Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18845017 | Work Machine | September 2024 | December 2025 | Allow | 15 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18632399 | DATA COLLECTION INSTRUCTION DEVICE, METHOD, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM FOR GIVING INSTRUCTIONS TO COLLECT DATA | April 2024 | March 2026 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18203099 | METHOD FOR CONTENT-BASED ADJUSTMENT OF THE VISIBILITY OF CONTENT ON A DISPLAY UNIT | May 2023 | February 2026 | Allow | 33 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18127290 | PREDICTIVE TRACTION ASSIST FOR VEHICLES IN PLATOONING OPERATIONS | March 2023 | March 2026 | Abandon | 36 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18118245 | METHOD AND COMPUTER SYSTEM FOR CONTROLLING THE MOVEMENT OF A HOST VEHICLE | March 2023 | May 2025 | Allow | 26 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18168660 | UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE ENTRY INTO A GEOFENCED AREA | February 2023 | October 2025 | Allow | 32 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17087430 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR UAV FLIGHT CONTROL | November 2020 | August 2025 | Allow | 57 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner HASSANIARDEKANI, HAJAR works in Art Unit 3669 and has examined 1 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 100.0%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 57 months.
Examiner HASSANIARDEKANI, HAJAR's allowance rate of 100.0% places them in the 100% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by HASSANIARDEKANI, HAJAR receive 5.00 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 99% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by HASSANIARDEKANI, HAJAR is 57 months. This places the examiner in the 1% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 25.0% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 39% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show below-average effectiveness with this examiner. Carefully evaluate whether an RCE or continuation is the better strategy.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 0.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 3% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 39% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 42% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.