Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18629806 | Multi-layer operating system and method for mobile robots | April 2024 | June 2024 | Allow | 2 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18082173 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR ADDRESSING FAILURE IN AN AUTONOMOUS AGENT | December 2022 | April 2024 | Allow | 16 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17751550 | INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD AND INFORMATION PROCESSING PROGRAM | May 2022 | May 2024 | Allow | 24 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17741965 | MOVING OBJECT AND ROUTE DECISION METHOD OF MOVING OBJECT | May 2022 | August 2024 | Allow | 27 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17655458 | COLLABORATIVE ROBOT SYSTEM AND ASSEMBLY SET THEREOF | March 2022 | February 2024 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17671545 | CONTROL DEVICE, ROBOT SYSTEM, CONTROL METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE MEDIUM | February 2022 | June 2024 | Allow | 28 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17650252 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR UPDATING VIRTUAL WORKSITE | February 2022 | October 2023 | Allow | 20 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17633458 | Work Machine Management System | February 2022 | February 2024 | Allow | 24 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17648869 | Object-Based Robot Control | January 2022 | March 2024 | Allow | 26 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17573932 | Automation Control Using Stop Trajectories | January 2022 | January 2024 | Allow | 24 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17557640 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR CONTROLLING ROBOT, AND ROBOT | December 2021 | March 2024 | Allow | 27 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17620431 | AN AIRBORNE VEHICLE ASSISTED LANDING SYSTEM AND METHOD THEREOF | December 2021 | May 2024 | Allow | 29 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17545390 | ROBOT CONTROL SYSTEM, ROBOT CONTROL METHOD, AND PROGRAM | December 2021 | December 2023 | Allow | 24 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17524727 | ROBOT CONTROL SYSTEM, ROBOT CONTROL METHOD, AND CONTROL PROGRAM | November 2021 | October 2023 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17517896 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR COMPENSATING ROAD LINE | November 2021 | June 2024 | Allow | 31 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17449137 | Preventing Regressions in Navigation Determinations Using Logged Trajectories | September 2021 | April 2024 | Allow | 31 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17476052 | Automatic Leveling Control Method for a Four-leg Support Working Platform | September 2021 | February 2024 | Allow | 29 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17242412 | COORDINATED BRAKING SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR RAIL CARS | April 2021 | March 2024 | Allow | 34 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17288160 | Method and Control Unit for Transversely Guiding a Vehicle During Following Travel | April 2021 | March 2024 | Allow | 34 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17095640 | METHOD FOR ROBOTIC TRAINING BASED ON RANDOMIZATION OF SURFACE DAMPING | November 2020 | February 2024 | Allow | 39 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16896404 | INVERSE KINEMATICS OF A SURGICAL ROBOT FOR TELEOPERATION WITH HARDWARE CONSTRAINTS | June 2020 | February 2024 | Allow | 44 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner TANG, BRYANT works in Art Unit 3664 and has examined 11 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 100.0%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 31 months.
Examiner TANG, BRYANT's allowance rate of 100.0% places them in the 99% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by TANG, BRYANT receive 1.55 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 28% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues fewer office actions than average, which may indicate efficient prosecution or a more lenient examination style.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by TANG, BRYANT is 31 months. This places the examiner in the 57% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly faster than average with this examiner.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +0.0% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by TANG, BRYANT. This interview benefit is in the 16% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 16.7% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 14% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show lower effectiveness with this examiner compared to others. Consider whether a continuation application might be more strategic, especially if you need to add new matter or significantly broaden claims.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 33.3% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 50% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows below-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. You may need to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 0.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 6% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are rarely granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing a petition, as the Technology Center Director typically upholds this examiner's decisions.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 38% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 41% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.