USPTO Examiner MITCHELL NATHAN A - Art Unit 3627

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
18403767SELF-CHECKOUT STOREJanuary 2024January 2025Allow1310NoNo
18533292SEMI-SELF POS SYSTEM, REGISTRATION APPARATUS, METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM STORING PROGRAMDecember 2023July 2025Allow1900NoNo
18530840SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CARD-HANDLING BY POINT OF SALE DEVICESDecember 2023November 2024Allow1110NoNo
18515006KIOSKS WITH PARALLEL JOB PROCESSINGNovember 2023October 2024Allow1110NoNo
18513284OPERATION OF A COMPUTING DEVICE INVOLVING WIRELESS TOKENSNovember 2023February 2025Abandon1510NoNo
18495219SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR NETWORK CONFIGURATIONS OF PIN PADSOctober 2023May 2025Allow1920NoNo
18476733Systems, Methods, and Media for Managing Inventory Associated With a FacilitySeptember 2023August 2024Allow1110NoNo
18237242INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUMAugust 2023May 2025Abandon2120NoNo
18237185INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUMAugust 2023May 2025Abandon2120NoNo
18237213INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUMAugust 2023May 2025Abandon2120NoNo
18336606COMPUTER VISION GROUPING RECOGNITION SYSTEMJune 2023July 2024Allow1310NoNo
18099901METHOD FOR STOCK KEEPING IN A STORE WITH FIXED CAMERASJanuary 2023August 2024Allow1910NoNo
18078024DATA PROCESSING APPARATUSDecember 2022March 2025Allow2710NoNo
18059019SHOPPING PAYMENT SYSTEM AND SHOPPING BASKETNovember 2022July 2025Allow3120NoNo
17927851HIGH DENSITY MICRO FULFILLMENT CENTER "HD-MFC" WITH NIGHTLY G2P STORAGE BATCH PICK REPLENISHMENT FROM STORE FLOOR AND METHOD OF OPERATING SAMENovember 2022March 2025Allow2810NoNo
17989577SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR TRACKING INVENTORY INSIDE WAREHOUSE WITH PUT-AWAY ACCURACY USING MACHINE LEARNING MODELSNovember 2022May 2025Allow3010NoNo
17983773SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF VERIFYING PRICE TAG LABEL-PRODUCT PAIRINGSNovember 2022March 2025Allow2920YesNo
17976643SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MANAGING DIRECT EXCHANGEOctober 2022April 2025Allow3010NoNo
18045966PROVIDING A USER INTERFACE ENABLING TIME TRACKING BASED ON PERCENTAGESOctober 2022March 2025Abandon2910NoNo
17959454SHOPPING CART WITH WEIGHT BUMP VALIDATIONOctober 2022December 2024Allow2610YesNo
17950310SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ITEM RECOGNITIONSeptember 2022March 2025Allow2911NoNo
17883001TOKENIZATION OF RESOURCE EXCHANGE EVENT INFORMATIONAugust 2022February 2025Allow3110NoNo
17882235PAYMENT DEVICEAugust 2022July 2024Allow2310NoNo
17881403MANUFACTURING ORDERING ASSISTANCE APPARATUS, METHOD AND PROGRAMAugust 2022May 2025Abandon3320NoNo
17880274DATA PROTECTION PROCESS TOOLAugust 2022March 2025Allow3120YesNo
17880421SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CASH LEVELING AT SELF-CHECKOUT MACHINEAugust 2022July 2024Allow2410YesNo
17837004SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ESTIMATING METRIC FORECASTS ASSOCIATED WITH RELATED ENTITIES WITH MORE ACCURACY BY USING A METRIC FORECAST ENTITY RELATIONSHIP MACHINE LEARNING MODELJune 2022April 2023Abandon1040NoNo
17834383PAPER SHEET STORAGE APPARATUS, PRODUCT REGISTRATION METHOD, AND RECORDING MEDIUMJune 2022August 2024Allow2610NoNo
17749773SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR INITIATING A COMPLETED LADING REQUESTMay 2022October 2024Allow2910YesNo
17718349MAINTENANCE SUPPORT SYSTEM, MAINTENANCE SUPPORT DEVICE, AND CONTROL METHOD THEREOFApril 2022October 2024Abandon3020NoNo
17768095ACTIVITY BASED CHEMICAL SUBSTANCE INVENTORY MANAGEMENTApril 2022June 2025Allow3840YesNo
17715134INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE AND METHODApril 2022October 2024Abandon3020NoNo
17710660METHODS, SYSTEMS, ARTICLES OF MANUFACTURE, AND APPARATUS FOR DECODING PURCHASE DATA USING AN IMAGEMarch 2022September 2024Allow3010YesNo
17708334RADIO FREQUENCY IDENTIFICATION (RFID) DRIVEN STOCKING PRIORITY DETERMINATIONMarch 2022March 2025Allow3630YesNo
17695913CAPTURE OF EMMC CARD IDENTIFICATION FOR COMPONENT TRACEABILITY OF PCIE DAUGHTER CARDMarch 2022March 2025Abandon3640YesNo
17692433METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR OPTIMIZING A LUBRICANTS VALUE CHAINMarch 2022December 2024Abandon3330YesNo
17674214TRANSACTION AUDITING USING TOKEN EXTRACTION AND MODEL MATCHINGFebruary 2022June 2025Allow3920YesNo
17629896SYSTEM AND METHODS FOR MODULAR INVENTORY MANAGEMENTJanuary 2022October 2024Allow3210NoNo
17648723SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PERSONALIZED TRANSACTIONS AND INDIVIDUALIZED PAYMENT BY ASSOCIATING DEVICE WITH JOINT TRANSACTIONJanuary 2022July 2024Allow3020NoNo
17310827Electronic Device Valuation SystemAugust 2021March 2025Abandon4330NoNo
16965839CARGO DETECTION AND TRACKINGJuly 2020April 2025Allow5721YesNo
16828806GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACE-BASED PLATFORM SUPPORTING BILL OF MATERIALS (BOM) CHARACTERIZATIONMarch 2020July 2024Allow5240YesNo
16663201PRIVACY ISSUES IN M2MOctober 2019February 2025Abandon60110YesNo
16482728INSTRUCTION ISSUING SYSTEM, INSTRUCTION ISSUING METHOD, AND PROGRAMAugust 2019January 2025Abandon6080YesNo
16523046Reducing Demurrage CostsJuly 2019January 2025Abandon6060YesNo
15979071COMBINED BASE TRANSCEIVER STATION AND BASE STATION CONTROLLER DATA CALL AND QUALITY OF SERVICEMay 2018December 2018Allow710NoNo
15900151SPECTRUM SHARING BETWEEN PRIMARY USERS AND CO-EXISTENCE GROUPS OF SECONDARY USERSFebruary 2018June 2018Allow310NoNo
15884260HAPTICALLY ENABLED MESSAGINGJanuary 2018November 2019Allow2230NoNo
15570548DEVICE, SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ISSUING ELECTRONIC RECEIPTSOctober 2017May 2019Allow1910NoNo
15786421DYNAMIC TOUCHSCREEN FUEL SELECTIONOctober 2017May 2025Abandon6070YesYes
15730801System and Method for Implementing SMS Texting as a Customer Service ChannelOctober 2017July 2018Allow910NoNo
15687741DEVICE AND METHOD FOR AUTHORIZING A COLOR CHANGE OF AN APPAREL DEVICEAugust 2017July 2018Allow1010NoNo
15541438METHODS AND DEVICES FOR CONTROLLING ANCILLARY OPERATIONS RELATED TO THE EXECUTION OF MAIN TRANSACTIONSJuly 2017April 2020Allow3320NoNo
15614828INSTANT SUPPORT AGENT CALL SETUP AND CALL CONNECTION APPLICATIONJune 2017January 2018Allow820NoNo
15588665SYSTEM FOR AND METHOD OF PROVIDING ENHANCED SERVICES BY USING MACHINE-BASED WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS OF PORTABLE COMPUTING DEVICESMay 2017April 2018Allow1110YesNo
15475446METHOD FOR MONITORING AND TRACKING IDENTIFIED MATERIAL IN FILLABLE RECEPTACLESMarch 2017January 2019Allow2210YesNo
15469288REDUCING BEVERAGE SHRINKAGE AND MONITORING BEVERAGE DISPENSING EMPLOYEES TO REDUCE REVENUE LOSSMarch 2017October 2019Allow3111NoNo
15512769METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR CONFIGURING USER EQUIPMENT INITIATED MESSAGES FOR DUAL CONNECTIVITY IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEMMarch 2017April 2018Allow1310NoNo
15462519SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DYNAMIC ACTIVATION AND DEACTIVATION OF USER PLANE INTEGRITY IN WIRELESS NETWORKSMarch 2017June 2018Allow1510NoNo
15510782METHODS AND NODES FOR MANAGING RSTD REPORTSMarch 2017February 2018Allow1110NoNo
15510564MOBILE DEVICE POSITION DETERMINING METHOD AND DETERMINING APPARATUS, AND MOBILE DEVICEMarch 2017July 2018Allow1720NoNo
15452554Planogram GenerationMarch 2017May 2019Allow2710YesNo
15500079APPARATUS, SYSTEM AND METHOD OF COMMUNICATING WITH A VEHICLE ALONG A TRANSPORTATION ROUTEJanuary 2017September 2018Abandon2020YesNo
15409396SENSORS, DEVICES, ADAPTERS AND MATING STRUCTURES FOR MERCHANDISERS AND RELATED METHODSJanuary 2017February 2020Allow3731NoNo
15395736S9 ROAMING SESSION CLEANUP WITH S9 CONNECTION FAILUREDecember 2016February 2018Allow1321NoNo
15386728INTERACTIVE JEWELRY VENDING MACHINEDecember 2016October 2018Allow2200NoNo
15366084METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR USING ACTIVE AND INACTIVE MOBILE SUBSCRIBER IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION IN A DEVICE TO PROVIDE SERVICES FOR A LIMITED TIME PERIODDecember 2016April 2018Allow1710YesNo
15346611METHOD AND SYSTEM OF AUTHENTICATION AND OTA REGISTRATION OF A NEW USER WITHOUT A SIM CARD IN MULTI-OPERATOR MOBILE TELEPHONYNovember 2016April 2018Allow1710NoNo
15343392TAX-EXEMPT SALE DOCUMENT CREATING SYSTEM, TAX-EXEMPT SALE DOCUMENT CREATING APPARATUS, AND TAX-EXEMPT SALE DOCUMENT CREATING METHODNovember 2016October 2018Allow2410NoNo
15227915DETERMINING THE OPTIMUM COVERAGE POSITION IN A BUILDING FOR EXTERNALLY PROVIDED RF SIGNALSAugust 2016March 2018Allow2020NoNo
15193377SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO DETERMINE A LOCATION OF A MOBILE DEVICEJune 2016October 2018Allow2811NoNo
14913989MOBILE DEVICE CONTEXT AWARE DETERMINATIONSFebruary 2016July 2018Allow2920NoNo
13890335SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AUDIO REMINDER MESSAGESMay 2013December 2013Allow710NoNo
13770232Systems, Methods, and Computer Program Products for Providing Service Credit to Customer Accounts in a Wireless Communications Service NetworkFebruary 2013November 2013Allow810NoNo
13516586MANAGEMENT METHOD AND APPARATUSESJuly 2012November 2013Allow1710NoNo
13144766METHODS OF PROVIDING CELL GROUPING FOR POSITIONING AND RELATED NETWORKS AND DEVICESJuly 2011August 2013Allow2500NoNo
12878503LOW COMPLEXITY BEAMFORMING FOR MULTIPLE ANTENNA SYSTEMSSeptember 2010June 2012Allow2120NoNo
12744501RESUSCITATION TEAM MOBILIZATION SYSTEM, DEVICE AND METHOD.May 2010June 2013Allow3610NoNo
11814061RESTRICTING THE USE OF MOBILE TERMINALS BASED ON FORCED LOCATION UPDATINGJuly 2008June 2012Allow5920NoNo
12142105SECURITY ACTIVATION IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS NETWORKSJune 2008July 2012Allow4811NoNo
12134329HETEROGENEOUS NETWORK HANDOVER-SUPPORT MECHANISMJune 2008September 2012Allow5230NoNo
11885772MEASURING RECEIVED SIGNAL QUALITYFebruary 2008September 2012Allow6040NoNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner MITCHELL, NATHAN A.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
1
Examiner Affirmed
1
(100.0%)
Examiner Reversed
0
(0.0%)
Reversal Percentile
14.9%
Lower than average

What This Means

With a 0.0% reversal rate, the PTAB affirms the examiner's rejections in the vast majority of cases. This reversal rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals face significant challenges here.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
3
Allowed After Appeal Filing
0
(0.0%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
3
(100.0%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
7.0%
Lower than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 0.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is less effective here than in most other areas.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB face challenges. Ensure your case has strong merit before committing to full Board review.

Filing a Notice of Appeal shows limited benefit. Consider other strategies like interviews or amendments before appealing.

Examiner MITCHELL, NATHAN A - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner MITCHELL, NATHAN A works in Art Unit 3627 and has examined 81 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 79.0%, this examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 26 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner MITCHELL, NATHAN A's allowance rate of 79.0% places them in the 40% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by MITCHELL, NATHAN A receive 1.91 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 61% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues a slightly above-average number of office actions.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by MITCHELL, NATHAN A is 26 months. This places the examiner in the 63% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly faster than average with this examiner.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a -14.9% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by MITCHELL, NATHAN A. This interview benefit is in the 1% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 23.9% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 24% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show lower effectiveness with this examiner compared to others. Consider whether a continuation application might be more strategic, especially if you need to add new matter or significantly broaden claims.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 26.9% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 29% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows below-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. You may need to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 0.0% of appeals filed. This is in the 1% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: This examiner rarely withdraws rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. If you file an appeal, be prepared to fully prosecute it to a PTAB decision. Per MPEP § 1207, the examiner will prepare an Examiner's Answer maintaining the rejections.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 75.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 90% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are frequently granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1002.02(c), various examiner actions are petitionable to the Technology Center Director, including prematureness of final rejection, refusal to enter amendments, and requirement for information. If you believe an examiner action is improper, consider filing a petition.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 32% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 3.1% of allowed cases (in the 72% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions more often than average when claims are allowable but formal matters remain (MPEP § 714.14).

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

    Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

    • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
    • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
    • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
    • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
    • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
    • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

    Important Disclaimer

    Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

    No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

    Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

    Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.