For Changing Cleaning Shoe Shaker Arm AngleJune 2018April 2020Allow2200NoNo
16011991SNOW GROOMER OR OTHER TRACKED VEHICLE AND SYSTEMS THEREFORJune 2018December 2019Allow1810NoNo
16009202AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WITH TREADER-REEL FINISHING ATTACHMENTJune 2018May 2020Abandon2311NoNo
16005025SYSTEM AND METHOD THEREOF FOR OFF SHORE MININGJune 2018October 2018Allow410NoNo
15976556METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR DETECTING HEAVY MACHINE WEARMay 2018January 2020Allow2010YesNo
15975304Tractor-Trailer CombinationsMay 2018October 2020Allow2920NoNo
15973670SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MONITORING THE AMOUNT OF PLANT MATERIALS ENTERING AN AGRICULTURAL HARVESTERMay 2018August 2020Allow2710NoNo
15973505AGRICULTURAL TOOLBAR APPARATUS, SYSTEMS AND METHODSMay 2018June 2020Allow2510NoNo
15967598MONITORING DEVICE FOR MONITORING CROP YIELDApril 2018July 2020Allow2610NoNo
15967589SENSOR SYSTEM FOR DETERMINING CROP YIELDApril 2018March 2020Allow2200NoNo
15953675HARVESTING MACHINE HAVING A MOISTURE REMOVAL MECHANISM AND A CROP CONVERGING MECHANISMApril 2018February 2020Allow2200NoNo
15950324Unterface Attachment System and MethodApril 2018August 2020Abandon2810NoNo
15767324ANTICIPATIVE ELECTRIC MOWER AND METHOD OF PILOTING SUCH A MOWERApril 2018February 2020Allow2200NoNo
15766922CARRIER ASSEMBLYApril 2018June 2020Allow2710NoNo
15945837DISK BLADE WITH SHARPENED EDGE AND RELIEF PORTION AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAMEApril 2018September 2020Allow2910NoNo
15938124Modular Combine Traction AxleMarch 2018May 2020Allow2610NoNo
15933234HARVESTER HEADER CONTROL SYSTEM, METHOD AND APPARATUSMarch 2018August 2020Abandon2910NoNo
15761435DRAPER BELT WITH A RUBBER INSERT INSIDE THE CLEATS TO INCREASE BELT DURABILITY AND REDUCE FIBERGLASS RODMarch 2018September 2020Allow3010NoNo
15926377PLOW BLADE WEAR MEMBERMarch 2018November 2018Allow810NoNo
15922221COMBINE HARVESTERMarch 2018October 2019Allow1910NoNo
15920101LAWN MOWER INCLUDING AN INCLINED BLOWERMarch 2018April 2020Allow2510NoNo
15917927LOCK PROVING SYSTEM FOR AN AGRICULTURAL MACHINE ATTACHMENTMarch 2018March 2020Allow2410NoNo
15758627COMBINE HEADER REEL APPARATUS FOR SUNFLOWERSMarch 2018December 2019Allow2110NoNo
15916275Corn Cob Harvesting MachineMarch 2018January 2020Allow2300NoNo
15912061PRESSURIZED LIQUID CUTTING HARVESTER FOR PRODUCEMarch 2018May 2020Allow2710NoNo
15910282GARDENING TOOLMarch 2018September 2019Allow1910NoNo
15906545TOOTH ADAPTER AND BUCKETFebruary 2018June 2020Allow2730YesNo
15902277SELECTIVE HARVESTERFebruary 2018March 2020Abandon2510NoNo
15902484AGRICULTURAL MOTOR VEHICLEFebruary 2018January 2020Allow2300NoNo
15901289DRIVE UNIT FOR A DOWN CROP ATTACHMENT ON A HEADERFebruary 2018November 2019Allow2100NoNo
15898698Harvester With Feedback Assembly And Methods Of Using The SameFebruary 2018April 2020Allow2610NoNo
15896485DETECTION ARRANGEMENT FOR DETECTING A STATE OF WEAR OF A CHOPPING ASSEMBLYFebruary 2018December 2019Allow2210NoNo
15897057DOUBLE-WHEEL HIGH PRESSURE ICE-BREAKING MACHINEFebruary 2018December 2019Abandon2211NoNo
15892232ADAPTIVE CONTROL OF A MOWERFebruary 2018January 2020Allow2410NoNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner PEZZUTO, ROBERT ERIC.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
2
Examiner Affirmed
1
(50.0%)
Examiner Reversed
1
(50.0%)
Reversal Percentile
77.9%
Higher than average

What This Means

With a 50.0% reversal rate, the PTAB reverses the examiner's rejections in a meaningful percentage of cases. This reversal rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals are more successful here than in most other areas.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
21
Allowed After Appeal Filing
9
(42.9%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
12
(57.1%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
71.3%
Higher than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 42.9% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is above the USPTO average, suggesting that filing an appeal can be an effective strategy for prompting reconsideration.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB show good success rates. If you have a strong case on the merits, consider fully prosecuting the appeal to a Board decision.

Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Examiner PEZZUTO, ROBERT ERIC - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner PEZZUTO, ROBERT ERIC works in Art Unit 3671 and has examined 1,829 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 88.2%, this examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 20 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner PEZZUTO, ROBERT ERIC's allowance rate of 88.2% places them in the 70% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by PEZZUTO, ROBERT ERIC receive 0.96 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 6% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues significantly fewer office actions than most examiners.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by PEZZUTO, ROBERT ERIC is 20 months. This places the examiner in the 93% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications move through prosecution relatively quickly with this examiner.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +1.4% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by PEZZUTO, ROBERT ERIC. This interview benefit is in the 22% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 42.9% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 94% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. If you receive a final rejection, filing an RCE with substantive amendments or arguments has a strong likelihood of success.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 62.3% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 88% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner is highly receptive to after-final amendments compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 714.12, after-final amendments may be entered "under justifiable circumstances." Consider filing after-final amendments with a clear showing of allowability rather than immediately filing an RCE, as this examiner frequently enters such amendments.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 125.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 84% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: Pre-appeal conferences are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. Before filing a full appeal brief, strongly consider requesting a PAC. The PAC provides an opportunity for the examiner and supervisory personnel to reconsider the rejection before the case proceeds to the PTAB.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 89.5% of appeals filed. This is in the 82% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 52.9% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner frequently reconsiders rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1207.01, all appeals must go through a mandatory appeal conference. Filing a Notice of Appeal may prompt favorable reconsideration even before you file an Appeal Brief.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 35.8% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 23% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are rarely granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing a petition, as the Technology Center Director typically upholds this examiner's decisions.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 3.8% of allowed cases (in the 83% percentile). Per MPEP § 1302.04, examiner's amendments are used to place applications in condition for allowance when only minor changes are needed. This examiner frequently uses this tool compared to other examiners, indicating a cooperative approach to getting applications allowed. Strategic Insight: If you are close to allowance but minor claim amendments are needed, this examiner may be willing to make an examiner's amendment rather than requiring another round of prosecution.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.2% of allowed cases (in the 55% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions more often than average when claims are allowable but formal matters remain (MPEP § 714.14).

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Consider after-final amendments: This examiner frequently enters after-final amendments. If you can clearly overcome rejections with claim amendments, file an after-final amendment before resorting to an RCE.
  • RCEs are effective: This examiner has a high allowance rate after RCE compared to others. If you receive a final rejection and have substantive amendments or arguments, an RCE is likely to be successful.
  • Request pre-appeal conferences: PACs are highly effective with this examiner. Before filing a full appeal brief, request a PAC to potentially resolve issues without full PTAB review.
  • Appeal filing as negotiation tool: This examiner frequently reconsiders rejections during the appeal process. Filing a Notice of Appeal may prompt favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.
  • Examiner cooperation: This examiner frequently makes examiner's amendments to place applications in condition for allowance. If you are close to allowance, the examiner may help finalize the claims.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.