Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18805245 | Exclusive Delivery of Content Within Geographic Areas | August 2024 | May 2025 | Allow | 9 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18656438 | RADAR APPARATUS | May 2024 | March 2025 | Allow | 10 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18617493 | Systems and Methods for Multi-Unit Collaboration for Noninvasive Detection of Concealed Impermissible Objects | March 2024 | June 2025 | Abandon | 14 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18397539 | METHOD, SYSTEM AND APPARATUS FOR CORRECTING SATELLITE OBSERVATION DATA | December 2023 | February 2025 | Allow | 14 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18148460 | UNDERWATER FERROMAGNETIC TARGET DETECTION METHOD AND SYSTEM EMPLOYING MULTIPLE POWER FREQUENCY RADIATION SOURCES | December 2022 | May 2025 | Allow | 29 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17984760 | PERSONNEL SAFETY SENSING | November 2022 | June 2025 | Allow | 31 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18052218 | SENSOR ASSEMBLY | November 2022 | March 2025 | Allow | 28 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17972203 | GLOBAL NAVIGATION SATELLITE SYSTEM RECEIVER | October 2022 | April 2025 | Allow | 30 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17965679 | RADIO FREQUENCY SENSING AND LOCALIZATION OF OBJECTS | October 2022 | April 2025 | Allow | 30 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17936889 | APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR ESTIMATING ANGLE OF ARRIVAL BASED ON ULTRA-WIDEBAND WIRELESS COMMUNICATION | September 2022 | March 2025 | Allow | 29 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17929240 | RADAR APPARATUS | September 2022 | March 2025 | Allow | 31 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17819191 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR RADIO FREQUENCY (RF) RANGING-AIDED LOCALIZATION AND MAP GENERATION | August 2022 | April 2025 | Allow | 32 | 0 | 1 | No | No |
| 17885815 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR OPTIMIZATION OF SIGNALING AND CONNECTION MANAGEMENT IN NON-ACCESS STRATUM | August 2022 | March 2025 | Allow | 31 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17798103 | REMOTE RADIO DIRECTION FINDER AND IDENTIFIER | August 2022 | June 2025 | Allow | 34 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17465633 | WAFER-SCALE DIRECT BONDED ARRAY CORE BLOCK FOR AN ACTIVE ELECTRONICALLY STEERABLE ARRAY (AESA) | September 2021 | May 2025 | Allow | 44 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17368100 | PHYSIOLOGICAL INFORMATION MONITORING AND IDENTIFICATION METHOD, CHARACTERIZATION INFORMATION MONITORING AND IDENTIFICATION METHOD, AND PHYSIOLOGICAL INFORMATION MONITORING RADAR | July 2021 | June 2025 | Allow | 48 | 5 | 0 | No | No |
| 16680842 | SENSOR MODULE FOR DETERMINING RANGE INFORMATION AND RELATED SYSTEMS AND METHODS | November 2019 | January 2021 | Allow | 14 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15664365 | POSITIONING REFERENCE SIGNAL (PRS) GENERATION FOR MULTIPLE TRANSMIT ANTENNA SYSTEMS | July 2017 | June 2018 | Allow | 10 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner AJIBADE AKONAI, OLUMIDE works in Art Unit 3645 and has examined 15 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 100.0%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 30 months.
Examiner AJIBADE AKONAI, OLUMIDE's allowance rate of 100.0% places them in the 100% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by AJIBADE AKONAI, OLUMIDE receive 0.80 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 8% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues significantly fewer office actions than most examiners.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by AJIBADE AKONAI, OLUMIDE is 30 months. This places the examiner in the 43% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly slower than average with this examiner.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +0.0% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by AJIBADE AKONAI, OLUMIDE. This interview benefit is in the 12% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 25.0% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 29% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show below-average effectiveness with this examiner. Carefully evaluate whether an RCE or continuation is the better strategy.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 100.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 100% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner is highly receptive to after-final amendments compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 714.12, after-final amendments may be entered "under justifiable circumstances." Consider filing after-final amendments with a clear showing of allowability rather than immediately filing an RCE, as this examiner frequently enters such amendments.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 0.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 4% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are rarely granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing a petition, as the Technology Center Director typically upholds this examiner's decisions.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 33% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 33% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.