USPTO Examiner WHITTINGTON JESS G - Art Unit 3666

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
18645515AUTOMATED VEGETATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEMApril 2024March 2025Allow1110YesNo
18407211MOBILE TRANSPORT SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DELIVERING ITEMS AND SERVICESJanuary 2024May 2025Abandon1610NoNo
18446547SYSTEM, CONTROL DEVICE, AND CONTROL METHOD FOR REMOTE CONTROL OF THE VEHICLEAugust 2023May 2025Allow2110NoNo
18200254SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR RESOLVING POINTS OF INTEREST ON MAPSMay 2023April 2025Allow2331YesNo
18144680PLANNING ACCOMMODATIONS FOR REVERSING VEHICLESMay 2023March 2025Allow2231YesNo
18189925SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROJECTING A THREE-DIMENSIONAL (3D) SURFACE TO A TWO-DIMENSIONAL (2D) SURFACE FOR USE IN AUTONOMOUS DRIVINGMarch 2023August 2024Allow1721YesNo
18122536VEHICLE FOR CONTROLLING A PLURALITY OF AIRBAG MODULES AND METHOD OF CONTROLLING THE SAMEMarch 2023August 2024Allow1711NoNo
18183547SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR BUILDING AND MANAGING A TRAIN CONSIST USING A PHASE ARRAY POWERED WIRELESS GATEWAYMarch 2023September 2024Allow1910YesNo
18175493SYSTEM FOR MAPPING TRAFFIC LIGHTS AND ASSOCIATED TRAFFIC LIGHT CYCLE TIMESFebruary 2023March 2025Allow2430NoNo
18171848METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR QUANTIFYING MAP ERRORSFebruary 2023April 2025Allow2511NoNo
18103936OBJECT DETECTION USING SIMILARITY DETERMINATIONS FOR SENSOR OBSERVATIONSJanuary 2023May 2025Allow2710YesNo
18101855DYNAMIC AIR DATA PROBE PROGNOSTICS HEALTH MONITORING COORDINATORJanuary 2023June 2025Allow2911YesNo
18158924Target Identification and Classification Vehicle System and Storage Medium Storing ProgramJanuary 2023June 2025Allow2911YesNo
18096707SYSTEM AND METHOD OF PREDICTING BATTERY STATE OF HEALTHJanuary 2023June 2025Allow2911NoNo
18089040INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, CONTROL DEVICE, AND INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM CALCULATING REMAINING LIFE OF BATTERYDecember 2022June 2025Allow2911YesNo
18085788METHOD OF SYNCHRONIZING A TIME BETWEEN A CONTROLLER AND AN UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLEDecember 2022March 2025Allow2721YesNo
18080883SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IDENTIFYING OBJECTS IN A SPACEDecember 2022May 2025Abandon2901NoNo
17990003Redundant Electronic Control System and DeviceNovember 2022August 2024Allow2131YesNo
17987052Wear Prognosis Method And Maintenance MethodNovember 2022June 2025Allow3111NoNo
17982181ABNORMALITY DETERMINATION PARKING SUPPORT DEVICE, METHOD, AND SYSTEMNovember 2022March 2025Allow2811YesNo
17901201SYSTEM AND METHOD FACILITATING TRAVEL OF AN ELECTRIC OFF-ROAD VEHICLE ON AN UNCHARTED ROUTESeptember 2022June 2025Allow3421YesNo
17891725VEHICLE CONTROL APPARATUS FOR AUTOMATED LANE CHANGINGAugust 2022January 2025Allow2911NoNo
17887050DETECTING AND RESPONDING TO AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE INCIDENTS AND UNUSUAL CONDITIONSAugust 2022August 2024Allow2411YesNo
17886066COURSE PREDICTION DEVICE FOR COLLISION AVOIDANCE IN VEHICLESAugust 2022January 2025Allow2911NoNo
17882523COORDINATING VEHICLE ACCESS TO POWER DISPENSERS AT A CHARGING STATIONAugust 2022April 2025Allow3221YesNo
17880649SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR STOPPED VEHICLE DRIVER ALERTAugust 2022November 2024Abandon2801NoNo
17782235Updating Map Data With User-Generated Image DataJune 2022June 2025Abandon3720YesYes
17756560AUTOMOBILE BRAKE CONTROL METHOD BASED ON AN ANTI-LOCK BRAKING SYSTEM (ABS) AND SYSTEM, AND STORAGE MEDIUMMay 2022October 2024Allow2910NoNo
17755395REMOTE TARGET VEHICLE TRACKING IN A REGION SURROUNDING A MOTOR VEHICLEApril 2022August 2024Allow2810YesNo
17726275SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ADJUSTMENT OF A SEAT OF A MOTORIZED MOBILE SYSTEMApril 2022July 2024Allow2731YesNo
17724525MARINE VESSEL PROPULSION CONTROL USING MAP INFORMATION AND MARINE VESSEL INCLUDING THE SAMEApril 2022April 2025Allow3531YesNo
17769784OVERTURNING-RISK PRESENTATION DEVICE AND OVERTURNING-RISK PRESENTATION METHODApril 2022February 2025Abandon3420NoNo
17723094Method for Online Direct Estimation and Compensation of Flux and Torque Errors in Electric DrivesApril 2022August 2024Allow2831NoNo
17754929Sensor Assembly for a Vehicle and Multi-Circuit Braking System Having Redundant Control and Rotation Rate Information CommunicationApril 2022March 2025Allow3530YesNo
17719072SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETECTING SOFTWARE INTERACTIONS FOR AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES WITHIN CHANGING ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONSApril 2022April 2024Allow2431YesNo
17674387GENERIC ACTUATOR WITH CUSTOMIZED LOCAL FEEDBACKFebruary 2022August 2024Allow3031YesNo
17635628CONTROLLER PROVIDING LINEAR FLUIDIC CONTROL RESPONSES TO VEHICLE MANOUEUVRE INPUTSFebruary 2022September 2024Allow3120YesNo
17632472MONITORING METHOD, COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT, AND ASSOCIATED MONITORING SYSTEM AND AIRCRAFT BY COMPARING AN IMAGE OF INTEREST FROM A VIDEO STREAM TO A LIBRARY OF SIGNATURESFebruary 2022January 2025Allow3520YesNo
17648980Automated Vehicle Scan Tool InitializationJanuary 2022January 2025Allow3651YesNo
17564443ADAPTIVE FORWARD-LOOKING BIOMASS CONVERSION AND MACHINE CONTROL DURING CROP HARVESTING OPERATIONSDecember 2021September 2024Allow3331YesNo
17548065VEHICLE LANE CHANGING METHOD AND APPARATUSDecember 2021May 2025Abandon4121NoNo
17531483ITERATIVE METHOD FOR ESTIMATING THE MOVEMENT OF A MATERIAL BODY BY GENERATING A FILTERED MOVEMENT GRIDNovember 2021December 2024Allow3621YesNo
17521897VEHICLE CONTROL SYSTEM STABILIZING BEHAVIOR OF A VEHICLE MOVING TO A ROAD EDGE TO BE STOPPEDNovember 2021September 2024Allow3521NoNo
17470894AUTONOMOUS REFUSE CONTAINER REPLACEMENT SYSTEMSeptember 2021July 2024Allow3421NoNo
17464237SMART RESCUE SYSTEM COORDINATED WITH AN INTERACTIVE APPLICATIONSeptember 2021October 2024Allow3830YesNo
17458541SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING LANDING OF MOBILE UNIT USING HUMAN FLOW DATAAugust 2021June 2024Allow3340YesNo
17402733PEANUT DIGGER-SHAKER CONTROL SYSTEMAugust 2021November 2024Abandon3910NoNo
17379126DYNAMICALLY MODIFIABLE MAPJuly 2021June 2024Allow3530YesNo
17143540MODULAR SENSOR BAY FOR A CONSTRUCTION MACHINEJanuary 2021February 2025Abandon4931YesNo
16973635CONTROL DEVICE, LOADING MACHINE, AND CONTROL METHOD TO DETERMINE A TARGET AZIMUTH DIRECTIONDecember 2020June 2024Allow4221NoNo
17055584DRIVER PREDICTIVE MENTAL RESPONSE PROFILE AND APPLICATION TO AUTOMATED VEHICLE BRAIN INTERFACE CONTROLNovember 2020July 2024Allow4431YesNo
17071346PRIORITIZATION AND GUIDANCE OF AN AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE TO A DETERMINED SERVICE PROVIDEROctober 2020December 2024Abandon5060YesNo
17031288Automated Swarming Vehicle Test EnvironmentSeptember 2020June 2025Allow5720YesYes
16968244CONTROL DEVICE OF A RIDEABLE MOBILE BODY INCLUDING SPEED LIMITING UNIT FOR LIMITING TARGET SPEED OF THE RIDEABLE MOBILE BODY ACCORDING TO POSITIONAL RELATIONSHIP WITH VIRTUAL WALLAugust 2020August 2024Allow4931YesNo
16932994METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR GUIDING AUTONOMOUS MOBILE VEHICLES WITHIN A LOGISTIC FACILITYJuly 2020February 2025Allow5590YesNo
16722323SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING A VEHICLE SYSTEM TO ACHIEVE OBJECTIVES DURING A TRIPDecember 2019September 2024Allow5771YesYes
15951832VEHICLE PROXIMITY CONDITION DETECTION AND HAPTIC NOTIFICATION SYSTEMApril 2018March 2019Allow1110YesNo
15796554DRIVABLE WORKING MACHINE AND METHOD FOR OPERATING SAMEOctober 2017September 2019Allow2300YesNo
15728897Accessory Device that Provides Sensor Input to a Media DeviceOctober 2017November 2019Allow2541YesNo
15719251AUTOMATED DRIVE UNITS WITH CLEANING MODULES FOR INVENTORY SYSTEMSSeptember 2017February 2020Allow2811YesNo
15611397COLLISION PREDICTION SYSTEMJune 2017March 2020Allow3330YesNo
15527654AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE, IN PARTICULAR FEED MIXING VEHICLE, AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING AN AUTONOMOUS VEHICLEMay 2017June 2019Allow2510NoNo
15499691SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING PERSISTENT MISSION DATA TO A FLEET OF VEHICLESApril 2017June 2019Allow2611YesNo
15378524FUEL PUMP CONTROL SYSTEM FOR SADDLE FUEL TANKSDecember 2016September 2018Allow2101NoNo
15376986DYNAMIC TORQUE PROFILES BASED ON DRIVE MODE SELECTIONDecember 2016February 2019Allow2621YesNo
15348562TRAFFIC LIGHT OPERATIONNovember 2016September 2018Allow2320YesNo
15273116ACTIVE STABILITY DEVICES AND SYSTEMS FOR MOBILE DEVICESSeptember 2016December 2018Allow2730YesNo
15257474STEERING SYSTEMSeptember 2016January 2018Allow1700YesNo
15012558MOBILE TERMINAL AND CONTROLLING METHOD THEREOFFebruary 2016September 2017Allow2011YesNo
14737322DRONE CONTROLLING DEVICE AND METHODJune 2015May 2018Allow3541YesNo
14590995HYDRAULIC OIL DETERIORATION RATIO ESTIMATING APPARATUS IN VEHICLEJanuary 2015May 2016Allow1610NoNo
14400962SYSTEM TO CONTROL THE TORQUE OF AN INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINE DURING A GEAR CHANGENovember 2014April 2016Allow1710NoNo
14346207ELECTRICALLY DRIVEN DUMP TRUCKMarch 2014December 2015Allow2110NoNo
14156322METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR DRIVELINE TORQUE CONTROLJanuary 2014January 2016Allow2411YesNo
14099004STATIC OBSTACLE DETECTIONDecember 2013January 2016Allow2520YesNo
14119044TRAVEL-RESTRICTED AREA SETTING SYSTEM FOR UNMANNED TRAVELING VEHICLE AND COMPUTER PROGRAM FOR SETTING TRAVEL-RESTRICTED AREA OF UNMANNED TRAVELING VEHICLENovember 2013February 2016Allow2730NoNo
14075173VEHICLE BEHAVIOR STABILITY CONTROL APPARATUSNovember 2013August 2015Allow2120YesNo
14003367EFFICIENCY MAP GENERATING APPARATUS, EFFICIENCY MAP GENERATING METHOD, AND PROGRAMOctober 2013March 2015Allow1810YesNo
14000019TORQUE DISTRIBUTION APPARATUS, TORQUE DISTRIBUTION METHOD, TORQUE DISTRIBUTION VALUE GENERATION METHOD, AND PROGRAMSeptember 2013December 2014Allow1610NoNo
14023855METHOD AND DEVICE FOR AUTOMATICALLY MANAGING THE SPACING OF AT LEAST ONE FOLLOWING AIRCRAFT BEHIND AT LEAST ONE TARGET AIRCRAFTSeptember 2013September 2014Allow1210NoNo
14020326METHOD OF ENHANCING ON-BOARD STATE ESTIMATION USING COMMUNICATION SIGNALSSeptember 2013November 2014Allow1510NoNo
14010937Camera Calibration using Structure from Motion TechniquesAugust 2013August 2015Allow2440YesNo
13973925ELECTRIC-POWERED SELF-BALANCING UNICYCLEAugust 2013February 2015Allow1810YesNo
13919158APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR FORECASTING GEOSTATIONARY SATELLITE ERRORJune 2013May 2014Allow1110NoNo
13844804AIRCRAFT TAXIING SYSTEMMarch 2013November 2014Allow2030YesNo
13627820TIRE FORCE MODELING RIG AND METHOD OF USING SAMESeptember 2012November 2015Allow3722YesNo
13609617SHIFT SWITCHING DEVICESeptember 2012May 2014Allow2010YesNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner WHITTINGTON, JESS G.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
1
Examiner Affirmed
1
(100.0%)
Examiner Reversed
0
(0.0%)
Reversal Percentile
16.1%
Lower than average

What This Means

With a 0.0% reversal rate, the PTAB affirms the examiner's rejections in the vast majority of cases. This reversal rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals face significant challenges here.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
3
Allowed After Appeal Filing
0
(0.0%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
3
(100.0%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
7.7%
Lower than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 0.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is less effective here than in most other areas.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB face challenges. Ensure your case has strong merit before committing to full Board review.

Filing a Notice of Appeal shows limited benefit. Consider other strategies like interviews or amendments before appealing.

Examiner WHITTINGTON, JESS G - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner WHITTINGTON, JESS G works in Art Unit 3666 and has examined 85 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 90.6%, this examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 28 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner WHITTINGTON, JESS G's allowance rate of 90.6% places them in the 73% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by WHITTINGTON, JESS G receive 2.05 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 67% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues a slightly above-average number of office actions.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by WHITTINGTON, JESS G is 28 months. This places the examiner in the 53% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly faster than average with this examiner.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +12.6% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by WHITTINGTON, JESS G. This interview benefit is in the 53% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide an above-average benefit with this examiner and are worth considering.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 36.6% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 79% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. If you receive a final rejection, filing an RCE with substantive amendments or arguments has a strong likelihood of success.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 23.8% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 23% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 0.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 17% percentile among all examiners. Note: Pre-appeal conferences show limited success with this examiner compared to others. While still worth considering, be prepared to proceed with a full appeal brief if the PAC does not result in favorable action.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 66.7% of appeals filed. This is in the 46% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 50.0% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner shows below-average willingness to reconsider rejections during appeals. Be prepared to fully prosecute appeals if filed.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 80.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 92% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are frequently granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1002.02(c), various examiner actions are petitionable to the Technology Center Director, including prematureness of final rejection, refusal to enter amendments, and requirement for information. If you believe an examiner action is improper, consider filing a petition.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 35% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 35% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Plan for RCE after final rejection: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments. Budget for an RCE in your prosecution strategy if you receive a final rejection.
  • RCEs are effective: This examiner has a high allowance rate after RCE compared to others. If you receive a final rejection and have substantive amendments or arguments, an RCE is likely to be successful.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.