USPTO Examiner MANSEN MICHAEL R - Art Unit 3654

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
17130967WIRE WINDING DEVICE AND WIRE TREATMENT SYSTEMDecember 2020January 2024Allow3710NoNo
16919193CABLE FEED DEVICE, CABLE PROCESSING SYSTEM, AND METHOD FOR FEEDING A CABLE TO A CABLE PROCESSING MACHINEJuly 2020April 2024Allow4511NoNo
16850242TEXTILE MACHINE PRODUCING CROSS-WOUND PACKAGESApril 2020February 2024Allow4640NoNo
16804577METHOD OF INSTALLING CABLE ON CABLE REELFebruary 2020June 2022Allow2831NoNo
16733389Stirrup Hoist Systems and Methods for Hoisting a Person onto a HorseJanuary 2020September 2023Abandon4520YesNo
16437172FLAT CABLE WINDING DEVICEJune 2019September 2020Abandon1500NoNo
16238597GAS TURBINE ENGINE OIL CIRCULATIONJanuary 2019September 2020Abandon2000NoNo
16151769VEHICLE TRANSMISSION DEVICEOctober 2018September 2019Abandon1200NoNo
16148346DRIVING BELT AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOFOctober 2018July 2020Abandon2100NoNo
16147995DRIVING BELTOctober 2018July 2020Abandon2100NoNo
16148413DRIVING BELTOctober 2018April 2020Abandon1800NoNo
15612629BICYCLE SPROCKETJune 2017August 2017Abandon300NoNo
15590336Convertible Display Stand to Seating AssemblyMay 2017March 2018Allow1010NoNo
15492542HOISTING ROPE AND HOISTING APPARATUSApril 2017January 2018Allow920NoNo
15469694FISHING LINE WINDING DEVICEMarch 2017June 2019Abandon2610NoNo
15387663CABLE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS AND METHODSDecember 2016May 2019Abandon2910NoNo
15142934ROTATIONAL POSITIONAL MONITORING OF VEHICLE LIFTSApril 2016February 2018Abandon2130YesNo
15006864TAILOR WELDED PANEL BEAM FOR CONSTRUCTION MACHINE AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURINGJanuary 2016January 2017Abandon1210NoNo
14867390RATCHET STRAP BINDER AND METHOD OF ADJUSTING A STRAP IN LENGTHSeptember 2015June 2017Abandon2010NoNo
14640246BICYCLE TRANSMISSION APPARATUSMarch 2015February 2016Abandon1100NoNo
14616861SEAT BELT RETRACTORFebruary 2015July 2017Abandon2910NoNo
14590181Adjusting Structure For Ratchet Safety BeltJanuary 2015June 2017Abandon2910NoNo
14566388Breakaway PulleyDecember 2014June 2017Abandon3010NoNo
14382969APPARATUS FOR ANCHORING AN OFFSHORE VESSELSeptember 2014September 2017Abandon3620NoNo
14381080SEATBELT RETRACTORAugust 2014June 2017Abandon3420NoNo
14367798TACKLE FOR DISPLACING A LOADJune 2014June 2016Abandon2310NoNo
14300714HYDRAULIC ELEVATOR SYSTEM AND METHODJune 2014March 2018Allow4540NoNo
14363841BOOM OF CONCRETE PUMP TRUCK AND CONCRETE PUMP TRUCKJune 2014May 2016Abandon2310NoNo
14361224CRANEMay 2014December 2016Allow3020YesYes
14351349Guide Rail for ElevatorApril 2014November 2018Abandon5520NoYes
14190271Wall Mountable Pulley DeviceFebruary 2014March 2017Abandon3720NoNo
14144308IMAGE FORMING APPARATUSDecember 2013February 2014Allow200NoNo
14119458SEATBELT RETRACTORNovember 2013April 2016Abandon2810NoNo
14008101SEATBELT RETRACTORSeptember 2013October 2017Allow4920NoYes
13974709SEATBELT RETRACTORAugust 2013December 2014Abandon1620NoNo
13885224SEATBELT TENSIONER WITH A FORCE-LIMITING DEVICE, AND METHOD THEREOFJune 2013October 2017Allow5320NoYes
13266621MOBILE REAR COUNTERWEIGHT DEVICE FOR CRAWLER CRANEApril 2013February 2016Abandon5220NoNo
13862161MAT ROLLER DEVICEApril 2013February 2017Abandon4620NoYes
13840783PRETENSIONER OF SEAT BELT FOR VEHICLEMarch 2013April 2016Abandon3720NoNo
13839099HOIST AND WINCH CABLE ANGLE SENSORMarch 2013December 2017Allow5721NoYes
13756773SEAT BELT RETRACTOR COMPRISING A TENSIONING DRIVEFebruary 2013December 2014Abandon2221NoNo
13750779Anti-Snag Guiding Device For Hoses, Cables Or Other Flexible Longitudinal ElementsJanuary 2013June 2015Abandon2911NoNo
13708145COIL ASSEMBLY HAVING PERMEABLE HUBDecember 2012February 2015Allow2711NoNo
13705381FRONT DERAILLEURDecember 2012January 2014Abandon1400NoNo
13508541Method for Operating a Winding DeviceJuly 2012February 2018Allow6020NoYes
13560451Retractor Mounted Belt Tension SensorJuly 2012April 2016Abandon4420NoNo
13470892LIFTING DEVICEMay 2012October 2017Abandon6040NoYes
13329578V-Shaped Cardboard Structure Addendum for Toilet Paper RollsDecember 2011December 2017Abandon6050NoYes
13326449TURNBAR AND TURNOVER MODULE FOR PRINTING SYSTEMSDecember 2011January 2015Abandon3710NoNo
13326487METHOD FOR TRANSPORTING PRINT MEDIADecember 2011January 2015Abandon3710NoNo
13276130Electronic Cargo Strap WinderOctober 2011September 2017Abandon6030NoYes
13201673BRAKE TORQUE CONTROLAugust 2011April 2018Allow6040NoYes
13143236Safety belt retractor having a pretensioning deviceJuly 2011May 2015Abandon4611NoNo
13118099WELDED SEAM BUSHINGMay 2011November 2013Abandon3011NoNo
13086248CONTROL METHOD OF AUTOMATIC LUBRICATION SYSTEM OF VARIABLE-PITCH BEARING USED FOR WIND TURBINE GENERATOR SYSTEMApril 2011May 2013Abandon2500NoNo
13040715WEB MEDIA MOVING APPARATUSMarch 2011December 2014Abandon4521NoNo
13021750METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR SELECTIVE MECHANICAL ENTRAINMENTFebruary 2011November 2013Abandon3311NoNo
13010775PAPER GUIDES FOR CONTINUOUS FEED PRINTINGJanuary 2011December 2014Abandon4620NoNo
13004391HYBRID BUSHED-SILENT CHAINJanuary 2011December 2013Abandon3520NoNo
12986724Apparatus for Controlling the Lateral Displacement of at least One Material Web with a Lath Securing DeviceJanuary 2011December 2014Abandon4720NoNo
12990116Cable Transport DeviceNovember 2010May 2015Abandon5521NoNo
12911785SEAT BELT RETRACTOR WITH DEEP DRAWN SPOOLOctober 2010December 2014Abandon4940NoNo
12893543PULLEY FOR USE WITH TOOTHED BELTSeptember 2010December 2013Abandon3821NoNo
12858850WINDING APPARATUS FOR ICE FISHING TIP-UPSAugust 2010August 2011Abandon1110NoNo
12777601Child-Resistant Roller Blind ApparatusMay 2010June 2013Abandon3701NoNo
12799780Belt driven wheel support and suspension system on a personal wheeled vehicleApril 2010June 2013Abandon3710NoNo
12758224Camber Tracking SystemApril 2010March 2011Abandon1110NoNo
12709678CRANE HOOK BLOCKFebruary 2010January 2011Allow1101NoNo
12591942Toilet paper roll scented foam insertDecember 2009August 2011Abandon2010NoNo
12595972WEB CONVEYANCE CONTROLLING METHOD, WEB SLIP AMOUNT MEASURING MEANS, AND WEB CONVEYANCE CONTROLLING DEVICEOctober 2009December 2014Abandon6042YesNo
12569056REAR YARD CRANE FOR AUTOMATIC TERMINALSeptember 2009January 2012Abandon2810NoNo
12545349WEB TRANSFER METHOD AND APPARATUSAugust 2009March 2015Abandon6051YesNo
12543279EQUALIZED HYDRAULIC CLAMP FORCE CONTROLAugust 2009March 2018Allow6041NoYes
12498828Special Functional and Decorative Paper Towel DispenserJuly 2009April 2011Abandon2230NoNo
12435021PORTABLE PILLAR-MOUNTABLE HOISTMay 2009August 2013Abandon5120NoYes
12379591Reel and recording tape cartridgeFebruary 2009May 2011Abandon2740NoNo
12379124Seat belt retractorFebruary 2009February 2016Abandon6040NoYes
12306248REELDecember 2008April 2011Abandon2820NoNo
12276338Screw elevatorNovember 2008January 2012Abandon3810NoNo
12265798VERTICAL LIFT WITH SYNCHRONIZERNovember 2008January 2012Abandon3810NoNo
12254930WEB PROCESSING APPARATUSOctober 2008August 2016Abandon6041YesYes
12162919Apparatus and Methods for Winding Wire Coils of Dynamoelectric Machine CoresJuly 2008March 2011Abandon3210NoNo
12103508SHEET ROLL DISPENSERApril 2008March 2011Abandon3521NoNo
12069913Methods and systems for raising and lowering a rig mast and substructure by remote controlFebruary 2008December 2011Abandon4620NoNo
12021443Multiple configuration Implement Carrier KitJanuary 2008December 2011Abandon4620NoNo
11944699LIFTING DEVICENovember 2007September 2013Allow6040NoYes
11862660VERSATILE SPROCKET SHEAVE ASSEMBLYSeptember 2007June 2011Abandon4430NoNo
11856164OIL REMOVAL SYSTEM AND METHODSeptember 2007March 2011Abandon4211NoNo
11817750LUBRICATION APPARATUSSeptember 2007April 2011Abandon4401NoNo
11815455Announcements Indicating One Car is Waiting for Another Car in the Same HoistwayAugust 2007April 2013Abandon6020NoYes
11713945Hybrid vehicle sensitive seat belt retractor inertial locking systemMarch 2007February 2015Abandon6040NoYes
11676025Electronic Dispenser for Dispensing Sheet ProductsFebruary 2007March 2011Abandon4950NoNo
11624078CARRIER DEVICE FOR A HOSE PACKET OF SUPPLY LINES OF AN OPERATING ROBOTJanuary 2007March 2011Abandon5010NoNo
10543893Seat belt retractorJune 2006May 2015Abandon6060YesYes
11383769Roll RoofingMay 2006September 2010Abandon5220NoYes
10294878DRIVER SYSTEM FOR REDUCING THE SPEED OF OR DRAGGING METAL STRIPSNovember 2002February 2003Allow300NoNo
10223595APPARATUS FOR A STEPWISE FEEDING OF A STRIP-SHAPED ARTICLEAugust 2002July 2003Allow1110NoNo
10070320YARN FEEDING DEVICEJuly 2002August 2003Allow2900NoNo
10170735BOBBIN FOR TYING A FISHING FLYJune 2002December 2002Allow610YesNo
10147727AUTOMATIC AND CONTINUOUS CALIBRATION OF FEED CORD PROPERTIESMay 2002July 2003Allow1400NoNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner MANSEN, MICHAEL R.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
17
Examiner Affirmed
14
(82.4%)
Examiner Reversed
3
(17.6%)
Reversal Percentile
30.1%
Lower than average

What This Means

With a 17.6% reversal rate, the PTAB affirms the examiner's rejections in the vast majority of cases. This reversal rate is below the USPTO average, indicating that appeals face more challenges here than typical.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
23
Allowed After Appeal Filing
5
(21.7%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
18
(78.3%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
29.8%
Lower than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 21.7% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is below the USPTO average, suggesting that filing an appeal has limited effectiveness in prompting favorable reconsideration.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB face challenges. Ensure your case has strong merit before committing to full Board review.

Filing a Notice of Appeal shows limited benefit. Consider other strategies like interviews or amendments before appealing.

Examiner MANSEN, MICHAEL R - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner MANSEN, MICHAEL R works in Art Unit 3654 and has examined 186 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 54.8%, this examiner allows applications at a lower rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 22 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner MANSEN, MICHAEL R's allowance rate of 54.8% places them in the 17% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is less likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by MANSEN, MICHAEL R receive 1.40 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 19% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues significantly fewer office actions than most examiners.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by MANSEN, MICHAEL R is 22 months. This places the examiner in the 88% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications move through prosecution relatively quickly with this examiner.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a -10.0% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by MANSEN, MICHAEL R. This interview benefit is in the 4% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 18.0% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 19% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show lower effectiveness with this examiner compared to others. Consider whether a continuation application might be more strategic, especially if you need to add new matter or significantly broaden claims.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 34.4% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 53% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows above-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. If your amendments clearly overcome the rejections and do not raise new issues, consider filing after-final amendments before resorting to an RCE.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 25.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 30% percentile among all examiners. Note: Pre-appeal conferences show below-average success with this examiner. Consider whether your arguments are strong enough to warrant a PAC request.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 37.0% of appeals filed. This is in the 6% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 20.0% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner rarely withdraws rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. If you file an appeal, be prepared to fully prosecute it to a PTAB decision. Per MPEP § 1207, the examiner will prepare an Examiner's Answer maintaining the rejections.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 42.9% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 33% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions show below-average success regarding this examiner's actions. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 1.6% of allowed cases (in the 72% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments more often than average to place applications in condition for allowance (MPEP § 1302.04).

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 2.0% of allowed cases (in the 70% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions more often than average when claims are allowable but formal matters remain (MPEP § 714.14).

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Prepare for rigorous examination: With a below-average allowance rate, ensure your application has strong written description and enablement support. Consider filing a continuation if you need to add new matter.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.