Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19243402 | BATTERY DIGITAL ASSETS, AND ACCOUNTABILITY | June 2025 | August 2025 | Allow | 2 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 19218464 | System, Method and Process for Product Authentication and Verification | May 2025 | August 2025 | Allow | 2 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 19017891 | System, Method and Process for Product Authentication and Verification | January 2025 | March 2025 | Allow | 2 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18784435 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO GENERATE RECORDS WITHIN A COLLABORATION ENVIRONMENT BASED ON A MACHINE LEARNING MODEL TRAINED FROM A TEXT CORPUS | July 2024 | October 2025 | Allow | 15 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18401525 | TOKENIZATION FOR TRUSTFUL REPORTING OF BUILDING ENERGY PERFORMANCE | December 2023 | March 2026 | Abandon | 26 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18490441 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETERMINING LAND USE DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL | October 2023 | August 2025 | Allow | 22 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18375707 | APPARATUS AND A METHOD FOR THE GENERATION OF A JUDGMENT SCORE | October 2023 | January 2026 | Allow | 27 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18374720 | AIRCRAFT, SATELLITE, SPACECRAFT, TECHNOLOGY, INFRASTRUCTURE, AND RESOURCE INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM, SERVER AND METHOD | September 2023 | February 2026 | Abandon | 28 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18373181 | Automated Property Access Control Involving Sequential Call Prompt Interactions Using Multiple Computing Devices | September 2023 | December 2025 | Allow | 26 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18224586 | DIVERSIFIED SYSTEM SHARED RENTAL DEVICE AND METHOD | July 2023 | February 2026 | Abandon | 31 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18329392 | Systems and Methods for a Subscription-Based Brokerage Model for Real Estate Brokerages | June 2023 | November 2025 | Abandon | 30 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18322873 | BATTERY DIGITAL ASSETS, AND ACCOUNTABILITY | May 2023 | March 2025 | Allow | 22 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18191832 | DYNAMIC CLAIMS SUBMISSION SYSTEM | March 2023 | January 2025 | Allow | 22 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18118477 | VEHICLE REPAIR GUIDE SYSTEM | March 2023 | October 2025 | Abandon | 32 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18043351 | STORE ARRANGEMENT STRUCTURE IN COMMERCIAL BUILDING | February 2023 | December 2025 | Abandon | 33 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18171703 | System, Method, and Apparatus for Mobile Vehicle Service | February 2023 | October 2025 | Abandon | 32 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18109686 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CONTRACT NEGOTIATION AND DRAFTING | February 2023 | December 2024 | Allow | 22 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18104820 | Remote Monitoring of Disposal Bins for Reprocessable Medical Devices | February 2023 | November 2025 | Abandon | 34 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18161651 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PERFORMING AND TRACKING ASSET INSPECTIONS | January 2023 | June 2025 | Allow | 29 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18159544 | Method and system for vehicle service session | January 2023 | December 2025 | Allow | 34 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18092314 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR EFFICIENT MOVING | December 2022 | May 2025 | Abandon | 28 | 3 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 17972261 | Systems and Methods for Generating a Home Score for a User | October 2022 | December 2023 | Allow | 14 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17816379 | Systems and Methods for Generating a Home Score for a User | July 2022 | January 2025 | Allow | 30 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17866681 | PRODUCT SHOPPING SYSTEM AND METHOD HAVING A CHARITABLE DONATION PLATFORM | July 2022 | May 2025 | Abandon | 34 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17810822 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR SOCIAL ASSISTANCE REVIEW OF SMART CITY BASED ON INTERNET OF THINGS | July 2022 | September 2025 | Abandon | 38 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17810344 | Smart Device Management Through Property Management Portal | July 2022 | May 2025 | Abandon | 35 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17803323 | System and method for the collection of United States of America nationwide building code for all jurisdictions having authority to adopt and enforce building code for the determination of the jurisdiction with authority for building code adoption and enforcement at the location of real property and the supplying of the building code for real property to the user | May 2022 | August 2025 | Abandon | 39 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17699847 | Blockchain Based System for Storing Data Regarding Ownership and Value of Real Estate Shares | March 2022 | November 2024 | Abandon | 31 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17666929 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ORCHESTRATING AUTOMATED CONTENT DISTRIBUTION TO ENCOURAGE DIGITAL ADOPTION | February 2022 | January 2026 | Abandon | 48 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17597420 | Method and Apparatus For Processing Carbon Emission Reduction Data, and Computer Readable Storage Medium | January 2022 | December 2024 | Abandon | 36 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 17409835 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING INTELLIGENT ASSISTANCE USING A WARRANTY BOT | August 2021 | September 2025 | Abandon | 48 | 4 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 17393259 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGED DIGITAL EVIDENCE CAPTURE, ANALYSIS AND COLLABORATION | August 2021 | March 2025 | Abandon | 44 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17235495 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR RECALL NOTIFICATION | April 2021 | October 2024 | Allow | 41 | 2 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 17233214 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PRODUCT AUTHENTICATION USING A BLOCKCHAIN | April 2021 | October 2024 | Abandon | 42 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17230079 | Real Food Honesty Display System | April 2021 | October 2024 | Abandon | 42 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17211478 | OBTAINING AND ESTIMATING REPAIR OR REPLACEMENT INFORMATION FROM A SMART BUILDING | March 2021 | September 2024 | Allow | 41 | 2 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 17201203 | ITEM RETURN DATA INTEGRATION PROCESSING | March 2021 | September 2025 | Abandon | 54 | 5 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 17188924 | METHOD FOR LICENSING PROPRIETARY RIGHTS USING A BLOCKCHAIN | March 2021 | January 2026 | Abandon | 59 | 4 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 17136995 | ARCHITECTURES AND METHODS FOR GENERATING AND TRANSFERRING ELECTRONICALLY SIGNED DOCUMENT DATA PACKAGES | December 2020 | October 2025 | Abandon | 58 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16903288 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AUTOMATED STAGING AND CAPTURE OF REAL ESTATE NEGOTIATIONS | June 2020 | February 2025 | Allow | 56 | 4 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 16385012 | REAL ESTATE MARKETPLACE METHOD AND SYSTEM | April 2019 | November 2024 | Allow | 60 | 4 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 16277279 | PREDICTING AFTER-REHAB VALUE OF A REAL-ESTATE PROPERTY BASED ON REHAB-PACKAGES | February 2019 | January 2025 | Abandon | 60 | 4 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 16101292 | LABOR MANAGEMENT SYSTEM | August 2018 | November 2022 | Abandon | 52 | 8 | 0 | No | No |
This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner MONAGHAN, MICHAEL J.
With a 0.0% reversal rate, the PTAB affirms the examiner's rejections in the vast majority of cases. This reversal rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals face significant challenges here.
Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.
In this dataset, 0.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is less effective here than in most other areas.
⚠ Appeals to PTAB face challenges. Ensure your case has strong merit before committing to full Board review.
⚠ Filing a Notice of Appeal shows limited benefit. Consider other strategies like interviews or amendments before appealing.
Examiner MONAGHAN, MICHAEL J works in Art Unit 3629 and has examined 13 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 30.8%, this examiner allows applications at a lower rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 52 months.
Examiner MONAGHAN, MICHAEL J's allowance rate of 30.8% places them in the 4% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is less likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by MONAGHAN, MICHAEL J receive 3.85 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 97% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by MONAGHAN, MICHAEL J is 52 months. This places the examiner in the 4% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +44.4% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by MONAGHAN, MICHAEL J. This interview benefit is in the 90% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner and should be strongly considered as a prosecution strategy. Per MPEP § 713.10, interviews are available at any time before the Notice of Allowance is mailed or jurisdiction transfers to the PTAB.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 12.1% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 7% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show lower effectiveness with this examiner compared to others. Consider whether a continuation application might be more strategic, especially if you need to add new matter or significantly broaden claims.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 0.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 2% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.
This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 0.0% of appeals filed. This is in the 1% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: This examiner rarely withdraws rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. If you file an appeal, be prepared to fully prosecute it to a PTAB decision. Per MPEP § 1207, the examiner will prepare an Examiner's Answer maintaining the rejections.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 150.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 97% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are frequently granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1002.02(c), various examiner actions are petitionable to the Technology Center Director, including prematureness of final rejection, refusal to enter amendments, and requirement for information. If you believe an examiner action is improper, consider filing a petition.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 35% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 38% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.