Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18416663 | GUARDIAN INFORMATION-BASED ANIMAL INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT SERVER AND ANIMAL INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT METHOD THEREOF | January 2024 | April 2025 | Abandon | 15 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18457985 | Spot Date App | August 2023 | October 2024 | Abandon | 14 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18263640 | INFORMED CONSENSUS DETERMINATION AMONG MULTIPLE DIVERGENT USER OPINIONS | July 2023 | June 2025 | Abandon | 22 | 2 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 18317868 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR AUTHENTICATION OF IDENTIFICATION DOCUMENTS FOR DETECTING POTENTIAL VARIATIONS IN REAL-TIME | May 2023 | January 2025 | Abandon | 20 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18142737 | VERIFIER-BUILT PROFILES FOR DATING APPLICATION | May 2023 | June 2025 | Abandon | 26 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18136269 | LOCATION-BASED SOCIAL APPLICATION | April 2023 | June 2025 | Abandon | 25 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18297279 | SOCIAL MEDIA SCORING SCHEMA CONNECTED TO CRYPTOGRAPHIC OBJECT SUBSET SELECTION | April 2023 | June 2025 | Abandon | 26 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18098448 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CREATING AND TRANSMITTING AN INCENTIVIZED OR MANDATED SERIOUS GAME SAFETY TEST TO OCCUPANTS OR USERS OF LIABLE PROPERTY IN AN ORGANIZATION | January 2023 | June 2025 | Abandon | 28 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18092067 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DIGITAL IMPRESSION AND MEMORIALIZATION | December 2022 | October 2024 | Abandon | 21 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17948483 | REFERRAL SYSTEM AND METHOD | September 2022 | February 2025 | Abandon | 37 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17785776 | A SYSTEM TO ACHIEVE DIGITAL IMMORTALITY | June 2022 | March 2025 | Abandon | 33 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17704100 | METHOD OF PROVING OWNERSHIP AND OWNERSHIP TRANSFER HISTORY USING DECENTRALIZED ID | March 2022 | April 2025 | Abandon | 36 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17761159 | APPARATUS FOR CHECKING LEGISLATION ON CHEMICALS, AND METHOD THEREFOR | March 2022 | December 2024 | Abandon | 33 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17692829 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ONLINE SOCIAL AND PROFESSIONAL NETWORKING | March 2022 | January 2025 | Abandon | 35 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17522768 | SKILL DATA MANAGEMENT | November 2021 | June 2025 | Abandon | 43 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 17511466 | STANDARDIZING GLOBAL ENTITY JOB DESCRIPTIONS | October 2021 | September 2024 | Allow | 34 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17469689 | Configuring A Software Service For Processing Time Data | September 2021 | November 2024 | Abandon | 38 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17469666 | Software Service For Processing Time Data | September 2021 | October 2024 | Abandon | 37 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17385761 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO GENERATE SUBSCRIPTION RECOMMENDATIONS BASED ON CLASSIFICATION OF CONTENT CREATORS | July 2021 | February 2025 | Abandon | 43 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17357637 | COMPUTER-IMPLEMENTED SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PREPARING COMPLIANCE DOCUMENTATION | June 2021 | May 2025 | Abandon | 46 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17292680 | DEVICES, SYSTEMS, AND METHODS FOR COORDINATED EVACUATION OF A PLURALITY OF BUILDINGS | May 2021 | May 2025 | Abandon | 48 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17122067 | Anti-Money Laundering Blockchain Technology | December 2020 | January 2025 | Abandon | 49 | 3 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 17107994 | SOCIAL NETWORKING CONVERSATION PARTICIPANTS | December 2020 | March 2025 | Abandon | 51 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16953884 | Computer Platform Implementing Many-to-Many Job Marketplace | November 2020 | December 2024 | Abandon | 48 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16776138 | AUTOMATICALLY DETERMINING THE QUALITY OF ATTRIBUTE VALUES FOR ITEMS IN AN ITEM CATALOG | January 2020 | January 2025 | Abandon | 59 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16742780 | INTELLIGENT REPORT WRITER | January 2020 | March 2025 | Abandon | 60 | 7 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16593000 | MEDICAL PRODUCT CONSISTENCY VERIFICATION | October 2019 | June 2025 | Abandon | 60 | 4 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 16549142 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ANALYZING CUSTOMER FEEDBACK | August 2019 | February 2025 | Abandon | 60 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner RIVERA GONZALEZ, IVONNEMARY.
With a 0.0% reversal rate, the PTAB affirms the examiner's rejections in the vast majority of cases. This reversal rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals face significant challenges here.
Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.
In this dataset, 0.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is less effective here than in most other areas.
⚠ Appeals to PTAB face challenges. Ensure your case has strong merit before committing to full Board review.
⚠ Filing a Notice of Appeal shows limited benefit. Consider other strategies like interviews or amendments before appealing.
Examiner RIVERA GONZALEZ, IVONNEMARY works in Art Unit 3626 and has examined 27 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 3.7%, this examiner allows applications at a lower rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 37 months.
Examiner RIVERA GONZALEZ, IVONNEMARY's allowance rate of 3.7% places them in the 0% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is less likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by RIVERA GONZALEZ, IVONNEMARY receive 3.44 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 99% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by RIVERA GONZALEZ, IVONNEMARY is 37 months. This places the examiner in the 15% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +5.9% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by RIVERA GONZALEZ, IVONNEMARY. This interview benefit is in the 32% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide a below-average benefit with this examiner.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 2.1% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 0% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show lower effectiveness with this examiner compared to others. Consider whether a continuation application might be more strategic, especially if you need to add new matter or significantly broaden claims.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 0.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 1% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.
When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 0.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 15% percentile among all examiners. Note: Pre-appeal conferences show limited success with this examiner compared to others. While still worth considering, be prepared to proceed with a full appeal brief if the PAC does not result in favorable action.
This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 0.0% of appeals filed. This is in the 1% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: This examiner rarely withdraws rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. If you file an appeal, be prepared to fully prosecute it to a PTAB decision. Per MPEP § 1207, the examiner will prepare an Examiner's Answer maintaining the rejections.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 0.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 4% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are rarely granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing a petition, as the Technology Center Director typically upholds this examiner's decisions.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 32% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 32% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.