Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18893154 | Vehicle Scan Tool Configured to Receive Automated Initialization Requests | September 2024 | January 2026 | Allow | 16 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18659534 | TRAFFIC PLANNING METHOD FOR A VEHICLE FLEET | May 2024 | January 2026 | Allow | 21 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18650842 | SAFELY SCHEDULING OFFLOADING OF COMPUTING TASKS FOR AN AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE | April 2024 | November 2025 | Allow | 19 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18614670 | MEASURING SYSTEM AND METHOD | March 2024 | February 2026 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18601754 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR EMBEDDING UNCERTAINTY ESTIMATION INTO DEEP-NEURAL-NETWORK-BASED AUTONOMOUS DRIVING PERCEPTION FRAMEWORKS | March 2024 | February 2026 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18596823 | VEHICLE TRAJECTORY CONTROL FOR PRECISE ROUTE FOLLOWING | March 2024 | February 2026 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18590375 | Path Determination for Autonomous Vehicle Parking | February 2024 | December 2025 | Allow | 21 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18434630 | SURROUNDING AWARE TRAJECTORY PREDICTION | February 2024 | March 2026 | Abandon | 25 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18390227 | VEHICLE GUIDANCE SYSTEMS AND ASSOCIATED METHODS OF USE AT LOGISTICS YARDS AND OTHER LOCATIONS | December 2023 | December 2025 | Allow | 24 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18542087 | METROLOGY SYSTEM WITH POSITION AND ORIENTATION TRACKING UTILIZING PATTERNS OF LIGHT BEAMS | December 2023 | February 2026 | Allow | 26 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18540185 | DEFINITION OF BOUNDARY FOR A ROBOTIC WORK TOOL | December 2023 | February 2026 | Allow | 26 | 2 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 18522113 | ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEM | November 2023 | February 2026 | Allow | 26 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18283994 | METHOD FOR DETECTING ABNORMAL VIBRATION OF ROLLING MILL, APPARATUS FOR DETECTING ABNORMALITY OF ROLLING MILL, ROLLING METHOD, AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING METAL STRIP | September 2023 | March 2026 | Allow | 30 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18457845 | Systems and methods of configuring vehicle service tools associated with display device based on operating condition of vehicle | August 2023 | November 2025 | Allow | 26 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18348159 | ELECTRONIC MAP CORRECTION METHOD, NAVIGATION INFORMATION SETTING METHOD, NAVIGATION METHOD, AND APPARATUS | July 2023 | February 2026 | Allow | 32 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18314514 | ENHANCEMENTS TO BEYOND-VISUAL-LINE-OF-SIGHT (BVLOS) OPERATION OF REMOTE-CONTROLLED APPARATUSES | May 2023 | December 2025 | Allow | 31 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18247126 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR IDENTIFYING AN OPTIMISED INTERNET CONNECTIVITY CONFIGURATION | March 2023 | February 2026 | Abandon | 34 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17556639 | MAGNETIC INDUCTION COMMUNICATION-BASED VEHICLE CONTROL APPARATUS AND METHOD | December 2021 | November 2025 | Allow | 47 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17515172 | REAL-TIME SELECTION OF DATA TO COLLECT IN AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE | October 2021 | March 2026 | Allow | 52 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner MAWARI, REDHWAN K works in Art Unit 3664 and has examined 2 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 100.0%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 52 months.
Examiner MAWARI, REDHWAN K's allowance rate of 100.0% places them in the 99% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by MAWARI, REDHWAN K receive 3.50 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 94% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by MAWARI, REDHWAN K is 52 months. This places the examiner in the 4% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +0.0% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by MAWARI, REDHWAN K. This interview benefit is in the 16% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 33.3% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 73% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. Consider whether your amendments or new arguments are strong enough to warrant an RCE versus filing a continuation.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 0.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 3% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 38% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 41% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.