Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18928719 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETERMINING PATH SOLUTIONS ASSOCIATED WITH A SUPPLY CHAIN NETWORK | October 2024 | February 2026 | Allow | 15 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18829005 | IDENTIFYING A TECHNOLOGY USED BY A USER | September 2024 | February 2026 | Allow | 17 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18734079 | UPDATING SUSTAINABILITY ACTION PLANS FOR AN ENTERPRISE BASED ON DETECTED CHANGE IN INPUT DATA | June 2024 | February 2026 | Allow | 20 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18733973 | IDENTIFYING ABATEMENT TECHNOLOGIES FOR IMPLEMENTATION IN SUSTAINABILITY ACTION PLANS | June 2024 | December 2025 | Allow | 19 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18613178 | DRILLING ACTIVITY RECOMMENDATION SYSTEM AND METHOD | March 2024 | January 2026 | Allow | 22 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18363803 | SUSTAINABILITY OPTIMIZER PLUGIN | August 2023 | February 2026 | Abandon | 30 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18351334 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ORCHESTRATING THE DETERMINATION OF A PRODUCT CARBON FOOTPRINT | July 2023 | January 2026 | Abandon | 30 | 4 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 18204084 | SYSTEMS AND METHOD FOR MESSAGE-BASED CONTROL AND MONITORING OF A BUSINESS PROCESS | May 2023 | January 2024 | Allow | 7 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17921800 | Reminding Method and Related Apparatus | October 2022 | February 2026 | Abandon | 39 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17867310 | ZAAF - Augmented Analytics Framework with Deep Metrics Discovery | July 2022 | November 2025 | Abandon | 40 | 3 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 17702356 | METHODS OF ASSESSING LONG-TERM INDICATORS OF SENTIMENT | March 2022 | January 2026 | Abandon | 46 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17668976 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MEASURING IMPACT OF ONLINE SEARCH QUERIES ON USER ACTIONS | February 2022 | January 2026 | Abandon | 47 | 5 | 0 | No | No |
| 17584895 | PREDICTING FUTURE DEMAND USING TIME-SERIES FORECASTS | January 2022 | January 2026 | Abandon | 47 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17153918 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR WORKFLOW AUTOMATION | January 2021 | February 2026 | Abandon | 60 | 5 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 16594194 | Rating Aggregation and Propagation Mechanism for Hierarchical Services and Products | October 2019 | August 2020 | Allow | 10 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14744458 | RATING AGGREGATION AND PROPAGATION MECHANISM FOR HIERARCHICAL SERVICES AND PRODUCTS | June 2015 | June 2019 | Allow | 48 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner SINGLETARY, TYRONE E.
With a 0.0% reversal rate, the PTAB affirms the examiner's rejections in the vast majority of cases. This reversal rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals face significant challenges here.
Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.
In this dataset, 0.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is less effective here than in most other areas.
⚠ Appeals to PTAB face challenges. Ensure your case has strong merit before committing to full Board review.
⚠ Filing a Notice of Appeal shows limited benefit. Consider other strategies like interviews or amendments before appealing.
Examiner SINGLETARY, TYRONE E works in Art Unit 3625 and has examined 3 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 66.7%, this examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 48 months.
Examiner SINGLETARY, TYRONE E's allowance rate of 66.7% places them in the 28% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications.
On average, applications examined by SINGLETARY, TYRONE E receive 3.00 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 87% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by SINGLETARY, TYRONE E is 48 months. This places the examiner in the 8% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 16.7% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 14% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show lower effectiveness with this examiner compared to others. Consider whether a continuation application might be more strategic, especially if you need to add new matter or significantly broaden claims.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 0.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 2% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.
This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 0.0% of appeals filed. This is in the 1% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: This examiner rarely withdraws rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. If you file an appeal, be prepared to fully prosecute it to a PTAB decision. Per MPEP § 1207, the examiner will prepare an Examiner's Answer maintaining the rejections.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 34% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 37% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.