USPTO Examiner WANG JINGLI - Art Unit 3666

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
17135092ROUTE OPTIMIZATION FOR VEHICLESDecember 2020April 2023Allow2720NoNo
17118104METHOD, APPARATUS, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT FOR GENERATING AND COMMUNICATING LOW BANDWIDTH MAP VERSION AGNOSTIC ROUTESDecember 2020April 2023Allow2810NoNo
17114639DEVICE AND METHOD FOR INTERACTIVE AUTONOMOUS DRIVINGDecember 2020December 2022Allow2420NoNo
17110966OPTIMIZING MANAGEMENT OF AUTONOMOUS VEHICLESDecember 2020November 2022Allow2420NoNo
17107570USER INTERFACE FOR REMOTE VEHICLE MONITORINGNovember 2020January 2023Allow2610YesNo
17098118MANAGEMENT OF DRONE OPERATIONS AND SECURITY IN A PERVASIVE COMPUTING ENVIRONMENTNovember 2020March 2025Abandon5220YesNo
17090923CLOSED-LOOP MOTION CONTROL METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR A THREE-THRUSTER UNMANNED UNDERWATER VEHICLENovember 2020April 2024Abandon4210NoNo
17090998SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR OPERATING A RETRACTABLE SENSOR OF AN AUTONOMOUS VEHICLENovember 2020August 2024Allow4520NoNo
17090739SYSTEMS AND METHODS REMOTE CONTROL OF VEHICLESNovember 2020July 2022Allow2010NoNo
17078349LOADER STABILITY SYSTEMOctober 2020August 2023Allow3340YesNo
17075181PERFORMANCE MONITORING AND EVALUATION OF A VEHICLE ADAS OR AUTONOMOUS DRIVING FEATUREOctober 2020December 2023Abandon3720NoNo
17046875MOBILE OBJECT, INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND PROGRAMOctober 2020March 2023Abandon2920NoNo
17042928DISPLAY CONTROL SYSTEM, DISPLAY CONTROL DEVICE AND DISPLAY CONTROL METHODSeptember 2020February 2024Allow4120YesNo
17028141VEHICLE CONTROL SYSTEMSeptember 2020July 2022Allow2210YesNo
17027838AUTOMATED VALET PARKING SYSTEMSeptember 2020June 2023Allow3340YesNo
17024338STALLED SELF-DRIVING VEHICLE RESCUE SYSTEMSeptember 2020September 2022Allow2420NoNo
17023936METHOD FOR CONTROLLING A MOTOR VEHICLE REMOTELYSeptember 2020March 2023Abandon2920NoNo
17004839Methods and Systems for Gradually Adjusting Vehicle Sensor Perspective using Remote AssistanceAugust 2020March 2023Allow3130YesNo
16999510METHOD FOR CONTROLLING A MOTOR VEHICLE REMOTELYAugust 2020September 2022Allow2520NoNo
16988453EDGE CENTRIC COMMUNICATION PROTOCOL FOR REMOTELY MANEUVERING A TELE-PRESENCE ROBOT IN A GEOGRAPHICALLY DISTRIBUTED ENVIRONMENTAugust 2020October 2022Allow2610NoNo
16914353CAR WASH JUDGMENT SYSTEM AND CAR WASH JUDGMENT METHODJune 2020May 2023Abandon3420NoNo
16911516METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR AUTONOMOUS DRIVING CONTROL, ELECTRONIC DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUMJune 2020September 2022Allow2620NoNo
16894411METHOD AND A SYSTEM FOR HIERARCHICAL NETWORK BASED DIVERSE TRAJECTORY PROPOSALJune 2020October 2022Allow2910NoNo
16892671LOCATING SIGNAL INTERFERENCE USING UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLESJune 2020February 2023Allow3220NoNo
16872284UNSTRUCTURED VEHICLE PATH PLANNERMay 2020June 2022Allow2510YesNo
16870693SYSTEM AND METHOD ON A TOWING VEHICLE TO CONTROL A TOWED VEHICLE’S CONTROLS AND SYSTEMSMay 2020November 2022Allow3010NoNo
16762239METHOD AND DRIVER ASSISTANCE SYSTEM FOR IMPROVING RIDE COMFORT OF A TRANSPORTATION VEHICLE AND TRANSPORTATION VEHICLEMay 2020August 2022Allow2720YesNo
16831150VEHICLE CONTROL SYSTEMMarch 2020May 2022Allow2510NoNo
16822794Unattended Occupant Alarm AssemblyMarch 2020July 2022Allow2810NoNo
16813533REMOTE CONTROL CONSOLE FOR A MACHINEMarch 2020June 2022Allow2710NoNo
16813351METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR AUTOMATED ALERTING AND SEQUENCING OF TASKS BASED ON REAL-TIME AIRPLANE CONFIGURATION FEEDMarch 2020January 2024Abandon4640YesNo
16810817Systems And Method For Painting Using DronesMarch 2020October 2023Allow4441NoNo
16810743METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR ENABLING PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE AND SECURITY FOR VEHICLES IN LONG HAUL ENVIRONMENTMarch 2020October 2022Abandon3110NoNo
16644419CHARGING SYSTEM FOR AUTONOMOUS UNDERWATER VEHICLE AND METHOD OF LIFTING AND RECOVERING AUTONOMOUS UNDERWATER VEHICLEMarch 2020November 2022Allow3211NoNo
16802995INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMSFebruary 2020February 2023Allow3620YesNo
16797109PLAY-FORWARD PLANNING AND CONTROL SYSTEM FOR AN AUTONOMOUS VEHICLEFebruary 2020April 2022Allow2600YesNo
16794388INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND PROGRAMFebruary 2020March 2023Abandon3720NoNo
16748447COASTING MANAGEMENT CONTROL OF A VEHICLE WITH A ROAD SPEED GOVERNORJanuary 2020May 2022Allow2710NoNo
16723937OBJECT UNCERTAINTY DETECTIONDecember 2019April 2022Allow2810YesNo
16465985UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES AND FLIGHT PLANNING METHODS AND APPARATUSDecember 2019November 2022Abandon4220YesNo
16687079METHODS OF INCREASING PROCESSING SPEED IN A PROCESSING SYSTEM THAT PERFORMS A NONLINEAR OPTIMIZATION ROUTINENovember 2019May 2022Allow3000NoNo
16582245AUTOMATED TRAVEL VEHICLE ASSISTANCE SYSTEM AND SERVERSeptember 2019March 2022Allow3010YesNo
16551759UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE LANDING AREA DETECTIONAugust 2019March 2023Abandon4320YesNo
16547182AUTOMATED TREND DETECTIONAugust 2019January 2024Abandon5340YesNo
16520977AERIAL VEHICLE WITH REPLACEABLE CAMERA MODULESJuly 2019August 2022Allow3721YesNo
16418912SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR VARIOUS VEHICLE-RELATED APPLICATIONSMay 2019June 2022Allow3720NoNo
16343700HYBRID AIRCRAFTApril 2019November 2022Abandon4320NoNo
16143117PROCESSING GRAPH REPRESENTATIONS OF TACTICAL MAPS USING NEURAL NETWORKSSeptember 2018August 2022Allow4710NoNo
15873428UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE LAUNCH SYSTEMJanuary 2018October 2023Allow6030NoNo

Appeals Overview

No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.

Examiner WANG, JINGLI - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner WANG, JINGLI works in Art Unit 3666 and has examined 49 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 73.5%, this examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 30 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner WANG, JINGLI's allowance rate of 73.5% places them in the 39% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by WANG, JINGLI receive 1.80 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 37% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues fewer office actions than average, which may indicate efficient prosecution or a more lenient examination style.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by WANG, JINGLI is 30 months. This places the examiner in the 61% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly faster than average with this examiner.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a -2.0% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by WANG, JINGLI. This interview benefit is in the 10% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 38.1% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 87% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. If you receive a final rejection, filing an RCE with substantive amendments or arguments has a strong likelihood of success.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 35.3% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 54% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows above-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. If your amendments clearly overcome the rejections and do not raise new issues, consider filing after-final amendments before resorting to an RCE.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 50.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 46% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions show below-average success regarding this examiner's actions. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 37% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 42% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • RCEs are effective: This examiner has a high allowance rate after RCE compared to others. If you receive a final rejection and have substantive amendments or arguments, an RCE is likely to be successful.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.