USPTO Examiner GOYEA OLUSEGUN - Art Unit 3627

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
18673068MULTI-SOURCE LIQUIDITY TRACKINGMay 2024March 2025Allow1010YesNo
18413726MERCHANDISER WITH ON-PRODUCT FINANCIAL PAYMENT SYSTEMJanuary 2024February 2025Allow1310NoNo
18450041SECURE FACILITATION OF VIRTUAL CARD ACTIVITIES FOR PROCUREMENTAugust 2023March 2025Allow1920YesNo
18220061SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR THE SALE OF AGE-RESTRICTED MERCHANDISEJuly 2023January 2025Allow1920YesNo
18213474OPTICAL SCANNING FOR WEIGHTS AND MEASURESJune 2023May 2025Allow2320YesNo
18201946USE OF BLOCKCHAIN BASED DISTRIBUTED CONSENSUS CONTROLMay 2023April 2025Abandon2310NoNo
18303515Multi-Merchant Concomitant-Use Point-of-Sale DeviceApril 2023October 2024Allow1810YesNo
18135294MULTI-MODE POINT-OF-SALE DEVICEApril 2023June 2025Allow2620YesNo
18295989AUTHENTICATION TRANSACTIONApril 2023March 2025Abandon2420NoNo
18118318System, Method, and Computer Program Product for Processing a Transaction as a Push Payment TransactionMarch 2023January 2025Allow2320YesNo
18171589GROUP DETERMINATION AND ASSOCIATIONFebruary 2023February 2025Allow2430NoNo
18170937SYSTEM FOR PREPARATION OF MODIFIABLE RECIPE-BASED PRODUCTSFebruary 2023June 2025Allow2810NoNo
17991237System and Method of an Explanation Tool for Automotive Production PlanningNovember 2022March 2025Allow2850NoNo
17988991FOOD TRANSPARENCY SYSTEMNovember 2022May 2025Abandon4010NoNo
17867047HYBRID RETAIL ENVIRONMENTSJuly 2022August 2024Allow2520NoNo
17811894SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR THIRD PARTY PAYMENT AT POINT OF SALE TERMINALSJuly 2022October 2024Allow2731YesNo
17840580Antifraud Resilient Transaction Identifier Datastructure Apparatuses, Methods and SystemsJune 2022September 2024Allow2730NoNo
17577580GOODS TO PERSON ORDER PICKING WITH DISCHARGE MECHANISMJanuary 2022June 2025Allow4110NoNo
17451353DETECTION AND ALERTING SYTEM FOR PRECURSORS TO SPOILAGE OR SPONTANEOUS COMBUSTION AND THE METHOD THEREOFOctober 2021March 2025Abandon4110NoNo
17328025AQUA INDEXMay 2021February 2025Abandon4520YesNo
17244125MULTI-CHANNEL AUTHENTICATION USING DELEGATED CREDENTIALSApril 2021July 2025Allow5040YesNo
17184916System for cook-neighbor reservation and food safety certificationFebruary 2021November 2024Abandon4410NoNo
17105761METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR AGREEMENT OF BLOCK IN BLOCKCHAIN NETWORKNovember 2020March 2025Allow5131NoNo
17076396SHOPPING SUPPORT APPARATUS AND SHOPPING SUPPORT METHODOctober 2020April 2024Allow4220NoNo
17061014SYSTEM FOR ARRANGING TRANSPORTATION SERVICES AND ASSOCIATED METHODSOctober 2020July 2024Allow4530NoNo
17034266Currency Tracking and Accounting SystemsSeptember 2020June 2025Abandon5730NoYes
17028554SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ENABLING A USER TO SELECT A SECURABLE DEVICE THROUGHOUT MULTIPLE SECURABLE DEVICE STATIONSSeptember 2020February 2025Allow5360YesNo
16796639System and Method of an Explanation Tool for Automotive Production PlanningFebruary 2020July 2025Allow6070NoNo
16285467AUTOMATED ZONE LOCATION CHARACTERIZATIONFebruary 2019January 2020Allow1110NoNo
15663407SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SECURE NETWORK TRANSACTIONSJuly 2017January 2020Allow2920NoNo
15282675PRE-PACKED SHIPMENT TRANSFORMABLE TO INVENTORY RECEPTACLE FOR DISTRIBUTORSeptember 2016March 2020Allow4121YesNo
15215149Shopping Cart with Integrated Scale and Point of Sale DeviceJuly 2016April 2019Allow3310YesNo
15158649AUTOMATED ZONE LOCATION CHARACTERIZATIONMay 2016January 2019Allow3220YesNo
14845770Point of Sale for Mobile TransactionsSeptember 2015December 2015Allow300YesNo
14740757CATEGORICALLY INDUCTIVE TAXONOMY SYSTEM, PROGRAM PRODUCT AND METHODJune 2015September 2018Allow3910NoNo
14170830YSTEM AND METHOD FOR USAGE BILLING OF HOSTED APPLICATIONSFebruary 2014March 2014Allow200YesNo
14140881SPLIT TENDER IN A PREPAID ARCHITECTUREDecember 2013September 2017Allow4450YesNo
14075467Delivery of Security Solutions Based On-DemandNovember 2013October 2015Allow2310NoNo
14014020PERSONALIZED MOBILE BANKING TRANSACTIONSAugust 2013March 2014Allow710NoNo
13859124COMMUNICATIONS TECHNIQUES FOR AN INTELLIGENT DIGITAL AUDIOVISUAL REPRODUCTION SYSTEMApril 2013May 2014Allow1320YesNo
13844853SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR USAGE BILLING OF HOSTED APPLICATIONSMarch 2013June 2013Allow300YesNo
13698773APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR STORING ELECTRONIC RECEIPTS ON A UNIFIED CARD OR SMARTPHONEJanuary 2013July 2016Allow4320NoNo
13736056REMOTE TRANSACTION PROCESSING USING A DEFAULT PAYMENT METHOD AND COUPONSJanuary 2013December 2013Allow1100YesNo
13736059REMOTE TRANSACTION PROCESSING WITH MULTIPLE PAYMENT MECHANISMSJanuary 2013March 2014Allow1400YesNo
13736061REMOTE TRANSACTION PROCESSING WITH MULTIPLE PAYMENT METHODS USING AUTHENTICATIONJanuary 2013March 2014Allow1400YesNo
13710441ONLINE SHOPPING USING NFC AND A MOBILE DEVICEDecember 2012May 2014Allow1720YesNo
13708858USING A SECURE ELEMENT COUPLED TO A MOBILE DEVICE AS A POS TERMINAL FOR PROCESSING MAG STRIPE TRANSACTIONSDecember 2012May 2014Allow1820YesNo
13706332USING A MOBILE DEVICE AS A POINT OF SALE TERMINALDecember 2012March 2014Allow1620YesNo
13690795SECURE MOBILE-BASED FINANCIAL TRANSACTIONSNovember 2012August 2013Allow900YesNo
13680303SINGLE TAP TRANSACTIONS USING A MOBILE APPLICATIONNovember 2012January 2014Allow1410YesNo
13680348SINGLE TAP TRANSACTIONS USING A SECURE ELEMENTNovember 2012October 2013Allow1010YesNo
13680526SINGLE TAP TRANSACTIONS USING A SERVERNovember 2012January 2014Allow1410YesNo
13680627SINGLE TAP TRANSACTIONS USING A POINT-OF-SALE TERMINALNovember 2012September 2013Allow1020YesNo
13680738REDEEMING COUPONS USING NFCNovember 2012February 2014Allow1410YesNo
13541166COMMUNICATIONS TECHNIQUES FOR AN INTELLIGENT DIGITAL AUDIOVISUAL REPRODUCTION SYSTEMJuly 2012January 2013Allow600YesNo
13411746TOKEN LICENSING MAPPING COSTS TO ENABLED SOFTWARE TOOL FEATURESMarch 2012July 2013Allow1620YesNo
13411000CHARGE MANAGING SYSTEM, IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS, CHARGE MANAGING SERVER, AND IMAGE FORMING METHODMarch 2012April 2013Allow1320NoNo
13371842COMMUNICATIONS TECHNIQUES FOR AN INTELLIGENT DIGITAL AUDIOVISUAL REPRODUCTION SYSTEMFebruary 2012March 2012Allow100YesNo
13309011METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR AUTHORIZING A TRANSACTIONAL SERVICE BY A POLICY AND CHARGING CONTROL ARCHITECTUREDecember 2011May 2015Allow4120YesNo
13373846Refuse intelligence acquisition system and method for ingestible product preparation system and methodNovember 2011February 2018Allow6080YesNo
13322529MECHANISMS FOR EXECUTING A PROCESS IN A CLOUD COMPUTING ENVIRONMENTNovember 2011April 2014Allow2810YesNo
13373675Ingestion intelligence acquisition system and method for ingestible material preparation system and methodNovember 2011November 2017Allow6090YesNo
13317979Selection information system and method for ingestible product preparation system and methodOctober 2011April 2015Allow4150YesNo
13106419SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR GENERATING OPTIMAL BILL/PAYMENT SCHEDULEMay 2011January 2012Allow800YesNo
13009528GLOBAL ACCOUNT RECONCILIATION TOOLJanuary 2011November 2011Allow1000YesNo
12851663SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR USAGE BILLING OF HOSTED APPLICATIONSAugust 2010November 2012Allow2810YesNo
12851639SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR USAGE BILLING OF HOSTED APPLICATIONSAugust 2010November 2012Allow2810YesNo
12805529ACCESS POINT FOR MOBILE DEVICES IN A PACKET BASED NETWORK AND A METHOD AND A SYSTEM FOR BILLING IN SUCH A NETWORKAugust 2010March 2012Allow1900YesNo
12805437METHOD OF COMMUNICATIONS FOR AN INTELLIGENT DIGITAL AUDIOVISUAL PLAYBACK SYSTEMJuly 2010November 2011Allow1500NoNo
12581305TOKEN LICENSING MAPPING COSTS TO ENABLED SOFTWARE TOOL FEATURESOctober 2009July 2013Allow4411YesNo
12575833METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR CREDITING MULTIPLE MERCHANT ACCOUNTS ON A SINGLE BILLOctober 2009July 2013Allow4511NoNo
12471701PROJECT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND METHODMay 2009January 2012Allow3210YesNo
12437494SURVEY LIFECYCLE TRACKINGMay 2009November 2012Allow4270YesNo
12427225LIFECYCLE TRACKING AND MANAGEMENT USING RFApril 2009January 2013Allow4460YesNo
12132707APPARATUS, METHODS AND COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR METERING AND ACCOUNTING FOR SERVICES ACCESSED OVER A NETWORKJune 2008September 2009Allow1610NoNo
12123737CHARGE MANAGING SYSTEM, IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS, CHARGE MANAGING SERVER, AND IMAGE FORMING METHODMay 2008December 2011Allow4350NoNo
12103608SYSTEM AND METHOD OF ELECTROSTATIC DISCHARGE PROTECTION FOR SIGNALS AT VARIOUS VOLTAGESApril 2008August 2010Allow2820NoNo
12077148SYSTEM FOR MERCHANDISE ORDERING AND ORDER FULFILMENTMarch 2008August 2010Allow2910YesNo
12048698SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PREDICTING PROFIT LEAKAGEMarch 2008December 2010Allow3310YesNo
12044781SOLICITATION-RESPONSE LIFECYCLE TRACKING AND MANAGEMENTMarch 2008April 2012Allow5030YesNo
12031177METHODS, APPARATUS AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCTS FOR USE IN ASSOCIATION WITH JOINT VENTURES AND/OR POTENTIAL JOINT VENTURESFebruary 2008May 2012Allow5140YesNo
11966677METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR ASSIGNING INTERCHANGE RATES TO FINANCIAL TRANSACTIONS USING AN INTERCHANGE NETWORKDecember 2007September 2011Allow4440YesNo
11955135ENHANCED TRADE COMPLIANCE SYSTEM: AUDIT PROCESSING, PAYMENT BALANCING AND AMENDMENT PROCESSINGDecember 2007July 2010Allow3120YesNo
11950529BILL OF LADING TRANSMISSION AND PROCESSING SYSTEM FOR LESS THAN A LOAD CARRIERSDecember 2007June 2010Allow3020YesNo
11999109SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SYNCHRONIZING LEDGER ACCOUNTS BY COMPANY GROUPDecember 2007July 2010Allow3230NoNo
11850465ENHANCEMENT OF NETWORK ACCOUNTING RECORDSSeptember 2007February 2011Allow4230NoYes
11781703METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR MANAGING MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL PROPERTY TAX INFORMATIONJuly 2007June 2010Allow3530NoYes
11825109AUTOMATIC CALCULATION WITH MULTIPLE EDITABLE FIELDSJuly 2007September 2013Allow6040YesNo
11753015LAUNDRY ROOM MANAGEMENT METHOD AND SYSTEMMay 2007February 2013Allow6040NoYes
11747934METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR REMOTE HEALTH MONITORING AND PROVIDING HEALTH RELATED INFORMATIONMay 2007March 2011Allow4620NoNo
11694569METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DUPLICATE SHIPMENT DETECTIONMarch 2007June 2010Allow3830YesNo
11624193PHILANTHROPY MANAGEMENT APPARATUS, SYSTEM, AND METHODS OF USE AND DOING BUSINESSJanuary 2007February 2010Abandon3750NoNo
11562007READING, ORGANIZING AND MANIPULATING ACCOUNTING DATANovember 2006September 2010Allow4612YesNo
11552892System and Method for Reconciling One or More Financial TransactionsOctober 2006August 2013Allow6080NoNo
11550845AUTOMATIC INVENTORY VARIANCE IDENTIFICATIONOctober 2006May 2012Allow6040NoYes
11454401SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR INDICATING PREVIOUS DOCUMENT SOURCE INFORMATION FOR CURRENT DOCUMENT FIELDSJune 2006March 2010Allow4530YesNo
10736181GLOBAL ACCOUNT RECONCILIATION TOOLDecember 2003October 2010Allow6050NoNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner GOYEA, OLUSEGUN.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
2
Examiner Affirmed
0
(0.0%)
Examiner Reversed
2
(100.0%)
Reversal Percentile
97.7%
Higher than average

What This Means

With a 100.0% reversal rate, the PTAB has reversed the examiner's rejections more often than affirming them. This reversal rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals are more successful here than in most other areas.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
5
Allowed After Appeal Filing
3
(60.0%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
2
(40.0%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
88.5%
Higher than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 60.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is particularly effective here. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB show good success rates. If you have a strong case on the merits, consider fully prosecuting the appeal to a Board decision.

Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Examiner GOYEA, OLUSEGUN - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner GOYEA, OLUSEGUN works in Art Unit 3627 and has examined 95 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 91.6%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 29 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner GOYEA, OLUSEGUN's allowance rate of 91.6% places them in the 76% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by GOYEA, OLUSEGUN receive 2.28 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 78% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by GOYEA, OLUSEGUN is 29 months. This places the examiner in the 48% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly slower than average with this examiner.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +17.2% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by GOYEA, OLUSEGUN. This interview benefit is in the 63% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide an above-average benefit with this examiner and are worth considering.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 29.1% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 45% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show below-average effectiveness with this examiner. Carefully evaluate whether an RCE or continuation is the better strategy.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 40.4% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 54% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows above-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. If your amendments clearly overcome the rejections and do not raise new issues, consider filing after-final amendments before resorting to an RCE.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 66.7% of appeals filed. This is in the 45% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 25.0% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner shows below-average willingness to reconsider rejections during appeals. Be prepared to fully prosecute appeals if filed.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 12.5% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 7% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are rarely granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing a petition, as the Technology Center Director typically upholds this examiner's decisions.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 8.4% of allowed cases (in the 95% percentile). Per MPEP § 1302.04, examiner's amendments are used to place applications in condition for allowance when only minor changes are needed. This examiner frequently uses this tool compared to other examiners, indicating a cooperative approach to getting applications allowed. Strategic Insight: If you are close to allowance but minor claim amendments are needed, this examiner may be willing to make an examiner's amendment rather than requiring another round of prosecution.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 2.3% of allowed cases (in the 67% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions more often than average when claims are allowable but formal matters remain (MPEP § 714.14).

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Expect multiple rounds of prosecution: This examiner issues more office actions than average. Address potential issues proactively in your initial response and consider requesting an interview early in prosecution.
  • Examiner cooperation: This examiner frequently makes examiner's amendments to place applications in condition for allowance. If you are close to allowance, the examiner may help finalize the claims.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.