USPTO Examiner HEBERT BENJAMIN RICHARD - Art Unit 3645

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
17139891DISTANCE MEASUREMENT DEVICE, CAMERA, INSPECTION ADJUSTMENT DEVICE, DISTANCE MEASUREMENT DEVICE DRIVE ADJUSTMENT METHOD, AND DISTANCE MEASUREMENT DEVICE INSPECTION ADJUSTMENT METHODDecember 2020September 2024Allow4410NoNo
17135959MEMS ACTUATED ALVAREZ LENS FOR TUNABLE BEAM SPOT SIZE IN LIDARDecember 2020December 2024Abandon4720YesNo
17120240LIGHT-EMITTING DEVICE, OPTICAL DEVICE, MEASURING DEVICE, AND INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICEDecember 2020August 2024Allow4410NoNo
17113427ENCRYPTED LIDAR SYSTEMS AND METHODSDecember 2020December 2024Allow4830NoNo
17114151LiDAR METHODS AND SYSTEMS WITH SELECTIVE DENSITY SCANNING BASED ON MEMSDecember 2020November 2024Abandon4720NoNo
15734997HORIZONTAL OR VERTICAL LINE TEST DEVICE AND SYSTEMDecember 2020January 2025Abandon4920NoNo
16951910ADAPTIVE VEHICLE HEADLIGHTNovember 2020April 2022Allow1701NoNo
17055207MULTIPLE MIRROR MONOSTATIC SCANNING LIDAR OPTICAL RANGING SENSORNovember 2020July 2024Abandon4410NoNo
17054431VIBRATION BASED ACTUATOR SYSTEM FOR CLEANING OF OPTICAL SURFACENovember 2020October 2024Allow4720NoNo
17090667MIRROR ASSEMBLY HAVING REINFORCEMENT STRUCTURE FOR LIGHT STEERINGNovember 2020March 2024Abandon4001NoNo
17052641METHOD FOR DETERMINING AN ALIGNMENT OF AN OPTOELECTRONIC SENSOR BY MEANS OF SCAN POINTS OF A SENSOR IMAGE, AND OPTOELECTRONIC SENSORNovember 2020March 2024Allow4000NoNo
17081715LIGHT DETECTION AND RANGING SENSORS WITH MULTIPLE EMITTERS AND MULTIPLE RECEIVERS, AND ASSOCIATED SYSTEMS AND METHODSOctober 2020March 2024Abandon4120NoNo
17066704METHOD FOR CARRYING OUT A MEASUREMENT PROCESSOctober 2020December 2024Allow5030NoNo
17041395MACROSCOPIC LIDAR DEVICESeptember 2020April 2024Abandon4320NoNo
17041114DISTANCE MEASUREMENT SENSOR, CONTROL DEVICE, CONTROL METHOD AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE MEDIUM WITH PROGRAM STORED THEREINSeptember 2020October 2024Abandon4920NoNo
16978994OBJECT RECOGNIZING DEVICESeptember 2020January 2024Allow4000NoNo
16978332FOG DETERMINATION APPARATUS, FOG DETERMINATION METHOD, AND COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUMSeptember 2020July 2024Allow4720YesNo
17001735DISTANCE MEASURING DEVICE AND DISTANCE MEASURING METHODAugust 2020February 2024Allow4220NoNo
16975560LIGHT DETECTION DEVICE, LIGHT DETECTION METHOD, AND LIDAR DEVICEAugust 2020February 2024Allow4220NoNo
16998294SINGLE BEAM DIGITALLY MODULATED LIDAR FOR AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE DISTANCE SENSINGAugust 2020November 2023Allow3920YesNo
16970333LIDAR SYSTEM, OPERATING METHOD FOR A LIDAR SYSTEM, AND WORKING DEVICEAugust 2020November 2023Abandon3910NoNo
16990491Self-Driving Sensor SystemAugust 2020June 2024Allow4640YesYes
16968198PHOTON DETECTING 3D IMAGING SENSOR DEVICEAugust 2020July 2024Allow4720NoNo
16987363LASER RADARAugust 2020January 2023Allow2910NoNo
16947351MULTI-LAYER METALLIZATION FOR MULTI-CHANNEL EMITTER ARRAYJuly 2020January 2024Allow4210NoNo
16919135LASER ARRANGEMENT WITH OPTICAL FILTERJuly 2020December 2024Allow5440YesNo
16852128Systems and Methods for Calibrating a LIDAR DeviceApril 2020June 2024Allow4921YesNo
16837429VARIABLE ANGLE POLYGON FOR USE WITH A LIDAR SYSTEMApril 2020December 2023Allow4530YesNo
16709729LIDAR DEVICEDecember 2019August 2023Allow4410NoNo
16512661LIGHT EMITTER, LIGHT EMITTING DEVICE, OPTICAL DEVICE, AND INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUSJuly 2019March 2024Abandon5620NoNo
16464657Method and System for Doppler Detection and Doppler Correction of Optical Chirped Range DetectionMay 2019June 2023Allow4940YesNo
16379207COMPENSATION CIRCUITRY FOR LIDAR RECEIVER SYSTEMS AND METHOD OF USE THEREOFApril 2019June 2023Allow5010YesNo
16334997EMITTER DEVICE FOR AN OPTICAL DETECTION APPARATUS, OPTICAL DETECTION APPARATUS, MOTOR VEHICLE AND METHODMarch 2019September 2023Allow5320NoNo
16356079Adaptive Ladar Receiver Control Using Spatial Index of Prior Ladar Return DataMarch 2019April 2023Allow4910NoNo
16285079OPTICAL STRUCTURE FOR EXTENDING LASER RADAR SCANNING RANGE OF UAVS AND OTHER OBJECTS, AND ASSOCIATED SYSTEMS AND METHODSFebruary 2019May 2023Abandon5010NoNo
16326755OPTICAL SENSOR MODULE AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING AN OPTICAL SENSOR MODULE FOR TIME-OF-FLIGHT MEASUREMENTFebruary 2019April 2023Allow5020YesNo
16269691METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR TARGETING AND TRACKING AN INTRUDER USING A LASER DETECTION AND RANGING DEVICEFebruary 2019May 2023Abandon5220NoNo
16268730EXTENDED LASER ACTIVE RANGING SYSTEM, METHOD AND COMPUTER READABLE PROGRAM PRODUCTFebruary 2019October 2022Allow4410NoNo
16265416REAL TIME GATING AND SIGNAL ROUTING IN LASER AND DETECTOR ARRAYS FOR LIDAR APPLICATIONFebruary 2019March 2023Allow4920YesNo
16260213ENCLOSURE FOR LIGHT DETECTION AND RANGING UNIT AND RELATED METHODSJanuary 2019March 2022Allow3800NoNo
16257697OPTOELECTRONIC SENSOR AND METHOD FOR DETECTING OBJECTSJanuary 2019December 2022Allow4720YesNo
16319142OPTICAL SYSTEM FOR DETECTING A SCANNING FIELDJanuary 2019August 2022Allow4310YesNo
16240512LIDAR DEVICEJanuary 2019December 2023Allow5940NoNo
16314898LASER POSITIONING APPARATUS AND LASER POSITIONING METHODJanuary 2019November 2022Allow4720YesNo
16314892LASER POSITIONING APPARATUS AND LASER POSITIONING METHODJanuary 2019May 2023Allow5330YesNo
16236442Parallax Compensating Spatial FiltersDecember 2018September 2022Allow4520YesNo
16229284MULTI-RANGE SOLID STATE LIDAR SYSTEMDecember 2018November 2022Abandon4720NoNo
16225903OBJECT DETECTORDecember 2018August 2022Abandon4420YesNo
16216780LIGHT DETECTION AND RANGE (LIDAR) DEVICE WITH COMPONENT STACKING FOR COAXIAL READOUT WITHOUT SPLITTER MIRROR FOR AUTONOMOUS DRIVING VEHICLESDecember 2018November 2023Allow5940YesNo
16205420SURVEYING DEVICE, AND CALIBRATION METHOD AND CALIBRATION PROGRAM FOR SURVEYING DEVICENovember 2018June 2022Allow4300NoNo
16060562METHOD FOR DETECTING A FUNCTIONAL IMPAIRMENT OF A LASER SCANNER, LASER SCANNER, AND MOTOR VEHICLENovember 2018September 2022Allow5220NoNo
16183017Surveying Instrument And Surveying Instrument SystemNovember 2018July 2022Allow4410NoNo
16164541ARRANGEMENT OF LIGHT SOURCES AND DETECTORS IN A LIDAR SYSTEMOctober 2018January 2024Abandon6040YesNo
16164217TRANSMISSION/RECEPTION MODULE FOR AN OPTOELECTRONIC SENSOR AND METHOD OF DETECTING OBJECTSOctober 2018May 2022Abandon4310NoNo
16153348SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR USING AN INDUSTRIAL MANIPULATOR FOR ATMOSPHERIC CHARACTERIZATION LIDAR OPTICS POSITIONINGOctober 2018September 2023Allow5950YesNo
16148550LIDAR 2D RECEIVER ARRAY ARCHITECTUREOctober 2018April 2022Allow4220NoNo
16146200APPARATUSES AND METHOD FOR LIGHT DETECTION AND RANGINGSeptember 2018March 2022Allow4220NoNo
16138661HYBRID LIDAR-IMAGING DEVICE FOR AERIAL SURVEYINGSeptember 2018December 2022Allow5130NoNo
16087547METHOD FOR CAPTURING AT LEAST ONE OBJECT, DEVICE OF A SENSOR APPARATUS, SENSOR APPARATUS AND DRIVER ASSISTANCE SYSTEM WITH AT LEAST ONE SENSOR APPARATUSSeptember 2018September 2022Allow4820NoNo
16136006METHOD FOR REGISTERING DISTANCE SCAN DATASeptember 2018January 2023Allow5220YesNo
16135846MULTIPLE OPERATIONAL MODES FOR AIRCRAFT LASER SENSING SYSTEMSSeptember 2018October 2022Allow4930NoNo
16132869Laser Measuring Method And Laser Measuring InstrumentSeptember 2018April 2022Allow4320NoNo
16123939POLARIZATION ENCODED BEAM DELIVERY AND COLLECTIONSeptember 2018April 2023Allow5530YesNo
16122054METHOD OF CORRECTING MEASUREMENT VALUE OF LASER SCANNER, AND DEVICE FOR THE METHODSeptember 2018November 2021Allow3910NoNo
16116769MEASURING DEVICE HAVING SCANNING FUNCTIONALITY AND SETTABLE RECEIVING RANGES OF THE RECEIVERAugust 2018April 2023Allow5650NoNo
16079053MULTI-ELEMENT FABRY-PEROT ETALON INTERFEROMETER FOR DIRECT DETECTION LIDARAugust 2018April 2022Allow4310YesNo
16105133DETECTION SYSTEM WITH REFLECTIVE MEMBER ILLUMINATED FROM MULTIPLE SIDESAugust 2018June 2022Allow4620NoNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner HEBERT, BENJAMIN RICHARD.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
1
Examiner Affirmed
1
(100.0%)
Examiner Reversed
0
(0.0%)
Reversal Percentile
16.1%
Lower than average

What This Means

With a 0.0% reversal rate, the PTAB affirms the examiner's rejections in the vast majority of cases. This reversal rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals face significant challenges here.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
2
Allowed After Appeal Filing
0
(0.0%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
2
(100.0%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
8.5%
Lower than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 0.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is less effective here than in most other areas.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB face challenges. Ensure your case has strong merit before committing to full Board review.

Filing a Notice of Appeal shows limited benefit. Consider other strategies like interviews or amendments before appealing.

Examiner HEBERT, BENJAMIN RICHARD - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner HEBERT, BENJAMIN RICHARD works in Art Unit 3645 and has examined 67 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 76.1%, this examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 47 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner HEBERT, BENJAMIN RICHARD's allowance rate of 76.1% places them in the 44% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by HEBERT, BENJAMIN RICHARD receive 1.96 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 44% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues fewer office actions than average, which may indicate efficient prosecution or a more lenient examination style.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by HEBERT, BENJAMIN RICHARD is 47 months. This places the examiner in the 11% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +16.5% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by HEBERT, BENJAMIN RICHARD. This interview benefit is in the 56% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide an above-average benefit with this examiner and are worth considering.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 34.0% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 76% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. If you receive a final rejection, filing an RCE with substantive amendments or arguments has a strong likelihood of success.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 50.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 76% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner is highly receptive to after-final amendments compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 714.12, after-final amendments may be entered "under justifiable circumstances." Consider filing after-final amendments with a clear showing of allowability rather than immediately filing an RCE, as this examiner frequently enters such amendments.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 50.0% of appeals filed. This is in the 20% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: This examiner rarely withdraws rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. If you file an appeal, be prepared to fully prosecute it to a PTAB decision. Per MPEP § 1207, the examiner will prepare an Examiner's Answer maintaining the rejections.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 16.7% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 9% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are rarely granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing a petition, as the Technology Center Director typically upholds this examiner's decisions.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 34% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 11.8% of allowed cases (in the 91% percentile). Per MPEP § 714.14, a Quayle action indicates that all claims are allowable but formal matters remain. This examiner frequently uses Quayle actions compared to other examiners, which is a positive indicator that once substantive issues are resolved, allowance follows quickly.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Consider after-final amendments: This examiner frequently enters after-final amendments. If you can clearly overcome rejections with claim amendments, file an after-final amendment before resorting to an RCE.
  • RCEs are effective: This examiner has a high allowance rate after RCE compared to others. If you receive a final rejection and have substantive amendments or arguments, an RCE is likely to be successful.
  • Plan for extended prosecution: Applications take longer than average with this examiner. Factor this into your continuation strategy and client communications.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.