Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17126307 | PERSONAL COMMUNICATION DRONES | December 2020 | October 2023 | Abandon | 34 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17112823 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR GENERATING JOB RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ONE OR MORE CANDIDATES | December 2020 | April 2024 | Abandon | 40 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17247078 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR ENABLING USERS TO COLLABORATE AND CREATE ONLINE MULTI-MEDIA STORY | November 2020 | January 2023 | Allow | 26 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17092147 | GROUP IDENTIFICATION USING MACHINE LEARNING | November 2020 | September 2024 | Abandon | 47 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17087894 | FORECASTING BASED ON PLANNING DATA | November 2020 | March 2023 | Allow | 29 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16983868 | SYSTEM AND ASSOCIATED METHODS FOR APPORTIONMENT OF INVENTORY BETWEEN WAREHOUSE NODES TO ACHIEVE REQUESTED SERVICE LEVELS | August 2020 | June 2023 | Allow | 34 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16920368 | Current Health Status Certification | July 2020 | August 2024 | Abandon | 49 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 16854481 | SALE SYSTEM AND CONTROLLING METHOD THEREOF | April 2020 | September 2023 | Abandon | 41 | 3 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 16438751 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR QUALITY ASSURANCE OF MEDIA ANALYSIS | June 2019 | June 2023 | Allow | 49 | 1 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 16437074 | Machine Learning-Enabled Event Tree for Rapid and Accurate Customer Problem Resolution | June 2019 | December 2023 | Abandon | 54 | 2 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 15904193 | KNOWLEDGE-GRAPH-DRIVEN RECOMMENDATION OF CAREER PATH TRANSITIONS | February 2018 | February 2023 | Abandon | 60 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner EL-CHANTI, KARMA AHMAD works in Art Unit 3627 and has examined 11 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 36.4%, this examiner allows applications at a lower rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 41 months.
Examiner EL-CHANTI, KARMA AHMAD's allowance rate of 36.4% places them in the 7% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is less likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by EL-CHANTI, KARMA AHMAD receive 2.09 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 52% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues a slightly above-average number of office actions.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by EL-CHANTI, KARMA AHMAD is 41 months. This places the examiner in the 22% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +57.1% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by EL-CHANTI, KARMA AHMAD. This interview benefit is in the 95% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner and should be strongly considered as a prosecution strategy. Per MPEP § 713.10, interviews are available at any time before the Notice of Allowance is mailed or jurisdiction transfers to the PTAB.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 25.0% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 42% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show below-average effectiveness with this examiner. Carefully evaluate whether an RCE or continuation is the better strategy.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 33.3% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 52% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows above-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. If your amendments clearly overcome the rejections and do not raise new issues, consider filing after-final amendments before resorting to an RCE.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 0.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 6% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are rarely granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing a petition, as the Technology Center Director typically upholds this examiner's decisions.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 33% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 38% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.