USPTO Examiner PARK KYLE S - Art Unit 3666

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
17250296INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE, OPTIMUM TIME ESTIMATION METHOD, SELF-POSITION ESTIMATION METHOD, AND RECORD MEDIUM RECORDING COMPUTER PROGRAMDecember 2020November 2023Abandon3520NoNo
17128810METHOD AND DEVICE FOR DISPLAYING 3D AUGMENTED REALITY NAVIGATION INFORMATIONDecember 2020March 2023Allow2720NoNo
17125847SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR UPDATING NAVIGATIONAL MAPSDecember 2020October 2022Allow2210NoNo
17124288LONG-TERM OBJECT TRACKING SUPPORTING AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE NAVIGATIONDecember 2020January 2023Allow2510YesNo
17115875SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR GENERATING, SUPPLYING, AND IMPLEMENTING AN OPTIMIZED DESCENT APPROACH PROFILE FOR AN AIRCRAFTDecember 2020February 2023Abandon2610NoNo
15734093Method for Calculating an Augmented Reality Overlay for Displaying a Navigation Route on an AR Display Unit, Device for Carrying Out the Method, Motor Vehicle and Computer ProgramDecember 2020January 2023Allow2620YesNo
17102697Reachability User Experience Interfaces for Autonomous VehiclesNovember 2020May 2023Allow2920YesNo
17058122Control of a Motor VehicleNovember 2020October 2023Allow3531YesNo
16953415SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR OPTIMIZING ROUTE PLANS IN AN OPERATING ENVIRONMENTNovember 2020June 2024Allow4340YesNo
16950890AUGMENTED REALITY DISPLAYS FOR LOCATING VEHICLESNovember 2020January 2023Allow2620NoNo
17050130SEMI-AUTOMATED CONVOY TRANSPORT SYSTEM FOR VEHICLESOctober 2020March 2023Abandon2920YesNo
17035325PATH PROVIDING DEVICE AND PATH PROVIDING METHOD THEREOFSeptember 2020July 2022Allow2210NoNo
17030508TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND METHODSeptember 2020February 2023Allow2920NoNo
17012497SOLVING OPTIMIZATION PROBLEMS ASSOCIATED WITH MARITIME FACILITY ON OPTIMIZATION SOLVER MACHINESSeptember 2020March 2024Abandon4250NoNo
17004607CHARGING FACILITY GUIDANCE SYSTEM AND CHARGING FACILITY GUIDANCE DEVICEAugust 2020December 2022Allow2810YesNo
16938020Object Trajectory Association and TrackingJuly 2020October 2022Allow2711YesNo
16897247MAP INFORMATION COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS DEVICE FOR THE DISABLEDJune 2020August 2022Abandon2610NoNo
16838499METHOD OF MOVING ROBOT IN ADMINISTRATOR MODE AND ROBOT OF IMPLEMENTING METHODApril 2020December 2022Allow3320NoNo
16829559REMOTE AUTOMOBILE DIAGNOSTIC METHOD AND APPARATUS, MOBILE TERMINAL,ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND SERVERMarch 2020November 2022Allow3220NoNo
16785842Systems and Methods for Monitoring and Maintaining Stability of Vehicle CargoFebruary 2020November 2022Allow3310YesNo
16751758SMART VEHICLE TRAVEL PREPARATION AND LOCATION-BASED SERVICING FEATURES FOR MOBILE DEVICE TOOLS AND METHODS OF USEJanuary 2020April 2023Allow3820YesNo
16731572CONTROL METHOD OF ROBOTDecember 2019February 2023Abandon3720YesNo
16726156CAMERA-SENSOR FUSION MODULE FOR SURFACE DETECTION AND FLEET VEHICLE CONTROL SYSTEMS AND METHODSDecember 2019April 2024Allow5230YesNo
16617717DRIVING SUPPORT DEVICENovember 2019November 2022Abandon3620NoNo
16696032METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR CONTEXT AND CONTENT AWARE SENSOR IN A VEHICLENovember 2019September 2022Abandon3411NoNo
16691745Traveling Control System and Method of Autonomous VehicleNovember 2019June 2022Allow3110NoNo
16656948AUTOMATIC GENERATION OF DIMENSIONALLY REDUCED MAPS AND SPATIOTEMPORAL LOCALIZATION FOR NAVIGATION OF A VEHICLEOctober 2019April 2024Abandon5340YesNo
16560459SMART AND SHARED SERVICES PLATFORMSeptember 2019May 2023Allow4530YesNo
16557196INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY STORAGE MEDIUMAugust 2019August 2022Allow3620NoNo
16553294LEARNING DEVICE, LEARNING METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUMAugust 2019July 2022Allow3520NoNo
16538097PREDICTIVE MAINTENANCE OF AUTOMOTIVE BATTERYAugust 2019September 2024Abandon6050YesNo
16435180SECURE INSTALLATION OF APPROVED PARTS USING BLOCKCHAINJune 2019October 2023Allow5240YesNo
16375386DAMPING OF AN OSCILLATION OF A SUPERIMPOSED STEERING SYSTEMApril 2019April 2022Allow3710YesNo
16352472VEHICLE CONTROL DEVICE AND VEHICLE CONTROL METHODMarch 2019May 2023Abandon5020NoNo

Appeals Overview

No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.

Examiner PARK, KYLE S - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner PARK, KYLE S works in Art Unit 3666 and has examined 34 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 67.6%, this examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 34 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner PARK, KYLE S's allowance rate of 67.6% places them in the 30% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by PARK, KYLE S receive 2.12 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 53% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues a slightly above-average number of office actions.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by PARK, KYLE S is 34 months. This places the examiner in the 45% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly slower than average with this examiner.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +17.6% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by PARK, KYLE S. This interview benefit is in the 58% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide an above-average benefit with this examiner and are worth considering.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 33.3% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 74% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. Consider whether your amendments or new arguments are strong enough to warrant an RCE versus filing a continuation.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 33.3% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 52% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows above-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. If your amendments clearly overcome the rejections and do not raise new issues, consider filing after-final amendments before resorting to an RCE.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 37% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 42% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

    Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

    • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
    • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
    • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
    • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
    • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
    • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

    Important Disclaimer

    Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

    No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

    Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

    Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.