USPTO Examiner JASMIN LYNDA C - Art Unit 3629

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
18801151SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR COORDINATING COMMUNICATION AND DATA COLLECTIONAugust 2024October 2025Allow1420YesNo
18521347Predictive targeting, analytics and modeling of users and audiencesNovember 2023September 2025Allow2120NoNo
18289630System For Managing Stock Of A Shelf Via Near Field Radio CommunicationNovember 2023November 2025Allow2410YesNo
18502427METHOD OF PROCESSING SEISMIC DATA ACQUIRED BY REFLECTION SEISMIC SURVEYNovember 2023February 2026Allow2800NoNo
18346466System and Method for Assessing Romantic PartnersJuly 2023August 2025Abandon2620NoNo
18177687SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DISTRIBUTED-LEDGER BASED INTERCOMPANY NETTINGMarch 2023February 2026Allow3640NoNo
18052002POST-INCARCERATION DIGITAL RE-ENTRY PLATFORMNovember 2022August 2025Allow3410NoNo
17996975METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR ONLINE SECURED TWO-PARTY COLLABORATIVE PREPARATION OF A FORMAL IP APPLICATION AND CONTROLLED ONLINE DELIVERY OF THE IP APPLICATION TO A SELECTED AGENCYOctober 2022July 2025Abandon3310NoNo
17443054METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR IMPROVED SENTIMENT ANALYSISJuly 2021February 2026Abandon5560NoNo
17330323SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SITUATIONAL AWARENESS ASSIST VIEWMay 2021September 2025Abandon5240YesNo
16927848Selecting a Real Estate AgentJuly 2020June 2022Abandon2410NoNo
16790297COMPUTER-IMPLEMENTED METHODS & SYSTEMS FOR DETERMINING DEVELOPMENT POTENTIALFebruary 2020April 2022Abandon2630YesNo
16627452SYSTEM FOR COLLABORATIVE INFRASTRUCTURE MANAGEMENT AND INCIDENT RESPONSEDecember 2019May 2022Abandon2810NoNo
16569915IDENTIFYING JOB SEEKERSSeptember 2019May 2022Abandon3210NoNo
16389095COMPANY SIZE ESTIMATION SYSTEMApril 2019July 2022Abandon3920NoNo
16360266DETERMINATION OF PROFILE MATCH FOR JOB POSTINGMarch 2019March 2022Abandon3620YesNo
16195000CONTRACT GENERATION AND TEMPLATINGNovember 2018February 2022Abandon3930YesNo
16121717Aircraft Certification System Based On A Distributed Public LedgerSeptember 2018August 2022Abandon4740YesNo
16041289SYSTEM FOR IDENTIFYING COMPATIBLE INDIVIDUALS IN A DESIGNATED LOCATIONJuly 2018December 2020Abandon2910NoNo
16017949Product Review Platform Based on Social ConnectionsJune 2018October 2020Abandon2810NoNo
15885149SKILLS-BASED CHARACTERIZATION AND COMPARISON OF ENTITIESJanuary 2018October 2020Abandon3310NoNo
15824669Contextual Information for Determining Credibility of Social-Networking PostsNovember 2017October 2020Abandon3410YesNo
15809972Computer Mediated Tool for TeamsNovember 2017August 2020Abandon3310NoNo
15809933Computer Mediated Authoring Tool for Performance ReviewsNovember 2017May 2020Abandon3010NoNo
15809963Computer-Mediated Tool for Determining PromotionsNovember 2017August 2020Abandon3301NoNo
15712163FRIEND RECOMMENDATION METHODSeptember 2017January 2021Abandon3920NoNo
15669944TECHNICAL REGULATION ENFORCEMENT SYSTEMAugust 2017June 2019Allow2310YesNo
15548171APPARATUS, METHOD AND SYSTEM TO VERIFY META DATA OF A PERSONAugust 2017August 2020Abandon3610NoNo
15659847METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR IMPROVED STUDENT MANAGEMENTJuly 2017April 2020Abandon3210NoNo
15506270METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR REAL ESTATE VALUATIONFebruary 2017March 2022Abandon6040YesNo
15396750DYNAMIC PROCESS SCREENING METHOD FOR A FACTORY IN OPERATIONJanuary 2017October 2020Abandon4620NoNo
15385742SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROVIDING PRODUCT TESTINGDecember 2016March 2018Abandon1500NoNo
15365516UNIFIED CROSS-PLATFORM JOB APPLICATION INTERFACENovember 2016May 2021Abandon5340NoNo
15348943Systems and Methods for Simultaneously Visualizing Academic and Career Interrelationship ArraysNovember 2016October 2021Abandon5960NoYes
15178044GENERATING JOB RECOMMENDATIONS BASED ON JOB POSTINGS WITH SIMILAR POSITIONSJune 2016October 2020Abandon5340YesNo
14876412CONTEXTUAL HELP MODULESOctober 2015March 2022Abandon6060YesNo
14814652UNDO FEATURE IN FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SOFTWAREJuly 2015September 2020Abandon6020NoYes
14788672SEARCH BY APPLICANT RANKER SCORESJune 2015December 2016Abandon1820YesNo
14308741METHOD OF DESIGNING POWER SUPPLY NETWORKJune 2014May 2015Allow1111NoNo
14287328Monitoring User Activities on Client Devices by Imaging Device DriversMay 2014June 2017Abandon3610NoNo
14287073METHOD AND SYSTEM OF PERSONAL ASSESSMENT AND PROFILINGMay 2014September 2017Abandon3910NoNo
14353623PRIVACY AUCTION MECHANISMApril 2014June 2017Abandon3710NoNo
14259201MATCHING INTERESTS OF USERSApril 2014June 2017Abandon3710NoNo
14257986METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR CREATING A LIST OF ORGANIZATIONS BASED ON AN INDIVIDUAL'S PREFERENCES AND PERSONAL CHARACTERISTICSApril 2014September 2017Abandon4110NoNo
14216930HIGH ASSURANCE FEDERATED ATTRIBUTE MANAGEMENTMarch 2014April 2016Abandon2510NoNo
14153395SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR OPTHALMIC STAFFINGJanuary 2014April 2016Abandon2730YesNo
14132713Computer-Implemented Personal Information Manager Method and SystemDecember 2013March 2017Abandon3810NoNo
14083086SCHOOL-FINDING TOOLNovember 2013March 2017Abandon3950NoNo
13998419Laborer connection - conexion jornaleraOctober 2013November 2017Abandon4910NoNo
14053520QUANTIZING NETWORK INTERCONNECTIONSOctober 2013April 2016Abandon3020YesNo
13963646SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR EVALUATING JOB CANDIDATESAugust 2013June 2021Abandon6090YesYes
13953297SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF OBTAINING CANDIDATE QUALIFICATIONS USING SELF-RANKING TESTING TOOLSJuly 2013March 2017Abandon4310NoNo
13925630BADGE LOGICAL GROUPIING ACCORDING TO SKILLS AND TRAININGJune 2013December 2016Abandon4210NoNo
13849401Employment Job Centers with Equal Opportunity ToolsMarch 2013December 2016Abandon4510NoNo
13840106METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR IMPROVED STUDENT MANAGEMENTMarch 2013September 2017Abandon5441NoYes
13787011REAL-TIME CUSTOMER SERVICE ASSISTANCE USING COLLECTED CUSTOMER LIFE CYCLE DATAMarch 2013March 2016Abandon3740YesNo
13779462Project and Document Management System with Automatic Metadata EncodingFebruary 2013October 2014Abandon2010NoNo
13750740Community Oriented Job Hub For Increasing Efficiency In Hiring ProcessesJanuary 2013March 2016Abandon3810NoNo
13723925PRESENTING REFERRERS ACCORDING TO DEGREES OF ASSOCIATIONDecember 2012April 2016Abandon4010NoNo
13705950METHOD FOR PREVENTING AND/OR DETERRING A CRIMINAL ACTDecember 2012June 2016Abandon4240YesNo
13675722Method and System for Automated Center WorkflowNovember 2012July 2020Abandon6070NoYes
13671616Method and System for Skill-Based Endorsement and Credential Validation PlatformNovember 2012March 2017Abandon5240YesNo
13643545SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FOR MANDATORY JOB SAFETY ANALYSIS AND METHOD THEREOFOctober 2012May 2015Abandon3120NoNo
13633507COMPETITION-BASED METHOD OF RANKING JOB CANDIDATESOctober 2012December 2018Abandon6030YesYes
13621776SOCIAL NETWORK AND LOCATION-BASED EMPLOYMENT PLACEMENT SYSTEM AND METHODSeptember 2012March 2016Abandon4210NoNo
13608685METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR OPERATING A WEBSITESeptember 2012April 2016Abandon4311NoNo
13608435METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR ASSESSING THE CANDIDACY OF AN APPLICANTSeptember 2012December 2016Abandon5230YesNo
13607143GIFT COLLABORATION SOCIAL NETWORK SERVICESeptember 2012April 2016Abandon4310NoNo
13604156METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR IDENTIFYING GRAPHICAL MODEL SEMANTICSSeptember 2012April 2016Abandon4340YesNo
13596817MATCHING CANDIDATES WITH POSITIONS BASED ON HISTORICAL ASSIGNMENT DATAAugust 2012November 2020Abandon6090YesYes
13561369BENEFIT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND METHODJuly 2012April 2014Allow2120NoNo
13455054COLLABORATIVE MANAGEMENT OF CONTACTS ACROSS MULTIPLE PLATFORMSApril 2012July 2020Abandon6051YesYes
13450659Counterfeit Products Detection Methods and SystemApril 2012June 2016Abandon5030NoNo
13443478METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR MATCHING BETWEEN EMPLOYERS AND EMPLOYEESApril 2012December 2016Abandon5720NoNo
13355240Methods and Systems to Help Detect Identity FraudJanuary 2012March 2017Abandon6020NoYes
13343775SERVICE LEVEL AGREEMENT DESIGN AND ENFORCEMENT FOR OUTSOURCED CALL CENTERJanuary 2012June 2017Abandon6040YesYes
13329506PROJECT MANAGEMENT CHARTINGDecember 2011March 2016Abandon5110NoNo
13303662CONNECTING BUSINESS CONTEXT TO BUSINESS SOLUTIONNovember 2011April 2016Abandon5350YesYes
13262680METHOD AND ARRANGEMENT FOR RETRIEVING INFORMATION RELATED TO A PRODUCTNovember 2011December 2016Abandon6030NoNo
13267428SYSTEMS, METHODS, APPARATUS AND GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACES FOR IMPROVED CANDIDATE SEARCH AND SELECTION AND RECRUITMENT MANAGEMENTOctober 2011March 2016Abandon5421NoNo
13251835Credibility Score and ReportingOctober 2011July 2018Abandon6040YesYes
13247908IDEAS PROMOTED TO PROJECTS AND SYNCHRONIZATION OF STATUS INFORMATIONSeptember 2011April 2016Abandon5511NoNo
13147077SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ASSESSING EMPLOYEE WORK PERFORMANCESeptember 2011May 2015Abandon4620NoNo
13206037METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR IMPROVING K-12 EDUCATIONAugust 2011March 2017Abandon6021NoYes
13172822EFFICIENT FRONTIER AND ATTAINMENT RATE FOR BUSINESS TRANSFORMATION OUTSOURCINGJune 2011December 2016Abandon6020NoYes
13162098TECHNIQUES TO IDENTIFY IN-MARKET PURCHASING INTERESTSJune 2011March 2016Abandon5740YesNo
13154267APPARATUS, SYSTEM, AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING A SOCIAL NETWORKJune 2011April 2016Abandon5840YesNo
13151580ESTABLISHING AN E-BADGE VIA MOBILE PRE-REGISTRATION FOR A VISITOR MANAGEMENT SYSTEMJune 2011January 2015Abandon4440NoYes
13117679BUSINESS FORM MANAGEMENT SYSTEM, METHOD AND PROGRAMMay 2011October 2014Abandon4120NoNo
13117234REGISTRATION METHOD AND REGISTRATION SYSTEM OF NETWORK SERVICE SYSTEMMay 2011May 2015Abandon4820NoNo
13070756METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR MANAGING PRODUCTION COMPLEXITY OF HIGH YIELD, MULTIPLE CROP GARDENING AND SUSTAINABLE FARMING OPERATIONSMarch 2011October 2014Abandon4320NoNo
13071434Credibility Scoring and ReportingMarch 2011July 2018Abandon6041NoYes
13070228Systems and Methods for Real Estate Documentation PreparationMarch 2011March 2017Abandon6050YesYes
13049769Decision-Theoretic Control of Crowd-Sourced WorkflowsMarch 2011March 2016Abandon6031YesNo
12944868SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MATCHING CANDIDATES WITH POSITIONS BASED ON HISTORICAL ASSIGNMENT DATANovember 2010November 2020Abandon6090YesYes
12808229Model Based Deployment Of Computer Based Business Process On Dedicated HardwareSeptember 2010May 2016Abandon6020YesYes
12670355DATA ASSOCIATION ENGINE FOR CREATING SEARCHABLE DATABASESJuly 2010April 2016Abandon6021NoNo
12821495System and method of global electronic job market in the InternetJune 2010June 2017Abandon6020NoYes
12808227Automated Model Generation For Computer Based Business ProcessJune 2010March 2016Abandon6030YesYes
12783171AUTOMATED AREA INSPECTION AND RECORDKEEPING SYSTEM AND METHODMay 2010December 2016Abandon6041NoNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner JASMIN, LYNDA C.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
45
Examiner Affirmed
43
(95.6%)
Examiner Reversed
2
(4.4%)
Reversal Percentile
21.8%
Lower than average

What This Means

With a 4.4% reversal rate, the PTAB affirms the examiner's rejections in the vast majority of cases. This reversal rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals face significant challenges here.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
73
Allowed After Appeal Filing
2
(2.7%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
71
(97.3%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
11.6%
Lower than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 2.7% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is less effective here than in most other areas.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB face challenges. Ensure your case has strong merit before committing to full Board review.

Filing a Notice of Appeal shows limited benefit. Consider other strategies like interviews or amendments before appealing.

Examiner JASMIN, LYNDA C - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner JASMIN, LYNDA C works in Art Unit 3629 and has examined 155 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 3.2%, this examiner allows applications at a lower rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 10000 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner JASMIN, LYNDA C's allowance rate of 3.2% places them in the 1% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is less likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by JASMIN, LYNDA C receive 3.54 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 94% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by JASMIN, LYNDA C is 10000 months. This places the examiner in the 1% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +0.4% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by JASMIN, LYNDA C. This interview benefit is in the 17% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 0.4% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 1% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show lower effectiveness with this examiner compared to others. Consider whether a continuation application might be more strategic, especially if you need to add new matter or significantly broaden claims.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 0.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 2% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 31.6% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 32% percentile among all examiners. Note: Pre-appeal conferences show below-average success with this examiner. Consider whether your arguments are strong enough to warrant a PAC request.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 6.2% of appeals filed. This is in the 2% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 100.0% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner rarely withdraws rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. If you file an appeal, be prepared to fully prosecute it to a PTAB decision. Per MPEP § 1207, the examiner will prepare an Examiner's Answer maintaining the rejections.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 41.2% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 32% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions show below-average success regarding this examiner's actions. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 35% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 37% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Prepare for rigorous examination: With a below-average allowance rate, ensure your application has strong written description and enablement support. Consider filing a continuation if you need to add new matter.
  • Expect multiple rounds of prosecution: This examiner issues more office actions than average. Address potential issues proactively in your initial response and consider requesting an interview early in prosecution.
  • Plan for RCE after final rejection: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments. Budget for an RCE in your prosecution strategy if you receive a final rejection.
  • Plan for extended prosecution: Applications take longer than average with this examiner. Factor this into your continuation strategy and client communications.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.