Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16953037 | DEEP DOCUMENT PROCESSING WITH SELF-SUPERVISED LEARNING | November 2020 | August 2023 | Allow | 33 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17028851 | LIVE STREAMING SHOPPING EXPERIENCE | September 2020 | July 2023 | Allow | 33 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17023721 | Method and Apparatus for Constructing Document Heading Tree, Electronic Device and Storage Medium | September 2020 | October 2023 | Abandon | 37 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17019211 | COMPONENT LEVEL DATA MANAGEMENT AND STATE CHANGE DETECTION IN WEB APPLICATIONS FOR DATA LOSS PROTECTION | September 2020 | May 2023 | Allow | 32 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16977999 | CARGO HANDLING VEHICLE FOR NAVIGATION IN NARROW AISLES AND METHOD THEREFORE | September 2020 | November 2024 | Allow | 51 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16984918 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR COMMUNICATION ACROSS MULTIPLE BROWSER PAGES FOR AN APPLICATION | August 2020 | June 2023 | Allow | 34 | 7 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16876534 | DOCUMENT AUTHORING PLATFORM | May 2020 | April 2023 | Allow | 34 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 16753505 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DOCUMENT AUTOMATION | April 2020 | October 2023 | Abandon | 42 | 3 | 1 | No | No |
| 16734173 | ELECTRONIC MESSAGE USER INTERFACE | January 2020 | April 2023 | Allow | 39 | 7 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16730097 | Creating and Performing Transforms for Indexed Data on a Continuous Basis | December 2019 | October 2023 | Abandon | 46 | 7 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16686621 | Automatic API Document Generation From SCIM Metadata | November 2019 | August 2023 | Allow | 45 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16661074 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SEMANTICALLY DETECTING SYNTHETIC DRIVEN CONVERSATIONS IN ELECTRONIC MEDIA MESSAGES | October 2019 | June 2023 | Allow | 43 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16587800 | MANAGING ACCESS TO SENSITIVE DATA IN TRANSCRIPTIONS | September 2019 | October 2024 | Allow | 60 | 4 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 16561629 | EMOJI PREDICTION AND VISUAL SENTIMENT ANALYSIS | September 2019 | August 2024 | Abandon | 60 | 5 | 1 | Yes | Yes |
| 16511055 | SEARCH-QUERY REDIRECTION | July 2019 | November 2023 | Abandon | 52 | 6 | 0 | No | No |
| 16509573 | INPUT DEVICE, MOBILE TERMINAL, INPUT DEVICE CONTROL METHOD, AND INPUT DEVICE CONTROL PROGRAM | July 2019 | September 2023 | Abandon | 50 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16441072 | Detaching Social Media Content Creation from Publication | June 2019 | January 2024 | Abandon | 56 | 4 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 16222026 | Systems, Methods, and Computer-Readable Storage Media for Designing, Creating, and Deploying Composite Machine Learning Applications in Cloud Environments | December 2018 | January 2024 | Abandon | 60 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16133308 | STATE PREDICTION OF DEVICES | September 2018 | August 2023 | Allow | 59 | 5 | 2 | Yes | No |
| 16024310 | PREDICTING A FUTURE BEHAVIOR BY APPLYING A PREDICTIVE MODEL TO EMBEDDINGS REPRESENTING PAST BEHAVIORS AND THE FUTURE BEHAVIOR | June 2018 | December 2023 | Abandon | 60 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 15890159 | LAYOUT DETECTION FOR BIDIRECTIONAL TEXT DOCUMENTS HAVING HEBREW TEXT | February 2018 | September 2021 | Allow | 43 | 7 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 15863807 | SYSTEM AND METHOD OF PROOFING EMAIL CONTENT | January 2018 | December 2018 | Allow | 11 | 1 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 15839982 | ANALYZING DOMAIN FEATURES USING NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING | December 2017 | October 2023 | Abandon | 60 | 2 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 15187394 | PRESENTING COLLABORATION SUMMARIES OF ARTIFACTS TO IMPROVE ENGAGEMENT OF USER IN COLLABORATION ACTIVITIES | June 2016 | February 2018 | Allow | 20 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14694035 | RESPONSIVE IMAGE RENDITION AUTHORING | April 2015 | March 2017 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14479447 | RESPONSIVE IMAGE RENDITION AUTHORING | September 2014 | March 2017 | Allow | 30 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14338233 | Method and System for Adding Dynamic Labels to a File and Encrypting the File | July 2014 | February 2017 | Allow | 30 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14011198 | Display of Hypertext Documents Grouped According to Their Affinity | August 2013 | December 2015 | Allow | 28 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13974904 | WEB PAGE ASSOCIATED WITH A NODE IN A WEBSITE TRAFFIC PATTERN | August 2013 | March 2016 | Allow | 31 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13959318 | FACILITATING ACCESS TO DATA IN NETWORK PAGE GENERATION CODE | August 2013 | October 2015 | Allow | 27 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 13784668 | PERSISTING THE STATE OF VISUAL CONTROL ELEMENTS IN UNIFORM RESOURCE LOCATOR (URL)-GENERATED WEB PAGES | March 2013 | February 2016 | Allow | 35 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13686114 | INFORMATION BROWSING APPARATUS AND RECORDING MEDIUM FOR COMPUTER TO READ, STORING COMPUTER PROGRAM | November 2012 | February 2017 | Allow | 51 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13667899 | INTERFACE AND METHOD FOR EXPLORING A COLLECTION OF DATA | November 2012 | February 2016 | Allow | 39 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13612015 | SYSTEM TO VIEW AND MANIPULATE ARTIFACTS AT A TEMPORAL REFERENCE POINT | September 2012 | December 2015 | Allow | 39 | 7 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13533190 | Non-Hierarchical Multi-Hash Table Model for Menu Data Representation | June 2012 | September 2014 | Allow | 27 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 13530467 | REAL ESTATE CONTENT TRACKING ON THE INTERNET | June 2012 | September 2015 | Allow | 39 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 13501370 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR DOCUMENT PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS | April 2012 | January 2014 | Allow | 21 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 13407648 | Automatic Detection and Manipulation of Calls to Action in Web Pages | February 2012 | June 2014 | Allow | 27 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13369955 | SYSTEM TO VIEW AND MANIPULATE ARTIFACTS AT A TEMPORAL REFERENCE POINT | February 2012 | January 2016 | Allow | 47 | 7 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13348088 | FACILITATING ACCESS TO DATA IN NETWORK PAGE GENERATION CODE | January 2012 | March 2013 | Allow | 14 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 13294803 | PROGRESS INDICATION FOR A DIGITAL WORK | November 2011 | March 2014 | Allow | 28 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13278899 | REPRESENTING EXTENSIBLE MARKUP LANGUAGE (XML) AS AN EXECUTABLE HAVING CONDITIONAL AUTHENTICATION OR POLICY LOGIC | October 2011 | April 2014 | Allow | 30 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13253883 | Proofreading Device, Method for Proofreading Document, and Computer Readable Recording Medium Storing Proofreading Control Program | October 2011 | January 2013 | Allow | 15 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 13200849 | Transmitting and Receiving data via Barcodes through a cellphone for privacy and anonymity | October 2011 | December 2013 | Allow | 26 | 2 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 13136610 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR A WEB BROWSER FOR USE IN HANDHELD WIRELESS DEVICES THAT RENDERS WEB PAGES WITHOUT ADVERTISEMENT | August 2011 | June 2018 | Abandon | 60 | 12 | 1 | Yes | Yes |
| 13186340 | PROTECTING CONTENT PRESENTED IN A WEB BROWSER | July 2011 | November 2013 | Allow | 27 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13184128 | SYSTEM TO FORECAST PERFORMANCE OF ONLINE NEWS ARTICLES TO SUGGEST THE OPTIMAL HOMEPAGE LAYOUT TO MAXIMIZE ARTICLE READERSHIP AND READERS STICKINESS | July 2011 | March 2013 | Allow | 20 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 13161715 | INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS AND METHOD THEREOF FOR GENERATING DRAWING DATA OF A MOVING IMAGE OBJECT IN A RASTER FORMAT FOR PRINTING AN IMAGE BASED ON A WEB PAGE BY A PRINTING APPARATUS IF IT IS DETERMINED THAT THE WEB PAGE CONTAINS THE MOVING IMAGE OBJECT AND DRAWING DATA OF THE MOVING IMAGE OBJECT CANNOT BE CREATED IN THE VECTOR FORMAT | June 2011 | May 2014 | Allow | 35 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 13106064 | CONCURRENT PARSING AND PROCESSING OF HTML AND JAVASCRIPT0 | May 2011 | October 2012 | Allow | 17 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 13022870 | WORD INPUT METHOD | February 2011 | May 2014 | Allow | 40 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 12890444 | DISPLAYING A PREVIEW OF DOCUMENT DATA INCLUDING A REGION IN WHICH AN OBJECT IS INSERTED | September 2010 | October 2012 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 12827538 | REUSING STYLE SHEET ASSETS | June 2010 | October 2012 | Allow | 27 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12439886 | ADD-IN PROGRAM FOR UPLOAD, AUXILIARY PROGRAM FOR UPLOAD AND UPLOAD METHOD | June 2010 | October 2014 | Allow | 60 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12822684 | User selecting control component of application program | June 2010 | July 2024 | Abandon | 60 | 11 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 12793236 | EXTENDABLE META-DATA SUPPORT IN FINAL FORM PRESENTATION DATASTREAM PRINT ENTERPRISES | June 2010 | July 2014 | Allow | 50 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 12749618 | TRADEMARK REPORT WITH STORE LAYOUT DIAGRAM | March 2010 | July 2013 | Allow | 39 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12576567 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR VALIDATION OF STRUCTURED DOCUMENTS | October 2009 | February 2013 | Allow | 40 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12566851 | RESOLVING INTER-PAGE NODES AND CONNECTORS IN PROCESS DIAGRAMS | September 2009 | August 2012 | Allow | 34 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 12196723 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR REPURPOSING FORMATTED CONTENT | August 2008 | July 2011 | Allow | 34 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 12092249 | INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS AND METHOD | April 2008 | May 2012 | Allow | 48 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 12062024 | SGML DOCUMENT VALIDATION USING XML-BASED TECHNOLOGIES | April 2008 | September 2011 | Allow | 41 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 12061502 | ADAPTIVE PARSING OF SPARSE XML DATA | April 2008 | March 2016 | Allow | 60 | 4 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 11951519 | METHODS FOR DEFORMING MAP WIDGETS ON THE BROWSER | December 2007 | December 2012 | Allow | 60 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 11949917 | EDITING APPARATUS AND EDITING METHOD | December 2007 | December 2012 | Allow | 60 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 11892114 | CALENDAR PRODUCTION APPARATUS | August 2007 | September 2010 | Allow | 37 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 11781447 | INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, ITS CONTROL METHOD, AND PROGRAM | July 2007 | October 2012 | Allow | 60 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 11799457 | AUTOMATIC SWITCHING FONTS ON MULTILINGUAL TEXT RUNS | May 2007 | August 2011 | Allow | 51 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 11686794 | MANAGING LIST TAILORING FOR A MOBILE DEVICE | March 2007 | November 2012 | Allow | 60 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 11685685 | OBJECT ANNOTATION | March 2007 | September 2014 | Allow | 60 | 9 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 11672166 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AUTOMATIC STYLESHEET INFERENCE | February 2007 | July 2013 | Allow | 60 | 5 | 0 | No | No |
| 11700563 | METHOD OF DETERMINING THE PROJECTED AREA OF A 2-D VIEW OF A COMPONENT | January 2007 | April 2010 | Allow | 38 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 11566145 | TARGET ADVERTISEMENT IN A BROADCAST SYSTEM | December 2006 | September 2013 | Allow | 60 | 7 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 11563965 | INTERACTIVE MULTIMEDIA DIARY | November 2006 | June 2014 | Allow | 60 | 4 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 11600349 | REPRESENTING EXTENSIBLE MARKUP LANGUAGE (XML) AS AN EXECUTABLE HAVING CONDITIONAL AUTHENTICATION OR POLICY LOGIC | November 2006 | July 2011 | Allow | 56 | 4 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 11600567 | METHOD FOR GENERATING PRESENTATION ORIENTED XML SCHEMAS THROUGH A GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACE | November 2006 | January 2010 | Allow | 38 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 11599947 | VERSATILE PAGE NUMBER DETECTOR | November 2006 | June 2010 | Allow | 43 | 2 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 11598909 | COLLABORATIVE EDITING OF A DOCUMENT | November 2006 | July 2011 | Allow | 56 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 11598835 | DIGITAL CONTENT CREATION SYSTEM, DIGITAL CONTENT CREATION METHOD, AND PROGRAM PRODUCT | November 2006 | November 2009 | Allow | 36 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 11598083 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CONVERTING LEGACY AND PROPRIETARY DOCUMENTS INTO EXTENDED MARK-UP LANGUAGE FORMAT | November 2006 | February 2010 | Allow | 39 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 11539445 | CONTENT COMPILATION AND PUBLISHING SYSTEM | October 2006 | November 2012 | Allow | 60 | 7 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 11533058 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR CUSTOMIZING THE DISPLAY OF MULTIDIMENSIONAL DATA | September 2006 | February 2010 | Allow | 40 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 11371810 | PROCESSING OF USER CHARACTER INPUTS HAVING WHITESPACE | March 2006 | February 2011 | Allow | 59 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 11357285 | APPLYING EFFECTS TO A MERGED TEXT PATH | February 2006 | April 2010 | Allow | 50 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 11355294 | ELECTRONIC MUSICAL APPARATUS FOR DISPLAYING CHARACTER | February 2006 | October 2010 | Allow | 56 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 11351065 | DETECTION OF LISTS IN VECTOR GRAPHICS DOCUMENTS | February 2006 | March 2010 | Allow | 49 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner DYER, ANDREW R.
With a 50.0% reversal rate, the PTAB reverses the examiner's rejections in a meaningful percentage of cases. This reversal rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals are more successful here than in most other areas.
Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.
In this dataset, 26.1% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is below the USPTO average, suggesting that filing an appeal has limited effectiveness in prompting favorable reconsideration.
✓ Appeals to PTAB show good success rates. If you have a strong case on the merits, consider fully prosecuting the appeal to a Board decision.
⚠ Filing a Notice of Appeal shows limited benefit. Consider other strategies like interviews or amendments before appealing.
Examiner DYER, ANDREW R works in Art Unit 3662 and has examined 85 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 85.9%, this examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 40 months.
Examiner DYER, ANDREW R's allowance rate of 85.9% places them in the 64% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications.
On average, applications examined by DYER, ANDREW R receive 3.24 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 88% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by DYER, ANDREW R is 40 months. This places the examiner in the 25% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a -7.1% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by DYER, ANDREW R. This interview benefit is in the 5% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 21.8% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 29% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show below-average effectiveness with this examiner. Carefully evaluate whether an RCE or continuation is the better strategy.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 10.5% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 12% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.
When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 33.3% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 35% percentile among all examiners. Note: Pre-appeal conferences show below-average success with this examiner. Consider whether your arguments are strong enough to warrant a PAC request.
This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 45.5% of appeals filed. This is in the 12% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 20.0% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner rarely withdraws rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. If you file an appeal, be prepared to fully prosecute it to a PTAB decision. Per MPEP § 1207, the examiner will prepare an Examiner's Answer maintaining the rejections.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 57.1% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 57% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions show above-average success regarding this examiner's actions. Petitionable matters include restriction requirements (MPEP § 1002.02(c)(2)) and various procedural issues.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 10.6% of allowed cases (in the 94% percentile). Per MPEP § 1302.04, examiner's amendments are used to place applications in condition for allowance when only minor changes are needed. This examiner frequently uses this tool compared to other examiners, indicating a cooperative approach to getting applications allowed. Strategic Insight: If you are close to allowance but minor claim amendments are needed, this examiner may be willing to make an examiner's amendment rather than requiring another round of prosecution.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 41% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.