Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19011682 | LARGE-SCALE ELECTRIC VEHICLE CLUSTER COORDINATED CHARGING OPTIMIZATION METHOD BASED ON GREEDY REPAIR GENETIC ALGORITHM | January 2025 | June 2025 | Allow | 5 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18767909 | INCREMENTALLY UPDATING EMBEDDINGS FOR USE IN A MACHINE LEARNING MODEL BY ACCOUNTING FOR EFFECTS OF THE UPDATED EMBEDDINGS ON THE MACHINE LEARNING MODEL | July 2024 | May 2025 | Allow | 10 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18596977 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR NAVIGATING DRIVERS TO SERVICE TRANSPORTATION REQUESTS HAVING SURGE PRICING MULTIPLIERS AND SURGE PRICING CAPS | March 2024 | June 2025 | Allow | 15 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18585737 | EXPIRATION MONITORING CONTROL MODULE | February 2024 | June 2025 | Abandon | 16 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18524698 | ELECTRIC POWER SUPPLY-DEMAND ADJUSTMENT SYSTEM AND ELECTRIC POWER SUPPLY-DEMAND ADJUSTMENT METHOD | November 2023 | February 2026 | Allow | 26 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18507748 | SYSTEM AND METHODS FOR PREDICTING RENTAL VEHICLE USE PREFERENCES | November 2023 | August 2025 | Allow | 21 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18497178 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR GENERATING PURCHASE RECOMMENDATIONS BASED ON GEOGRAPHIC ZONE INFORMATION | October 2023 | July 2025 | Abandon | 21 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18380549 | MACHINE LEARNING PREDICTIVE MODELING WITH NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING OF END-USER COMMUNICATIONS | October 2023 | August 2025 | Abandon | 22 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18487112 | METHOD FOR POWER CONSUMPTION ANALYSIS AND TROUBLESHOOTING OF PRODUCTION LINE BASED ON INDUSTRIAL INTERNET OF THINGS, SYSTEM AND STORAGE MEDIUM THEREOF | October 2023 | February 2025 | Allow | 16 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18376799 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETECTING ATTRITION IN A DISTRIBUTED NETWORK USING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE | October 2023 | January 2026 | Allow | 28 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18478437 | DECISION MANAGEMENT FOR ITEMS DIGITALLY REPRESENTED IN AN INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM | September 2023 | February 2026 | Allow | 29 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18330060 | Logistics Management System for EV Charging Station Use | August 2023 | April 2025 | Abandon | 22 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18455846 | CHARGING PREDICTION SYSTEM | August 2023 | September 2025 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18275676 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SELECTING PROCESS KEY FACTOR IN COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PROCESS | August 2023 | November 2025 | Allow | 27 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18346776 | PLANNING DEVICE | July 2023 | January 2026 | Abandon | 30 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18214645 | EXTRACTION OF ACTIONABLE INSIGHTS THROUGH ANALYSIS OF UNSTRUCTURED COMPUTER TEXT | June 2023 | November 2025 | Allow | 28 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18328124 | RIDE REQUEST MAP DISPLAYING UNDISCOVERED AREAS | June 2023 | October 2025 | Allow | 29 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18203725 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR FORWARD MARKET PURCHASE OF MACHINE RESOURCES | May 2023 | October 2024 | Allow | 17 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18317524 | SYSTEM FOR PLACING DRIVERS IN A PRIORITY QUEUE AND NAVIGATING THE DRIVERS TO FULLFILL PASSENGER REQUESTS | May 2023 | July 2024 | Allow | 14 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18304847 | RISK ASSESSMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND METHOD | April 2023 | September 2025 | Allow | 29 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18136050 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR INCREASED CORRECTIONAL FACILITY SAFETY | April 2023 | June 2025 | Allow | 26 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18105128 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR DEVELOPING AND MANAGING A PRODUCT | February 2023 | July 2025 | Abandon | 29 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 18103336 | SYSTEM OF AND METHOD FOR FACILITATING ON-DEVICE TRAINING AND CREATING, UPDATING, AND DISSEMINATING MICRO-LEARNING SIMULATIONS | January 2023 | February 2026 | Abandon | 36 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 18160426 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR RECOGNIZING USER SHOPPING INTENT AND UPDATING A GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACE | January 2023 | August 2025 | Allow | 31 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18101050 | PREDICTIVE TRANSACTION MODELS AND DEPLOYMENT | January 2023 | October 2025 | Allow | 33 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18154980 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR MATCHING CONTRACTS BETWEEN AUTOMOTIVE DATA PROVIDERS AND AUTOMOTIVE DATA CONSUMERS | January 2023 | August 2025 | Abandon | 31 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18148446 | QUEUE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM | December 2022 | March 2025 | Abandon | 27 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18089177 | TRACKING CHANGES FOLLOWING MERGERS OF STORED USER STRUCTURES | December 2022 | April 2025 | Abandon | 28 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18088789 | METHOD FOR ALLOCATING PERISHABLE PRODUCTS BASED ON MACHINE LEARNING SO AS TO OPTIMIZE AN ESTIMATED REVENUE | December 2022 | April 2025 | Abandon | 27 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18066088 | SYSTEMS, METHODS, AND GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACES FOR DONATING SURPLUS FOOD | December 2022 | January 2026 | Allow | 37 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18051798 | RATE CARD MANAGEMENT | November 2022 | June 2025 | Abandon | 32 | 0 | 1 | No | No |
| 18051864 | METHODS, INTERNET OF THINGS SYSTEMS, AND STORAGE MEDIUMS FOR PREDICTING WATER ACCUMULATION RISKS IN SMART CITIES | November 2022 | February 2025 | Allow | 28 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17946354 | PREDICTING MARKETING OUTCOMES USING CONTRASTIVE LEARNING | September 2022 | January 2026 | Allow | 40 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17798319 | SYSTEM, METHOD AND COMPUTER PROGRAM FOR FORECASTING A TREND OF A NUMERICAL VALUE OVER A TIME INTERVAL | August 2022 | September 2025 | Abandon | 38 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17794514 | Factory Management Device, Factory Management Method, and Factory Management Program | July 2022 | January 2026 | Abandon | 42 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17662742 | MANAGING DISRUPTION BETWEEN ACTIVITIES IN COMMON AREA ENVIRONMENTS | May 2022 | August 2025 | Abandon | 39 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17726938 | HIGH-DEMAND PRODUCT PROCESSING SYSTEM AND RELATED METHODS | April 2022 | May 2025 | Allow | 37 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17770724 | FACILITY PLAN EVALUATION DEVICE AND FACILITY PLAN EVALUATION METHOD | April 2022 | December 2024 | Allow | 32 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17714831 | PRODUCT STOCK NOTIFICATION SYSTEM INCLUDING IMAGE-BASED REPLACEMENT PRODUCT PROMPTING AND RELATED METHODS | April 2022 | February 2025 | Allow | 35 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17667670 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR RESOURCE ALLOCATION BASED ON RESOURCE ATTRIBUTES AND ELECTRONIC FEEDBACK | February 2022 | January 2025 | Allow | 35 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17575653 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR ANALYZING SALES CONVERSATION BASED ON VOICE RECOGNITION | January 2022 | December 2024 | Allow | 35 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17525649 | SYSTEMS, METHODS, AND USER INTERFACES FOR A WEB-BASED PERSONALIZED UPSKILLING PLATFORM INCLUDING VISUALIZING ROLE DATA AND WORKFORCE DATA | November 2021 | July 2025 | Abandon | 44 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17606766 | Method and System for Automatically Identifying Valid Data Acquisition Module | October 2021 | October 2024 | Abandon | 35 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17598578 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PREDICTING SERVICE DEMAND BASED ON GEOGRAPHICALLY ASSOCIATED EVENTS | September 2021 | June 2025 | Abandon | 45 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17466957 | LOW CAPITAL AND OPERATION COST E-COMMERCE LOGISTICS SYSTEM THAT ALLOWS FOR THE FAST AND MASSIVE DELIVERY OF E-COMMERCE MERCHANDISE TO HIGH-POPULATION DENSITY URBAN AREAS | September 2021 | August 2024 | Allow | 36 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17408828 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MODIFYING ONLINE STORES THROUGH SCHEDULING | August 2021 | November 2024 | Allow | 39 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17310547 | INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE, INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM, AND INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD | August 2021 | September 2024 | Allow | 37 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 17250884 | PLAN DEVIATIONS VISUALIZATION AND INTERPRETATION | March 2021 | December 2025 | Allow | 57 | 4 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 17079359 | QUANTIFYING USAGE OF DISPARATE COMPUTING RESOURCES AS A SINGLE UNIT OF MEASURE | October 2020 | April 2025 | Allow | 53 | 6 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 17039171 | PROVIDING DYNAMIC ALTERNATE LOCATION TRANSPORTATION MODES AND USER INTERFACES WITHIN MULTI-PICKUP-LOCATION AREA GEOFENCES | September 2020 | February 2025 | Allow | 53 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17006750 | DYNAMIC TRANSPORT ENERGY CONTROL | August 2020 | October 2024 | Abandon | 50 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16921307 | MACHINE UTILIZATION SYSTEM | July 2020 | June 2025 | Abandon | 59 | 4 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 16145510 | INDUSTRIAL AUTOMATION PROJECT ACCELERATION | September 2018 | December 2024 | Abandon | 60 | 4 | 1 | Yes | Yes |
| 15299517 | ENERGY SUPPLIER STRATEGY BASED ON SUPPLIER CONFIDENCE SCORING | October 2016 | April 2020 | Allow | 42 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 14742870 | Development of Dynamic Business Data Based on Moving Spatiotemporal Phenomena and Events | June 2015 | January 2019 | Allow | 43 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14695141 | USING SOCIAL DATA TO ASSIST EDITORS IN ADDRESSING REVIEWER FEEDBACK IN A DOCUMENT REVIEW WORKFLOW | April 2015 | November 2019 | Allow | 55 | 6 | 0 | No | No |
| 14529936 | Development of Dynamic Business Data Based on Moving Spatiotemporal Phenomena and Events | October 2014 | February 2019 | Allow | 51 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14459848 | GENERATING WORK PRODUCTS USING WORK PRODUCT METRICS AND PREDICTED CONSTITUENT AVAILABILITY | August 2014 | June 2019 | Allow | 58 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13976949 | INTERESTINGNESS SCORING OF AREAS OF INTEREST INCLUDED IN A DISPLAY ELEMENT | August 2014 | April 2019 | Allow | 60 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 14456604 | USING SOCIAL DATA TO ASSIST EDITORS IN ADDRESSING REVIEWER FEEDBACK IN A DOCUMENT REVIEW WORKFLOW | August 2014 | November 2019 | Allow | 60 | 6 | 0 | No | No |
| 14046852 | FORECASTING A TIME SERIES BASED ON ACTUALS AND A PLAN | October 2013 | April 2019 | Allow | 60 | 6 | 0 | No | Yes |
This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner ULLAH, ARIF.
With a 0.0% reversal rate, the PTAB affirms the examiner's rejections in the vast majority of cases. This reversal rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals face significant challenges here.
Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.
In this dataset, 25.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is below the USPTO average, suggesting that filing an appeal has limited effectiveness in prompting favorable reconsideration.
⚠ Appeals to PTAB face challenges. Ensure your case has strong merit before committing to full Board review.
⚠ Filing a Notice of Appeal shows limited benefit. Consider other strategies like interviews or amendments before appealing.
Examiner ULLAH, ARIF works in Art Unit 3625 and has examined 20 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 70.0%, this examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 53 months.
Examiner ULLAH, ARIF's allowance rate of 70.0% places them in the 32% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications.
On average, applications examined by ULLAH, ARIF receive 3.90 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 97% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by ULLAH, ARIF is 53 months. This places the examiner in the 3% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +0.0% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by ULLAH, ARIF. This interview benefit is in the 16% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 20.7% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 23% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show lower effectiveness with this examiner compared to others. Consider whether a continuation application might be more strategic, especially if you need to add new matter or significantly broaden claims.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 5.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 5% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.
When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 0.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 17% percentile among all examiners. Note: Pre-appeal conferences show limited success with this examiner compared to others. While still worth considering, be prepared to proceed with a full appeal brief if the PAC does not result in favorable action.
This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 40.0% of appeals filed. This is in the 7% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: This examiner rarely withdraws rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. If you file an appeal, be prepared to fully prosecute it to a PTAB decision. Per MPEP § 1207, the examiner will prepare an Examiner's Answer maintaining the rejections.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 34% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 37% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.