Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18911129 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GENERATING AND PRESENTING USER INTERFACE FRONTENDS FOR FACILITATING SCORE-BASED INVENTORY-SPECIFIC RESOURCE ALLOCATION | October 2024 | January 2026 | Abandon | 15 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18900814 | ELECTRONIC DEVICE COMPRISING USER INTERFACE FOR PROVIDING USER-PARTICIPATING-TYPE AI TRAINING SERVICE, AND SERVER AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING USER-PARTICIPATING-TYPE AI TRAINING SERVICE USING THE ELECTRONIC DEVICE | September 2024 | May 2025 | Abandon | 8 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18900811 | ELECTRONIC DEVICE COMPRISING USER INTERFACE FOR PROVIDING USER-PARTICIPATING-TYPE AI TRAINING SERVICE, AND SERVER AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING USER-PARTICIPATING-TYPE AI TRAINING SERVICE USING THE ELECTRONIC DEVICE | September 2024 | May 2025 | Abandon | 8 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18671578 | CENTRAL SERVICE THAT GENERATES EVALUATION SCORES FOR ENTITIES | May 2024 | February 2026 | Abandon | 21 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18439185 | Software Product Optimization Identification Through Natural Language Processing | February 2024 | November 2025 | Allow | 21 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18533709 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IMPROVING MACHINE LEARNING MODELS VIA DIMENSIONALITY REDUCTION EVALUATION TO REDUCE DISPARATE IMPACT ON PROTECTED CLASS INDIVIDUALS | December 2023 | December 2025 | Allow | 24 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18525816 | Machine-Learning-Driven Supply Chain Out-of-Stock Inventory Resolution and Contract Negotiation | November 2023 | March 2025 | Allow | 16 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18525831 | Value Chain Network Planning Using Machine Learning and Digital Twin Simulation | November 2023 | January 2025 | Allow | 13 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18525826 | Training Inventory Management Robots Using Digital Twins, Trained Machine Learning Models, and Human Feedback | November 2023 | August 2024 | Abandon | 8 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18525823 | Artificial Intelligence Prediction of Component Failure in Value Chain Networks | November 2023 | November 2025 | Allow | 23 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18381497 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AUTO-REPLENISHMENT OF PRODUCTS USING PRESSURE MAPPING SENSORS AND MACHINE LEARNING | October 2023 | January 2025 | Allow | 15 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18379656 | METHOD FOR PROVIDING GOAL-DRIVEN SERVICES | October 2023 | January 2026 | Abandon | 27 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18485554 | ALLOCATING SHOPPERS FOR ORDER FULFILLMENT BY AN ONLINE CONCIERGE SYSTEM ACCOUNTING FOR VARIABLE NUMBERS OF SHOPPERS ACROSS DIFFERENT TIME WINDOWS AND VARYING CAPABILITIES FOR FULFILLING ORDERS | October 2023 | April 2025 | Allow | 18 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18376516 | ASSOCIATING GROUPS OF CONSUMERS WITH TRANSACTIONS USING VIDEO DATA AND LOCATION INFORMATION | October 2023 | December 2025 | Abandon | 26 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18264823 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SCHEDULING HOTEL CLEANING SERVICE WORKERS PROVIDED BY A PLURALITY OF CLEANING SERVICE PROVIDERS | August 2023 | December 2024 | Abandon | 16 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18204526 | PRE-PROCESSING FINANCIAL MARKET DATA PRIOR TO MACHINE LEARNING TRAINING | June 2023 | June 2024 | Allow | 13 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18203428 | ONLINE MERCHANT REVIEW SYSTEM AND METHOD UTILIZING DYNAMIC URL REDIRECTION FOR DISTRIBUTING REVIEW REQUESTS | May 2023 | August 2024 | Allow | 14 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18321162 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR OPERATING VEHICLE | May 2023 | December 2025 | Abandon | 31 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18197454 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SPACE OPTIMIZATION IN A RETAIL ENVIRONMENT | May 2023 | October 2025 | Allow | 29 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18030011 | DELIVERY ASSISTANCE SYSTEM FOR CREATING A DELIVERY PLAN | April 2023 | January 2026 | Abandon | 34 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18124393 | System for Automated Floor Cleaning | March 2023 | January 2026 | Abandon | 34 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18120088 | RESOURCE PROVISIONING BY A REINFORCEMENT LEARNING FRAMEWORK USING GUIDED ORDERING OF SERVICES | March 2023 | September 2025 | Allow | 31 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18178289 | Configuration and Implementation of Extra-Organizational Applications | March 2023 | November 2025 | Abandon | 32 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18174833 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PLANNING HYDROGEN MANUFACTURING TO MEET ENERGY DEMAND, SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ENERGY GENERATION OPERATIONAL PLANNING UTILIZING PHOTOVOLTAIC PRODUCTION AND HYDROGEN MANUFACTURING | February 2023 | March 2025 | Allow | 24 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18102155 | DETERMINING SHORTCUT RELATIONSHIPS IN DATA MODELS | January 2023 | April 2025 | Allow | 26 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18157655 | GENERATING AND COMMUNICATING DEVICE BALANCE GRAPHICAL REPRESENTATIONS FOR A DYNAMIC TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM | January 2023 | October 2025 | Abandon | 33 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18097056 | System and Method for Coordinating Worker Activity to Fulfill Orders | January 2023 | January 2026 | Abandon | 36 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18096044 | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR EVALUATING EFFECTIVENESS OF TRANSFORMER FIRE EXTINGUISHING SYSTEM | January 2023 | March 2025 | Abandon | 26 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18014597 | INFORMATION ANALYSIS METHOD | January 2023 | March 2025 | Abandon | 26 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18013979 | A METHOD FOR CONTROLLING A PROCESS FOR HANDLING A CONFLICT AND RELATED ELECTRONIC DEVICE | December 2022 | March 2025 | Allow | 26 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18147802 | AUTOMATED WORKFLOW COMPOSER USING UNMODELED METRIC-BASED GOALS | December 2022 | August 2025 | Allow | 32 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18003747 | Platform Service System and Method for Integrated Management and Residual Value Evaluation of a Reused Battery | December 2022 | October 2025 | Abandon | 33 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18147482 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING A STRUCTURED REPRESENTATION OF A FORM DOCUMENT UTILIZING MULTIPLE MACHINE LEARNING MODELS | December 2022 | March 2025 | Allow | 26 | 2 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 18068167 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR USE OF A GLOBAL REGISTRY WITH AUTOMATED DEMAND PROFILING VIA MACHINE LEARNING TO OPTIMIZE INVENTORY MANAGEMENT | December 2022 | November 2025 | Allow | 35 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18063778 | ANALOGUE IDENTIFICATION AND EVALUATION FOR FIELD DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING | December 2022 | April 2025 | Abandon | 29 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18061802 | SERVER AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING USER-PARTICIPATING-TYPE AI TRAINING SERVICE USING THE ELECTRONIC DEVICE | December 2022 | March 2025 | Allow | 27 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18072477 | FINANCIAL ADVERTISEMENTS BASED ON USER PHOTOGRAPHS ASSOCIATED WITH USER SPENDING BEHAVIOR | November 2022 | January 2025 | Abandon | 25 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17925140 | VALUE CHAIN PLAN LINKING METHOD, VALUE CHAIN PLAN LINKING APPARATUS, AND VALUE CHAIN PLAN LINKING SYSTEM | November 2022 | February 2025 | Allow | 27 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17973733 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PREDICTING FOOD PRODUCT SALES UTILIZING A PLURALITY OF ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE SUB-MODELS | October 2022 | December 2025 | Allow | 37 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17973829 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR LOAD BALANCING CARRIER DEVICES AMONG STATIONS IN A PACKING SYSTEM | October 2022 | October 2024 | Allow | 24 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17968676 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ASSIGNING AGENTS TO CRITICAL/HIGH PRIORITY SUPPLY CHAIN RISK USE CASES | October 2022 | March 2025 | Allow | 29 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17958978 | Offender Electronic Monitoring Program Compliance Assessment and Program Revision | October 2022 | November 2024 | Abandon | 25 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17886962 | METHOD AND SERVER FOR PROVIDING SERVICE TO A CLIENT FROM AN INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR | August 2022 | November 2024 | Abandon | 27 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17871398 | SOFTWARE APPLICATION USER EXPERIENCE (UX) MISSED TARGET SCORE ANALYSIS AND VISUALIZATION | July 2022 | December 2024 | Abandon | 29 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17871731 | ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS IN PROCESS MINING | July 2022 | June 2025 | Abandon | 35 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17871564 | Part Supply System and Method for Operating Part Supply System | July 2022 | September 2024 | Allow | 26 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17807520 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING CUSTOMER'S TRAVEL PROPENSITY TO REDEEM MERCHANT PROMOTIONS | June 2022 | March 2025 | Abandon | 33 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17842477 | Organizational Role Specific Skill Improvement Performance Management System and Method | June 2022 | October 2025 | Abandon | 40 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17752546 | SEGMENTING PROCESSES INTO STAND-ALONE SERVICES | May 2022 | August 2024 | Allow | 27 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17605171 | METHOD FOR DETERMINING TEACHING STYLE, AND COMPUTER STORAGE MEDIUM | April 2022 | May 2025 | Abandon | 43 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17729679 | SUPPLY CHAIN CARBON INTENSITY TRACKING THROUGH IMMUTABLE DATA STORAGE CHAINS | April 2022 | April 2025 | Abandon | 36 | 2 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 17699259 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR DYNAMICALLY OPTIMIZING THE OPERATIONS OF LOGISTICS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM | March 2022 | November 2025 | Allow | 44 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17690231 | DRONE TAXI SYSTEM BASED ON MULTI-AGENT REINFORCEMENT LEARNING AND DRONE TAXI OPERATION USING THE SAME | March 2022 | October 2024 | Allow | 31 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17683894 | DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM FOR MARKETING MIX MODELING | March 2022 | May 2025 | Abandon | 38 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17677257 | WORKFLOW EXTRACTION AND EXECUTION BASED ON ENCODED FLOW GRAPHS | February 2022 | September 2025 | Allow | 43 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17577185 | SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT WITH INTELLIGENT DEMAND ALLOCATION AMONG MULTIPLE SUPPLIERS | January 2022 | April 2025 | Abandon | 39 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17553195 | INVENTORY REPLENISHMENT PLANNING BASED ON DEMAND MODELING IN THE PRESENCE OF UNOBSERVED LOST SALES | December 2021 | January 2025 | Abandon | 37 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 17644467 | APPARATUSES, METHODS, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCTS FOR MONITORING ASSET REMAINING USEFUL LIFETIME | December 2021 | October 2025 | Abandon | 46 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17536869 | ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE-BASED SHOPPING MALL PURCHASE PREDICTION DEVICE | November 2021 | January 2025 | Abandon | 38 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17437882 | OPERATING A SUPPLY CHAIN USING CAUSAL MODELS | September 2021 | June 2025 | Abandon | 46 | 2 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 17461387 | PACKAGING DESIGN UTILIZING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND DIGITAL TWIN SIMULATION | August 2021 | March 2025 | Abandon | 43 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17461037 | SUPPLY CHAIN GOOD INSPECTION UTILIZING MACHINE LEARNED ROBOTIC PROCESS AUTOMATION | August 2021 | November 2025 | Allow | 51 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17368365 | MANAGEMENT OF VEHICULAR TRAFFIC AT A FACILITY HAVING ALLOCABLE SPACE RESOURCES | July 2021 | November 2024 | Abandon | 40 | 2 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 17287678 | DEEP REINFORCEMENT LEARNING FOR PRODUCTION SCHEDULING | April 2021 | October 2025 | Abandon | 53 | 4 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 17229547 | Smart Workspace Management System Including Port-Level Usage Data, Monitoring, and Reporting | April 2021 | March 2025 | Abandon | 47 | 3 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 17175073 | ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE DRIVEN FOOD SELECTION AND DELIVERY ROUTING | February 2021 | March 2025 | Abandon | 49 | 4 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 17164201 | Generating Creative Content for Advertising Audiences | February 2021 | December 2025 | Abandon | 58 | 4 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 17098214 | Computing Productivity Values for a Building Layout | November 2020 | March 2025 | Abandon | 52 | 6 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 16467775 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING UNIQUE PRODUCT PRICING FOR A CUSTOMER | June 2019 | November 2023 | Abandon | 53 | 9 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16157817 | PRIORITIZATION OF MOBLE ORDERS BASED UPON VEHICLE LOCATION | October 2018 | September 2022 | Abandon | 47 | 9 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 15291385 | GLOBAL NETWORKING SYSTEM FOR REAL-TIME GENERATION OF A GLOBAL BUSINESS RANKING BASED UPON GLOBALLY RETRIEVED DATA | October 2016 | November 2024 | Abandon | 60 | 8 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 15199717 | Digital Media Asset Tagging Workflow System and Method Using Workflow Management Software to Update Tagging Applications Based on Tagging Data | June 2016 | June 2025 | Abandon | 60 | 8 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 13969155 | Systems and Methods for Classifying Computer Video Game Genres Utilizing Multi-Dimensional Cloud Chart | August 2013 | July 2014 | Allow | 10 | 1 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 12947844 | CONCURRENT SCHEDULING OF PLAN OPERATIONS IN A VIRTUALIZED COMPUTING ENVIRONMENT | November 2010 | June 2014 | Allow | 43 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 11867904 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR THE DEVELOPMENT AND DEPLOYMENT OF SERVICE ELEMENTS | October 2007 | April 2010 | Allow | 31 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 11610525 | PRE-EXECUTING WORKFLOW PREPARATION ACTIVITIES BASED ON ACTIVITY PROBABILITIES AND SYSTEM LOAD AND CAPACITY THRESHOLD REQUIREMENTS | December 2006 | May 2016 | Allow | 60 | 4 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 11224036 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CUSTOMER BEHAVIOR MOVEMENT FREQUENCY PREDICTION IN A STORE | September 2005 | April 2010 | Allow | 55 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 11001455 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR PROFILE-BASED FORECASTING WITH DYNAMIC PROFILE SELECTION | December 2004 | December 2009 | Allow | 60 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 10868661 | HIERARCHICAL PROJECTS IN A COMPUTER-ENABLED PROJECT MANAGEMENT METHOD AND SYSTEM | June 2004 | March 2010 | Allow | 60 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 10777918 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AGGREGATING A MEASURE OVER A NON-ADDITIVE ACCOUNT DIMENSION | February 2004 | March 2010 | Allow | 60 | 3 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 10605725 | METHOD AND STORAGE MEDIUM FOR IMPORTING CALENDAR DATA FROM A COMPUTER SCREEN INTO A CALENDAR APPLICATION | October 2003 | August 2008 | Allow | 58 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 10666868 | SIMULATION OF BUSINESS TRANSFORMATION OUTSOURCING OF SOURCING, PROCUREMENT AND PAYABLES | September 2003 | February 2009 | Allow | 60 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 10660012 | SIMULATION OF BUSINESS TRANSFORMATION OUTSOURCING | September 2003 | January 2009 | Allow | 60 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 10454446 | REUSABLE ELECTRONIC TAG FOR SECURE DATA ACCUMULATION | June 2003 | August 2005 | Allow | 27 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 10323163 | SYSTEM, METHOD, AND PROGRAM PRODUCT FOR SELECTING A LOWER COST SUPPLIER BASED ON TOTAL COST AND FORECASTED DEMAND | December 2002 | March 2008 | Allow | 60 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 10284300 | UPSKILLING PLAN PROPOSING METHOD, UPSKILLING PLAN PROPOSING SYSTEM, AND COMPUTER-READABLE MEDIUM | October 2002 | May 2008 | Allow | 60 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 10271475 | SUPPLY PLANNING SYSTEM AND METHOD UTILIZING CONSTRAINED AND UNCONSTRAINED EXPLOSION AND IMPLOSION OF FLAGGED DEMAND STATEMENTS | October 2002 | December 2008 | Allow | 60 | 3 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 10256191 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR FORECASTING WORKLOAD AND RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS IN A CALL CENTER/HELP DESK | September 2002 | January 2009 | Allow | 60 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 10246690 | PROJECT RISK MANAGEMENT SYSTEM UTILIZING PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS | September 2002 | August 2007 | Allow | 59 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 10184440 | COMPUTER APPARATUS AND METHODS SUPPORTING DIFFERENT CATEGORIES OF USERS | June 2002 | December 2006 | Allow | 54 | 4 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 10142467 | AN INTEGRATED PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENT FOR DETERMINING THE TIME EXPENDED ON PROJECT TASKS | May 2002 | June 2007 | Allow | 60 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 10140585 | METHOD FOR DEVELOPING AN ENTERPRISE ALIGNMENT FRAMEWORK HIERARCHY BY COMPILING AND RELATING SETS OF STRATEGIC BUSINESS ELEMENTS | May 2002 | August 2007 | Allow | 60 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 10127483 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR TRAVEL CARRIER CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AND OPTIMIZATION USING SPEND ANALYSIS | April 2002 | July 2007 | Allow | 60 | 3 | 1 | No | No |
| 10121311 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR THE DEVELOPMENT AND DEPLOYMENT OF SERVICE ELEMENTS | April 2002 | July 2007 | Allow | 60 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 10106567 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CALCULATING AND DISPLAYING ESTIMATED WAIT TIMES FOR TRANSACTION REQUEST BASED ON THE SKILL REQUIRED TO PROCESS THE TRANSACTION REQUEST | March 2002 | January 2008 | Allow | 60 | 4 | 1 | No | No |
| 10093782 | A PROJECT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ASSESSING RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN CURRENT AND HISTORICAL PROJECTS | March 2002 | January 2008 | Allow | 60 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 10079024 | TALENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND METHODS FOR REVIEWING AND QUALIFYING A WORKFORCE UTILIZING CATEGORIZED AND FREE-FORM TEXT DATA | February 2002 | June 2008 | Allow | 60 | 2 | 1 | No | No |
| 10042624 | AIR CARGO YIELD MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND METHOD UTILIZING BOOKING PROFILES AND UNCONSTRAINED DEMAND | January 2002 | April 2008 | Allow | 60 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 10001686 | A SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PLANNING A DESIGN PROJECT, COORDINATING PROJECT RESOURCES AND TOOLS AND MONITORING PROJECT PROGRESS | October 2001 | December 2006 | Allow | 60 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 09976959 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR FORECASTING UNCERTAIN EVENTS WITH ADJUSTMENTS FOR PARTICIPANTS CHARACTERISTICS | October 2001 | May 2009 | Allow | 60 | 6 | 0 | No | Yes |
This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner JARRETT, SCOTT L.
With a 40.0% reversal rate, the PTAB reverses the examiner's rejections in a meaningful percentage of cases. This reversal rate is above the USPTO average, indicating that appeals have better success here than typical.
Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.
In this dataset, 25.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is below the USPTO average, suggesting that filing an appeal has limited effectiveness in prompting favorable reconsideration.
✓ Appeals to PTAB show good success rates. If you have a strong case on the merits, consider fully prosecuting the appeal to a Board decision.
⚠ Filing a Notice of Appeal shows limited benefit. Consider other strategies like interviews or amendments before appealing.
Examiner JARRETT, SCOTT L works in Art Unit 3625 and has examined 61 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 73.8%, this examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 10000 months.
Examiner JARRETT, SCOTT L's allowance rate of 73.8% places them in the 38% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications.
On average, applications examined by JARRETT, SCOTT L receive 3.30 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 91% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by JARRETT, SCOTT L is 10000 months. This places the examiner in the 1% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a -35.3% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by JARRETT, SCOTT L. This interview benefit is in the 0% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 21.1% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 24% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show lower effectiveness with this examiner compared to others. Consider whether a continuation application might be more strategic, especially if you need to add new matter or significantly broaden claims.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 15.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 16% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.
When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 0.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 17% percentile among all examiners. Note: Pre-appeal conferences show limited success with this examiner compared to others. While still worth considering, be prepared to proceed with a full appeal brief if the PAC does not result in favorable action.
This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 28.6% of appeals filed. This is in the 4% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: This examiner rarely withdraws rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. If you file an appeal, be prepared to fully prosecute it to a PTAB decision. Per MPEP § 1207, the examiner will prepare an Examiner's Answer maintaining the rejections.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 100.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 92% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are frequently granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1002.02(c), various examiner actions are petitionable to the Technology Center Director, including prematureness of final rejection, refusal to enter amendments, and requirement for information. If you believe an examiner action is improper, consider filing a petition.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 26.2% of allowed cases (in the 99% percentile). Per MPEP § 1302.04, examiner's amendments are used to place applications in condition for allowance when only minor changes are needed. This examiner frequently uses this tool compared to other examiners, indicating a cooperative approach to getting applications allowed. Strategic Insight: If you are close to allowance but minor claim amendments are needed, this examiner may be willing to make an examiner's amendment rather than requiring another round of prosecution.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 36% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.