USPTO Examiner ESTEVEZ DAIRON - Art Unit 3656

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
18954634Park-and-Ride Route Generation Method, System, Device, and MediumNovember 2024April 2025Allow500NoNo
18669709ROBOT FOR LOCOMOTION IN INTERIOR SPACES OF PIPES, AND OPERATING METHODMay 2024November 2025Allow1800NoNo
18639891METHOD OF GENERATING ROBOT PATH AND COMPUTING DEVICE FOR PERFORMING THE METHODApril 2024November 2025Allow1900NoNo
18529605AUTONOMOUS DRIVING CONTROL APPARATUSDecember 2023December 2025Allow2510NoNo
18489750ROBOT, ROBOT CONTROL METHOD, ARTICLE MANUFACTURING METHOD USING ROBOT, AND CONTROL PROGRAM AND STORAGE MEDIUMOctober 2023March 2026Allow2810NoNo
18357306CONTROL APPARATUS, VEHICLE, AND CONTROL METHODJuly 2023August 2025Allow2510NoNo
18357578SYSTEM-LEVEL OPTIMIZATION AND MODE SUGGESTION PLATFORM FOR TRANSPORTATION TRIPSJuly 2023December 2025Allow2810NoNo
18356867INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND VEHICLEJuly 2023July 2025Allow2410NoNo
18272306ROBOT SYSTEM AND ROBOT CONTROL METHODJuly 2023September 2025Allow2610YesNo
18261010SPRING CONSTANT CORRECTION DEVICE, METHOD THEREFOR, AND RECORDING MEDIUMJuly 2023July 2025Allow2410NoNo
18257442INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND MOBILE DEVICEJune 2023October 2025Allow2820NoNo
18332315DRIVE ROUTE GENERATION DEVICE, DRIVE ROUTE GENERATION METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUMJune 2023December 2025Abandon3020NoNo
18038807SAFETY VISION DEVICE, AND SAFETY VISION SYSTEMMay 2023May 2025Allow2410NoNo
18324072VEHICLE REACTION TO SCENE CHANGES AT PICK-UP AND DROP-OFFMay 2023January 2026Abandon3220NoNo
18143995PARKING MANAGEMENT DEVICE, VEHICLE, AND PARKING MANAGEMENT METHODMay 2023March 2025Allow2310YesNo
17637994PRIVATE DIRECTIONS AND NAVIGATIONApril 2023December 2025Abandon4620YesNo
18167221ROBOT SYSTEM AND CONTROLLERFebruary 2023August 2025Abandon3010NoNo
18011308EXTERNAL ROBOT STAND AND EXTERNAL ROBOT SYSTEMDecember 2022December 2025Allow3630NoNo
18081133VEHICLE WITH OCCUPANT TRAJECTORY-BASED AIRBAG SUPPRESSIONDecember 2022March 2026Abandon3920YesNo
18061547INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS AND INFORMATION PROCESSING METHODDecember 2022March 2025Allow2810YesNo
17922906DRIVER ASSISTANCE FOR A MOTOR VEHICLENovember 2022June 2025Allow3120YesNo
17978738SMART ON-DEMAND STORAGE FOR ROBOTSNovember 2022January 2026Allow3921YesNo
17919637PROGRAM EDITING DEVICEOctober 2022January 2025Allow2710NoNo
17966018BRAKING CONTROL SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AUTONOMOUS VEHICLEOctober 2022April 2025Allow3020NoNo
17918281CABIN-INSIDE DETECTION DEVICE AND CABIN-INSIDE DETECTION METHODOctober 2022August 2024Allow2200NoNo
17962320GEOLOCATION-BASED VEHICLE DATA MONITORING AND COMPARISONOctober 2022February 2026Abandon4030YesNo
17952987Method and System for Programming a RobotSeptember 2022August 2025Abandon3520NoNo
17799061MANIPULATION GUIDE DEVICEAugust 2022January 2025Allow2920YesNo
17884981SURGICAL ROBOT AND CONTROLLER OF SURGICAL ROBOTAugust 2022January 2026Allow4140NoNo
17880654PATH PLANNING WITH DIRECTION OF TRAVEL AT START AND END POINTSAugust 2022August 2025Abandon3610NoNo
17793736MOVABLE BODY CONTROL SYSTEM, CONTROL APPARATUS, CONTROL METHOD AND RECORDING MEDIUMJuly 2022July 2025Abandon3620YesNo
17852560ELECTRIC PARKING BRAKE AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING THE SAMEJune 2022December 2024Allow3020NoNo
17773153System for Detecting a Man-Overboard EventApril 2022January 2025Allow3310NoNo
17770884SYSTEM, METHOD AND MAIN CONTROL SYSTEM FOR HANDLING MALFUNCTIONING VEHICLES IN AN AUTOMATED STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL SYSTEM COMPRISING A RAIL SYSTEMApril 2022December 2024Allow3210NoNo
17770837FLIGHT CONTROL SYSTEMS, GROUND-BASED CONTROL CENTRES, REMOTELY PILOTED AIRCRAFT, AND METHODApril 2022July 2025Allow3920NoNo
17768789METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR NAVIGATING A VEHICLE AT INTERSECTIONSApril 2022November 2024Allow3110NoNo
17703566PREDICTING A DRIVING CONDITION TO PROVIDE ENHANCED VEHICLE MANAGEMENTMarch 2022October 2025Abandon4340YesNo
17642428OPERATION INSTRUCTION SYSTEMMarch 2022April 2025Allow3730NoNo
17685178MOBILE COMPUTE SYSTEM WITH INTERFACE VERIFICATION MECHANISM AND METHOD OF OPERATION THEREOFMarch 2022September 2024Allow3120NoNo
17684847DRIVING SUPPORT APPARATUS, DRIVING SUPPORT METHOD, AND COMPUTER-READABLE MEDIUMMarch 2022June 2025Abandon4020YesNo
17684685ELECTRONIC DEVICE FOR PROJECTING IMAGE ONTO WINDSHIELD OF VEHICLE AND OPERATING METHOD THEREOFMarch 2022October 2024Allow3120YesNo
17637437ENVIRONMENT MAP CREATION DEVICE AND METHOD, LOCAL POSITION ESTIMATION DEVICE, AND AUTONOMOUS MOVING BODYFebruary 2022May 2025Abandon3830NoNo
17637162Apparatus, Method and System for Providing Evaluation and/or Optimization of Trajectory Management ServicesFebruary 2022September 2024Allow3120NoNo
17673801UNMANNED DRIVING DEVICE CONTROLFebruary 2022February 2025Abandon3620YesNo
17665698SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MANAGEMENT OF DRIVING MANEUVERSFebruary 2022July 2025Abandon4130NoNo
17645042User Interface for Supervised Autonomous GraspingDecember 2021September 2025Abandon4550YesNo
17644123ONLINE AUTO-INTERLOCK STRATEGYDecember 2021March 2026Abandon5120NoYes
17548625TRANSPORT SYSTEM, MOVING METHOD OF OPERATION TARGET AND STORAGE MEDIUMDecember 2021November 2024Abandon3520NoNo
17643093Personal Mobility and Control Method ThereofDecember 2021August 2024Allow3220NoNo
17456418A SYSTEM AND A METHOD FOR CONTROLLING A WHEEL OF A VEHICLENovember 2021August 2024Allow3320NoNo
17456429TIRE PRESSURE MONITORING UNIT AND METHOD FOR MANAGING TIRE DATA IN A TIRE PRESSURE MONITORING UNITNovember 2021October 2024Allow3520NoYes
17533167TAKEOVER OF VEHICLE CONTROLNovember 2021February 2026Allow5140YesYes
17612998Load-handling vehicleNovember 2021March 2025Allow4030NoNo
17514194Control Method For RobotOctober 2021October 2024Allow3530NoNo
17509100METHOD OF SUPPORTING ADJUSTMENT OF PARAMETER SET OF ROBOT, A NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM, AND INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICEOctober 2021September 2024Allow3530NoNo
17470812METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR POSITIONING A MOVEABLE ROBOTIC SYSTEMSeptember 2021April 2025Abandon4340YesNo
17173084WORKSPACE OPTIMIZATION FOR ROBOTIC SURGERYFebruary 2021March 2025Allow4931YesYes
16828596METHOD FOR ACQUIRING DATA CAPTURED BY A CAPTURE MODULE EMBEDDED IN A MOBILE DEVICE FOLLOWING A PREDETERMINED TRAJECTORY, CORRESPONDING COMPUTER PROGRAM AND DEVICEMarch 2020September 2024Allow5350NoNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner ESTEVEZ, DAIRON.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
2
Examiner Affirmed
1
(50.0%)
Examiner Reversed
1
(50.0%)
Reversal Percentile
77.0%
Higher than average

What This Means

With a 50.0% reversal rate, the PTAB reverses the examiner's rejections in a meaningful percentage of cases. This reversal rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals are more successful here than in most other areas.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
4
Allowed After Appeal Filing
2
(50.0%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
2
(50.0%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
82.3%
Higher than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 50.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is particularly effective here. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB show good success rates. If you have a strong case on the merits, consider fully prosecuting the appeal to a Board decision.

Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Examiner ESTEVEZ, DAIRON - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner ESTEVEZ, DAIRON works in Art Unit 3656 and has examined 13 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 69.2%, this examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 40 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner ESTEVEZ, DAIRON's allowance rate of 69.2% places them in the 31% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by ESTEVEZ, DAIRON receive 3.08 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 88% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by ESTEVEZ, DAIRON is 40 months. This places the examiner in the 24% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a -27.8% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by ESTEVEZ, DAIRON. This interview benefit is in the 1% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 27.3% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 47% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show below-average effectiveness with this examiner. Carefully evaluate whether an RCE or continuation is the better strategy.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 50.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 76% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner is highly receptive to after-final amendments compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 714.12, after-final amendments may be entered "under justifiable circumstances." Consider filing after-final amendments with a clear showing of allowability rather than immediately filing an RCE, as this examiner frequently enters such amendments.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 66.7% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 56% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: Pre-appeal conferences show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. If you have strong arguments, a PAC request may result in favorable reconsideration.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 60.0% of appeals filed. This is in the 36% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 66.7% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner shows below-average willingness to reconsider rejections during appeals. Be prepared to fully prosecute appeals if filed.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 36% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 39% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Expect multiple rounds of prosecution: This examiner issues more office actions than average. Address potential issues proactively in your initial response and consider requesting an interview early in prosecution.
  • Consider after-final amendments: This examiner frequently enters after-final amendments. If you can clearly overcome rejections with claim amendments, file an after-final amendment before resorting to an RCE.
  • Plan for extended prosecution: Applications take longer than average with this examiner. Factor this into your continuation strategy and client communications.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.