USPTO Examiner KNUDSON ELLE ROSE - Art Unit 3667

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
18427949WORKING VEHICLE AND ATTACHMENT USAGE SYSTEMJanuary 2024February 2026Allow2410NoNo
18561641SYSTEM FOR DETERMINING ABNORMALITIES IN EXTERNAL RECOGNITION, VEHICLE-MOUNTED DEVICE, AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING ABNORMALITIES IN EXTERNAL RECOGNITIONNovember 2023February 2026Abandon2710NoNo
18374590OPERATOR CONFIRMATION OF MACHINE CONTROL SCHEMESeptember 2023October 2025Allow2510YesNo
18235147Portable Flight Navigation Tool Adapted to Assist Pilots in Compliance with International Flight Procedures and NavigationAugust 2023June 2025Allow2200YesNo
18039711WORKING VEHICLE AND WORKING VEHICLE CONTROL METHODMay 2023September 2025Allow2810NoNo
18036507AIRCRAFT POSITION CONTROL SYSTEM, AIRCRAFT, AND AIRCRAFT POSITION CONTROL METHODMay 2023August 2025Allow2710YesNo
18312256VEHICLE BACKUP MONITORING AND REPORTING SYSTEMMay 2023August 2025Allow2710YesNo
18032347Method and Apparatus for Displaying Function Menu Interface of Automobile Tyre Pressure Monitoring SystemApril 2023November 2025Allow3120NoNo
18004908BASECUTTER AUTOMATED HEIGHT CALIBRATION FOR SUGARCANE HARVESTERSJanuary 2023December 2025Allow3510NoNo
18055657OBJECT ENROLLMENT IN A ROBOTIC CART COORDINATION SYSTEMNovember 2022December 2025Allow3720YesNo
17998633LIGHTING SYSTEMNovember 2022October 2025Abandon3510NoNo
17985194NOTIFICATION DEVICE AND NOTIFICATION METHODNovember 2022May 2025Allow3010YesNo
18053939Automated Control Of Vehicle Longitudinal MovementNovember 2022December 2025Abandon3720NoNo
17954994SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR OPTIMIZING THE NOTIFICATION OF MODIFICATIONS TO A ROUTESeptember 2022June 2025Abandon3310NoNo
17930773Baling ApparatusSeptember 2022March 2025Allow3110NoNo
17220046NEAR REAL-TIME RECONSTRUCTION USING DRONESApril 2021August 2025Allow5310YesNo

Appeals Overview

No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.

Examiner KNUDSON, ELLE ROSE - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner KNUDSON, ELLE ROSE works in Art Unit 3667 and has examined 1 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 100.0%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 53 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner KNUDSON, ELLE ROSE's allowance rate of 100.0% places them in the 100% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by KNUDSON, ELLE ROSE receive 1.00 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 9% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues significantly fewer office actions than most examiners.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by KNUDSON, ELLE ROSE is 53 months. This places the examiner in the 3% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 38% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 41% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Plan for extended prosecution: Applications take longer than average with this examiner. Factor this into your continuation strategy and client communications.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.