Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18713065 | Parking Assistance Method and Parking Assistance Device | May 2024 | December 2024 | Allow | 7 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18428427 | ROBOTIC SYSTEM SIMULATION ENGINE | January 2024 | December 2024 | Allow | 11 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18517636 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR EXTENDING SENSOR AND LIGHTING COVERAGE BETWEEN VEHICLES | November 2023 | June 2025 | Allow | 19 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18385038 | CARRIAGE FOR GUIDED AUTONOMOUS LOCOMOTION | October 2023 | September 2024 | Allow | 10 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18238371 | SURROUNDING TRAFFIC SPEED MANAGEMENT SYSTEM | August 2023 | August 2024 | Allow | 12 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18331632 | DATA-DRIVEN ROBOT CONTROL | June 2023 | February 2025 | Allow | 20 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18011561 | Transporter Network for Determining Robot Actions | December 2022 | May 2025 | Allow | 29 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17979413 | OBJECT ASSESSMENT DEVICE, STORAGE MEDIUM STORING COMPUTER PROGRAM FOR OBJECT ASSESSMENT, AND OBJECT ASSESSMENT METHOD | November 2022 | January 2025 | Allow | 26 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17890603 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR FLIGHT CONTROL FOR AN ELECTRIC AIRCRAFT | August 2022 | September 2024 | Allow | 25 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17768255 | HYDRAULIC WORK MACHINE AND REMOTE OPERATION SYSTEM | April 2022 | June 2025 | Abandon | 38 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17719153 | AUTONOMOUS LANE MERGING SYSTEM AND METHOD | April 2022 | April 2025 | Abandon | 36 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17657847 | SYSTEM AND METHOD OF RESPONSE TO AN UNSTABLE APPROACH DURING AN APPROACH TO LANDING FOR AN AIRCRAFT | April 2022 | March 2025 | Allow | 35 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17656871 | GRAPH-BASED VEHICLE ROUTE OPTIMIZATION WITH VEHICLE CAPACITY CLUSTERING | March 2022 | April 2025 | Abandon | 36 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17578902 | VEHICLE CONTROL METHOD, VEHICLE CONTROL SYSTEM, AND VEHICLE CONTROL PROGRAM | January 2022 | August 2024 | Allow | 31 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17610471 | ROBOT APPARATUS, METHOD FOR CONTROLLING ROBOT APPARATUS, AND LOAD COMPENSATION APPARATUS | November 2021 | August 2024 | Allow | 33 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17470087 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR OPERATING ONE OR MORE SELF-DRIVING VEHICLES | September 2021 | June 2024 | Allow | 34 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17412121 | ROBOTICALLY CONTROLLABLE FIELD GENERATORS FOR TRACKING AN MEDICAL INSTRUMENT | August 2021 | October 2024 | Allow | 38 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17203773 | CONTROL METHOD FOR ROBOT AND ROBOT SYSTEM | March 2021 | July 2024 | Allow | 40 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 17114464 | Method for Redundant Control Policies for Safe Operation of an Exoskeleton | December 2020 | October 2024 | Abandon | 46 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 17025248 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR COLLISION AVOIDANCE USING OBJECT MODELS | September 2020 | September 2024 | Allow | 48 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16389222 | PROVIDING ASSIST TORQUE IN STEERING SYSTEMS OPERATING WITHOUT A TORQUE SENSOR | April 2019 | December 2024 | Allow | 60 | 8 | 0 | Yes | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner JACKSON, DANIELLE MARIE works in Art Unit 3657 and has examined 19 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 78.9%, this examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 34 months.
Examiner JACKSON, DANIELLE MARIE's allowance rate of 78.9% places them in the 40% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications.
On average, applications examined by JACKSON, DANIELLE MARIE receive 2.21 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 75% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by JACKSON, DANIELLE MARIE is 34 months. This places the examiner in the 24% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +40.0% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by JACKSON, DANIELLE MARIE. This interview benefit is in the 89% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner and should be strongly considered as a prosecution strategy. Per MPEP § 713.10, interviews are available at any time before the Notice of Allowance is mailed or jurisdiction transfers to the PTAB.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 21.4% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 17% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show lower effectiveness with this examiner compared to others. Consider whether a continuation application might be more strategic, especially if you need to add new matter or significantly broaden claims.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 20.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 17% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 0.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 4% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are rarely granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing a petition, as the Technology Center Director typically upholds this examiner's decisions.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 34% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 34% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.