USPTO Examiner YU ARIEL J - Art Unit 3627

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
17003271AUTOMATED INVENTORY MANAGEMENTAugust 2020November 2024Abandon5180YesNo
16687064MANAGEMENT OF ITEM ATTRIBUTE DATA FOR SHIPPING AND HANDLING SYSTEMSNovember 2019February 2025Abandon6080YesNo
16551564USER INTERFACES FOR INSTANT PAYROLL WITH BULK APPROVALAugust 2019June 2025Abandon6080YesYes
16331781Method For Locating Electronic Shelf Labels In A Retail AreaMarch 2019May 2025Abandon6081YesNo
16211490Automated Package Delivery SystemDecember 2018February 2025Allow6050YesYes
16134896ROUTE-BASED OPTIMIZATION OF OBJECT DISPLAYS ON USER INTERFACESSeptember 2018October 2024Abandon6040YesYes
15675898NETWORK-BASED GROCERY STOREAugust 2017August 2019Allow2400NoNo
15445284SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR BEACON AND CLOUD PAYMENTSFebruary 2017April 2025Allow60120YesYes
14972688METHODS AND APPARATUS TO TRACK WIRE OR CABLE REELS IN AN INVENTORY STORAGE ENVIRONMENT USING A MOBILE DEVICEDecember 2015December 2017Allow2410YesNo
14874364METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR INVENTORY CONTROLOctober 2015May 2018Abandon3920NoNo
14869526TOUCH SCREEN FILM LAYER HAVING TAMPER LINE EMBEDDED THEREINSeptember 2015February 2017Abandon1600NoNo
14857628INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE, TRANSACTION PROCESSING SYSTEM, AND RECORDING DEVICESeptember 2015June 2018Allow3310NoNo
14842886METHOD AND A SYSTEM FOR CASHLESS TRANSACTION AND INVENTORY MANAGEMENT FOR VENDING MACHINESSeptember 2015June 2018Abandon3410NoNo
14756630Client Entry and Maintenance System for Timekeeping and Billing for Professional Services System and MethodJune 2015January 2025Abandon60140YesNo
14747824Fueling Station Non-Fuel Item Display, Purchase, and Payment SystemsJune 2015February 2018Abandon3210NoNo
14741424PROXIMITY-BASED INFORMATION AND AREA OF RELEVANCEJune 2015August 2018Abandon3820NoNo
14741420System and Method for SMS Ordering Via an Order Management SystemJune 2015May 2018Abandon3511NoNo
14738278PERSISTENT AUTHENTICATION OF A WEARABLE DEVICEJune 2015May 2018Allow3521YesNo
14730860APPARATUSES, METHODS, AND SYSTEMS FOR GENERATING INTERACTIVE DIGITAL RECEIPTSJune 2015February 2018Allow3320YesNo
14726426CONTINUOUS SHRINK REDUCTION SYSTEM SENSITIVITY ADJUSTMENTMay 2015October 2017Allow2910NoNo
14711120TRANSACTION PAYMENT PROCESSING BY MULTIPLE DATA CENTERSMay 2015August 2015Allow320YesNo
14702722CUSTOMER SERVICE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMMay 2015July 2015Allow200NoNo
14681918SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETECTING RETAIL ITEMS STORED IN THE BOTTOM OF THE BASKET (BOB)April 2015June 2018Abandon3920NoNo
14678760SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MANAGING AIRPORT LOUNGESApril 2015November 2018Allow4330YesNo
14639106KvitsMarch 2015November 2017Abandon3210NoNo
14634138AUTOMOTIVE FLEET MANAGEMENT SYSTEM HAVING AN AUTOMATED VEHICLE MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR REFERRALFebruary 2015April 2017Abandon2610NoNo
14632410NETWORK-BASED GROCERY STOREFebruary 2015May 2017Allow2701NoNo
14612762METHOD, SYSTEM, AND DEVICE FOR DETERMINING A LOCATION OF MICRO DIGITAL SIGNAGE DEVICESFebruary 2015February 2018Allow3620NoNo
14580596WHOLE-COURSE VISUALIZATION SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR LOGISTICS ARTICLESDecember 2014October 2018Abandon4620NoNo
14560616PRODUCT AVAILABILITY CHECK USING IMAGE PROCESSINGDecember 2014March 2015Allow300NoNo
14541936MERCHANT TRACKING AND ANALYSIS TOOLNovember 2014September 2018Abandon4630YesNo
14540662Logging Transaction Tracking Systems and MethodsNovember 2014May 2018Abandon4220NoNo
14526112PAYMENT TERMINAL OPERATION METHOD AND SYSTEM THEREFOROctober 2014June 2016Allow2021YesNo
14516212MERCHANT MANAGED METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR TEXT-TO-PAY SUBSCRIPTIONS AT A BILLING SERVEROctober 2014June 2017Allow3210NoNo
14383026PRODUCT DELIVERY INSPECTION SYSTEM, ORDER-RECEIVING-SIDE HANDY TERMINAL, ORDERING-SIDE HANDY TERMINAL, AND CONTAINERSeptember 2014August 2017Allow3550NoNo
14457052MULTI-CURRENCY FINANCIAL CONSOLIDATIONAugust 2014June 2017Abandon3510NoNo
14337529Application Activity SystemJuly 2014June 2017Abandon3510NoNo
14323989System And Method For Workflow Management With Configurable States And ExtensibilityJuly 2014March 2018Abandon4420NoNo
14321066INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS AND PROGRAMJuly 2014November 2017Abandon4120NoNo
14291158SYSTEM, PAYMENT AGENT AND COMPUTER READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM FOR FACILITATING CONTACTLESS MOBILE PAYMENT TRANSACTIONSMay 2014May 2017Abandon3610NoNo
14264888SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO IMAGE VALIDATIONApril 2014September 2017Allow4030NoNo
14260247AUTOMATED ENTRYApril 2014December 2017Allow4431YesNo
14243882Inventory Validator with Notification ManagerApril 2014January 2017Allow3410YesNo
14218964Business Process Management SystemMarch 2014October 2017Abandon4320NoNo
14203544POINT OF SALE SYSTEM, INVENTORY SYSTEM, AND METHODS THEREOFMarch 2014January 2017Abandon3510NoNo
14199931ELECTRONIC PAYMENT PROCESSING SYSTEMMarch 2014January 2017Abandon3410NoNo
14193541PRE-CALCULATED PERFORMANCE SIMULATIONFebruary 2014July 2017Allow4120NoYes
14186090Warehouse Control System With Dynamic Process ControlFebruary 2014December 2016Abandon3310NoNo
14186410SYSTEM FOR STRUCTURED ENCRYPTION OF PAYMENT CARD TRACK DATAFebruary 2014June 2017Allow4020NoNo
14185844FACILITATING ORDERING AT AN ORDER POINT VIA SMART ORDERING DEVICESFebruary 2014May 2016Allow2700NoNo
14151996System and Method for Providing Asset Accountability InformationJanuary 2014June 2018Abandon5390YesYes
14109852STATISTICALLY COST-FOLLOWING ACCOUNTING MODELDecember 2013May 2017Allow4111YesNo
14092988NON-METERED WIRELESS SYSTEM AND METHOD TO RENDER USAGE BASED INVOICES FOR STORAGE TANK CONSUMABLESNovember 2013March 2017Allow3920YesNo
14086510ACCOUNTING JOURNALIZATION FILE DATA STANDARDIZATION SYSTEMNovember 2013October 2016Abandon3410NoNo
13976164SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MOBILE POINT OF SALENovember 2013February 2017Abandon4420NoNo
14019004Low Authority GPS Aiding of Navigation System For Anti-SpoofingSeptember 2013July 2016Allow3510YesNo
13968510SALES PROCESSING APPARATUS, SALES PROCESSING METHOD AND SALES PROCESSING SYSTEMAugust 2013April 2018Allow5640NoNo
13962350COMMUNITY-BASED USAGE MONITORINGAugust 2013March 2017Abandon4320NoNo
13954040COMPENSATION RECOMMENDATIONSJuly 2013June 2018Abandon6031YesNo
13932696Generating a Simulated InvoiceJuly 2013October 2016Abandon4010NoNo
13910926SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR REDUCING FRAUDULENT ACTIVITY IN TRANSACTION DISPUTE RESOLUTIONJune 2013January 2017Abandon4320YesNo
13618982DYNAMIC ROUTING VIA INTELLIGENT MAPPING SYSTEMSeptember 2012April 2016Allow4320YesNo
13619786METHOD FOR CLOCKING CUMULATIVE OPERATING TIME FOR A CARGO-HANDLING VEHICLE, AND THE CARGO-HANDLING VEHICLE BY USE OF THE METHODSeptember 2012January 2015Allow2800NoNo
13587886System And Method For Workflow Management With Configurable States And ExtensibilityAugust 2012August 2014Abandon2411NoNo
13560707PUSH NOTIFICATION CARRYING RECEIPT DATAJuly 2012November 2017Abandon6080YesNo
13551566Automated EntryJuly 2012December 2017Allow6081YesYes
13541409CUSTOMER TO SUPPLIER FUNDS TRANSFERJuly 2012May 2016Allow4721NoNo
13528104VEHICLE CALIBRATION USING DATA COLLECTED DURING NORMAL OPERATING CONDITIONSJune 2012July 2015Allow3600YesNo
13450298Conducting Commerce Between IndividualsApril 2012January 2017Allow5720NoYes
13450153Conducting Commerce Between IndividualsApril 2012January 2017Allow5720YesYes
13449466METHOD, SYSTEM AND APPARATUS FOR GENERATION OF LOT CODES AND EXPIRY DATESApril 2012April 2016Allow4820NoNo
13440694CONSTRUCTION PAYMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND METHOD WITH AUTOMATIC NOTIFICATION WORKFLOW FEATURESApril 2012March 2016Allow4840YesNo
13440740CONSTRUCTION PAYMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND METHOD WITH DRAW NOTIFICATION FEATURESApril 2012March 2016Allow4840YesNo
13406579SPONSORED FACSIMILE TO E-MAIL TRANSMISSION METHODS AND APPARATUSFebruary 2012May 2016Abandon5020NoNo
13335936CASH REGISTER COMMUNICATION INTERFACE DOCKDecember 2011September 2016Allow5760YesYes
13324970SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CONDUCTING FINANCIAL TRANSACTIONS USING NON-STANDARD MAGSTRIPE PAYMENT CARDSDecember 2011September 2015Allow4520YesNo
13315764VIDEO CONTENT ANALYSIS USING POINT OF SALE DATADecember 2011September 2016Allow5750NoNo
13301804HANDLING INVOICE BASED SERVICESNovember 2011October 2016Abandon5830NoYes
13277514CUSTOMER CONTROLLED ACCOUNT, SYSTEM, AND PROCESSOctober 2011April 2018Allow6081YesNo
13268084SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DISTRIBUTION, REDEMPTION AND PROCESSING OF ELECTRONIC COUPONSOctober 2011January 2016Abandon5131NoNo
13200806Computational systems and methods for disambiguating search terms corresponding to network membersSeptember 2011April 2018Allow6080NoNo
13212961Vehicle Impound and Auctioning Management SystemAugust 2011June 2015Allow4630NoNo
13206044APPLICATION ACTIVITY SYSTEMAugust 2011February 2017Abandon6041YesYes
13191732SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING INDOOR NAVIGATION SERVICESJuly 2011January 2016Abandon5440YesNo
13184521SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ROUTE REPRESENTATION WITH WAYPOINT STORAGEJuly 2011January 2012Allow710NoNo
13184173Retail Location ServicesJuly 2011June 2016Allow5980YesNo
13181349CONSUMER SUPPORT FOR SUPPLY-CHAIN MANGEMENT SYSTEMJuly 2011February 2015Allow4330YesNo
13164598Systems and Methods to Predict Potential Attrition of Consumer Payment AccountJune 2011August 2015Abandon5030YesNo
13155200System and Method for Surgical Pack Manufacture, Monitoring, and TrackingJune 2011August 2017Abandon6031NoYes
13116876Order Management Device, Expansion Board, Order Management System Including These, and a Control Method and Program for an Order Management DeviceMay 2011December 2015Abandon5440NoNo
12999234FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEMMay 2011January 2016Abandon6030YesNo
13092188Methods, Devices, and Computer Program Products for Tracking Product InventoryApril 2011October 2024Abandon60140YesYes
13064861Interface between online salary statement and tax declaration programApril 2011October 2016Abandon6070NoNo
13086715SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CALCULATING TAXES AND MULTI-CURRENCY PRICINGApril 2011October 2014Abandon4240NoNo
13078822SYSTEM FOR STRUCTURED ENCRYPTION OF PAYMENT CARD TRACK DATAApril 2011October 2013Allow3120YesNo
13073524DYNAMIC ROUTING VIA INTELLIGENT MAPPING SYSTEMMarch 2011April 2016Allow6060YesNo
13050832SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETERMINING PAYMENTS FOR COLLABORATIVE INNOVATION AND AUTHORSHIPMarch 2011October 2018Abandon6071YesNo
13045200STATISTICALLY COST-FOLLOWING ACCOUNTING MODEL FOR DEDICATED RESOURCESMarch 2011August 2013Allow3021YesYes
13036270METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DETECTING DUPLICATE ACCOUNTING RECORDS IN DISTRIBUTED NETWORKFebruary 2011June 2015Abandon5241NoNo
12991670CONTROL OF A CONDENSER FAN OF AN AUTOMOTIVE AIR-CONDITIONING SYSTEMFebruary 2011October 2013Allow3610YesNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner YU, ARIEL J.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
22
Examiner Affirmed
11
(50.0%)
Examiner Reversed
11
(50.0%)
Reversal Percentile
76.9%
Higher than average

What This Means

With a 50.0% reversal rate, the PTAB reverses the examiner's rejections in a meaningful percentage of cases. This reversal rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals are more successful here than in most other areas.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
55
Allowed After Appeal Filing
21
(38.2%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
34
(61.8%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
63.2%
Higher than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 38.2% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is above the USPTO average, suggesting that filing an appeal can be an effective strategy for prompting reconsideration.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB show good success rates. If you have a strong case on the merits, consider fully prosecuting the appeal to a Board decision.

Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Examiner YU, ARIEL J - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner YU, ARIEL J works in Art Unit 3627 and has examined 200 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 45.5%, this examiner allows applications at a lower rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 50 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner YU, ARIEL J's allowance rate of 45.5% places them in the 11% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is less likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by YU, ARIEL J receive 3.56 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 92% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by YU, ARIEL J is 50 months. This places the examiner in the 8% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +24.5% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by YU, ARIEL J. This interview benefit is in the 70% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide an above-average benefit with this examiner and are worth considering.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 7.1% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 4% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show lower effectiveness with this examiner compared to others. Consider whether a continuation application might be more strategic, especially if you need to add new matter or significantly broaden claims.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 21.1% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 28% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows below-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. You may need to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 75.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 62% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: Pre-appeal conferences show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. If you have strong arguments, a PAC request may result in favorable reconsideration.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 56.0% of appeals filed. This is in the 29% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 28.6% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner shows below-average willingness to reconsider rejections during appeals. Be prepared to fully prosecute appeals if filed.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 58.8% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 60% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions show above-average success regarding this examiner's actions. Petitionable matters include restriction requirements (MPEP § 1002.02(c)(2)) and various procedural issues.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 33% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 38% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Prepare for rigorous examination: With a below-average allowance rate, ensure your application has strong written description and enablement support. Consider filing a continuation if you need to add new matter.
  • Expect multiple rounds of prosecution: This examiner issues more office actions than average. Address potential issues proactively in your initial response and consider requesting an interview early in prosecution.
  • Plan for extended prosecution: Applications take longer than average with this examiner. Factor this into your continuation strategy and client communications.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.