USPTO Examiner KAERCHER ASHLEY ANGELINE - Art Unit 3671

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
18926633STRAW RETURNING METHOD THROUGH THAWING AND WET PUDDLING FOR SALINE-SODIC PADDY FIELDS AND APPLICATION THEREOFOctober 2024June 2025Allow820NoNo
17968914BELT DRIVE FOR A WEED SEED DESTRUCTOR OF A COMBINE HARVESTEROctober 2022July 2025Abandon3300NoNo
17841102AGRICULTURAL HEADER WITH A DRAPER BELT INCLUDING A SEED SAVER DISPOSED BEHIND ONE OR MORE CROP RAMPSJune 2022January 2026Allow4310NoNo
17715601MODULAR AGRICULTURAL PLANTERApril 2022September 2024Allow2910NoNo
17754105CUTTING TOOL MOUNTED ON DIVIDER OF A HARVESTING HEADERMarch 2022September 2025Allow4210NoNo
17693661COMBINE HARVESTER RESIDUE SPREADER FIN SHAPED TO INCREASE SPREADING ACTIONMarch 2022March 2024Allow2410NoNo
17692097Trimmer Attachment for LawnmowerMarch 2022January 2025Abandon3410NoNo
17652040COMBINE CONCAVEFebruary 2022April 2024Abandon2610NoNo
17590956CONDITIONER ASSEMBLY WITH REMOTE ADJUSTABLE ROLL GAPFebruary 2022October 2025Allow4420NoNo
17586133Utility Vehicle Hay Fork Attachment DeviceJanuary 2022January 2026Allow4710NoNo
17561965Systems and Methods for Improved Bucker InsertionDecember 2021March 2024Allow2600NoNo
17645952SKID PLATE FOR SENSOR INTEGRATIONDecember 2021March 2024Allow2710NoNo
17645881FORAGE HARVESTERDecember 2021March 2024Allow2600NoNo
17552777DAMPER ELEMENT FOR AGRICULTURAL EQUIPMENT DISC SUPPORT, AGRICULTURAL EQUIPMENT DISC SUPPORT, AND AGRICULTURAL EQUIPMENTDecember 2021April 2025Abandon4010NoNo
17618271A COMBINE HARVESTER AND A METHOD FOR THRESHING HARVESTED CROP MATERIALDecember 2021April 2025Abandon4010NoNo
17545380ROTARY FRAME AND GRADER WITH SAMEDecember 2021September 2025Allow4510NoNo
17457828WRAP DETECTION AND MOISTURE SENSING CONTROL SYSTEM OF AGRICULTURAL BALERDecember 2021May 2025Allow4110NoNo
17534984Mower Having a Mower Unit With a Wind-Around Power Transmission MechanismNovember 2021November 2025Abandon4840NoNo
17531675VEGETATION EDGER WITH LASER AND METHODNovember 2021March 2025Abandon4010NoNo
17529023RESIDUE CHOPPER WITH COUNTERBLADES AND FINSNovember 2021July 2025Allow4410NoNo
17512779LAWN MOWER CUTTER HEIGHT ADJUSTMENTOctober 2021August 2024Allow3300NoNo
17606865WORK VECHICLE WITH QUALITY DETERMINATION DEVICE FOR GRASSOctober 2021September 2025Allow4721YesNo
17594701SEEDING ROBOTOctober 2021September 2025Allow4720NoNo
17509978HYDRAULIC SYSTEMS FOR GRADING MACHINESOctober 2021August 2025Allow4610YesNo
17450618UNIFORM BALE FORMATION SYSTEMOctober 2021July 2025Allow4520NoNo
17496982RADIO-CONTROLLED VEHICLE FOR PERFORMING GROUND WORKOctober 2021March 2025Allow4110NoNo
17497500Height Adjustment Device and Robotic Mower Comprising a Height Adjustment DeviceOctober 2021October 2024Allow3710NoNo
17494366CRAWLER DOZER BLADE CORNER VISIBILITYOctober 2021April 2025Allow4310NoNo
17491722PIVOTABLE WINDROW CHUTE FOR COMBINE HARVESTEROctober 2021February 2024Allow2810NoNo
17449460MOWER CUTTING UNIT LIFT SYSTEM WITH FLEXIBLE LINKSeptember 2021July 2025Allow4520NoNo
17483169COMMON DRIVE MEMBER FOR WEED SEED MILL OF COMBINE HARVESTERSeptember 2021December 2023Allow2600NoNo
17476146STALK ROLLER ASSEMBLY FOR AN AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMSeptember 2021April 2024Allow3110NoNo
17471269MOVABLE HARVESTING APPARATUS AND HARVESTING UNITSeptember 2021July 2024Allow3410NoNo
17470398BUBBLE UP AUGER FOR COMBINE HARVESTERSeptember 2021March 2025Allow4220NoNo
16325643MOWER FOLDING-TYPE CHASSISSeptember 2021April 2025Abandon6011NoNo
17436217METHOD AND DEVICE FOR STRIPPING LEAVES AND OR FLOWERS FROM A STALKSeptember 2021September 2024Allow3620YesNo
17462657INTERNAL DRIVE SYSTEM FOR WEED SEED MILL OF COMBINE HARVESTERAugust 2021February 2024Allow2920NoNo
17434769PRUNING DEVICEAugust 2021February 2025Abandon4210NoNo
17408635APPARATUS FOR ATTACHMENT TO A TRACTORAugust 2021February 2025Abandon4210NoNo
17432301ELECTRIC WORK MACHINE WITH CUTTING BLADEAugust 2021January 2025Abandon4110NoNo
17386885Belt Drive for a Weed Seed Destructor of a Combine HarvesterJuly 2021June 2025Abandon4730NoNo
17381428INTEGRATED WEED SEED MILL AND CHOPPER FOR COMBINE HARVESTERJuly 2021June 2024Allow3510NoNo
17381302COMBINE HARVESTERS HAVING AIR CHANNEL ASSEMBLIES, AND RELATED METHODSJuly 2021September 2024Allow3710NoNo
17424556HARVESTING HEADER HAVING A HYDRAULIC FLUID LOOP AND RELATED SYSTEMS AND METHODSJuly 2021October 2024Allow3910NoNo
17380503Cutting DeviceJuly 2021July 2024Allow3630NoNo
17424121BAFFLE SYSTEM FOR LAWN MOWER CUTTING DECKJuly 2021January 2025Abandon4210NoNo
17422821REEL ASSEMBLY OF AN AGRICULTURAL HEADERJuly 2021April 2024Allow3300NoNo
17375056LAND PLANE ATTACHMENT WITH MECHANICAL RIPPERJuly 2021August 2024Allow3710NoNo
17421485Swath LifterJuly 2021July 2025Allow4820NoNo
17355805AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT SYSTEM WITH A CONTROLLER FOR DETECTING AND MITIGATING PLUG CONDITIONSJune 2021March 2024Allow3310NoNo
17347781SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR STEERING A HARVESTING IMPLEMENT OF AN AGRICULTURAL HARVESTERJune 2021October 2024Abandon4020NoNo
17347752SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ADJUSTING THE POSITION OF A HARVESTING IMPLEMENT OF AN AGRICULTURAL HARVESTERJune 2021September 2025Allow5121NoNo
17344124A MOWING DEVICE WITH A ROTARY FAN AND RELATED FEATURESJune 2021June 2025Allow4830NoNo
17324571AGRICULTURAL HEADER REEL POSITION CONTROL BASED ON HEADER WING POSITIONMay 2021July 2024Allow3820NoNo
17293952HARVESTER HEADER HAVING A SEGMENT CONTROL SYSTEMMay 2021April 2025Allow4720NoNo
17294259HEADER WITH MODULAR RIGID FRAMEMay 2021February 2025Abandon4520NoNo
17293713HARVESTER HEADER WITH LATERAL BELT ROLLER MOUNTMay 2021September 2025Allow5220NoYes
17292332LOCKING MECHANISM FOR AN AGRICULTURAL HEADERMay 2021April 2024Allow3610NoNo
17245260ELECTRONICALLY CONTROLLED VISCOUS COUPLER FOR COMBINE HARVESTERApril 2021July 2024Allow3910NoNo
17242489Conveying and Collecting Device with a Drivable Conveying and Collecting Unit and Agricultural Crop Press with the Conveying and Collecting DeviceApril 2021July 2024Allow3910NoNo
17226002Apparatus, Systems And Methods For Stalk SensingApril 2021August 2024Allow4011NoNo
17225586Method for warning of a shelled ear eventApril 2021September 2024Allow4111YesNo
17282995AUTONOMOUS CROP HARVESTERApril 2021April 2024Allow3610YesNo
17250816CROP DUST SEPARATION SYSTEMMarch 2021May 2024Allow3910NoNo
17177340WORKING MACHINE HAVING MULTIPLE MODES OF OPERATIONFebruary 2021March 2024Allow3710NoNo
17266536AGRICULTURAL WORKING APPARATUSFebruary 2021March 2025Abandon5030NoNo
17141651MOWER-CONDITIONER MACHINE FOR SENSING MOISTURE CONTENT OF CROP MATERIALJanuary 2021March 2024Allow3810NoNo
17056865IMPROVED METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR AUTOMATICALLY PICKING A FRUITNovember 2020April 2025Allow5330YesNo
17051547MULTI-POSITION LOCKING MECHANISM FOR A RIDING LAWN CARE VEHICLEOctober 2020June 2024Allow4320NoNo
17013037Apparatus, Systems And Methods For Stalk SensingSeptember 2020February 2026Allow6040NoNo
16947352METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR CONTROLLING WEEDSJuly 2020April 2024Allow4410NoNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner KAERCHER, ASHLEY ANGELINE.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
1
Allowed After Appeal Filing
1
(100.0%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
0
(0.0%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
99.5%
Higher than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 100.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is particularly effective here. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Strategic Recommendations

Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Examiner KAERCHER, ASHLEY ANGELINE - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner KAERCHER, ASHLEY ANGELINE works in Art Unit 3671 and has examined 61 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 78.7%, this examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 40 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner KAERCHER, ASHLEY ANGELINE's allowance rate of 78.7% places them in the 47% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by KAERCHER, ASHLEY ANGELINE receive 1.43 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 23% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues significantly fewer office actions than most examiners.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by KAERCHER, ASHLEY ANGELINE is 40 months. This places the examiner in the 25% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +23.6% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by KAERCHER, ASHLEY ANGELINE. This interview benefit is in the 70% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide an above-average benefit with this examiner and are worth considering.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 34.6% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 77% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. If you receive a final rejection, filing an RCE with substantive amendments or arguments has a strong likelihood of success.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 58.8% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 84% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner is highly receptive to after-final amendments compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 714.12, after-final amendments may be entered "under justifiable circumstances." Consider filing after-final amendments with a clear showing of allowability rather than immediately filing an RCE, as this examiner frequently enters such amendments.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 100.0% of appeals filed. This is in the 98% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: This examiner frequently reconsiders rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1207.01, all appeals must go through a mandatory appeal conference. Filing a Notice of Appeal may prompt favorable reconsideration even before you file an Appeal Brief.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 39% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 4.2% of allowed cases (in the 78% percentile). Per MPEP § 714.14, a Quayle action indicates that all claims are allowable but formal matters remain. This examiner frequently uses Quayle actions compared to other examiners, which is a positive indicator that once substantive issues are resolved, allowance follows quickly.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Consider after-final amendments: This examiner frequently enters after-final amendments. If you can clearly overcome rejections with claim amendments, file an after-final amendment before resorting to an RCE.
  • RCEs are effective: This examiner has a high allowance rate after RCE compared to others. If you receive a final rejection and have substantive amendments or arguments, an RCE is likely to be successful.
  • Appeal filing as negotiation tool: This examiner frequently reconsiders rejections during the appeal process. Filing a Notice of Appeal may prompt favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.
  • Plan for extended prosecution: Applications take longer than average with this examiner. Factor this into your continuation strategy and client communications.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.