USPTO Examiner FRAZIER BRADY W - Art Unit 3648

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
19196991AIRCRAFT TILT APPARATUS INCLUDING VARIABLE COOLING AIR INLETMay 2025October 2025Allow610YesNo
18997365ELECTRICALLY POWERED PROPELLER SYSTEMS INCLUDING AN EXHAUST SYSTEM FOR BATTERY THERMAL MANAGEMENTJanuary 2025November 2025Allow1010NoNo
19022315METHOD OF SPACE TRANSPORTATION USING A DISTRIBUTED NETWORK OF SPACE TUGSJanuary 2025February 2026Allow1310NoNo
19016983AIRCRAFT PROPULSION SYSTEM INCLUDING PUMP GEAR DRIVEN BY PLANETARY GEARBOX ASSEMBLYJanuary 2025July 2025Allow610YesNo
19014981HIGH VOLTAGE JUNCTION BOX FOR A BATTERY PACKJanuary 2025August 2025Allow810YesNo
18989418SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR OIL MANAGEMENT IN GEARBOXES FOR EVTOL AIRCRAFTDecember 2024May 2025Allow510YesNo
18885934ADAPTIVE AUTOMATED PET TOY INCLUDING CIRCULATING DRIVE BELT EXTENSION OPERABLE WITH PROXIMITY SENSORSeptember 2024October 2025Allow1310NoNo
18809869SYSTEM FOR RECEIVING A DESCENDING ROCKET ON A SEMISUBMERSIBLE VESSEL USING A SUSPENDED CABLEAugust 2024December 2025Allow1610NoNo
18772556Bidirectionally Activated Leash ReleaseJuly 2024January 2026Abandon1810NoNo
18766137SLOW-EATING TUMBLER TOYJuly 2024November 2025Allow1610NoNo
18760326PET HARNESS INCLUDING LEG LIMITERS HAVING A RETRACTABLE BINDING ROPEJuly 2024August 2025Allow1410NoNo
18760226Crawling Insect Repelling Pet Dish PlatformJuly 2024October 2025Allow1610YesNo
18716905APPARATUSES AND METHODS FOR SEAWEED EMBEDDED INTERTWINED ROPE MATRIXJune 2024October 2025Allow1710NoNo
18733441SHELVING SYSTEM FOR PLANT CULTIVATIONJune 2024January 2026Allow2011NoNo
18675150Intelligent, self watering, auto rotating PlanterMay 2024January 2026Abandon1910NoNo
18619292CONTROL DEVICE FOR POWER CONSUMPTION MANAGEMENT OF ELECTRIC VTOL MOTORMarch 2024June 2025Allow1500YesNo
18590935METHOD FOR SCENTING BOTANICALS IN A DISPLAY JAR USING A CLOSABLE VENTFebruary 2024January 2026Allow2210YesNo
18586428Aircraft Electric Motor Cooling SystemFebruary 2024July 2025Allow1610YesNo
18686306GAS DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM FOR AQUACULTURE RESERVOIR INCLUDING INTERNAL FLOW CONTROL DEVICEFebruary 2024August 2025Allow1810NoNo
18438786PET SHOWER INCLUDING COLLAPSIBLE UPPER WASHING STATION AND INTERIOR SUPPORT FRAMEFebruary 2024November 2025Allow2110YesNo
18437873THERMAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FOR AIRCRAFT PROPULSION SYSTEM USING A FLOW OF COMPRESSED FLUID EXTRACTED FROM A COMPRESSOR SECTIONFebruary 2024August 2025Allow1801NoNo
18433097ROCKET INCLUDING ROTATABLE ARM FOR ENGAGING A CABLE DURING DESCENT AND METHOD FOR THE SAMEFebruary 2024September 2025Allow1910NoNo
18580702MILKING DEVICE INCLUDING TUBE-SHAPED FILTER COMPONENTJanuary 2024September 2025Allow2010YesNo
18411828PET TOYJanuary 2024October 2025Abandon2110NoNo
18398841MANAGING COOLING AIRFLOW USING VARIABLE-GEOMETRY OPENINGSDecember 2023August 2025Allow2010NoNo
18395696MULTI-RADAR BASED DETECTION DEVICE AND DETECTION METHOD FOR TARGET OBJECTDecember 2023February 2026Allow2610NoNo
18389880MICROELECTRONIC THERMAL VALVEDecember 2023November 2025Allow2310NoNo
18569321SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETERRING AQUATIC ANIMALS BY REMOTE CONTROL OF ELECTROMAGNETIC BARRIERDecember 2023January 2026Allow2520NoNo
18535340METHODS FOR OPTIMIZING BOUNDARY LAYER CONTROL (BLC) SYSTEMS AND RELATED SYSTEMSDecember 2023November 2025Allow2310NoNo
18532331DUAL WATERFALL CABINET FOR FOOD PROCESSING APPLICATIONSDecember 2023October 2025Allow2200YesNo
18509984WASTE HEAT CONTROL FOR AIRCRAFT FUEL CELLNovember 2023September 2025Allow2210NoNo
18559789FLOW RATE REGULATING STRUCTURE AND BUBBLERNovember 2023October 2025Allow2300NoNo
18480338ELECTRIC TILTROTOR AIRCRAFT WITH TILTING COAXIAL MOTORS AND GEARBOXOctober 2023August 2025Allow2320YesNo
18375824Water Catalyzed Nitrate Fixation of Atmospheric NitrogenOctober 2023January 2026Abandon2711NoNo
18371989SYSTEM FOR TREATING PLANTS ESPECIALLY IN AGRICULTURE BY APPLYING A COMPLIMENTARY PRODUCT DOSE BASED ON IMAGE ANALYSISSeptember 2023December 2025Allow2610NoNo
18370213SIMULTANEOUS AIR COOLING OF MULTIPLE ELEMENTS OF A HYBRID POWERPLANTSeptember 2023July 2025Allow2231YesNo
18275774CONTAINER FOR DISCHARGING CONTENTS BY A FIXED AMOUNT INCLUDING A DROPPER AND PRESSURIZING PUMPAugust 2023October 2025Allow2610NoNo
18223210HYBRID ELECTRIC AIRCRAFT INCLUDING FUEL POD WITH ELECTRICAL INTERFACEJuly 2023July 2025Allow2420NoNo
18330776ELECTRIC PROPULSION SYSTEM FOR AN AIRCRAFT INCLUDING A MOTOR LOCATED BETWEEN A GEARBOX ASSEMBLY AND A PROPELLERJune 2023August 2025Allow2611YesNo
18197394ELECTRIC VERTICAL TAKEOFF AND LANDING (EVTOL) AIRCRAFT LIFT MOTOR WITH AIR COOLINGMay 2023July 2025Allow2611YesNo
18049672SAFETY HARNESS INCLUDING A REMOVABLY CONNECTED RETENTION COMPONENT FOR A LOAD-BEARING MEMBEROctober 2022March 2026Allow4111NoNo
18046914Waterfowl Motion Simulation DeviceOctober 2022July 2025Allow3310NoNo
17912054ELECTRONIC DEVICE INCLUDING A CLOCK-GATED LATCH FOR TRANSPORTING A DEMODULATION SIGNAL TO A PIXEL ARRAY, AND METHOD AND COMPUTER PROGRAM FOR THE SAMESeptember 2022February 2026Allow4110YesNo
17929844MOBILE ELEVATED SURVEILLANCE TOWERSeptember 2022October 2025Allow3710YesNo
17849499PACKAGING COMPRISING SEEDSJune 2022November 2025Abandon4110NoNo
16806683DEVICE AND SYSTEM FOR RODENT CONTROL AND EXTERMINATIONMarch 2020September 2020Allow720YesNo
16656850GROW CABINET AND SYSTEM FOR GROWING PLANTSOctober 2019May 2020Allow710YesNo
16599514Intelligent POD Management and TransportOctober 2019June 2020Allow820YesNo
16173333Dog DiaperOctober 2018November 2020Allow2410YesNo
16156682FISHING ICE HOLE FUNNEL APPARATUSOctober 2018July 2020Allow2210YesNo
16033982TRANSMISSION LINE TETHERED DRONE SYSTEMJuly 2018September 2020Allow2610YesNo
16002371SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MONITORING EGGS DURING INCUBATIONJune 2018November 2020Allow2910YesNo
15662997AIRCRAFT PROPELLER DRIVE SYSTEMJuly 2017April 2020Allow3310NoNo
15656295Interceptor Unmanned Aerial SystemJuly 2017April 2020Allow3311NoNo
15652702Fishing Lure With A Scent Disbursement ApparatusJuly 2017February 2020Allow3110NoNo
15628599TWO-STAGE MOLDED PET TOYJune 2017March 2020Allow3230NoNo
15622071Bladeless fan with mosquito killing functionJune 2017December 2019Allow3010NoNo
15603909AIRCRAFT PROVIDED WITH A WINCH DEVICEMay 2017August 2019Allow2710NoNo
15482737Very Low Power Actuation DevicesApril 2017May 2020Allow3711NoNo
15513003SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MOORING A LAGOON ARRAY WITHIN A RINGMarch 2017July 2020Allow4040YesNo
15403008Very Low-Power Actuation DevicesJanuary 2017January 2021Allow4821NoNo
15371589BOUNDARY LAYER EXCITATION AFT FAN GAS TURBINE ENGINEDecember 2016May 2020Allow4121NoNo
15292840FISHING APPARATUS AND METHODOctober 2016March 2020Allow4120NoYes
15230527AUTOMATED MOBILE TERRACE GROWING SYSTEMAugust 2016May 2019Allow3320NoNo
15205738MULTILEVEL MOBILE GUTTER SYSTEM FOR GROWING INDOOR VEGETATIONJuly 2016May 2019Allow3420YesNo
15164181BIRD FEEDERMay 2016August 2019Allow3931NoNo
15160130MAPLE SAP COLLECTION APPARATUS AND METHODMay 2016February 2020Allow4440NoNo
14988204RATTLE REELJanuary 2016May 2019Allow4030NoNo
14967311ADAPTER FOR RESTRAINING PETSDecember 2015July 2018Allow3121YesNo
14955315FISH LURE VOCALIZATION DEVICEDecember 2015November 2017Allow2410NoNo
14935633ENHANCED WATER CAPTURE SYSTEMS FOR AIRCRAFT INTERIORSNovember 2015May 2018Allow3130YesNo
14854130FISHING HOOK AND COVERSeptember 2015May 2017Allow2010YesNo
14679353Gun Dog Training Tool and MethodApril 2015May 2019Abandon5030NoYes
13758570Nail or Claw Trimmer for Use With PetsFebruary 2013August 2019Allow6040YesYes

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner FRAZIER, BRADY W.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
1
Examiner Affirmed
0
(0.0%)
Examiner Reversed
1
(100.0%)
Reversal Percentile
97.7%
Higher than average

What This Means

With a 100.0% reversal rate, the PTAB has reversed the examiner's rejections more often than affirming them. This reversal rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals are more successful here than in most other areas.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
4
Allowed After Appeal Filing
2
(50.0%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
2
(50.0%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
82.2%
Higher than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 50.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is particularly effective here. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB show good success rates. If you have a strong case on the merits, consider fully prosecuting the appeal to a Board decision.

Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Examiner FRAZIER, BRADY W - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner FRAZIER, BRADY W works in Art Unit 3648 and has examined 29 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 96.6%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 32 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner FRAZIER, BRADY W's allowance rate of 96.6% places them in the 87% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by FRAZIER, BRADY W receive 1.93 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 47% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues fewer office actions than average, which may indicate efficient prosecution or a more lenient examination style.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by FRAZIER, BRADY W is 32 months. This places the examiner in the 52% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly faster than average with this examiner.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +6.2% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by FRAZIER, BRADY W. This interview benefit is in the 33% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide a below-average benefit with this examiner.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 35.0% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 78% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. If you receive a final rejection, filing an RCE with substantive amendments or arguments has a strong likelihood of success.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 60.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 85% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner is highly receptive to after-final amendments compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 714.12, after-final amendments may be entered "under justifiable circumstances." Consider filing after-final amendments with a clear showing of allowability rather than immediately filing an RCE, as this examiner frequently enters such amendments.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 75.0% of appeals filed. This is in the 66% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: This examiner shows above-average willingness to reconsider rejections during appeals. The mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) provides an opportunity for reconsideration.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 25.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 13% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are rarely granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing a petition, as the Technology Center Director typically upholds this examiner's decisions.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 36% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 7.1% of allowed cases (in the 85% percentile). Per MPEP § 714.14, a Quayle action indicates that all claims are allowable but formal matters remain. This examiner frequently uses Quayle actions compared to other examiners, which is a positive indicator that once substantive issues are resolved, allowance follows quickly.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Consider after-final amendments: This examiner frequently enters after-final amendments. If you can clearly overcome rejections with claim amendments, file an after-final amendment before resorting to an RCE.
  • RCEs are effective: This examiner has a high allowance rate after RCE compared to others. If you receive a final rejection and have substantive amendments or arguments, an RCE is likely to be successful.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.