Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17119593 | PASSENGER SEATING ARRANGEMENT | December 2020 | January 2023 | Allow | 26 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17109355 | VEHICLE WITH AT LEAST ONE EMERGENCY EXIT SYSTEM | December 2020 | November 2022 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17059971 | FLOOR STRUCTURE FOR AIRCRAFT LAVATORY UNIT | November 2020 | January 2024 | Abandon | 38 | 0 | 1 | No | No |
| 17058778 | AIRCRAFT SEAT UNIT | November 2020 | February 2023 | Allow | 27 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17095634 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AERIAL AIRCRAFT RESUPPLY | November 2020 | February 2023 | Allow | 27 | 3 | 1 | No | No |
| 17094180 | ENERGY ATTENUATING POD CARRIER SYSTEM FOR VERTICAL LIFT AIRCRAFT | November 2020 | January 2024 | Allow | 38 | 3 | 1 | No | No |
| 17077518 | Aircraft door mechanism, and associated aircraft and moving method | October 2020 | January 2023 | Allow | 27 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17008138 | UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE PORT | August 2020 | August 2023 | Abandon | 36 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 16997702 | INTEGRATED AIRCRAFT SEAT CONTROL PANEL | August 2020 | January 2023 | Allow | 29 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16896377 | PASSIVE-RELEASE, SNAP-FIT COUPLING DEVICES FOR SUSPENDED PAYLOAD CONTAINERS OF AIRCRAFTS | June 2020 | October 2022 | Allow | 28 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16849593 | UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE PORT | April 2020 | March 2023 | Abandon | 35 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16842735 | Double Translating Plug-Type Passenger Entry Door | April 2020 | February 2023 | Allow | 34 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 16805962 | LATTICE STRUCTURE CUSHIONS FOR AIRCRAFT FUEL SYSTEMS | March 2020 | February 2023 | Allow | 35 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16786301 | SYSTEMS, METHODS, AND APPARATUS TO CONTROL AIRCRAFT ROLL OPERATIONS USING WING ACTUATORS | February 2020 | January 2023 | Allow | 36 | 1 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 16784748 | ASSEMBLY COMPRISING AN AIRCRAFT DOOR AND AN AUXILIARY EQUIPMENT | February 2020 | December 2022 | Allow | 34 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 16743572 | Removable Air Filter Assemblies for Aircraft | January 2020 | April 2022 | Allow | 27 | 1 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 16709588 | FLYING TAXI FOR FACILITATING THE TRANSPORTATION OF PAYLOADS | December 2019 | April 2023 | Abandon | 40 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 16705438 | SYSTEM FOR OPERATING AN AIRCRAFT DOOR | December 2019 | September 2022 | Allow | 33 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16613767 | AIRCRAFT CABIN COMPRISING A CARGO AREA INTENDED TO ACCOMMODATE PASSENGERS | November 2019 | October 2022 | Allow | 35 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16679018 | BONDED SKINS FOR DUCTED-ROTOR AIRCRAFT | November 2019 | September 2022 | Allow | 34 | 1 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 16595752 | ENHANCED DESIGN FOR STRINGER RUNOUT TERMINATIONS ON COMPOSITE PANELS | October 2019 | March 2023 | Allow | 41 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16565175 | AIRCRAFT PARTITIONS HAVING AN ELECTROCHROMIC DISPLAY, AND RELATED METHODS | September 2019 | July 2022 | Abandon | 35 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16377669 | DOOR LATCH ARRANGEMENT | April 2019 | March 2023 | Abandon | 47 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner LEUNG, KA CHUN works in Art Unit 3642 and has examined 23 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 73.9%, this examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 34 months.
Examiner LEUNG, KA CHUN's allowance rate of 73.9% places them in the 40% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications.
On average, applications examined by LEUNG, KA CHUN receive 1.70 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 32% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues fewer office actions than average, which may indicate efficient prosecution or a more lenient examination style.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by LEUNG, KA CHUN is 34 months. This places the examiner in the 44% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly slower than average with this examiner.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +50.0% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by LEUNG, KA CHUN. This interview benefit is in the 92% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner and should be strongly considered as a prosecution strategy. Per MPEP § 713.10, interviews are available at any time before the Notice of Allowance is mailed or jurisdiction transfers to the PTAB.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 37.5% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 86% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. If you receive a final rejection, filing an RCE with substantive amendments or arguments has a strong likelihood of success.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 22.2% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 30% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows below-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. You may need to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 34% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 39% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.