USPTO Examiner COLLINS TIMOTHY D - Art Unit 3644

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
18626580Pet food bowl with insect exclusionApril 2024August 2025Allow1710YesNo
18608395TURBULENT AIRFLOW DEFLECTOR FOR ROTORCRAFT SLIDING DOORMarch 2024August 2025Allow1710NoNo
18681620FLIGHT DEVICEFebruary 2024May 2025Allow1620YesNo
18498769FENDER FOR WATERCRAFTOctober 2023January 2026Allow2600NoNo
18482061OUTBOARD MOTOR AND MARINE VESSELOctober 2023January 2026Allow2800NoNo
18246109AUTOMATIC LOCKING SAIL TRACK CAR SYSTEMS AND APPARATUSMarch 2023August 2025Allow2900NoNo
18014247BERTH FOR MULTI-PURPOSE DISASTER RESPONSE SHIP AND HARBOR STRUCTUREJanuary 2023June 2025Allow2900NoNo
18012721FLOATING BODY FOR OFFSHORE WIND TURBINEDecember 2022October 2025Allow3410YesNo
18086609MOORING DEVICE AND OPERATING METHOD THEREOFDecember 2022June 2025Allow2900NoNo
18058717CONVERTIBLE STANDUP PADDLE BOARD PADDLENovember 2022October 2025Allow3510NoNo
17964722PANEL CONNECTIONOctober 2022October 2025Allow3620NoNo
17562739MODULAR PET LITTER BOX SYSTEMDecember 2021October 2025Abandon4610NoNo
17493568PAYLOAD MOUNTING METHOD, SYSTEM, AND APPARATUSOctober 2021October 2023Abandon2410NoNo
17177461FISHING LINE ALARMFebruary 2021December 2022Abandon2210NoNo
17119911WEEDLESS GUARD FOR FISHING NEEDLE AND FISHING NEEDLE INCLUDING SAMEDecember 2020January 2023Abandon2510NoNo
17097372Fishing DeviceNovember 2020July 2024Abandon4420YesNo
17065757Brooder AssemblyOctober 2020November 2022Abandon2620NoNo
17004701SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CENTRIFUGAL HONEY EXTRACTIONAugust 2020November 2022Abandon2720NoNo
17001786USE OF ELECTRIC SHOCK TO PREVENT ANTS AND OTHER CRAWLING INSECTS FROM GAINING ACCESS TO HUMMINGBIRD AND OTHER TYPES OF BIRD FEEDERSAugust 2020October 2022Abandon2630NoNo
16990019PET COLLAR AND PET INFORMATION COMBINATION ASSEMBLYAugust 2020March 2023Abandon3120NoNo
16986554PORTABLE PET WASTE STORAGE DEVICEAugust 2020February 2023Abandon3010NoNo
16921601Artificial Fishing LureJuly 2020November 2022Abandon2810NoNo
16915305ENCLOSURE FOR AN ELECTRONIC DEVICE IN A FISHING RODJune 2020January 2023Abandon3120YesNo
16770188PLANT CULTIVATION GREENHOUSEJune 2020October 2022Abandon2820NoNo
16890939FEARLESS FISHING LURE DEFLECTORJune 2020November 2022Abandon3010NoNo
16857826BALLASTED PET FURNITUREApril 2020December 2022Abandon3120NoNo
16642399ANATOMICAL PAD AND SADDLE ASSEMBLYFebruary 2020March 2023Abandon3740NoNo
16801076Rodent Trap and Method of Using ItFebruary 2020March 2022Allow2510YesNo
16798800INTERNAL STRENGTHENING SYSTEM FOR SOFT PLASTIC FISHING LURESFebruary 2020October 2022Abandon3120NoNo
16750154DE-ICING SYSTEMJanuary 2020September 2020Abandon800NoNo
16748208Artificial intelligence driven horticulture systemJanuary 2020October 2022Abandon3311NoNo
16716894Meredith Effect Boundary Layer Energisation SystemDecember 2019September 2020Abandon900NoNo
16620848SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR USE IN FISH FARMING OR MARINE HARVESTINGDecember 2019July 2022Allow3130YesNo
16573392Scalable Aquaculture and Hydroponic (Aquaponics) Production SystemsSeptember 2019October 2022Abandon3711NoNo
16552106DETECTION OF THE PRESENCE OF ICE IN A TOTAL-AIR-TEMPERATURE PROBEAugust 2019June 2020Abandon1000NoNo
16549329ENGINE WINGAugust 2019November 2019Abandon200NoNo
16517269FUEL CELL SYSTEM FOR AN AIRCRAFTJuly 2019June 2020Abandon1100NoNo
16460307GAS TURBINE ENGINE MOUNT ARRANGEMENTJuly 2019June 2020Abandon1200NoNo
16451734VERTICAL TAKE-OFF AND LANDING AIRCRAFTJune 2019July 2020Abandon1300NoNo
16437415VERTICAL STABILIZER FOR AN AIRCRAFTJune 2019April 2020Abandon1000NoNo
16404280Outrigger AssemblyMay 2019October 2022Abandon4110NoNo
16400119AIRCRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL SYSTEMMay 2019September 2020Abandon1600NoNo
16400143AIRCRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL SYSTEMMay 2019September 2020Abandon1600NoNo
16386675APPARATUS, AIRCRAFT AND METHOD OF MOVING A MOVABLY MOUNTED WING TIP DEVICEApril 2019April 2020Abandon1200NoNo
16286565Multi-Purpose, Multi-Rod, Modular Fishing SystemFebruary 2019October 2022Abandon4410NoNo
16182344ENGINE MOUNTED AIRCRAFT GEARBOX DISPOSED IN PYLONNovember 2018January 2022Abandon3810NoNo
16141095ACTIVE VIBRATION CONTROL FOR AERIAL VEHICLESSeptember 2018July 2021Allow3410NoNo
16027705ARTIFICIAL SATELLITE AND METHOD OF CONTROLLING THE SAMEJuly 2018June 2021Allow3620NoNo
16024777VTOL HAVING RETRACTABLE WINGS WITH OBLIQUE REVOLUTE JOINTSJune 2018July 2022Abandon4810NoNo
15761722AIRCRAFT WING STRUCTUREMarch 2018August 2020Abandon2910NoNo
15895619FUSELAGE EMBEDDED FUEL TANKFebruary 2018June 2020Allow2810YesNo
15884411DETACHABLE MULTIAXIAL AIRCRAFTJanuary 2018August 2020Abandon3010NoNo
15869263LANDING GEAR DRIVE SYSTEMSJanuary 2018June 2020Abandon2900NoNo
15869223ACOUSTIC ATTENUATION SYSTEM FOR NACELLE STRUCTURES AND METHOD THEREFORJanuary 2018February 2022Abandon4920NoNo
15859377COLLAPSIBLE OCTAGONAL SINGLE-LINE KITEDecember 2017January 2021Abandon3720NoNo
15805518PRESSURIZED-FLUID FLIGHT SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF USE THEREOFNovember 2017August 2020Abandon3310NoNo
15794477AIRCRAFT WING ROTATABLE ABOUT A SPAROctober 2017August 2020Abandon3410NoNo
15726042PORTABLE PERSONAL AIRBAG FOR AIRCRAFTOctober 2017April 2020Abandon3010NoNo
15719407SUSPENDABLE INSECT TRAPSeptember 2017April 2020Abandon3110NoNo
15682542TAIL TRACKING ANTENNAAugust 2017March 2018Abandon600NoNo
15657914WINGED MULTI-ROTOR FLYING CRAFT WITH AUTOMATIC PAYLOAD DELIVERYJuly 2017March 2020Abandon3110NoNo
15469128AIRBAG SYSTEM FOR USE WITH UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLESMarch 2017January 2020Abandon3410NoNo
15467666TIME DELAY DEVICE FOR PARACHUTE DEPLOYMENTMarch 2017August 2020Abandon4120NoNo
15436522SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SPRING ASSISTED LANDING GEAR OPERATIONFebruary 2017August 2020Abandon4210YesNo
15411841HIGH ALTITUDE BALLOON ANTENNA SYSTEMSJanuary 2017August 2020Abandon4320YesNo
15379554AERIAL VEHICLEDecember 2016May 2018Abandon1700NoNo
15221059OSCILLATING HEAT PIPE HEATING DEVICE FOR AN AVIONIC EQUIPMENTJuly 2016August 2020Abandon4930NoNo
14983088DEVICE FOR REMOVING DEBRIS FROM AN AERODYNAMIC STRUCTUREDecember 2015February 2017Abandon1400NoNo
14966493FEATHERING PROPELLER CLUTCH MECHANISMSDecember 2015January 2021Allow6021YesYes
14781937GLASS PANEL FOR A SPACE AIRCRAFTOctober 2015October 2017Abandon2410NoNo
14779252AIRCRAFT PASSENGER CABIN INTERIOR LAYOUTSeptember 2015August 2017Abandon2310NoNo
14842907LINK FOR AIRCRAFT COMPONENT MOUNTINGSeptember 2015April 2021Allow6021NoYes
14696220ROTARY-WING DRONE OF THE QUADRICOPTER TYPE, PROVIDED WITH REMOVABLE BUMPERS FOR PROTECTING THE PROPELLERSApril 2015March 2017Abandon2310NoNo
14121954Multiple compartment bird feederNovember 2014May 2017Abandon3020NoNo
14098587BUBBLE COLLECTOR FOR SUCTION FUEL SYSTEMDecember 2013November 2019Abandon6051NoNo
13785534COMPRESSED PACKAGED ARTICLES AND METHODS OF MAKING, TRANSPORTING, SHIPPING AND USING SAMEMarch 2013August 2013Allow610NoNo
13752853V-Trough Photobioreactor System and Method of UseJanuary 2013July 2014Abandon1810NoNo
13659983USE OF QUATERNARY AMMONIUM COMPOUND AS A HYDROTROPE AND A COMPOSITION CONTAINING THE QUATERNARY AMMONIUM COMPOUNDOctober 2012December 2013Allow1420YesNo
13127181Botanical Arrangement and Display ApparatusMay 2011April 2015Abandon4810NoNo
13020970LAUNCH AND RECOVERY SYSTEM FOR UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLESFebruary 2011August 2012Abandon1811NoNo
12792203ROTOCRAFT POWER-GENERATION, CONTROL APPARATUS AND METHODJune 2010November 2011Abandon1700NoNo
12750921IMPACT ATTENUATION SYSTEM AND METHODMarch 2010February 2013Abandon3521NoNo
12660903Vortex left platformMarch 2010September 2011Abandon1800NoNo
12445104HURRICANE SUPPRESSION BY SUPERSONIC BOOMFebruary 2010February 2013Abandon4610NoNo
12636381CARGO AIRCRAFTDecember 2009August 2011Abandon2000NoNo
12588623Power assisted toy flying deviceOctober 2009November 2012Abandon3710NoNo
12301491Dual-Use Modular Propulsion surveillance Vehicle with Detachable Unmanned Airborne VehiclesMay 2009April 2012Abandon4110NoNo
12190473INFLATABLE KITE WITH VENTSAugust 2008February 2013Abandon5410NoNo
12140788SYSTEM FOR MOVING AND STORING A CONDUIT FOR SUPPLYING AIR TO AN AIRCRAFTJune 2008February 2013Abandon5620NoNo
12057034RF Shielding for Aircraft WindowsMarch 2008February 2011Abandon3410NoNo
11965142SECURED COCKPIT FOR AN AIRCRAFTDecember 2007February 2013Abandon6040NoNo
11695085PROCESS FOR REPLACING A CAGE IN A RODENT CONTAINMENT SYSTEM FOR ANIMAL HUSBANDRYApril 2007February 2013Abandon6060YesNo
11276027FOAMED VITROEOUS MATERIALS FOR AGRICULTURAL APPLICATIONSFebruary 2006February 2010Allow4811NoNo
11240638ROCKET-POWERED VEHICLE RACING COMPETITIONOctober 2005June 2007Allow2120NoNo
10717465Method for accelerating destruction of a vortex formed by a wing of an aircraftNovember 2003April 2011Abandon6041NoYes
09914047Foldable/collapsible structuresJanuary 2002August 2010Abandon6010NoNo
09781088CATCH'EM FLEA BRUSHJanuary 2001September 2002Allow2030NoNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner COLLINS, TIMOTHY D.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
2
Examiner Affirmed
0
(0.0%)
Examiner Reversed
2
(100.0%)
Reversal Percentile
97.5%
Higher than average

What This Means

With a 100.0% reversal rate, the PTAB has reversed the examiner's rejections more often than affirming them. This reversal rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals are more successful here than in most other areas.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
3
Allowed After Appeal Filing
2
(66.7%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
1
(33.3%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
92.7%
Higher than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 66.7% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is particularly effective here. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB show good success rates. If you have a strong case on the merits, consider fully prosecuting the appeal to a Board decision.

Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Examiner COLLINS, TIMOTHY D - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner COLLINS, TIMOTHY D works in Art Unit 3644 and has examined 86 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 14.0%, this examiner allows applications at a lower rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 31 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner COLLINS, TIMOTHY D's allowance rate of 14.0% places them in the 2% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is less likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by COLLINS, TIMOTHY D receive 1.33 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 19% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues significantly fewer office actions than most examiners.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by COLLINS, TIMOTHY D is 31 months. This places the examiner in the 57% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly faster than average with this examiner.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +40.8% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by COLLINS, TIMOTHY D. This interview benefit is in the 88% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner and should be strongly considered as a prosecution strategy. Per MPEP § 713.10, interviews are available at any time before the Notice of Allowance is mailed or jurisdiction transfers to the PTAB.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 9.1% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 4% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show lower effectiveness with this examiner compared to others. Consider whether a continuation application might be more strategic, especially if you need to add new matter or significantly broaden claims.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 30.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 43% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows below-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. You may need to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 0.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 18% percentile among all examiners. Note: Pre-appeal conferences show limited success with this examiner compared to others. While still worth considering, be prepared to proceed with a full appeal brief if the PAC does not result in favorable action.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 50.0% of appeals filed. This is in the 19% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: This examiner rarely withdraws rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. If you file an appeal, be prepared to fully prosecute it to a PTAB decision. Per MPEP § 1207, the examiner will prepare an Examiner's Answer maintaining the rejections.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 64.3% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 69% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions show above-average success regarding this examiner's actions. Petitionable matters include restriction requirements (MPEP § 1002.02(c)(2)) and various procedural issues.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 1.2% of allowed cases (in the 69% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments more often than average to place applications in condition for allowance (MPEP § 1302.04).

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 38% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Prepare for rigorous examination: With a below-average allowance rate, ensure your application has strong written description and enablement support. Consider filing a continuation if you need to add new matter.
  • Prioritize examiner interviews: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner. Request an interview after the first office action to clarify issues and potentially expedite allowance.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.