Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17378500 | CABLE DRUM FOR A CABLE WINCH AND METHOD FOR PRODUCTION THEREOF | July 2021 | February 2025 | Allow | 60 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16973267 | ROTARY TOWER CRANE HAVING A TOWER MAST THAT CONSISTS OF A PLURALITY OF TOWER SECTIONS | June 2021 | October 2024 | Abandon | 46 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17255855 | VEHICLE CRANE COMPRISING A MOVABLE ADAPTER BETWEEN THE MAIN BOOM AND THE MAIN BOOM EXTENSION | December 2020 | March 2023 | Allow | 27 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17128670 | KNUCKLE BOOM CRANE, FOR OFFSHORE APPLICATION | December 2020 | March 2023 | Allow | 27 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17102216 | FAIRLEAD WITH ILLUMINATION MODULE | November 2020 | March 2023 | Allow | 27 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17075194 | Cable Guide Device | October 2020 | January 2024 | Allow | 39 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17073137 | BAITCASTER WITH COMPOUND GEAR SET | October 2020 | May 2023 | Allow | 31 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17066723 | SNATCH RING PULLEY | October 2020 | January 2024 | Allow | 39 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 16608844 | IMPROVED MODULAR FENCING STORAGE AND HANDLING DEVICE | October 2019 | April 2024 | Abandon | 54 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner SOTO, HENRIX works in Art Unit 3654 and has examined 9 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 77.8%, this examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 39 months.
Examiner SOTO, HENRIX's allowance rate of 77.8% places them in the 47% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications.
On average, applications examined by SOTO, HENRIX receive 2.00 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 47% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues fewer office actions than average, which may indicate efficient prosecution or a more lenient examination style.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by SOTO, HENRIX is 39 months. This places the examiner in the 27% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly slower than average with this examiner.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a -5.0% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by SOTO, HENRIX. This interview benefit is in the 6% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 25.0% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 42% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show below-average effectiveness with this examiner. Carefully evaluate whether an RCE or continuation is the better strategy.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 100.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 100% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner is highly receptive to after-final amendments compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 714.12, after-final amendments may be entered "under justifiable circumstances." Consider filing after-final amendments with a clear showing of allowability rather than immediately filing an RCE, as this examiner frequently enters such amendments.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 35% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 40% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.